Radical infrastructure: Building beyond the failures of past imaginaries for networked communication

Abstract

Ongoing political, environmental, and economic crises require infrastructures that can respond to crises in ways that do not replicate and reinforce inequality. To this end, we use a case study method of analysis that compares the authors’ previous work on Internet infrastructure at the levels of development, governance, and use to explore how these imaginaries promote or impede people-centered change in the development and maintenance of Internet infrastructure. This theoretical work puts the three existing cases in conversation to better understand how Internet infrastructure alternatives presented as radical, new, or non-hierarchical present shortcomings and opportunities, so that it might be more possible to imagine better, more truly radical, people-centered alternatives. From this comparison, we close our discussion with three heuristics for radical infrastructure: the need for pushing for alternative ensembles of support, busting the myth of technosolutionism, re-politicizing Internet infrastructure, and encouraging technical communities to build around cooperativity, not connectivity.

Keywords

Cryptography ethics of care Future Internet Architecture IETF Internet infrastructure Internet Protocol science and technology studies sociotechnical imaginaries technosolutionism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

Murphy

Clarke

(2009) Anticipation: technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity 28(1): 246–265.

Ali

(2021) Farm Fresh Broadband: The Politics of Rural Connectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ames

(2019) The Charisma Machine: The Life, Death, and Legacy of One Laptop Per Child. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Annas

(2000) Platonic Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Annas

(2007) Virtue ethics. In: Copp

(ed.) Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–24.

Barad

(2003) Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs 28(3): 801–831.

Bellacasa

(2017) Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Benjamin

(ed.) (2019a) Captivating Technology: Race, Carceral Technoscience, and Liberatory Imagination in Everyday Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Benjamin

(2019b) Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. 1st ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.

10.

Bowker

Baker

Millerand

, et al. (2010) Toward information infrastructure studies: ways of knowing in a networked environment. In: Hunsinger

Klastrup

Allen

(eds) International Handbook of Internet Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 97–117.

11.

Braman

(2011) The framing years: policy fundamentals in the Internet design process, 1969–1979. The Information Society 27(5): 295–310.

12.

Braman

(2017) Internet histories: the view from the design process. Internet Histories 1(1–2): 70–78.

13.

Brock

(2018) Critical technocultural discourse analysis. New Media & Society 20(3): 1012–1030.

14.

Broeders

(2016) The Public Core of the Internet: An International Agenda for Internet Governance. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

15.

Browne

(2015) Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

16.

Burrell

(2009) The field site as a network: a strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods 21(2): 181–199.

17.

Burrell

(2018) View of thinking relationally about digital inequality in rural regions of the U.S. First Monday 23(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i6.8376

18.

Callon

(1980) The state and technical innovation: a case study of the electrical vehicle in France. Research Policy 9(4): 358–376.

19.

Cath

(2021a) Changing Minds and Machines: A Case Study of Human Rights Advocacy in the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

20.

Cath

(2021b) The technology we choose to create: human rights advocacy in the Internet Engineering Task Force. Telecommunications Policy 45(6): 102144.

21.

Cath

Floridi

(2017) The design of the Internet’s architecture by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and Human Rights. Science and Engineering Ethics 23(2): 449–468.

22.

Cath-Speth

Van Geuns

(2020) How hate speech reveals the invisible politics of internet infrastructure. Brookings. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/how-hate-speech-reveals-the-invisible-politics-of-internet-infrastructure/

23.

Cetina

(1997) Sociality with objects social relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies. Theory, Culture & Society 14(4): 1–30.

24.

Clark

(2018) Designing an Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

25.

Clark

Wroclawski

Sollins

, et al. (2005) Tussle in cyberspace: defining tomorrow’s Internet. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 13(3): 462–475.

26.

Collins

(2000 [1990]) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

27.

Conger

(2021) “Master,” “slave” and the fight over offensive terms in computing. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/13/technology/racist-computer-engineering-terms-ietf.html

28.

Costanza-Chock

(2020) Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

29.

Crawford

(2018) Why you won’t be getting 5G connectivity any time soon. Wired. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/america-needs-more-fiber/

30.

Cruz

Harindranath

(2020) WhatsApp as “technology of life”: reframing research agendas. First Monday. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i12.10405

31.

Daniels

(2009) Cyber Racism: White Supremacy Online and the New Attack on Civil Rights. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

32.

Detroit Community Technology Project (2021) Technology rooted in community needs. Available at: https://detroitcommunitytech.org/

33.

Dourish

Bell

(2014) “Resistance is futile”: reading science fiction alongside ubiquitous computing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18(4): 769–778.

34.

