Scholarly discussions of the consequences of the on-demand economy on work mainly focus on precarity. Using a case study of Didi Chuxing, this article moves beyond this conventional approach to highlight coercion as a striking feature of labor relations in China’s ride-hailing industry. Drawing upon the conceptual tool of neo-bondage, this article foregrounds the central role played by forced labor in securing a cheap and docile work force during Didi’s rapid market expansion. This article advances the existing literature in two ways. First, it highlights the need for a more robust analysis of the productive forces in the on-demand economy. Second, it argues that the on-demand economy not only represents an intensification of the ongoing trend toward precarity, but also an extension of forced labor regimes from electronic assembly lines to the service industry.
AcquierA (2018) Uberization meets organizational theory: platform capitalism and the rebirth of the putting-out system. In: DavisionNFinckDInfrancaJ (eds) Cambridge Handbook on Law and Regulation of the Sharing Economy. Oxford: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–26.
2.
BaishyaP (1997) The putting out system in ancient India. Social Scientist25(7/8): 51–56.
3.
BremanJ (2010) Neo-bondage: a fieldwork-based account. International Labor and Working-Class History78: 48–62.
4.
BremanJ (2014) On labour bondage. Contributions to Indian Sociology48(1): 133–141.
5.
CalvãoF (2016) Unfree labor. Annual Review of Anthropology45(1): 451–467.
6.
ChanNK (2019) Becoming an expert in driving for Uber”: Uber driver/bloggers’ performance of expertise and self-presentation on YouTube. New Media & Society21(9): 2048–2067.
7.
ChanNKKwokC (2021) The politics of platform power in surveillance capitalism: a comparative case study of ride-hailing platforms in China and the United States. Global Media and China. Epub ahead of print 26 September. DOI: 10.1177/20594364211046769
ChenY (2018) Thrown under the bus and outrunning it! the logic of Didi and taxi drivers’ labour and activism in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society20(8): 2691–2711.
10.
ChenYQiuJL (2019) Digital utility: datafication, regulation, labor, and DiDi’s platformization of urban transport in China. Chinese Journal of Communication12(3): 274–289.
11.
EvansR (1970) Some notes on coerced Labor. The Journal of Economic History30(4): 861–866.
12.
FriedmanELeeCK (2010) Remaking the world of Chinese labor: a 30-year retrospective. British Journal of Industrial Relations48(3): 507–533.
13.
GriesbachKReichAElliott-NegriL, et al. (2019) Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World5: 1–15.
14.
GuérinIVenkatasubramanianGKumarS (2015) Debt bondage and the tricks of capital. Economic and Political Weekly50(26/27): 11–18.
15.
HattonE (2019) “Either you do it or you’re going to the box”: coerced labor in contemporary America. Critical Sociology45(6): 907–920.
16.
HattonE (2020) Coerced: Work Under Threat of Punishment. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
17.
HymanL (2018) Temp: How American Work, American Business, and the American Dream Became Temporary. New York: Viking.
18.
JiangHZhangX (2019) An experimental model of regulating the sharing economy in China: the case of online car hailing. Computer Law & Security Review35(2): 145–156.
19.
KaraS (2008) Sex Trafficking: Inside the Business of Modern Slavery. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
KenneyMZysmanJ (2016) The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology32(3): 61–69.
21.
KumariS (2018) Neo-bondage in the brick kiln industry: a case study of Bihar. Social Change48(3): 384–397.
22.
LeBaronG (2014) Reconceptualizing debt bondage: debt as a class-based form of labor discipline. Critical Sociology40(5): 763–780.
23.
LeiYW (2021) Delivering solidarity: platform architecture and collective contention in China’s platform economy. American Sociological Review86(2): 279–309.
24.
LiAK (2021) Beyond algorithmic control: flexibility, intermediaries, and paradox in the on-demand economy. Information, Communication & Society. Epub ahead of print 23 May. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2021.1924225.
25.
McGrathS (2013) Many chains to break: the multi-dimensional concept of slave labor in Brazil. Antipode45(4): 1005–1028.
26.
MarxK (2014) Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. New York: Dover Publications Inc.
27.
NgaiPChanJ (2012) Global capital, the state, and Chinese workers: the Foxconn experience. Modern China38(4): 383–410.
28.
PrasslJ (2018) Humans as a Service: The Promise and Perils of Work in the Gig Economy. London: Oxford University Press.
29.
QiHLiZ (2020) Putting precarity back to production: a case study of Didi Kuaiche drivers in the city of Nanjing, china. Review of Radical Political Economics52(3): 506–522.
30.
RavenelleAJ (2019) Hustle and Gig. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
31.
RosenblatA (2018) Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
32.
SchorJ (2021) After the Gig: How the Sharing Economy Got Hijacked and How to Win It Back. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
33.
ShapiroA (2020a) Design, Control, Predict: Logistical Governance in the Smart City. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
34.
ShapiroA (2020b) Dynamic exploits: calculative asymmetries in the on-demand economy. New Technology, Work and Employment35(2): 162–177.
35.
ShieldsK (2011) Labor exploitation. In: KaufmannPKuchHNeuhäuserC, et al. (eds) Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization: Human Dignity Violated. New York: Springer, pp. 173–191.
StanfordJ (2017) The resurgence of gig work: historical and theoretical perspectives. The Economic and Labor Relations Review28(3): 382–401.
38.
StraussKMcGrathS (2017) Temporary migration, precarious employment and unfree labour relations: exploring the “continuum of exploitation” in Canada’s temporary foreign worker program. Geoforum78: 199–208.
39.
SundararajanA (2017) The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-based Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
40.
Tencent Technology (2016) Didi promotes partner-entrepreneurial project, driving for Didi without a car. Available at: https://tech.qq.com/a/20160418/049987.htm (accessed 10 July 2021)
