This study contributes to the line of digital dis/connection by stretching it into the concept of mediated co-presence and dealing with complex Chinese acquaintance networks on WeChat, thereby creatively proposing three modes of digital interactivity—co-presence, dysco-presence, and disco-presence. Therein, dysco-presence and disco-presence refer to resistance awareness and resistance actions toward co-presence, respectively. Based on a 2-year ethnographic study of Chinese youth, we further reveal the complex combination of mediated dis/dys/co-presence and acquaintance networks on WeChat. Ambient co-presence enables WeChat users to extend their social interactivity with acquaintance networks in a superficial dimension, while guanxi maintenance determines that they cannot completely quit WeChat-mediated co-presence, resulting in an ambivalent dysco-presence. Yet disco-presence comprises the ambiguous strategies of human and technological aggregation that offer possibilities for reorganizing resistance, temporality, and sociality.
AcederaKAYeohBSA (2019) “Making time”: long-distance marriages and the temporalities of the transnational family. Current Sociology67(2): 250–272.
2.
AcederaKFYeohBSA (2021) When care is near and far: care triangles and the mediated spaces of mobile phones among Filipino transnational families. Geoforum121: 181–191.
3.
BaldassarL (2008) Missing kin and longing to be together: emotions and the construction of co-presence in transnational relationships. Journal of Intercultural Studies29(3): 247–266.
4.
BaldassarL (2016) De-demonizing distance in mobile family lives: co-presence, care circulation and polymedia as vibrant matter. Global Networks16(2): 145–163.
5.
BoellstorffTNardiBPearceC, et al. (2012) Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
7.
BucherT (2020) Nothing to disconnect from? Being singular plural in an age of machine learning. Media, Culture & Society42(4): 610–617.
8.
CasemajorNCoutureSDelfinM, et al. (2015) Non-participation in digital media: toward a framework of mediated political action. Media, Culture & Society37(6): 850–866.
9.
ChenYMaoZQiuJL (2018) Super-Sticky WeChat and Chinese Society. Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing.
CostaEEsteve-Del-ValleMHagedoornB (2022) Scalable co-presence: WhatsApp and the mediation of personal relationships during the COVID-19 lockdown. Social Media + Society8(1): 1069053.
12.
FangSGongH (2020) What happens after young adults’ “friending” of parents? A qualitative study about mediated family communication and privacy management in China. Mobile Media & Communication8(3): 299–317.
13.
FeiXHamiltonGGWangZ (1992) From the Soil, the Foundations of Chinese Society: A Translation of Fei Xiaotong’s Xiangtu Zhongguo, with an Introduction and Epilogue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
FranksJChenhallRKeoghL (2018) The Facebook sabbatical as a cycle: describing the gendered experience of young adults as they navigate disconnection and reconnection. Social Media + Society4(3): 8801995.
15.
FuJCookJ (2020) Browsing for cunzaigan on WeChat: young people’s social media presence in accelerated urban China. Young28(4): 404–421.
16.
GoldTGuthrieDWankD (2002) An introduction to the study of Guanxi. In: GoldTGuthrieDWankD (eds) Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture, and the Changing Nature of Guanxi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–20.
17.
GuoYLuZKuangH, et al. (2020) Information avoidance behavior on social network sites: information irrelevance, overload, and the moderating role of time pressure. International Journal of Information Management52: 102067.
18.
HesselberthP (2018) Discourses on disconnectivity and the right to disconnect. New Media & Society20(5): 1994–2010.
19.
HsuJ (2021) Filial technologies: transnational daughterhood and polymedia environments in transnational Taiwanese families. Information, Communication & Society24(4): 507–522.
20.
HuangYMiaoW (2021) Re-domesticating social media when it becomes disruptive: evidence from China’s “super app” WeChat. Mobile Media & Communication9(2): 177–194.
21.
JorgeA (2019) Social media, interrupted: users recounting temporary disconnection on Instagram. Social Media + Society5: 1–19.
22.
JorgensenDL (1989) Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
23.
KarppiT (2011) Digital suicide and the biopolitics of leaving Facebook. Transformations20: 1–18.
24.
KuntsmanAMiyakeE (2019) The paradox and continuum of digital disengagement: denaturalising digital sociality and technological connectivity. Media, Culture & Society41(6): 901–913.
25.
LicoppeC (2004) “Connected” presence: the emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22(1): 135–156.
26.
LightB (2014) Disconnecting with Social Networking Sites. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
MadianouM (2016) Ambient co-presence: transnational family practices in polymedia environments. Global Networks16(2): 183–201.
28.
MarwickAEBoydD (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society13(1): 114–133.
29.
MaslenS (2022) Affective forces of connection and disconnection on Facebook: a study of Australian parents beyond toddlerhood. Information, Communication & Society2022: 1–17.
30.
MeadW (1995) Trains, planes, and automobiles: the end of the postmodern moment. World Policy Journal12(4): 13–31.
31.
MejiasU (2013) Off the Network: Disrupting the Digital World. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
NedelcuMWyssM (2016) “Doing family” through ICT-mediated ordinary co-presence: transnational communication practices of Romanian migrants in Switzerland. Global Networks16(2): 202–218.
33.
NguyenMH (2021) Managing social media use in an “always-on” society: exploring digital wellbeing strategies that people use to disconnect. Mass Communication and Society24(6): 795–817.
34.
Portwood-StacerL (2013) Media refusal and conspicuous non-consumption: the performative and political dimensions of Facebook abstention. New Media & Society15(7): 1041–1057.
35.
RainieHWellmanB (2012) Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
SchwarzeneggerCLohmeierC (2021) Creating opportunities for temporary disconnection: how tourism professionals provide alternatives to being permanently online. Convergence27(6): 1631–1647.
38.
ShannonCS (2019) #Family: exploring the display of family and family leisure on Facebook and Instagram. Leisure Sciences44(4): 459–475.
39.
ShaoZPanZ (2019) Building Guanxi network in the mobile social platform: a social capital perspective. International Journal of Information Management44: 109–120.
WallisC (2013) Technomobility in China: Young Migrant Women and Mobile Phones. New York: New York University Press.
42.
WangYHuangXWangC (2021) Chinese WeChat users and their behavioural features: a case study based on the grounded theory. Journal of Applied Business and Economics23(5): 141–153.
43.
WellmanBQuan-HaaseABoaseJ, et al. (2006) The social affordances of the internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication8(3): 834.
44.
WuYWallM (2019) The ties that bind: how the dominance of WeChat combines with guanxi to inhibit and constrain China’s contentious politics. New Media & Society21(8): 1714–1733.
45.
XuXYaoZTeoTS (2020) Moral obligation in online social interaction: clicking the “like” button. Information & Management57(7): 1–12.
46.
YanY (1996) The Flow of Gifts: Reciprocity and Social Networks in a Chinese Village. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
47.
ZhuHMiaoW (2021) Should I click the “like” button for my colleague? Domesticating social media affordance in the workplace. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media65(5): 741–760.
