Defining empathy: Interconnected discourses of virtual reality’s prosocial impact

Abstract

While a consumer revolution in virtual reality (VR) has piqued the interest of many fields, industries, and professions, it is unclear when, how, and to what degree the technology can elicit empathy. To better understand how the relationship between VR and empathy is communicated and defined, we performed qualitative and quantitative thematic analyses on popular (N = 640) and academic articles (N = 53) that included both terms. Findings revealed empathy is an aspirational term for journalists and researchers to showcase the potential of immersive media for prosocial change. Writers in both corpora suggested that empathetic experiences could lead to prosocial action through VR, but do not consistently define or measure empathy, given the inherent complexities surrounding the term. Drawing on seminal research in the field, we conclude with a definition of empathy related to immersive media.

Keywords

Empathy immersive media prosocial change virtual reality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahn

Minh

TLA

Bailenson

(2013) The effect of embodied experiences on self-other merging, attitude, and helping behavior. Media Psychology 16(1): 7–38.

Ando

Clement

Barley

, et al. (2011) The simulation of hallucinations to reduce the stigma of schizophrenia: a systematic review. Schizophrenia Research 133: 8–16.

Apodaca

(2016) Journalism + empathy & VR. Medium, 12 May. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20170115065357/https://medium.com/@jocelynapodaca/journalism-empathy-vr-29d1c3423013 (accessed 2 February 2021).

AppliedVR (2016) Virtual perspective taking: building empathy, better. Medium, 23 March. Available at: https://medium.com/@AppliedVR/virtual-perspective-taking-building-empathy-better-2cab21fbc7bd (accessed 13 February 2019).

Archer

Finger

(2018) Walking in another’s virtual shoes: do 360-degree video news stories generate empathy in viewers? The Tow Center for Digital Journalism, 15 March. Available at: https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/virtual-reality-news-empathy.php/ (accessed 18 February 2019).

Bailenson

(2018) Experience on Demand: What Virtual Reality Is, How It Works, and What It Can Do. New York: WW Norton & Company.

Bailenson

Yee

Blascovich

, et al. (2008) The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: digital transformations of teachers, students, and social context. Journal of the Learning Sciences 17(1): 102–141.

Bandura

(2000) Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 9(3): 75–78.

Baron-Cohen

Wheelwright

(2004) The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34(2): 163–175.

10.

Biocca

(1995) Intelligence augmentation: the vision inside virtual reality. In: Gorayska

Mey

(eds) Cognitive Technology 13: In Search of a Human Interface. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, pp. 59–78.

11.

Blackburn

Yilmaz

Boyd

(2018) Food for thought: exploring how people think and talk about food online. Appetite 123: 390–401.

12.

Bonasio

(2016) Across the line: how VR has the power to make you care. UploadVR. Available at: https://uploadvr.com/vr-power-make-care/ (accessed 12 February 2019).

13.

Bonasio

(2017) How VR will change soft skills training. Medium, 17 December. Available at: https://medium.com/edtech-trends/how-vr-will-change-soft-skills-training-67e9ac07518f (accessed 25 February 2019).

14.

Box

GEP

(1976) Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 71(356): 791–799.

15.

Boyd

(2018) MEH: meaning extraction helper (version 2.1.06) [software]. Available at: https://meh.ryanb.cc/ (accessed 19 February 2019).

16.

Business Journal (2018) Online launch of “there’s something in the air”—a virtual reality air pollution visualization. 22 March. Available at: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/online-launch-of-theres-something-in-the-air---a-virtual-reality-air-pollution-visualization-300617345.html (accessed 16 February 2019).

17.

Chung

Pennebaker

(2008) Revealing dimensions of thinking in open-ended self-descriptions: an automated meaning extraction method for natural language. Journal of Research in Personality 42(1): 96–132.

18.

Constine

(2018) Imverse’s groundbreaking mixed reality renders you inside VR. TechCrunch, 30 January. Available at: http://social.techcrunch.com/2018/01/30/imverse-mixed-reality/ (accessed 13 February 2019).

19.

Cummings

Bailenson

(2016) How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychology 19(2): 272–309.

20.

Davis

(1980) A multidimensional approach to individual difference in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 10: 85–104.

21.

Davis

(1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44(1): 113–126.

22.

Davis

Chansiri

(2019) Digital identities: overcoming visual bias through virtual embodiment. Information, Communication and Society 22(4): 491–505.

