Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-2
Go big or go home: Examining the longitudinal relations between exposure to successful portrayals on social media and adolescents’ feelings of discrepancy
Social media abound with successful portrayals in nearly every life domain (e.g. appearance, social life). Many researchers have expressed concerns about such portrayals, claiming that they might be detrimental to adolescents’ self-development. More specifically, continuous exposure to successful portrayals on social media may encourage adolescents to perceive these portrayals as standards to meet, which might evoke feelings of discrepancy (i.e. the feeling of falling short of important standards). The results of a three-wave longitudinal study (N = 1032, Mage = 14.55, SD = 1.65) revealed that exposure to different types of successful portrayals on social media (i.e. attractive appearance and a perfect life) does not relate to feelings of discrepancy over time, and vice versa at a within-person level. Yet, between-person associations were present for both types of successful portrayals with feelings of discrepancy. Hence, our findings stress the importance of taking into account both between- and within-person relations when examining social media effects.
AhadzadehASPahlevan SharifSOngFS (2017) Self-schema and self-discrepancy mediate the influence of Instagram usage on body image satisfaction among youth. Computers in Human Behavior68: 8–16.
2.
AlfasiY (2019) The grass is always greener on my friends’ profiles: the effect of Facebook social comparison on state self-esteem and depression. Personality and Individual Differences147: 111–117.
3.
AmabileTKramerS (2011) The Progress Principle: Using Small Wins to Ignite Joy, Engagement, and Creativity at Work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
4.
ArnettJJ (2015) Identity development from adolescence to emerging adulthood: what we know and (especially) don’t know. In: McLeanKCSyedM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Identity Development. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 53–64.
5.
BookerCLKellyYJSackerA (2018) Gender differences in the associations between age trends of social media interaction and well-being among 10–15 year olds in the UK. BMC Public Health18(1): 321–321.
6.
BrownBBLarsonJ (2009) Peer relationships in adolescence. In: LernerRMSteinbergL (eds) Handbook of Adolescent Psychology: Contextual Influences on Adolescent Development. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 74–103.
7.
ChaeJ (2017) Virtual makeover: selfie-taking and social media use increase selfie-editing frequency through social comparison. Computers in Human Behavior66: 370–376.
8.
ChansiriKWongphothiphanTShaferA (2022) The indirect effects of thinspiration and fitspiration images on young women’s sexual attitudes. Communication Research49(4): 524–546.
9.
ChouHEdgeN (2012) “They are happier and having better lives than I am”: the impact of using facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking15(2): 117–121.
10.
CôtéJE (2009) Identity formation and self-development in adolescence. In: LernerRMSteinbergL (eds) Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, Volume 1: Individual Bases of Adolescent Development. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 266–304.
11.
CoyneSMRogersAAZurcherJD, et al. (2020) Does time spent using social media impact mental health? An eight year longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior104: 106160.
12.
CramerDHowittD (2004) The SAGE Dictionary of Statistics: A Practical Resource for Students in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
De VriesDAPeterJNikkenP (2014) The effect of social network site use on appearance investment and desire for cosmetic surgery among adolescent boys and girls. Sex Roles71: 283–295.
14.
EriksonEH (1968) Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.
15.
FestingerL (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations7(2): 117–140.
16.
FieldA (2018) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. London: Sage.
17.
FioravantiGBocci BenucciSCeragioliG, et al. (2022) How the exposure to beauty ideals on social networking sites influences body image: a systematic review of experimental studies. Adolescent Research Review7(3): 419–458.
18.
GilesDC (2002) Parasocial interaction: a review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology4(3): 279–305.
19.
GilesDCMaltbyJ (2004) The role of media figures in adolescent development: relations between autonomy, attachment, and interest in celebrities. Personality and Individual Differences36(4): 813–822.
20.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
21.
GoodmanEAdlerNEKawachiI, et al. (2001) Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics108(2): e31–e31.
22.
GranicIMoritaHScholtenH (2020) Beyond screen time: identity development in the digital age. Psychological Inquiry31(3): 195–223.
23.
GündüzU (2017) The effect of social media on identity construction. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences8(5): 85–92.
24.
HamakerELKuiperRMGrasmanRPPP (2015) A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods20(1): 102–116.
25.
HigginsET (1987) Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review94(3): 319–340.
26.
KerpelmanJLPittmanJF (2001) The instability of possible selves: identity processes within late adolescents’ close peer relationships. Journal of Adolescence24(4): 491–512.
27.
