This study analyzes the self-representations of Russian-speaking women with anorexia on YouTube. Using multimodal interaction analysis, the research focuses on how the explanatory model of anorexia and the representation platform influence the narratives produced by vloggers who have experienced or are experiencing anorexia. It is concluded that anorexia is mainly represented in these videos as a weight-related mental health disorder. Although the explanatory model of anorexia shapes self-representations on YouTube, the platform plays an even greater role in the construction of such narratives. This study’s findings fill gaps in the existing literature by revealing the joint structural influences that shape storytelling regarding the anorexia experience. The theoretical perspective utilized in this article could be further applied in research examining media representations of other mental health conditions.
American Psychiatric Association (2013) The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM-5®). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
2.
ArnoldLBDoranE (2007) Stop before you hurt the kids: communicating self-control and self-negation in femininity, mothering, and eating disorders. Women’s Studies in Communication30(3): 310–339.
BishopS (2018) Anxiety, panic and self-optimization: inequalities and the YouTube algorithm. Convergence24(1): 69–84.
5.
BishopS (2020) Algorithmic experts: selling algorithmic lore on YouTube. Social Media + Society6(1): 1–11.
6.
BlochSReddawayP (2019) Soviet Psychiatric Abuse: The Shadow Over World Psychiatry. New York: Routledge.
7.
BowenMLovellAWallerR (2022) Stigma: the representation of anorexia nervosa in UK newspaper Twitter feeds. Journal of Mental Health31(1): 131–138.
8.
BreletLFlaudiasVDésertM, et al. (2021) Stigmatization toward people with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder: a scoping review. Nutrients13(8): 2834.
9.
BurkeE (2006) Feminine visions: anorexia and contagion in pop discourse. Feminist Media Studies6(3): 315–330.
10.
CastroTSOsórioA (2012) Online violence: not beautiful enough. . . not thin enough. Anorectic testimonials in the web. PsychNology Journal10(3): 169–186.
11.
ChancellorSMitraTDe ChoudhuryM (2016) Recovery amid pro-anorexia: analysis of recovery in social media. In: CHI’16: proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, 7–12 May, pp. 2111–2123. New York: ACM.
12.
ChoJAhmedSHilbertM, et al. (2020) Do search algorithms endanger democracy? An experimental investigation of algorithm effects on political polarization. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media64(2): 150–172.
13.
CobbG (2017) “This is not pro-ana”: denial and disguise in pro-anorexia online spaces. Fat Studies6(2): 189–205.
14.
FirkinsATwistJSolomonsW, et al. (2019) Cutting ties with pro-ana: a narrative inquiry concerning the experiences of pro-ana disengagement from six former site users. Qualitative Health Research29(10): 1461–1473.
15.
FoltsAODaninabMM (2019) The #faceofdepression hashtag in the Facebook and VKontakte social networks: the public discourse features among a Russian-speaking audience. Psychology in Russia. State of the Art12(3): 13–27.
FoxNWardKO’RourkeA (2005) Pro-anorexia, weight-loss drugs and the internet: an “anti-recovery” explanatory model of anorexia. Sociology of Health and Illness27(7): 944–971.
18.
GaleLChannonSLarnerM, et al. (2016) Experiences of using pro-eating disorder websites: a qualitative study with service users in NHS eating disorder services. Eating and Weight Disorders—Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity21(3): 427–434.
19.
GilesDC (2016) Does ana= anorexia? Online interaction and the construction of new discursive objects. In: O’ReillyMLesterJN (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 308–326.
20.
GingDGarveyS (2018) ‘Written in these scars are the stories I can’t explain’: a content analysis of pro-ana and thinspiration image sharing on Instagram. New Media & Society20(3): 1181–1200.
21.
GoodeE (2017) Moral panic. In: SchreckCJLeiberMJMillerHV, et al. (eds) The Encyclopedia of Juvenile Delinquency and Justice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–3.
22.
GreeneAKBrownstoneLM (2021) “Just a place to keep track of myself”: eating disorders, social media, and the quantified self. Feminist Media Studies. Epub ahead of print 17 October. DOI: 10.1080/14680777.2021.1984272.
23.
GriffithFJSteinCH (2021) Behind the hashtag: online disclosure of mental illness and community response on Tumblr. American Journal of Community Psychology67: 419–432.
24.
HaasSMIrrMEJenningsNA, et al. (2011) Communicating thin: a grounded model of online negative enabling support groups in the pro-anorexia movement. New Media & Society13(1): 40–57.
25.
HerrickSSCHallwardLDuncanLR (2021) “This is just how I cope”: an inductive thematic analysis of eating disorder recovery content created and shared on TikTok using #EDrecovery. International Journal of Eating Disorders54: 516–526.
26.
Hockin-BoyersHPopeSJamieK (2021) Digital pruning: agency and social media use as a personal political project among female weightlifters in recovery from eating disorders. New Media & Society23(8): 2345–2366.
27.
HolmesS (2017) ‘My anorexia story’: girls constructing narratives of identity on YouTube. Cultural Studies31(1): 1–23.
28.
HolmesS (2021) “The fact she has anorexia fits in perfectly”: Beverley Allitt, self-starvation, and media narratives of criminal femininity. Women’s Studies in Communication44: 1–22.
29.
HouM (2019) Social media celebrity and the institutionalization of YouTube. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies25(3): 534–553.
30.
KimJ (2012) The institutionalization of YouTube: from user-generated content to professionally generated content. Media, Culture & Society34(1): 53–67.
31.
KrupetzYNartovaN (2014) Weight-reflexive culture and normalized corporeal anxiety of urban youth. The Journal of Social Policy Studies12(4): 523–538.
32.