Duarte

(2017) Network Sovereignty: Building the Internet across Indian Country. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

35.

Eubanks

(2015) The policy machine. Slate. Available at: http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2015/04/the_dangers_of_letting_algorithms_enforce_policy.html

36.

Eubanks

(2018) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

37.

Fight for the Future (2021) Fight for the future, defending our basic rights and freedoms. Fight for the Future. Available at: https://www.fightforthefuture.org

38.

Gandy

(1993) African Americans and Privacy: understanding the Black perspective in the Emerging Policy Debate. Journal of Black Studies 24(2): 178–195.

39.

Gig Workers Collective (2022) Gig Workers Collective. Available at: https://www.gigworkerscollective.org/home

40.

Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace GCHS (2017) Call to protect the public core of the Internet. GCSC. Available at: https://cyberstability.org/research/call-to-protect/

41.

Gomm

Hammersley

Foster

(2009) Case Study Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

42.

Haraway

(1991) A cyborg manifesto: science, technology and socialist-feminism in the late 20th century. In: Haraway D (ed) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 149–181.

43.

Harding

(2004) The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. London and New York: Routledge; Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Available at: https://www.routledge.com/The-Feminist-Standpoint-Theory-Reader-Intellectual-and-Political-Controversies/Harding/p/book/9780415945011

44.

Harvey

(2003) The fetish of technology: causes and consequences. Macalester International 13: 1–29.

45.

Haskins

(2022) Google and Amazon ignore employee protests and plow ahead with deals involving the US Military, ICE, and CBP. Business Insider. Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com/google-amazon-quietly-contract-dod-ice-cbp-employee-protests-2022-9

46.

Hecht

(2010) The power of nuclear things. Technology and Culture 51(1): 1–30.

47.

Hogan

(2015) Data flows and water woes: the Utah Data Center. Big Data & Society 2(2): 2053951715592429.

48.

Hogan

(2018) Big data ecologies. Ephemera 18(3): 631.

49.

Hou

(2022) Presenting new research climate justice x digital rights. Branch. Available at: https://branch.climateaction.tech/issues/issue-4/climate-justice-digital-rights/

50.

Inclusive Naming Initiative (2021) Inclusive Naming Initiative. Available at: https://inclusivenaming.org/word-lists/

51.

Institute for Local Self-Reliance (2022) Cooperatives build community networks. Community Broadband Networks. Available at: https://muninetworks.org/content/rural-cooperatives-page

52.

Jackson

Edwards

Bowker

, et al. (2007) Understanding infrastructure: history, heuristics and cyberinfrastructure policy. First Monday. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i6.1904

53.

Jackson

(2013) Rethinking repair. In: Gillespie

Boczkowski

Foote

(eds) Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 221–239.

54.

Jasanoff

Kim

(2013) Sociotechnical imaginaries and National Energy Policies. Science as Culture 22(2): 189–196.

55.

Jasanoff

Kim

(2015) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

56.

Jasser

McSwiney

Pertwee

, et al. (2021) “Welcome to #GabFam”: far-right virtual community on Gab. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 28 June. DOI:10.1177/14614448211024546.

57.

Kamara

(2020) Crypto for the people, invited talk at Crypto 2020. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ygq9ci0GFhA

58.

Kaye

(2015) United Nations report to the Human Rights Council on encryption, anonymity, and the human rights framework. United Nations Human Rights Council. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/freedomopinion/pages/callforsubmission.aspx

59.

Kazansky

(2021) “It depends on your threat model”: the anticipatory dimensions of resistance to data-driven surveillance. Big Data & Society. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2053951720985557

60.

Kienbaum

(2020) Cooperatives essential to bringing high-quality fiber Internet access to rural America. Institute for Local Self-Reliance. Available at: https://ilsr.org/cooperatives-essential-to-bringing-high-quality-fiber-internet-access-to-rural-america/

61.

Kor-Sins

(2021) The alt-right digital migration: a heterogeneous engineering approach to social media platform branding. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 20 August. DOI: 10.1177/14614448211038810.

62.

Larkin

(2013) The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology 42(1): 327–343.

63.

Latour

(1990) Technology is Society Made Durable. The Sociological Review 38(1_suppl): 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03350.

64.

Levidow

Papaioannou

(2013) State imaginaries of the public good: shaping UK innovation priorities for bioenergy. Environmental Science & Policy 30: 36–49.

65.

Los Deliveristas Unidos (2022) Los Deliveristas Unidos. Available at: https://losdeliveristasunidos.org/

66.

McAlevey

(2016) No Shortcuts: Organizing for Power in the New Gilded Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

67.

