Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-9
Transnational familyhood in times of imposed separation: How the US-based Iranian students use ICTs to enact relationships with their parents after the Travel Ban
This study employs polymedia theory to analyze how Iranian students use information communication technologies (ICTs) to sustain relationships with their homeland-based parents under extended separation caused by the Travel Ban or Muslim Ban. The study draws on in-depth interviews to analyze the impact of the Ban on child-parent relationships in the context of the following three consequences of polymedia: sociality, power distribution, and emotional expression. Findings reveal that prolonged separation combined with how students and parents use ICTs shift the established cultural norms. Students use ICTs to represent their personas selectively and practice ambient concealing. The reversed asymmetry in relational power distribution grants them greater relationship control. Students also actively engage in dialogues with their parents to compensate for their absence. This study extends the existing research by examining how cultural norms influence the use of ICTs in distance relationships, and by turning attention to political factors exacerbating family separation.
AssadiSMZokaeiNKavianiH, et al. (2007) Effect of sociocultural context and parenting style on scholastic achievement among Iranian adolescents. Social Development16(1): 169–180.
2.
AzadarmakiTBaharM (2006) Families in Iran: changes, challenges and future. Journal of Comparative Family Studies37(4): 589–608.
3.
BaldassarL (2008) Missing kin and longing to be together: emotions and the construction of co-presence in transnational relationships. Journal of Intercultural Studies29(3): 247–266.
4.
BaldassarLNedelcuMMerlaL, et al. (2016) ICT-based co-presence in transnational families and communities: challenging the premise of face-to-face proximity in sustaining relationships. Global Networks16(2): 133–144.
5.
BarakjiFMaguireKCReissH, et al. (2019) Cultural and transnational influences on the use of information communication technologies in adult long-distance family relationships: an extension of media multiplexity theory. Journal of Family Communication19(1): 30–46.
6.
BorisovaE (2016) Parenting at a distance: transnational practices in migrant families from Tajikistan. Forum for Anthropology & Culture12: 125–137.
de BruinJ (2017) New Zealand migrants, polymedia and the ambivalences of staying in touch. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies25(3): 479–495.
9.
GonzalezCKatzVS (2016) Transnational family communication as a driver of technology adoption. International Journal of Communication10(21): 2683–2703.
10.
GubriumJFHolsteinJAMarvastiAB, et al. (eds) (2012) The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
HamedaniNGPurvisTMGlazerS, et al. (2012) Ways of manifesting collectivism: an analysis of Iranian and African cultures. Available at: https://mdsoar.org/handle/11603/7293
12.
HofstedeGHofstedeGJMinkovM (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival. Johanneshov: MTM.
13.
JavidanMDastmalchianA (2003) Culture and leadership in Iran: the land of individual achievers, strong family ties, and powerful elite. Academy of Management Perspectives17(4): 127–142.
14.
JavidanMHouseRJDorfmanPW, et al. (2006) Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: a comparative review of GLOBE’s and Hofstede’s approaches. Journal of International Business Studies37(6): 897–914.
15.
KarandashevV (2015) A cultural perspective on romantic love. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture5(4): 1–21.
16.
KarrakerMW (2015) Global families in a digital age. In: BrussC (ed.) Family Communication in the Age of Digital and Social Media. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 55–75.
17.
LambtonAKS (1954) Persian Vocabulary. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
18.
LindlofTRTaylorBC (2011) Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
MadianouM (2014) Smartphones as polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19(3): 667–680.
20.
MadianouM (2016) Ambient co-presence: transnational family practices in polymedia environments. Global Networks16(2): 183–201.
21.
MadianouMMillerD (2012) Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. London: Routledge.
22.
MadianouMMillerD (2013) Polymedia: towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies16(2): 169–187.
23.
MarwickAEBoydD (2014) Networked privacy: how teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society16(7): 1051–1067.
24.
NedelcuMWyssM (2016) “Doing family” through ICT-mediated ordinary co-presence: transnational communication practices of Romanian migrants in Switzerland. Global Networks16(2): 202–218.
25.
PengY (2016) Student migration and polymedia: mainland Chinese students’ communication media use in Hong Kong. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(14): 2395–2412.
26.
ShareMWilliamsCKerrinsL (2018) Displaying and performing: Polish transnational families in Ireland Skyping grandparents in Poland. New Media & Society20(8): 3011–3028.
27.
SheykhiMT (2009) Children as a source of happiness within the Iranian families: profiles and challenges. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations3(11): 526–531.
YumYCanaryDJ (2009) Cultural differences in equity theory predictions of relational maintenance strategies. Human Communication Research35(3): 384–406.
