Upon release from prison, women face barriers in every step of their journey home, with most reentry services designed for men. With virtual reality (VR) headsets increasingly affordable and normalized as a mental health treatment modality, VR is being adopted by prisons around the United States. We argue that the risks and affordances of VR in this political context necessitate centering those with lived experience as creative agents to avoid designing media that re-traumatizes, reduces the complexities of reentry, and reproduces oppressive prisoner–guard dynamics. This article documents and analyzes the design process of a VR reentry program for a state prison to help incarcerated women practice responding to high-stress reentry situations, prior to their release. The resulting VR prototype draws on therapeutic VR work but takes a community-based participatory design approach. We conclude by discussing the institutional and cultural tensions of implementing a participatory design process in a US state prison system.
BirckheadBKhalilCLiuX, et al. (2019) Recommendations for methodology of virtual reality clinical trials in health care by an international working group: iterative study. JMIR Mental Health6(1): 1–14.
7.
BjörgvinssonEEhnPHillgrenPA (2012) Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign8(2–3): 127–144.
8.
BlombergJKarastiH (2013) Ethnography: positioning ethnography within participatory design. In: SimonsenJRobertsonT (eds) Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. New York: Routledge, pp. 86–116.
9.
BotellaCSerranoBBañosRM, et al. (2015) Virtual reality exposure-based therapy for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: a review of its efficacy, the adequacy of the treatment protocol, and its acceptability. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment11: 2533–2545.
10.
BreyP (1999) The ethics of representation and action in virtual reality. Ethics and Information Technology1(1): 5–14.
11.
BuckwalterJG (2015) The strive-ONR (Office of Naval Research) project: Stress resistance in virtual environments. Contact No. N00014-12-1-0163. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA623557
Committee on Ethical Considerations for Revisions to DHHS Regulations for Protection of Prisoners Involved in Research, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (2007) The ethical framework for research involving prisoners. In: GostinLOVanchieriCPopeA (eds) Ethical Considerations for Research Involving Prisoners. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, pp. 113–136.
14.
Costanza-ChockS (2019) Design Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
CovingtonS (2002) A woman’s journey home: challenges for female offenders and their children. Paper presented at the From prisons to home conference, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
DiSalvoBYipJBonsignoreE, et al. (2017) Participatory Design for Learning. New York: Routledge.
18.
DiSalvoC (2012) Adversarial Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
DiSalvoCClementAPipekV (2013) Communities: participatory design for, with and by communities. In: SimonsenJRobertsonT (eds) Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. New York: Routledge, pp. 202–230.
FinsethTTKerenNDorneichMC, et al. (2018) Evaluating the effectiveness of graduated stress exposure in virtual spaceflight hazard training. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making12(4): 248–268.
24.
FreudenbergN (2002) Adverse effects of US jail and prison policies on the health and wellbeing of women of color. American Journal of Public Health92: 1895–1899.
GiordanoPCCernkovichSARudolphJL (2002) Gender, crime, and desistance: toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology107(4): 990–1064.
27.
GirardBTurcotteVBouchardS, et al. (2009) Crushing virtual cigarettes reduces tobacco addiction and treatment discontinuation. Cyberpsychol Behav12(5): 477–483.
28.
GordonEMugarG (2020) Meaningful Inefficiencies: Civic Design in the Age of Digital Expediency. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
GreenBLMirandaJDaroowallaA, et al. (2005) Trauma exposure, mental health functioning, and program needs of women in jail. Crime and Delinquency51(1): 133–151.
30.
HaighR (1999) The quintessence of a therapeutic environment: five universal qualities. In: CamplingPHaighR (eds) Therapeutic Communities: Past, Present and Future. London: Jessica Kingsley, pp. 246–257.
31.
Institute for Creative Technologies (2014) Stress Resilience in Virtual Environments (Strive). Institute for Creative Technologies Prototypes. Available at: https://ict.usc.edu/prototypes/strive/ (accessed 8 August 2018).
ManziniE (2015) Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
Maples-KellerJLBunnellBEKimSJ, et al. (2017) The use of virtual reality technology in the treatment of anxiety and other psychiatric disorders. Harvard Review of Psychiatry25(3): 103–113.
41.
MauerMPotlerCWolfR (1999) Gender and Justice: Women, Drugs, and Sentencing Policy. Washington, DC: Sentencing Project, p. 5.
42.
Miner-RomanoffK (2012) Interpretive and critical phenomenological crime studies: a model design. Qualitative Report17(54): 1–32.
43.
MorashMBynumTSKoons-WittB (1998) Women offenders: Programming needs and promising approaches. NCJ No.171668. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
44.
MullerM (2002) Participatory design: the third space in HCI. In: JackoJASearsA (eds) The Human-computer Interaction Handbook. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, pp. 1051–1068.
45.
PetersiliaJ (2003) When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
PhillipsLALindsayM (2011) Prison to society: a mixed methods analysis of coping with reentry. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology55(1): 136–154.
RizzoABuckwalterJGJohnB, et al. (2012a) Strive: stress resilience in virtual environments: a pre-deployment VR system for training emotional coping skills and assessing chronic and acute stress responses. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics173: 379–385.
RizzoASchultheisMTRothbaumBO (2003) Ethical issues for the use of virtual reality in the psychological sciences. In: BushSSDrexlerML (eds) Ethical Issues in Clinical Neuropsychology. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger Publishers, pp. 243–280.
RothbaumBOHodgesLF (1999) The use of virtual reality exposure in the treatment of anxiety disorders. Behavior Modification23(4): 507–525.
54.
RothbaumBOHodgesLFKooperR, et al. (1995) Effectiveness of computer-generated (virtual reality) graded exposure in the treatment of acrophobia. American Journal of Psychiatry152(4): 626–628.
55.
SeiterRPKadelaKR (2003) Prisoner reentry: what works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime & Delinquency49(3): 360–388.
56.
SpjeldnesSGoodkindS (2009) Gender differences and offender reentry: a review of the literature. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation48: 314–335.
57.
TengMHodgeJGordonE (2019) Participatory design of a virtual reality-based reentry training with a women’s prison. In: Proceedings of CHI’19 extended abstracts, 4–9 May, Glasgow.
ValmaggiaLRLatifLKemptonMJ, et al. (2016) Virtual reality in the psychological treatment for mental health problems: a systemic review of recent evidence. Psychiatry Research236: 189–195.