McGlotten

(2016) Black data. In: Johnson EP (ed) No Tea, No Shade: New Writings in Black Queer Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 262–286.

68.

McIlwain

(2019) Black Software: The Internet & Racial Justice, from the Afronet to Black Lives Matter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

69.

MacKenzie

Spinardi

(1995) Tacit knowledge, weapons design, and the uninvention of nuclear weapons. American Journal of Sociology 101(1): 44–99.

70.

MacLellan

(2021) For better or worse, web infrastructure is not a public good. Quartz. Available at: https://qz.com/work/1956070/internet-infrastructure-companies-should-be-public-utilities/

71.

Mager

Katzenbach

(2021) Future imaginaries in the making and governing of digital technology: multiple, contested, commodified. New Media & Society 23(2): 223–236.

72.

Malazita

Resetar

(2019) Infrastructures of abstraction: how computer science education produces anti-political subjects. Digital Creativity 30(4): 300–312.

73.

Malmgren

(2017) Nationalize the networks. Dissent Magazine. Available at: https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/net-neutrality-repeal-case-for-public-broadband

74.

Martin

Myers

Viseu

(2015) The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science 45(5): 625–641.

75.

Marwick

boyd

(2014) Networked privacy: how teenagers negotiate context in social media—Alice E Marwick, danah boyd, 2014. New Media & Society 16(7): 1051–1067.

76.

Mertia

(2020) Lives of Data: Essays on Computational Cultures from India. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.

77.

Mijente. (2018). Who’s Behind ICE? The Tech and Data Companies Fueling Deportations (pp. 1–75). Mijente. https://mijente.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/WHO%E2%80%99S-BEHIND-ICE_-The-Tech-and-Data-Companies-Fueling-Deportations-_v1.pdf

78.

Murphy

(2006) Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty: Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers. 1st ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

79.

Nelson

(2002) Introduction: FUTURE TEXTS. Social Text 20(2(71)): 1–15.

80.

Nelson

(2011) Body and Soul: The Black Panther Party and the Fight against Medical Discrimination. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

81.

Nissenbaum

Stark

Zeiwitz

(2013) Values in design council: an end of project report NSF Eager: values in design in the Future Internet Architecture. Available at: http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/vid/pdfs/VIDCouncilReportv2.pdf

82.

Noble

(2013 [1984]) Forces of Production. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

83.

Noble

(2016) A future for intersectional black feminist technology studies. Scholar & Feminist Online 13(3): 1–2. Available at: https://sfonline.barnard.edu/traversing-technologies/safiya-umoja-noble-a-future-for-intersectional-black-feminist-technology-studies/

84.

Noble

(2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.

85.

Paris

(2018) Time constructs, the origins of a future Internet. PhD Dissertation Los Angeles, University of California Los Angeles. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/133926p6

86.

Paris

(2020) The Internet of Futures Past: values trajectories of networking protocol projects. Science, Technology, & Human Values. Epub ahead of print 24 November. DOI: 10.1177/0162243920974083.

87.

Paris

Currie

Pasquetto

, et al. (2022) Data burdens: epistemologies of evidence in police reform and abolition movements. Data Justice and the Right to the City. Available at: https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/data-burdens-epistemologies-of-evidence-in-police-reform-and-abol

88.

Paris

Reynolds

McGowan

(2021) Sins of omission: critical informatics perspectives on privacy in e-learning systems in higher education. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Epub ahead of print 29 September. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24575.

89.

Paris

(2021) Time constructs: design ideology and a future internet. Time & Society 30(1): 126–149.

90.

Pierre

Crooks

Currie

, et al. (2021) Getting ourselves together: data-centered participatory design research & epistemic burden. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Yokohama, Japan, 8–13 May, pp. 1–11. New York: ACM.

91.

Piven

Cloward

(1978) Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail (unknown edition). New York: Vintage Books.

92.

Reynolds

Aromi

McGowan

, et al. (2022) Digital divide, critical-, and crisis-informatics perspectives on K-12 emergency remote teaching during the pandemic. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Epub ahead of print 2 May. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24654.

93.

Rosa

Hauge

(2022) GAFA’s information infrastructure distribution: interconnection dynamics in the Global North versus global south. Policy & Internet 14(2): 424–449.

94.

Schiller

(1995) Information Inequality. 1st ed. London and New York: Routledge

95.

Scholz

(2016) Platform Cooperativism: Challenging the Corporate Sharing Economy. Berlin: Rosa Luxemburg Siftung.

96.

Shilton

(2015). Anticipatory Ethics for a Future Internet: Analyzing Values During the Design of an Internet Infrastructure. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9510-z

97.