KleemansMDaalmansSCarbaatI, et al. (2018) Picture perfect: the direct effect of manipulated instagram photos on body image in adolescent girls. Media Psychology21(1): 93–110.
28.
Knobloch-WesterwickS (2015) Choice and Preference in Media Use. New York: Routledge.
29.
KolekEASaundersD (2008) Online disclosure: an empirical examination of undergraduate facebook profiles. NASPA Journal45(1): 1–25.
30.
LaursenBVeenstraR (2021) Toward understanding the functions of peer influence: a summary and synthesis of recent empirical research. Journal of Research on Adolescence31(4): 889–907.
31.
McIntyreKPEisenstadtD (2011) Social comparison as a self-regulatory measuring stick. Self and Identity10(2): 137–151.
32.
MeeusWVan De SchootRKeijsersL, et al (2010) On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation: a five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescence. Child Development81(5): 1565–1581.
33.
MulderJDHamakerEL (2021) Three extensions of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Structural Equation Modeling28(4): 638–648.
34.
OrbenAPrzybylskiAK (2019) Screens, teens, and psychological well-being: evidence from three time-use-diary studies. Psychological Science30(5): 682–696.
35.
PappLMDanielewiczJCayembergC (2012) “Are we facebook official?” implications of dating partners’ facebook use and profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking15(2): 85–90.
36.
RagelienėT (2016) Links of adolescents identity development and relationship with peers: a systematic literature review. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry25(2): 97–105.
37.
ReidGGBoyerW (2013) Social network sites and young adolescent identity development. Childhood Education89(4): 243–253.
38.
ReineckeLTrepteS (2014) Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: a two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior30: 95–102.
39.
RotterJB (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs80(1): 1–28.
40.
RousseauAEggermontSFrisonE (2017) The reciprocal and indirect relationships between passive Facebook use, comparison on Facebook, and adolescents’ body dissatisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior73: 336–344.
41.
SappSGHarrodWJ (1993) Reliability and validity of a brief version of Levenson’s locus of control scale. Psychological Reports72(2): 539–550.
42.
SchreursLVandenboschL (2021) The development and validation of measurement instruments to address interactions with positive social media content. Media Psychology25(2): 262–289.
43.
SebreSBMiltuzeA (2021) Digital media as a medium for adolescent identity development. Technology, Knowledge and Learning: Learning Mathematics, Science and the Arts in the Context of Digital Technologies26(4): 867–881.
44.
SeekisVBradleyGLDuffyAL (2020) Appearance-related social networking sites and body image in young women: testing an objectification-social comparison model. Psychology of Women Quarterly44(3): 377–392.
45.
SlaterMD (2007) Reinforcing spirals: the mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory17(3): 281–303.
46.
StavrovaODenissenJ (2021) Does using social media jeopardize well-being? The importance of separating within- from between-person effects. Social Psychological and Personality Science12(6): 964–973.
47.
SubrahmanyamKSmahelD (2010) Digital Youth: The Role of Media in Development. New York: Springer.
48.
SundarSSLimperosAM (2013) Uses and grats 2.0: new gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media57(4): 504–525.
49.
UtzS (2015) The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior45: 1–10.
50.
ValkenburgPMBeyensIPouwelsJL, et al (2021) Social media use and adolescents’ self-esteem: heading for a person-specific media effects paradigm. Journal of Communication71(1): 56–78.
51.
VandenboschLEggermontS (2021) The malleability narrative in entertainment and social media: explaining pathways to happiness in media content. Communication Theory31(3): 506–527.
52.
VogelEARoseJP (2017) Perceptions of perfection: the influence of social media on interpersonal evaluations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology39(6): 317–325.
53.
WeinsteinE (2018) The social media see-saw: positive and negative influences on adolescents’ affective well-being. New Media & Society20(10): 3597–3623.
54.
WesterwickAJohnsonBKKnobloch-WesterwickS (2017) Change your ways: fostering health attitudes toward change through selective exposure to online health messages. Health Communication32(5): 639–649.
55.
YangC-CBrownBB (2016) Online self-presentation on Facebook and self-development during the college transition. Journal of Youth and Adolescence45: 402–416.
56.
YeeZWGriffithsSFuller-TyszkiewiczM, et al (2020) The differential impact of viewing fitspiration and thinspiration images on men’s body image concerns: an experimental ecological momentary assessment study. Body Image35: 96–107.
57.
YuEKimH-C (2020) Is she really happy? A dual-path model of narcissistic self-presentation outcomes for female facebook users. Computers in Human Behavior108: 106328.
