Our daily dealings with media products are shaped by the use of generic designations such as journalistic presentation modes, for example, news, commentary, and Instagram-story. Yet, scholarship has examined presentation modes only selectively and lacks empirical investigations in this domain. Based on literature and a quantitative content analysis of jury protocols of the German online journalism award “Grimme Online Award,” this article explores how presentation modes are constructed and further develops a framework for a categorization of presentation modes with eight dimensions: Content and Function, Author, Sources, Periodicity, Material Substrate, Structure, Media, and Interactive-Engagement Elements. This study is the first to empirically assess journalistic presentation mode dimensions and manifestations.
BatemanJA (2011) The decomposability of semiotic modes. In: O’HalloranKLSmithBA (eds) Multimodal Studies Multiple Approaches and Domains. London: Routledge, pp. 17–38.
5.
BatesMJ (1999) The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science50(12): 1043–1050.
6.
BergerBMattCSteiningerDM, et al. (2015) It is not just about competition with “free”: differences between content formats in consumer preferences and willingness to pay. Journal of Management Information Systems32(3): 105–128.
7.
BioccaFLevyMR (1995) Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality. New York: Routledge.
8.
BoomgaardenHBoukesMIorgoveanuA (2016) Image versus text: how newspaper reports affect evaluations of political candidates. International Journal of Communication10(27): 2529–2555.
9.
BucherH-JGloningTLehnenK (2010) Neue Medien—neue Formate: Ausdifferenzierung und Konvergenz in der Medienkommunikation. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
10.
CareyJW (1969) The communications revolution and the professional communicator. In: HalmosP (ed.) The Sociology of Mass-Media Communicators. Keele: University of Keele, pp. 23–38.
11.
CarlsonMRobinsonSLewisSC, et al. (2018) Journalism studies and its core commitments: the making of a communication field. Journal of Communication68(1): 6–25.
12.
ChapmanNChapmanJ (2009) Digital Multimedia. 3rd ed.Chichester: Wiley.
13.
CoddingtonM (2015) Clarifying journalism’s quantitative turn: a typology for evaluating data journalism, computational journalism, and computer-assisted reporting. Digital Journalism3(3): 331–348.
14.
CrowstonKWilliamsM (2000) Reproduced and emergent genres of communication on the world wide web. The Information Society16(3): 201–216.
15.
De SwertK (2012) Calculating Inter-Coder Reliability in Media Content Analysis using Krippendorff’s Alpha. Newark, DE: Center for Politics and Communication.
16.
DeuzeM (2003) The web and its journalisms: considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media & Society5(2): 203–230.
17.
Di EugenioBGlassM (2004) Squibs and discussions. The kappa statistic: a second look. Computational Linguistics30(1): 95–101.
18.
EngesserS (2014) Towards a classification of participatory news websites: comparing heuristic and empirical types. Digital Journalism2(4): 575–595.
19.
EricssonKASimonHA (1993) Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
FurnhamAGunterBGreenA (1990) Remembering science: the recall of factual information as a function of the presentation mode. Applied Cognitive Psychology4(3): 203–212.
21.
GodullaAWolfC (2018) Digitales storytelling—nutzererwartungen, usability, produktionsbedingungen und präsentation. In: NuernbergkCNeubergerC (eds) Journalismus im Internet. 2nd ed.. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 81–100.
22.
GreeneJCCaracelliVJGrahamWF (1989) Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis11(3): 255–274.
HardeeGM (2016) Immersive journalism in VR: four theoretical domains for researching a narrative design framework. In: LackeySShumakerR (eds) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. VAMR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9740. Cham: Springer, pp. 679–690.
28.
HayesAFKrippendorffK (2007) Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures1(1): 77–89.
29.
HeijnkS (2014) Die print-reportage: genrekonventionen aus reportersicht. Publizistik59(2): 135–157.
30.
HernandezRKRueJ (2016) The Principles of Multimedia Journalism—Packaging Digital News. London: Routledge.
31.
HiippalaT (2017) The multimodality of digital longform journalism. Digital Journalism5(4): 420–442.
32.
HoadTF (2003) The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
HooffackerG (2016) Online-Journalismus. Texten und Konzipieren für das internet. Ein Handbuch für Ausbildung und Praxis. 4th ed.Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
34.
HooffackerGMeierK (2017) La Roches Einführung in den praktischen Journalismus. Mit genauer Beschreibung aller Ausbildungswege Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
35.
JanowitzM (1975) Professional models in journalism: the gatekeeper and the advocate. Journalism Quarterly52(4): 618–626.
36.
KangSO’BrienEVillarrealA, et al. (2018) Immersive journalism and telepresence. Does virtual reality news use affect news credibility?Digital Journalism7(2): 294–313.
37.
KimKJSundarSS (2016) Mobile persuasion: can screen size and presentation mode make a difference to trust?Human Communication Research42(1): 45–70.
38.
KlaßNWellbrockCM (2021) When journalists become stars: drivers of human brand images and their influence on consumer intentions. Journal of Media Economics32(1–2): 35–55.
39.
KleemansMSchaapGSuijkerbuijkM (2017) Getting youngsters hooked on news: the effects of narrative news on information processing and appreciation in different age groups. Journalism Studies19(14): 2108–2125.
40.
KrippendorffK (1980) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. London: SAGE.
41.
La RocheWHooffackerGMeierK (2013) Einführung in den praktischen Journalismus: Mit genauer Beschreibung aller Ausbildungswege Deutschland—Österreich—Schweiz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
42.
LandisJRKochGG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics33(1): 159–174.
43.
Lassila-MerisaloM (2014) Story first—publishing narrative long-form journalism in digital environments. Journal of Magazine & New Media Research15(2): 1–15.
