This article explores the dynamics and practices of feminist data activism that engages with grassroots data to archive cases of sexual violence in China. Drawing on Cammaert’s notion of the mediation opportunity structure, we investigate the mediation process of a feminist data campaign and activists’ communicative practices in contemporary China. By practicing data-activist research, our study shows that the data-based action repertoire opens up hybrid and contingent mediation opportunities for an anti-sexual violence campaign under the current political opportunity structure. We find the paradox of seeking visibility while refusing mainstream media coverage in activist tactics, which embodies a form of adaptive and resilient feminist data activism in the authoritarian context of China. This case study suggests that the dynamics of feminist data activism in China are configured by the tripartite interaction among the disruptive action repertoire, mediation opportunity structure, and political conditions.
BailoFVromenA (2017) Hybrid social and news media protest events: from #MarchinMarch to #BusttheBudget in Australia. Information, Communication & Society20(11): 1660–1679.
2.
BeraldoDMilanS (2019) From data politics to the contentious politics of data. Big Data & Society6(2). DOI: 10.1177/2053951719885967.
3.
CammaertsB (2012) Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication27(2): 117–134.
4.
ChadwickA (2011) Britain’s first live televised party leader’s debate: from the news cycle to the political information cycle. Parliamentary Affairs64: 24–44.
5.
CondonAJohnsLChesterP (2021) Utilizing an autoethnographic case study approach to explore patient-centered care and its principles in an oncology and palliative care setting. Illness, Crisis & Loss29(3): 241–256.
6.
CouldryNMejiasUA (2019) Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media20(4): 336–349.
7.
CurrieMParisBPasquettoI, et al. (2016) The conundrum of police officer-involved homicides: counter-data in Los Angeles County. Big Data & Society3(2). DOI: 10.1177/2053951716663566.
8.
Della PortaDPavanE (2018) The nexus between media, communication and social movements: looking back and the way forward. In: GrahamM (ed.) The Routledge Companion to Media and Activism. London: Routledge, pp. 29–37.
9.
D’IgnazioCKleinL (2020) Data Feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
EarlJ (2016) Protest online: theorizing the consequences of online engagement. In: BosiLGiugniMGUbaK (eds) The Consequences of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 363–400.
11.
FincherLH (2018) Betraying Big Brother: The Feminist Awakening in China. Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books.
12.
GabrysJPritchardHBarrattB (2016) Just good enough data: figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society3(2). DOI: 10.1177/2053951716679677.
13.
GamsonWAWolfsfeldG (1993) Movements and media as interacting systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science528(1): 114–125.
14.
GrayJ (2019) Data witnessing: attending to injustice with data in Amnesty International’s Decoders project. Information, Communication & Society22(7): 971–991.
15.
GrayJLämmerhirtD (2019) Making data public? The open data index as participatory device. In: DalyADevittKMannM (eds) Good Data. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, pp. 174–188.
16.
GutiérrezM (2019) The good, the bad and the beauty of ‘good enough data’. In: DalyADevittKMannM (eds) Good Data. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, pp. 54–76.
17.
HanX (2018) Searching for an online space for feminism? The Chinese feminist group Gender Watch Women’s Voice and its changing approaches to online misogyny. Feminist Media Studies18(4): 734–749.
18.
HuangRSunX (2020) Dual mediation and success of environmental protests in China: a qualitative comparative analysis of 10 cases. Social Movement Studies19(4): 408–425.
19.
HuangSSunW (2021) #Metoo in China: transnational feminist politics in the Chinese context. Feminist Media Studies21(4): 677–681.
20.
JingXRistivojevićD (2021) #MeToo in China: how do the voiceless rise up in an authoritarian state?Politics & Gender17(3): 490–499.
21.
KazanskyBTorresGvan der VeldenL, et al. (2019) Data for the social good: toward a data-activist research agenda. In: DalyADevittKMannM (eds) Good Data. Amsterdam: Institute for Network Cultures, pp. 244–259.
22.
KoopmansRStathamP (1999) Political claims analysis: integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization: An International Quarterly4(2): 203–221.
23.
LiJLiX (2017) Media as a core political resource: the young feminist movements in China. Chinese Journal of Communication10(1): 54–71.
LinZYangL (2019) ‘Me too!’: individual empowerment of disabled women in the #MeToo movement in China. Disability & Society34(5): 842–847.
26.
LyonD (2015) Surveillance after Snowden. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
27.
MilanS (2010) SSRC| introduction: toward an epistemology of engaged research| making communication research matter. International Journal of Communication4: 856–858.
28.
MilanS (2017) Data activism as the new frontier of media activism. In: YangGPickardV (eds) Media Activism in the Digital Age. New York: Routledge, pp. 151–163.
29.
MilanSvan der VeldenL (2016) The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2), 57–74.
30.
MilanS (2018) Political agency, digital traces, and bottom-up data practices. International Journal of Communication12: 507–525.
31.
MilanSTreréE (2019) Big data from the South(s): beyond data universalism. Television & New Media20(4): 319–335.
RenziALangloisG (2015) Data activism. In: ElmerGLangloisGReddenJ (eds) Compromised Data: From Social Media to Big Data. New York: Bloomsbury, pp. 202–225.
34.
SchrockAR (2016) Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy: a history from publicity to open government data. New Media & Society18(4): 581–599.
SunYYanW (2020) The power of data from the Global South: Environmental civic tech and data activism in China. International Journal of Communication14(2020): 2144–2162.
37.
SunYHuangVG (2022) Embedded data activism: the institutionalization of a grassroots environmental data initiative in China. Chinese Journal of Communication15(1): 115–137.
38.
TanJ (2017) Digital masquerading: feminist media activism in China. Crime, Media, Culture13(2): 171–186.
39.
TarrowS (1994) Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Mass Politics in the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
WangBDriscollC (2019) Chinese feminists on social media: articulating different voices, building strategic alliances. Continuum33(1): 1–15.
41.
WangZ (2010) Feminist networks. In: HsingYLeeCK (eds) Reclaiming Chinese Society: The New Social Activism. New York: Routledge, pp. 101–118.
42.
WangZZhangY (2010) Global concepts, local practices: Chinese feminism since the Fourth UN Conference on Women. Feminist Studies36(1): 40–70.
43.
WongSCWrightS (2020) Hybrid mediation opportunity structure? A case study of Hong Kong’s Anti-National Education Movement. New Media & Society22(10): 1741–1762.
44.
YinSSunY (2021) Intersectional digital feminism: assessing the participation politics and impact of the MeToo movement in China. Feminist Media Studies, 21(7): 1176–1192.
45.
ZengJ (2019) You Say #MeToo, I Say #MiTu: China’s online campaigns against sexual abuse. In: FilebornBLoney-HowesR (eds) #Metoo and the Politics of Social Change. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 71–83.
46.
ZengJ (2020) #MeToo as connective action: a study of the anti-sexual violence and anti-sexual harassment campaign on Chinese social media in 2018. Journalism Practice14(2): 171–190.
