Game design’s influence on how gaming is practiced is a debated topic within video game research. Overlapping with this debate are questions of how game design and social practice each contribute to experiences of problematic gaming. In this study, we drew on focus groups and individual interviews with a total of 107 adolescents. We deployed practice theory to demonstrate how game design is an integrated part of the material configurations of everyday gaming practices. Furthermore, we will provide empirical examples of how interplays between game design and social practices can shape experiences of problematic gaming. In the analysis, we will demonstrate how adverse consequences of gaming can emerge in the clash between game design and everyday life obligations. Additionally, we will show how strategically designed monetary mechanics and patterns can be intensified or stifled by players’ socializing practices. Finally, we will address the interplay between gendered practices and game designs.
ArnettJJ (2000) Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist55: 469–480.
5.
BeanAMNielsenRKLvan RooijAJ, et al. (2017) Video game addiction: the push to pathologize video games. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice48(5): 378–389.
6.
BengtssonTTRavnS (2018) A New Perspective on Risk-taking in Young Lives. London: Routledge.
7.
BengtssonTTBomLHFynboL (2021) Playing apart together: young people’s online gaming during the COVID-19 lockdown. Young29(4_suppl): S65–S80. DOI: 10.1177/11033088211032018.
8.
BjörkSLundgrenSHolopainenJ (2003) Game design patterns. In: Digital games research conference, Utrecht, 4–6 November.
9.
BoultonEJCreminC (2011) The sociology of videogames. In: CohenB (ed.) Being Cultural. Auckland: Pearson, pp. 341–356.
10.
BrusA (2018) Generagency and problem gaming as stigma. In: EnevoldJThorhaugeA-MGregersenA (eds) What’s the Problem in Problem Gaming. Göteborg: Nordicom, pp. 51–62.
ConsalvoM (2007) Cheating: Gaining Advantage in Videogames. Cambridge: MIT Press.
14.
ConsalvoM (2009) There is no magic circle. Games and Culture4(4): 408–417.
15.
CrawfordG (2015) Is it in the game? Reconsidering play spaces, game definitions, theming, and sports videogames. Games and Culture10(6): 571–592.
16.
CrawfordGGoslingVKLightB (2011) Video Gamers. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
17.
CroneEAvan DuijvenvoordeACKPeperJS (2016) ‘Annual research review: neural contributions to risk—taking in adolescence—developmental changes and individual differences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry57(3): 353–368.
18.
DantT (2008) The “Pragmatics” of material interaction. Journal of Consumer Culture8(1): 11–33.
19.
DebeauvaisTNardiBSchianoDJ, et al. (2011) If you build it they might stay: retention mechanisms in world of Warcraft. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games, FDG ’11. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 180–187. Available at: https://artifex.org/~bonnie/WoW_retention_04_24_11.pdf
20.
DemetrovicsZUrbánRNagygyörgyK, et al. (2011) Why do you play? The development of the motives for Online Gaming Questionnaire (MOGQ). Behavior Research Methods43: 814–825.
21.
DietzTL (1998) An examination of violence and gender role portrayals in video games: implications for gender socialization and aggressive behavior. Sex Roles38(5): 425–442.
22.
EllisBJDel GiudiceMDishionTJ, et al. (2012) The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: implications for science, policy, and practice. Developmental Psychology48(3): 598–623.
23.
EnevoldJ (2012) Domesticating play, designing everyday life: the practice and performance of family, gender and gaming. In: DiGRA Nordic ’12: Proceedings of 2012 international DiGRA Nordic conference. Available at: http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/12168.15073.pdf
24.
EnevoldJThorhaugeAMGregersenA (2018) What’s the Problem in Problem Gaming?Gothenburg: Nordicom.
25.
EvansDM (2019) What is consumption, where has it been going, and does it still matter?The Sociological Review67(3): 499–517.
26.