44.
LombardMSnyder-DuchJBrackenCC (2002) Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research28(4): 587–604.
45.
LoosenWAhvaLReimerJ, et al. (2020) “X Journalism.” Exploring journalism’s diverse meanings through the names we give it. Journalism. Epub ahead of print 12 August 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1464884920950090.
46.
LügerH-H (1983) Pressesprache. Berlin: De Gruyter.
47.
LuhmannN (1994) Die Realität der Massenmedien. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
48.
MachillMKöhlerSWaldhauserM (2007) The use of narrative structures in television news: an experiment in innovative forms of journalistic presentation. European Journal of Communication22(2): 185–205.
49.
MayringP (2015) Qualitative content analysis: theoretical background and procedures. In: Bikner-AhsbahsAKnippingCPresmegN (eds) Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 365–380.
50.
MichaelH (2017) Ein mediengattungstheoretischer Modellentwurf zur Beobachtung der Entgrenzung journalistischer Formate am Beispiel von „fake news shows“. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft65(2): 385–405.
51.
MitchelsteinEBoczkowskiPJ (2010) Online news consumption research: an assessment of past work and an agenda for the future. New Media & Society12(7): 1085–1102.
52.
Müller-StewensJSchlagerTHäublG, et al. (2017) Gamified information presentation and consumer adoption of product innovations. Journal of Marketing81(2): 8–24.
53.
NeubergerCKapernP (2013) Grundlagen des Journalismus. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
54.
OhJBellurSSundarSS (2018) Clicking, assessing, immersing, and sharing: an empirical model of user engagement with interactive media. Communication Research45(5): 737–763.
55.
PavlikJVBridgesF (2013) The emergence of augmented reality (AR) as a storytelling medium in journalism. Journalism & Communication Monographs15(1): 4–59.
56.
PüchelL (2019) Online content complexity: a conceptual framework to categorize and evaluate presentation modes. In: Proceedings of international conference on information systems, Munich, 15–18 December.
57.
PüschelU (1992) Von der Pyramide zum Cluster. Textsorten und Textsortenmischung in Fernsehnachrichten. In: Hess-LüttichEWB (ed.) Medienkultur—Kulturkonflikt. Massenmedien in der Interkulturellen und Internationalen Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 233–258.
SantiniM (2007) Characterizing genres of web pages: genre hybridism and individualization. In: 40th Hawaii International international conference on systems science (HICSS-40 2007), CD-ROM/Abstracts Proceedings, Waikoloa, HI, 3–6 January 2007.
60.
Schäfer-HockC (2018) Entstehung und Entwicklung der Darstellungsformen. In: Schäfer-HockC (ed.) Journalistische Darstellungsformen im Wandel. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 107–159.
61.
SchmidtSJWeischenbergS (1994) Mediengattungen, Berichterstattungsmuster, Darstellungsformen. In: MertenKSchmidtSJWeischenbergS (eds) Die Wirklichkeit der Medien. Wiesbaden: Springer VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 212–236.
62.
SchumacherP (2009) Multimedia, Multimodalität und Crossmedia. Rezeption als Interaktion: Wahrnehmung und Nutzung multimodaler Darstellungsformen im Online-Journalismus. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
63.
ShapiroI (2014) Why democracies need a functional definition of journalism now more than ever. Journalism Studies15(5): 555–565.
64.
SimmlerF (1993) Zum Verhältnis von publizistischen Gattungen und linguistischen Textsorten. Zeitschrift für Germanistik3(2): 349–363.
65.
SommerCvon RimschaMB (2014) Jenseits von traditionellen Mediengattungen: die transmediale Angebotsmatrix. In: RauH (ed.) Digitale Dämmerung. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, pp. 245–264.
SturmS (2013) Digitales Storytelling. Eine Einführung in neue Formen des Qualitätsjournalismus. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
68.
Van CauwenbergeAd’HaenensLBeentjesH (2015) How to take advantage of tablet computers: effects of news structure on recall and comprehension. Communications40(4): 425–446.
69.
VeglisA (2012) Journalism and cross-media publishing: the case of Greece. In: SiaperaEVeglisA (eds) The Handbook of Global Online Journalism. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 209–230.
70.
WagnerH (1988) Vermittlungsverfassung in der Massenkommunikation. Zeitungswissenschaftliche Theorie der journalistischen und publizistischen Darstellungsformen. In: LangenbacherWR (ed.) Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Ein Textbuch zur Einführung in ihre Teildisziplinen. 2nd ed.Wilhelm Braumüller, pp. 182–189.
71.
WebsterJWatsonR (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly26(2): xiii–xxiii.
72.
WellbrockCMKleinK (2014) Journalistische Qualität–eine empirische Untersuchung des Konstrukts mithilfe der Concept Map Methode. Publizistik59(4): 387–410.
73.
WellbrockCMWolframM (2019) Effects of journalism awards as quality signals on demand. Journalism. Epub ahead of print 23 September 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1464884919876223.
74.
WidholmAAppelgrenE (2020) A softer kind of hard news? Data journalism and the digital renewal of public service news in Sweden. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 30 November. DOI: 10.1177/1461444820975411.
75.
WolfCGodullaA (2015) Onlinemedien und Hintergrundinformation: Nutzererwartungen. Medienrepertoires mobiler Internetnutzer und ihre Erwartungen an Scrollytelling, Webdokumentationen und Multimediastorys. Media Perspektiven5: 241–249.
76.
YangFShenF (2017) Effects of web interactivity: a meta-analysis. Communication Research45(5): 635–658.
77.
YangJGrabeME (2011) Knowledge acquisition gaps: a comparison of print versus online news sources. New Media & Society13(8): 1211–1227.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
