A common view is that marginalized groups benefit substantially from strategic use of digital technologies. An intersectionality perspective, however, suggests that these outcomes may vary depending on individuals’ social positionality. We propose the concept of “subverted agency” to emphasize that use of digital technologies may be personally empowering but might reinforce normative regimes contributing to sociostructural marginalization. We investigated digital practices of 17 online-soliciting transfeminine sex workers through semi-structured interviews in Singapore, where attitudes toward gender diversity and sex work remain conservative. We highlight three dilemmas of digital media environments, namely, presentation of gender identity and embodiment, intimate relationships characterized by persistent liminality, and competitive pressures related to authenticity of identity. The subverted agency perspective suggests that digital practices do not straightforwardly transform unequal sociostructural conditions; instead, it offers a frame to rethink inclusion by attending to contextual intersections of marginalization.
AngMWTanJCKLouC (2021) Navigating sexual racism in the sexual field: compensation for and disavowal of marginality by racial minority Grindr users in Singapore. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication26(3): 129–147.
2.
ArgentoETaylorMJollimoreJ, et al. (2018) The loss of Boystown and transition to online sex work: strategies and barriers to increase safety among men sex workers and clients of men. American Journal of Men’s Health12(6): 1994–2005.
3.
AshfordC (2009) Male sex work and the Internet effect: time to re-evaluate the criminal law?The Journal of Criminal Law73(3): 258–280.
4.
BuggsSG (2020) (Dis)owning exotic: navigating race, intimacy, and trans identity. Sociological Inquiry90(2): 249–270.
5.
BurghartKO (2018) What’s on sale? A discourse analysis of four distinctive online escort advertisement websites. Sexuality & Culture22(1): 316–335.
6.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
7.
CannonYSpeedlinSAveraJ, et al. (2017) Transition, connection, disconnection, and social media: examining the digital lived experiences of transgender individuals. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling11(2): 68–87.
8.
Capous-DesyllasMLoyV (2020) Navigating intersecting identities, self-representation, and relationships: a qualitative study with trans sex workers living and working in Los Angeles, CA. Sociological Inquiry90(2): 339–370.
9.
CavalcanteA (2016) “I did it all online”: transgender identity and the management of everyday life. Critical Studies in Media Communication33(1): 109–122.
10.
ChaiyajitN (2014) TLBz sexperts! Using information and communication technologies (ICTS) to get to zero HIV infections among Thai transgender people. Digital Culture & Education6(3): 243–253.
11.
Chapman-SchmidtB (2015) Sex in the shadow of the law: regulating sex work and human trafficking in Singapore. Asian Journal of Comparative Law10(1): 1–21.
12.
ChibAChenVHH (2011) Midwives with mobiles: a dialectical perspective on gender arising from technology introduction in rural Indonesia. New Media & Society12(3): 486–501.
13.
ChibANguyenHLinD (2021) Provocation as agentic practice: gender performativity in online strategies of transgender sex workers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication26(2): 55–71.
14.
CipollettaSVotadoroRFaccioE (2017) Online support for transgender people: an analysis of forums and social networks. Health & Social Care in the Community25(5): 1542–1551.
15.
ConnellC (2010) Doing, undoing, or redoing gender? Learning from the workplace experiences of transpeople. Gender & Society24(1): 31–55.
16.
CrenshawK (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum1989(1): 8.
17.
CunninghamSKendallTD (2011) Prostitution 2.0: the changing face of sex work. Journal of Urban Economics69(3): 273–287.
18.
CunninghamSSandersTScoularJ, et al. (2018) Behind the screen: commercial sex, digital spaces and working online. Technology in Society53: 47–54.
19.
DameA (2016) Making a name for yourself: tagging as transgender ontological practice on Tumblr. Critical Studies in Media Communication33(1): 23–37.
20.
DennermalmN (2014) Resistance to the Swedish model through LGBTQ and sex work community collaboration and online intervention. Digital Culture & Education6(3): 230–239.
21.
DozierR (2005) Beards, breasts, and bodies: doing sex in a gendered world. Gender & Society19(3): 297–316.
22.
EhrenreichN (2002) Subordination and symbiosis: mechanisms of mutual support between subordinating systems. UMKC Law Review71: 251.
23.
FitzGeraldSAMunroVE (2012) Sex work and the regulation of vulnerability(ies): introduction. Feminist Legal Studies20(3): 183–188.
24.
GanjuDSaggurtiN (2017) Stigma, violence and HIV vulnerability among transgender persons in sex work in Maharashtra, India. Culture, Health & Sexuality19(8): 903–917.
25.
GiddensA (1986) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
26.
GubriumJFHolsteinJA (2001) Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
HaimsonOL (2018) The social complexities of transgender identity disclosure on social media. PhD Thesis, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA.
28.
HaimsonOLBrubakerJRDombrowskiL, et al. (2016) Digital footprints and changing networks during online identity transitions. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, 07–12 May 2016, pp. 2895–2907. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
29.
HanckelBVivienneSByronP, et al. (2019) “That’s not necessarily for them”: LGBTIQ + young people, social media platform affordances and identity curation. Media, Culture & Society41(8): 1261–1278.
30.
HwahngSJNuttbrockL (2007) Sex workers, fem queens, and cross-dressers: differential marginalizations and HIV vulnerabilities among three ethnocultural male-to-female transgender communities in New York City. Sexuality Research & Social Policy4(4): 36.
