Despite the ubiquitous use of social media platforms by people of all ages, there is limited synthesis of evidence on their effect on family connectedness. This systematic review assesses the quantitative evidence around relationship between social media use and family connectedness. We searched articles published between January 2010 and April 2020. Nine of the 14 included studies examined the effect of social media on parent-child communication, while the rest explored the effect on broader family relationships. Overall evidence is mixed, highlighting some aspects of social media use that may strengthen family connectedness, while others that may negatively impact meaningful interactions within families. This review illustrates the complex nature of this research domain with limited consensus on how to measure family connectedness in context of social media use. We discuss the limitations of the studies and the greater need for high-quality research in the fast-paced world of social media.
AbelSMachinTBrownlowC (2020) Social media, rituals, and long-distance family relationship maintenance: a mixed-methods systematic review. New Media & Society23: 632–654.
2.
AljehaniHA (2019) Impact of social media on social value systems among university students in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Education and Practice7: 216–229.
3.
AllcottHGentzkowMYuC (2019) Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research & Politics. Epub ahead of print 9 May 2019. DOI: 10.1177/2053168019848554.
4.
BallHWanzerMBServossTJ (2013) Parent-child communication on Facebook: family communication patterns and young adults’ decisions to “friend” parents. Communication Quarterly61: 615–629.
5.
BanduraA (2006) Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents5: 307–337.
6.
BarrieCKBartkowskiJPHaverdaT (2019) The digital divide among parents and their emerging adult children: intergenerational accounts of technologically assisted family communication. Social Sciences8: 1–30.
7.
BrennanKAClarkCLShaverPR (1998) Self-report measurement of adult attachment: an integrative overview. In: SimpsonJARholesWS (eds) Attachment Theory and Close Relationships. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 46–76.
8.
BuchananCMMaccobyEEDornbuschSM (1991) Caught between parents: adolescents’ experience in divorced homes. Child Development62: 1008–1029.
9.
BurkeMAdamicLAMarciniakK (2013) Families on Facebook. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on weblogs and social media, ICWSM, pp. 41–50. Available at: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14386
10.
CarrCTHayesRA (2015) Social media: defining, developing, and divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication23: 46–65.
11.
ChildJTWestermannDA (2013) Let’s be Facebook friends: exploring parental Facebook friend requests from a Communication Privacy Management (CPM) perspective. Journal of Family Communication13: 46–59.
12.
ChildJTDuckARAndrewsLA, et al. (2015) Young adults’ management of privacy on Facebook with multiple generations of family members. Journal of Family Communication15: 349–367.
DobbsS (2020) Connected: Social Media Use and Quality Family Time. Long Beach, CA: California State University.
15.
DotyJDworkinJ (2014) Parents’ of adolescents use of social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior33: 349–355.
16.
DrouinMMcDanielBTPaterJ, et al. (2020) How parents and their children used social media and technology at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and associations with anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. Epub ahead of print 6 November 2020. DOI: 10.1089/CYBER.2020.0284.
17.
DworkinJHesselHLeBouefS (2019) The use of communication technology in the context of adolescent and family development: an integration of family and media theories. Journal of Family Theory & Review11: 510–523.
18.
DworkinJRudiJHHesselH (2018) The state of family research and social media. Journal of Family Theory & Review10: 796–813.
19.
FraleyRCWallerNGBrennanKA (2000) An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78: 350.
20.
FurmanWBuhrmesterD (1985) Children’s perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology21: 1016.
21.
FussBGDorstynDWardL (2019) Computer-mediated communication and social support among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of cross-sectional data. Australasian Journal on Ageing38: e103–e113.
HesselHDworkinJ (2018) Emerging adults’ use of communication technology with family members: a systematic review. Adolescent Research Review3: 357–373.
25.
HustonTLMcHaleSMCrouterAC (1986) When the honeymoon’s over: changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In: GilmoreRDuckS (eds) The Emerging Field of Personal Relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 109–132.
26.