EvansDM (2020) After practice? Material semiotic approaches to consumption and economy. Cultural Sociology14(4): 340–356.
27.
FraserSLewisVDingS, et al. (2004) Doing Research with Children and Young People. London: Sage.
28.
FulcherMHayesAR (2018) Building a pink dinosaur: the effects of gendered construction toys on girls’ and boys’ play. Sex Roles79(5–6): 273–284.
29.
GregersenA (2018) Games between family, homework, and friends: problem gaming as conflicts between social roles and institutions. In: EnevoldJThorhaugeA-MGregersenA (eds) What’s the Problem in Problem Gaming?Gothenburg: Nordicom, pp. 35–49.
30.
GriffithsMD (2018) Is the buying of loot boxes in video games a form of gambling or gaming?Gaming Law Review22(1): 52–54.
31.
GriffithsMDNuyensF (2017) An overview of structural characteristics in problematic video game playing. Current Addiction Reports4(3): 272–283.
32.
GrüsserSThalemannRGriffithsM (2007) Excessive computer game playing: evidence for addiction and aggression?Cyberpsychology & Behavior : The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society10: 290–292.
33.
HalkierB (2010) Focus groups as social enactments: integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data. Qualitative Research10(1): 71–89.
34.
HalkierB (2020) Social interaction as key to understanding the intertwining of routinized and culturally contested consumption. Cultural Sociology14(4): 399–416.
35.
HamariJJärvinenA (2011) Building customer relationship through game mechanics in social games. In: Cruz-CunhaMCarvalhoVTavaresP (eds) Business, Technological and Social Dimensions of Computer Games: Multidisciplinary Developments. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Available at: https://www.irma-international.org/viewtitle/53938/?isxn=9781609605674
36.
HamariJHannerNKoivistoJ (2017) Service quality explains why people use freemium services but not if they go premium: an empirical study in free-to-play games. International Journal of Information Management37(1 Pt A): 1449–1459.
IvoryJD (2006) Still a man’s game: gender representation in online reviews of video games. Mass Communication and Society9(1): 103–114.
40.
JanszJAvisCVosmeerM (2010) Playing the Sims2: an exploration of gender differences in players’ motivations and patterns of play. New Media & Society12(2): 235–251.
41.
JensonJde CastellS (2010) Gender, simulation, and gaming: research review and redirections. Simulation & Gaming41(1): 51–71.
42.
Kardefelt-WintherD (2014) A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: towards a model of compensatory internet use. Computers in Human Behavior31: 351–354.
43.
KellerMHalkierBWilskaT-A, et al. (2017) Routledge Handbook on Consumption. London: Routledge.
44.
KowertRBreuerJQuandtT (2017) Women are from FarmVille, men are from ViceCity: the cycle of exclusion and sexism in video game content and culture. In: KowertRQuandtT (eds) New Perspectives on the Social Aspects of Digital Gaming. London: Routledge, pp. 136–150.
45.
KristiansenSSeverinMC (2020) Loot box engagement and problem gambling among adolescent gamers: findings from a national survey. Addictive Behaviors103: 106254.
46.
KvaleSBrinkmannS (2015) Interview: Det kvalitative forskningsinterview som håndværk. 3. udgave. 1. oplag. København: Hans Reitzel.
47.
LehdonvirtaV (2009) Virtual consumption. PhD dissertation, Turku School of Economics, Turku.
48.
LemmensJS (2022) Play or pay to win: loot boxes and gaming disorder in FIFA ultimate team. Telematics and Informatics Reports8: 100023.
49.
MarteyRMStromer-GalleyJ (2007) The digital dollhouse: context and social norms in The Sims Online. Games and Culture2(4): 314–334.
50.
MurielDCrawfordG (2018) Video Games as Culture: Considering the Role and Importance of Video Games in Contemporary Society. London: Routledge.
51.
NardiB (2010) My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
52.
NardiB (2015) Virtuality. Annual Review of Anthropology44(1): 15–31.