Shilton

(2017). Engaging Values Despite Neutrality: Challenges and Approaches to Values Reflection during the Design of Internet Infrastructure - Katie Shilton, 2018. Science, Technology, & Human Values. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0162243917714869

98.

Social.coop (2022) Social.coop: a cooperative decentralized social network. Grassroots Economic Organizing. Available at: https://geo.coop/content/socialcoop-cooperative-decentralized-social-network

99.

Solomon

(2020) Meshiness: mesh networks and the politics of connectivity. New York University Proquest Dissertation Publishing. Available at: https://www.proquest.com/openview/35dca67d10717f2130572fb824cb1b7b/1.pdf?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

100.

Soundarajan

Kumar

Nair

, et al. (2019) Facebook India report. Equality Labs. Available at: https://www.equalitylabs.org/facebookindiareport

101.

Spade

(2020) Mutual Aid: Building Solidarity during This Crisis. New York: Verso Books.

102.

Squires

(2002) Rethinking the black public sphere: an alternative vocabulary for multiple public spheres. Communication Theory 12(4): 446–468.

103.

Srinivasan

(2017) Whose Global Village? Rethinking How Technology Shapes Our World. New York: New York Unversity Press.

104.

Srinivasan

Becvar

Boast

, et al. (2010) Diverse knowledges and contact zones within the digital museum. Science, Technology & Human Values 35(5): 735–768.

105.

Srnicek

(2016) Platform Capitalism. 1st ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.

106.

Star

(1990) Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions. The Sociological Review 38(Suppl. 1): 26–56.

107.

Star

Ruhleder

(1994) Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, Chapel Hill, NC, 22–26 October, pp. 253–264. New York: ACM.

108.

Strubell

Ganesh

McCallum

(2019) Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. In: Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, Florence, July 2019, pp. 3645–3650. New York: ACM.

109.

Suchman

(2000) Embodied practices of engineering work. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7(1–2): 4–18.

110.

Tarnoff

(2022) Internet for the People: The Fight for Our Digital Future. New York: Verso Books.

111.

Ten Oever

(2020) Wired norms: inscription, resistance, and subversion in the governance of the Internet infrastructure. PhD Dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

112.

ten Oever

(2021) “This is not how we imagined it”: technological affordances, economic drivers, and the Internet architecture imaginary. New Media & Society 23(2): 344–362.

113.

Thompson

(2018) Rural America could reboot the old DIY spirit of the Internet. Wired. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/rural-america-diy-internet-spirit-reboot/

114.

Trendacosta

(2019) Real net neutrality is more than a ban on blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Available at: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/02/real-net-neutrality-more-ban-blocking-throttling-and-paid-prioritization.

115.

Trostle

(2021) Building indigenous future zones: Four tribal broadband case studies. Community Networks. Available at: https://ilsr.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/IndigenousFutureZones-0221.pdf

116.

Uber & Lyft Drivers Union (2022) Rideshare Drivers United. Uber & Lyft Drivers Union. Available at: https://www.drivers-united.org/

117.

Van Dijk

(2005) Critical discourse analysis. In: Schiffrin

Tannen

Hamilton

(eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, pp. 349–371.

118.

Verran

(2002) A Postcolonial Moment in science studies: alternative firing regimes of environmental scientists and aboriginal land owners. Social Studies of Science 32(5–6): 729–762.

119.

Vitak

Zimmer

(2020) How Covid-19 is changing workplace surveillance: American workers’ experiences and privacy expectations when working from home. Covid-19 and the Social Sciences—Social Science Research Council (SSRC). Available at: https://covid19research.ssrc.org/grantee/how-covid-19-is-changing-workplace-surveillance-american-workers-experiences-and-privacy-expectations-when-working-from-home/

120.

Vonderau

(2019) Storing data, infrastructuring the air: thermocultures of the cloud − Asta Vonderau. Culture Machine. Available at: https://culturemachine.net/vol-18-the-nature-of-data-centers/storing-data/

121.

Waldman

(2021) Industry Unbound: The inside Story of Privacy, Data, and Corporate Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

122.

Waldrop

(2002) The Dream Machine: J.C.R. Licklider and the Revolution That Made Computing Personal. 1st ed. London: Penguin Books.

123.

Walsham

(1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4(2): 74–81.

124.

West

(2019) Data capitalism: redefining the logics of surveillance and privacy. Business & Society 58(1): 20–41.

125.

West

(2022) Survival of the cryptic: tracing technological imaginaries across ideologies, infrastructures, and community practices. New Media & Society 24(8): 1891–1911.

126.

Wodak

Meyer

(2009) Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

127.

Zuboff

(2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. 1st ed. New York: PublicAffairs