31.
JohnsonAH (2016) Transnormativity: a new concept and its validation through documentary film about transgender men. Sociological Inquiry86(4): 465–491.
32.
JonesA (2015) Sex work in a digital era. Sociology Compass9(7): 558–570.
33.
JonesA (2020a) Camming: Money, Power, and Pleasure in the Sex Work Industry. New York: NYU Press.
34.
JonesA (2020b) Where the trans men and enbies at? Cissexism, sexual threat, and the study of sex work. Sociology Compass14(2): e12750.
35.
JonesA (2021) Cumming to a screen near you: transmasculine and non-binary people in the camming industry. Porn Studies8(2): 239–254.
36.
KokenJA (2012) Independent female escort’s strategies for coping with sex work related stigma. Sexuality & Culture16(3): 209–229.
37.
LefebvreD (2020) Transgender women and the male gaze: gender, the body, and the pressure to conform. Master’s Thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
McLeanA (2012) New realm, new problems? Issues and support networks in online male sex work. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review8(2): 70.
40.
McLeanA (2015) “You can do it from your sofa”: the increasing popularity of the internet as a working site among male sex workers in Melbourne. Journal of Sociology51(4): 887–902.
41.
MalhotraASchulerSRBoenderC (2002) Measuring Women’s Empowerment As a Variable in International Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
42.
MarcianoA (2014) Living the VirtuReal: negotiating transgender identity in cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19(4): 824–838.
43.
MariënIProdnikJA (2014) Digital inclusion and user (dis) empowerment: a critical perspective. info16(6): 35–47.
44.
MarwickAEboydD (2010) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society13(1): 114–133.
45.
MillerJNicholsA (2012) Identity, sexuality and commercial sex among Sri Lankan nachchi. Sexualities15(5–6): 554–569.
46.
NguyenHChibAMahalingamR (2017) Mobile phones and gender empowerment: negotiating the essentialist-aspirational dialectic. Information Technologies & International Development13: 181–185.
47.
OchaWEarthB (2013) Identity diversification among transgender sex workers in Thailand’s sex tourism industry. Sexualities16(1–2): 195–216.
48.
PeiXChibA (2020) Defining mGender: the role of mobile phone use in gender construction processes. In: LingRFortunatiLGogginGLimSSLiY (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Mobile Communication, Culture, and Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 515–528.
49.
PeiXChibALingR (2021) Covert resistance beyond #MeToo: mobile practices of marginalized migrant women to negotiate sexual harassment in the workplace. Information, Communication & Society. Epub ahead of print 14February2021. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874036.
50.
PeterF (2003) Gender and the foundations of social choice: the role of situated agency. Feminist Economics9(2–3): 13–32.
51.
PezzuttoS (2019) From porn performer to porntropreneur: online entrepreneurship, social media branding, and selfhood in contemporary trans pornography. AG: about Gender8(16): 30–60.
52.
PhuaVCCarasA (2008) Personal brand in online advertisements: comparing White and Brazilian male sex workers. Sociological Focus41(3): 238–255.
53.
PowellAScottAJHenryN (2020) Digital harassment and abuse: experiences of sexuality and gender minority adults. European Journal of Criminology17(2): 199–223.
54.
PrinslooJ (2011) Negotiating transgender identities on the internet—a South African study. Agenda25(4): 30–41.
SamudziZMannellJ (2016) Cisgender male and transgender female sex workers in South Africa: gender variant identities and narratives of exclusion. Culture, Health & Sexuality18(1): 1–14.
57.
SandersT (2005) “It’s just acting”: sex workers’ strategies for capitalizing on sexuality. Gender, Work & Organization12(4): 319–342.
58.
SandersT (2008) Male sexual scripts: intimacy, sexuality and pleasure in the purchase of commercial sex. Sociology42(3): 400–417.
59.
SandersTScoularJCampbellR, et al. (2018) Internet Sex Work: Beyond the Gaze. Cham: Springer.
60.
SelkieEAdkinsVMastersE, et al. (2020) Transgender adolescents’ uses of social media for social support. Journal of Adolescent Health66(3): 275–280.
61.
SenA (1985) Well-being, agency and freedom: the Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy82(4): 169–221.
62.
SeranoJ (2007) Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity. Cypress, CA: Seal Press.
63.
SieblerK (2012) Transgender transitions: sex/gender binaries in the digital age. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health16(1): 74–99.
UrquhartCLehmannHMyersMD (2010) Putting the “theory” back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal20(4): 357–381.
66.
Van DeursenAJvan DijkJA (2015) Toward a multifaceted model of Internet access for understanding digital divides: an empirical investigation. The Information Society31(5): 379–391.
67.
VeenaN (2007) Revisiting the prostitution debate in the technology age: women who use the internet for sex work in Bangkok. Gender, Technology and Development11(1): 97–107.
WestbrookLSchiltK (2014) Doing gender, determining gender: transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society28(1): 32–57.
70.
WilliamsJ (2005) Measuring gender and women’s empowerment using confirmatory factor analysis. Population Program, Institute of Behavioural Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
71.
YavorskyJE (2016) Cisgendered organizations: trans women and inequality in the workplace. Sociological Forum31(4): 948–969.