KanterMAfifiTRobbinsS (2012) The impact of parents ‘friending’ their young adult child on Facebook on perceptions of parental privacy invasions and parent–child relationship quality. Journal of Communication62: 900–917.
27.
KaplanMSánchezMBradleyL (2015) Conceptual frameworks and practical applications to connect generations in the technoscape. Anthropology & Aging36: 182–205.
28.
KelesBMcCraeNGrealishA (2020) A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth25: 79–93.
KoernerAFFitzpatrickMA (2002) Toward a theory of family communication. Communication Theory12: 70–91.
31.
LeeY-HYuanCW (2020) The privacy calculus of ‘friending’ across multiple social media platforms. Social Media+ Society. Epub ahead of print 16 June 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2056305120928478.
32.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ, et al. (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology62: e1–e34.
LopezAGCuarterosKG (2020) Exploring the effects of social media on interpersonal communication among family members. Canadian Journal of Family and Youth12: 66–80.
35.
MasciantonioABourguignonDBouchatP, et al. (2020) Don’t put all social network sites in one basket: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok and their relations with well-being.
36.
MatassiMBoczkowskiPJMitchelsteinE (2019) Domesticating WhatsApp: family, friends, work, and study in everyday communication. New Media & Society21: 2183–2200.
37.
MoolaSMunnZTufanaruC, et al. (2017) Chapter 7: systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In: AromatarisEMunnA (eds) Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual. Adelaide, SA, Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute, pp. 2019–2005.
38.
MullenCHamiltonNF (2016) Adolescents’ response to parental Facebook friend requests: the comparative influence of privacy management, parent-child relational quality, attitude and peer influence. Computers in Human Behavior60: 165–172.
39.
NouwensMGriggioCFMackayWE (2017) “WhatsApp is for family; Messenger is for friends” communication places in app ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, CO, 6–11 May, pp. 727–735. New York: ACM.
40.
Padilla-WalkerLMCoyneSM (2011) ‘Turn that thing off!’ parent and adolescent predictors of proactive media monitoring. Journal of Adolescence34: 705–715.
41.
Padilla-WalkerLMCoyneSMFraserAM (2012) Getting a high-speed family connection: associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations61: 426–440.
42.
PetronioS (1994) Privacy binds in family interactions: the case of parental privacy invasion. In: CupachWRSpitzbergBH (eds) LEA’s communication series: The dark side of interpersonal communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 241–257.
PrimeHWadeMBrowneDT (2020) Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist75: 631–643.
46.
ProcenteseFGattiFDi NapoliI (2019) Families and social media use: the role of parents’ perceptions about social media impact on family systems in the relationship between family collective efficacy and open communication. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health16: 5006.
47.
RamseyMAGentzlerALMoreyJN, et al. (2013) College students’ use of communication technology with parents: comparisons between two cohorts in 2009 and 2011. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking16: 747–752.
48.
RobinsonCCMandlecoBOlsenSF, et al. (2001) The parenting styles and dimensions questionnaire (PSDQ). Handbook of Family Measurement Techniques3: 319–321.
RussellDPeplauLACutronaCE (1980) The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39: 472.
SiibakATammeV (2013) ‘Who introduced Granny to Facebook?’: an exploration of everyday family interactions in web-based communication environments. Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook11: 71–89.
53.
TanisMvan der LouwMBuijzenM (2017) From empty nest to social networking site: what happens in cyberspace when children are launched from the parental home?Computers in Human Behavior68: 56–63.
54.
ValkenburgPMPeterJ (2007) Online communication and adolescent well-being: testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12: 1169–1182.
55.
WangMPChuJTWViswanathK, et al. (2015) Using information and communication technologies for family communication and its association with family well-being in Hong Kong: FAMILY Project. Journal of Medical Internet Research17: e207.
56.
WoolleySCHowardPN (2018) Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
YuRPMcCammonRJEllisonNB, et al. (2016) The relationships that matter: social network site use and social wellbeing among older adults in the United States of America. Ageing & Society36: 1826–1852.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