53.
NicklinLLSpicerSGCloseJ, et al. (2021) “It’s the attraction of winning that draws you in”—a qualitative investigation of reasons and facilitators for videogame loot box engagement in UK gamers. Journal of Clinical Medicine10(10): 2103.
54.
NielsenRGrabarczykP (2019) Are loot boxes gambling? Random reward mechanisms in video games. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association4: 104.
55.
PetryNRehbeinFKoC-H, et al. (2015) Internet Gaming Disorder in the DSM-5. Current Psychiatry Reports17: 72.
56.
ReckwitzA (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory5(2): 243–263.
57.
RettbergS (ed.) (2008) Corporate ideology in world of Warcraft. In: CorneliussenHGRettbergJW (eds) Digital Culture, Play, and Identity: A World of Warcraft® Reader. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 19–38.
58.
RobertsSRavnS (2020) Towards a sociological understanding of sexting as a social practice: a case study of university undergraduate men. Sociology54(2): 258–274. DOI: 10.1177/0038038519864239.
59.
RolandoSWardleH (2023) “That’s why it’s gambling, because you don’t know what you find in it!” Perceptions of the relationship between gaming and gambling among young adult gamers. Journal of Youth Studies. Epub ahead of print 31 May. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2023.2174012.
60.
SchatzkiT (2010) Materiality and social life. Nature & Culture5(2): 123–149.
61.
SchatzkiTR (2019) Social Change in a Material World. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
62.
ShawA (2015) Gaming at the Edge: Sexuality and Gender at the Margins of Gamer Culture. Illustrated ed. Minneapolis, MN; London: University of Minnesota Press.
63.
ShoveE (2003) Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
64.
ShoveEPantzarMWatsonM (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. London: Sage.
SkellyTAMJensenKHHalkierB (2023) The convenience of gaming. Consumption and Society2(1): 102–121. DOI: 10.1332/PLWS2488.
68.
SturrockI (2018) How the ethical dimensions of game design can illuminate the problem of problem gaming. In: EnevoldJThorhaugeA-MGregersenA (eds) What’s the Problem in Problem Gaming?Nordicom, pp. 107–120. Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1535777/FULLTEXT01.pdf
69.
TaylorTL (2009) The assemblage of play. Games and Culture4(4): 331–339.
70.
TekinbasKSZimmermanE (2003) Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71.
ThorhaugeAM (2013) The rules of the game—the rules of the player. Games and Culture8(6): 371–391.
ThorhaugeAM (2020) Business models in online gaming and their implications for the protection of minors. In: WrońskaALew-StarowiczRRywczyńskaA, et al. (eds) Education—Relationships—Play: Multifaceted Aspects of the Internet and Child and Youth Online Safety. Warsaw: FRSE Publications, pp. 212–229.
74.
ThorhaugeAMGregersenA (2019) Individual pastime or focused social interaction: gendered gaming practices among Danish youth. New Media & Society21(7): 1444–1464.
75.
ThornhamH (2008) It’s a boy thing. Feminist Media Studies8(2): 127–142.
76.
Toft-NielsenCKrogagerSGS (2015) Gaming practices in everyday life. An analytical operationalization of field theory by means of practice theory. Mediekultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research31(58): 68–84.
77.
TullochR (2014) The construction of play: rules, restrictions, and the repressive hypothesis. Games and Culture9(5): 335–350.
78.
VarneyW (1996) The briar around the strawberry patch: toys, women, and food. Women’s Studies International Forum19(3): 267–276.
79.
WardeA (2005) Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture5(2): 131–153.
80.
WardeA (2014) After taste: culture, consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture14(3): 279–303.
81.
WelchDHalkierBKellerM (2020) Introduction to the special issue: renewing theories of practice and reappraising the cultural. Cultural Sociology14(4): 325–339.
82.
YeeN (2006) Motivations for play in online games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior9: 772–775.