23.

Dempsey

(2018) Can virtual reality increase empathy? Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/@rdemp2/can-virtual-reality-increase-empathy-8bdc25078350 (accessed 13 February 2019).

24.

Dittmer C (2017)

Five incredible opportunities for virtual reality. Medium, 17 January. Available at: https://medium.com/@ditz/incredible-opportunities-for-vr-6a17eb94ee02 (accessed 14 February 2019).

25.

Downey

(2016) The gigantic list of augmented reality use cases. UploadVR, 25 October. Available at: https://uploadvr.com/augmented-reality-use-cases-list/ (accessed 14 February 2019).

26.

Ducros

(2017) Case study: mapping virtual reality. Medium, 16 October. Available at: https://medium.com/@Valentin.Ducros/case-study-mapping-virtual-reality-14db54808d99 (accessed 13 February 2019).

27.

Eisenberg

Miller

(1987) The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin 101(1): 91–119.

28.

Fields

(2017) Virtual reality 2017: top 100 influencers, brands and publications. Onalytica, 4 October. Available at: http://www.onalytica.com/blog/posts/virtual-reality-2017-top-100-influencers-brands-publications/ (accessed 19 February).

29.

Fink

(2018) VR at Tribeca 18: the awesome list. Forbes Magazine. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/charliefink/2018/04/20/vr-at-tribeca-18-the-awesome-list/ (accessed 14 February 2019).

30.

Fjællingsdal

Klöckner

(2017) ENED-GEM: a conceptual framework model for psychological enjoyment factors and learning mechanisms in educational games about the environment. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1085.

31.

Fox

Gilbert

Tang

(2018) Player experiences in a massively multiplayer online game: a diary study of performance, motivation, and social interaction. New Media & Society 20: 4056–4073.

32.

Foxman

(2018) Playing with virtual reality: early adopters of commercial immersive technology. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Columbia University. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/287f/3d0a0e75e0c3dcffc2edfa34e3465e0ef837.pdf

33.

Freeman

(2015) Using virtual reality to generate empathy and end homelessness. UploadVR, 9 March. Available at: https://uploadvr.com/using-virtual-reality-to-generate-empathy-and-end-homelessness/ (accessed 14 February 2019).

34.

Goleman

(2008) Hot to help: when can empathy move us to action? Greater Good Magazine, 1 March. Available at: https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/hot_to_help (accessed 19 February).

35.

Goodman

(2016) Electronic empathy: meet the next wave of virtual reality. The Guardian, 8 September. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/media-network/2016/sep/08/electronic-empathy-virtual-reality-pokemon-go-oculus (accessed 19 February).

36.

Graham

(2015) The uprising creative launches VR studio VEHICLEvr. VR Focus, 22 October. Available at: https://www.vrfocus.com/2015/10/the-uprising-creative-launches-vr-studio-vehiclevr/ (accessed 13 February 2019).

37.

Haidamus

(2015) Ramzi Haidamus: taking VR from virtual to emotional. Wired, December. Available at: https://www.wired.com/brandlab/2015/12/ramzi-haidamus-taking-vr-from-virtual-to-emotional/ (accessed 13 February 2019).

38.

Haptical (2018) Virtual reality helps students experience life with dementia. Medium, 2 September. Available at: https://haptic.al/virtual-reality-helps-students-experience-life-with-dementia-8b8c34eb7a2d (accessed 14 February 2019).

39.

Heeter

(1992) Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence, Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1(2): 262–271.

40.

Herrera

Bailenson

Weisz

, et al. (2018) Building long-term empathy: a large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PLoS ONE 13(10): e0204494.

41.

High

(2018) CNET and Salesforce co-founder Halsey Minor focuses on crypto currency and VR. Forbes Magazine. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterhigh/2018/04/30/cnet-and-salesforce-co-founder-halsey-minor-focuses-on-crypto-currency-and-vr/ (accessed 14 February 2019).

42.

Hoffman

(1984) Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. In: Izard

Kagan

Zajonc

(eds) Emotions, Cognition, and Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–131.

43.

Humphrey

(2017) Adobe’s path to entering the virtual reality story. Forbes Magazine. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelhumphrey/2017/02/06/adobes-path-to-entering-the-virtual-reality-story/ (accessed 13 February 2019).

44.

Kim

Jung

, et al. (2009) Reduced activation in the mirror neuron system during a virtual social cognition task in euthymic bipolar disorder. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 33: 1409–1416.