LaiCPellicanoGRIulianoS, et al. (2021) Why people join pro-ana online communities? A psychological textual analysis of eating disorder blog posts. Computers in Human Behavior124: 106922.
33.
LaMarreARiceC (2016) Embodying critical and corporeal methodology: digital storytelling with young women in eating disorder recovery. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung17(2): 159–184.
34.
LepeshevaSOKholmogorovaAB (2021) Fitness blogging as a new social practice and its implications for young women’s mental health. Cultural-Historical Psychology17(2): 144–154.
35.
LitvinaDOstrouhovaP (2015) The discursive regulation of female corporeality in social networks: the thin line between skinniness and anorexia in conventional and pro-anorexic discourses. The Journal of Social Policy Studies13(1): 33–48.
36.
LogriecoGMarchiliMRRoversiM, et al. (2021) The paradox of Tik Tok anti-pro-anorexia videos: how social media can promote non-suicidal self-injury and anorexia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(3): 1041.
37.
LyonsAC (2000) Examining media representations: benefits for health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology5(3): 349–358.
38.
MalovaEDunleavyV (2021) Men have eating disorders too: an analysis of online narratives posted by men with eating disorders on YouTube. Eating Disorders. Epub ahead of print 17 August. DOI: 10.1080/10640266.2021.1930338.
39.
MarcusS-R (2016) Thinspiration vs. thicksperation: comparing pro-anorexic and fat acceptance image posts on a photo-sharing site. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace10(2): Article 5.
MoeH (2019) Comparing platform “ranking cultures” across languages: the case of Islam on YouTube in Scandinavia. Social Media + Society5(1): 1–10.
42.
MoessnerMFeldhegeJWolfM, et al. (2018) Analyzing big data in social media: text and network analyses of an eating disorder forum. International Journal of Eating Disorders51(7): 656–667.
43.
MohanSPunathambekarA (2019) Localizing YouTube: language, cultural regions, and digital platforms. International Journal of Cultural Studies22(3): 317–333.
44.
MorozL (2020) Father is tired, he is sad. How looks like postnatal depression in fathers and how it affects children. Knife, 26August. Available at: https://knife.media/dads-depression/
45.
MorrealeJ (2014) From homemade to store bought: annoying orange and the professionalization of YouTube. Journal of Consumer Culture14(1): 113–128.
46.
MurrayJWilliamsB (2021) The role of images on illness behaviour: interdisciplinary theory, evidence, and ideas. Psychological Reports124: 2453–2475.
47.
NapoliPM (2011) Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.
48.
NassauerALegewieNM (2021) Video data analysis: a methodological frame for a novel research trend. Sociological Methods & Research50(1): 135–174.
49.
NorrisS (2004) Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London: Routledge.
50.
PaterJAHaimsonOLAndalibiN, et al. (2016) “Hunger hurts but starving works”: characterizing the presentation of eating disorders online. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing, San Francisco CA, 27 February–2 March, pp. 1185–1200. New York: ACM. Available at: https://doi.org/10/gmxrts
51.
PereiraLMQuinnNMoralesE (2016) Breaking news: “I have an eating disorder.” Video testimonials on YouTube. Computers in Human Behavior63: 938–942.
PietrobrunoS (2018) YouTube flow and the transmission of heritage: the interplay of users, content, and algorithms. Convergence24(6): 523–537.
54.
QuinionesCOsterC (2019) Embracing or resisting masculinity: Male participation in the proeating disorders (proana) online community. Psychology of Men & Masculinities20(3): 368.
55.
Ramírez-CifuentesDFreireABaeza-YatesR, et al. (2021) Characterization of anorexia nervosa on social media: textual, visual, relational, behavioral, and demographical analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research23(7): e25925.
56.
RiederBMatamoros-FernándezACorominaÒ (2018) From ranking algorithms to ‘ranking cultures’: investigating the modulation of visibility in YouTube search results. Convergence24(1): 50–68.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1978) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. In: SchenkeinJ (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 7–55.
59.
SchottNDLanganD (2015) Pro-anorexia/bulimia censorship and public service announcements: the price of controlling women. Media, Culture & Society37(8): 1158–1175.
60.
ShesterkinaLVazheninaO (2018) TV series as a means of representing people with autistic personality traits in the system of social coordinates. Rudn Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism23(1): 103–114.
61.
SieffE (2003) Media frames of mental illnesses: the potential impact of negative frames. Journal of Mental Health12(3): 259–269.
62.
SmahelovaMDrtilovaHSmahelD, et al. (2020) Internet usage by women with eating disorders during illness and recovery. Health Communication35(5): 628–636.
SunSHeJFanX, et al. (2020) Chinese media coverage of eating disorders: disorder representations and patient profiles. International Journal of Eating Disorders53(1): 113–122.
65.
Van DijckJ (2020) Governing digital societies: private platforms, public values. Computer Law & Security Review36: 105377.
66.
Van EedenAEVan HoekenDHoekHW (2021) Incidence, prevalence and mortality of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Current Opinion in Psychiatry34(6): 515–524.
67.
Van EsK (2020) YouTube’s operational logic: “the view” as pervasive category. Television & New Media21(3): 223–239.
WangTBredeMIanniA, et al. (2017) Detecting and characterizing eating-disorder communities on social media. In: Proceedings of the tenth ACM International conference on web search and data mining, Cambridge, 6–10 February, pp. 91–100. New York: ACM. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3018661.3018706
72.
WangTBredeMIanniA, et al. (2019) Characterizing dynamic communication in online eating disorder communities: a multiplex network approach. Applied Network Science4(1): 1–22.
73.
Yom-TovEBrunstein-KlomekAHadasA, et al. (2016) Differences in physical status, mental state and online behavior of people in pro-anorexia web communities. Eating Behaviors22: 109–112.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