45.

Kohler

(1929) Gestalt Psychology. New York: Liveright.

46.

Kors

MJL

Ferri

Van Der Spek

, et al. (2016) A breathtaking journey. On the design of an empathy-arousing mixed-reality game. In: Proceedings of the 2016 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play, Austin, TX, 16–19 October, pp. 91–104. New York: ACM.

47.

Kors

MJL

Van Der Spek

Ferri

, et al. (2018) You; the observer, partaker or victim. Delineating three perspectives to empathic engagement in persuasive games using immersive technologies. In: CHI PLAY’18 extended abstracts: proceedings of the 2018 annual symposium on comsputer-human interaction in play companion extended abstracts, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 28–31 October, pp. 493–501. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

48.

Kozuch

(2019) A virtual reality check. Medium, 4 January. Available at: https://medium.com/@katekozuch/a-virtual-reality-check-99a6e0f93fd5 (accessed 3 February 2021).

49.

Krohner

(2015) Measuring empathy in virtual reality. Medium, 3 November. Available at: https://virtualrealitypop.com/measuring-empathy-in-virtual-reality-678dd02eac61 (accessed 14 February 2019).

50.

Lapowsky

(2015) This is trump with a man bun. We wish it were real. Wired, 1 October. Available at: https://www.wired.com/2015/10/trump-man-bun-social-media/ (accessed 16 February 2019).

51.

Leslie

Johnson-Frey

Grafton

(2004) Functional imaging of face and hand imitation: towards a motor theory of empathy. NeuroImage 21(2): 601–607.

52.

Levenson

Ruef

(1992) Empathy: a physiological substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(2): 234–246.

53.

Lincoln

Guba

(1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

54.

Lopez

Bailenson

(2019) 5 Lessons for the future success of virtual and augmented reality. World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/five-lessons-to-shape-the-future-of-virtual-and-augmented-reality/ (accessed 15 February 2019).

55.

Markowitz

Laha

Perone

, et al. (2018) Immersive virtual reality field trips facilitate learning about climate change. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 2364.

56.

Mead

(1934) Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

57.

Mehrabian

Epstein

(1972) A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality 40(4): 525–543.

58.

Milk

(2015) How Virtual Reality Can Create the Ultimate Empathy Machine. Available at: https://www.ted.com/talks/chris_milk_how_virtual_reality_can_create_the_ultimate_empathy_machine?language=en (accessed 15 February 2019).

59.

Millar

Hunston

(2015) Adjectives, communities, and taxonomies of evaluative meaning. Functions of Language 22(3): 297–331.

60.

Minsky

(1980) Telepresence. OMNI Magazine, June.

61.

Nowell

Norris

White

, et al. (2017) Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1): 1–13.

62.

Schutte

Stilinović

(2017) Facilitating empathy through virtual reality. Motivation and Emotion 41(6): 708–712.

63.

Shin

(2018) Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: to what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience? Computers in Human Behavior 78: 64–73.

64.

Shin

Biocca

(2018) Exploring immersive experience in journalism. New Media & Society 20(8): 2800–2823.

65.

Slater

Wilbur

(1997) A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6(6): 603–616.

66.

Stanford Medicine (2018) Can virtual reality help people become more compassionate? Medium, 22 October. Available at: https://medium.com/scope-stanford-medicine/can-virtual-reality-help-people-become-more-compassionate-1a62fa730c62 (accessed 13 February 2019).

67.

Stueber

(2019) Empathy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/empathy/measuring.html (accessed 2 August 2019).

68.

Tausczik

Pennebaker

(2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(1): 24–54.

69.

The New York Times (2016) Where virtual reality takes us. 21 January. Available at: https:// www.nytimes.com/2016/01/21/opinion/sundance-new-frontiers-virtual-qreality.html (accessed 13 February 2019).

70.

Thomas

(2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation 27(2): 237–246.

71.

Van Dijk

(1993) Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 4(2): 249–283.

72.

Van Loon

Bailenson

Zaki

, et al. (2018) Virtual reality perspective-taking increases cognitive empathy for specific others. PLoS ONE 13(8): e0202442.

73.

Wallach

Safir

Samana

(2010) Personality variables and presence. Virtual Reality 14(1): 3–13.

74.

Zaki

(2019) The War for Kindness: Building Empathy in a Fractured World. New York: Crown Publishers.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB