As a consequence of children’s nearly ubiquitous smartphone use, many parents experience resignation or frustration due to a perceived loss of control over their child’s excessive smartphone activities. This perceived lack of control may not only increase children’s risk of exposure to online harassment but also affect the relationship between parents and children—both crucial influence factors for children’s self-esteem. We tested these relationships using a two-wave panel study of children between 10 and 14 years (NT2 = 384) and one of their parents. Findings revealed that parental lack of control over their child’s smartphone use increased the risk of children becoming victims of online harassment and decreased children’s perceived parental support over time. However, while lower perceived parental control decreased children’s self-esteem over time, exposure to online harassment did not. We discuss implications of these findings for intervention and prevention of parental lack of control over children’s smartphone use.
AdachiPWilloughbyT (2015) Interpreting effect sizes when controlling for stability effects in longitudinal autoregressive models: implications for psychological science. European Journal of Developmental Psychology12(1): 116–128.
BanduraA (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. New York: Prentice Hall, Inc.
4.
BanduraA (1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist44(9): 1175–1184.
5.
BaumrindD (1967) Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs75(1): 43–88.
6.
BeanRABushKRMcKenryPC, et al (2003) The impact of parental support, behavioral control, and psychological control on the academic achievement and self-esteem of African American and European American adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research18(5): 523–541.
7.
BleakleyAEllithorpeMRomerD (2016) The role of parents in problematic internet use among US adolescents. Media and Communication4(3): 24–34.
8.
BogenschneiderKSmallSATsayJC (1997) Child, parent, and contextual influences on perceived parenting competence among parents of adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Family2: 345–362.
9.
Boudreault-BouchardAMDionJHainsJ, et al (2013) Impact of parental emotional support and coercive control on adolescents’ self-esteem and psychological distress: results of a four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence36(4): 695–704.
10.
BulandaREMajumdarD (2009) Perceived parent–child relations and adolescent self-esteem. Journal of Child and Family Studies18(2): 203–212.
11.
ByrneSKatzSJLeeT, et al (2014) Peers, predators, and porn: predicting parental underestimation of children’s risky online experiences. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication19(2): 215–231.
12.
ChenLHoSSLwinMO (2017) A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: from the social cognitive and media effects approach. new media & society19: 1194–1213.
13.
ChoYKYooJW (2017) Cyberbullying, internet and SNS usage types, and perceived social support: a comparison of different age groups. Information, Communication & Society20(10): 1464–1481.
14.
ColemanPKKarrakerKH (1998) Self-efficacy and parenting quality: findings and future applications. Developmental Review18(1): 47–85.
15.
DeHartTPelhamBWTennenH (2006) What lies beneath: parenting style and implicit self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology42(1): 1–17.
16.
EganSKPerryDG (1998) Does low self-regard invite victimization?Developmental Psychology34(2): 299–309.
17.
ElsaesserCRussellBOhannessianCM, et al (2017) Parenting in a digital age: a review of parents’ role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior35: 62–72.
18.
EricksonLBWisniewskiPXuH, et al (2015) The boundaries between: parental involvement in a teen’s online world. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67: 1384–1403.
19.
EriksonE (1968) Identity: youth and Crisis Erik H. Erikson. Norton, New York, 1968. 336 pp. Cloth, $6.95; paper, $2.95. Science3838: 257–258.
20.
EvansCBSmokowskiPRCotterKL (2014) Cumulative bullying victimization: an investigation of the dose–response relationship between victimization and the associated mental health outcomes, social supports, and school experiences of rural adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review44: 256–264.
21.
Gámez-GuadixMOrueISmithPK, et al (2013) Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic internet use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health53(4): 446–452.
22.
GómezPHarrisSKBarreiroC, et al (2017) Profiles of Internet use and parental involvement, and rates of online risks and problematic Internet use among Spanish adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior75: 826–833.
23.
HarterS (1999) The Construction of the Self: A Developmental Perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
24.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
25.
HuverRMEOttenRde VriesH, et al (2010) Personality and parenting style in parents of adolescents. Journal of Adolescence33: 395–402.
26.
IzzoCWeissLShanahanT, et al (2000) Parental self-efficacy and social support as predictors of parenting practices and children’s socioemotional adjustment in Mexican immigrant families. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community20(1-2): 197–213.
27.
JensenMGeorgeMJRussellMR, et al (2019) Young adolescents’ digital technology use and mental health symptoms: little evidence of longitudinal or daily linkages. Clinical Psychological Science7(6): 1416–1433.
28.
JonesTLPrinzRJ (2005) Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: a review. Clinical Psychology Review25(3): 341–363.
29.
KhuranaABleakleyAJordanAB, et al (2015) The protective effects of parental monitoring and internet restriction on adolescents’ risk of online harassment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence44(5): 1039–1047.
30.
KorchmarosJDMitchellKJYbarraML (2014) Technology-based interpersonal victimization: predictors of patterns of victimization over time. Journal of Interpersonal Violence29(7): 1297–1317.
31.
LeeSJ (2013) Parental restrictive mediation of children’s internet use: effective for what and for whom?new media & society15(4): 466–481.
32.
LeungL (2014) Predicting Internet risks: a longitudinal panel study of gratifications-sought, Internet addiction symptoms, and social media use among children and adolescents. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine2(1): 424–439.
33.
LivingstoneSHelsperE (2008) Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media52(4): 581–599.
34.
LloydTHastingsRP (2009) Parental locus of control and psychological well-being in mothers of children with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability34(2): 104–115.
35.
MalmEKHenrichCVarjasK, et al (2017) Parental self-efficacy and bullying in elementary school. Journal of School Violence16(4): 411–425.
36.
MartínezIMurguiSGarcíaOF, et al (2019) Parenting in the digital era: protective and risk parenting styles for traditional bullying and cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior90: 84–92.
37.
MartinsNMaresMLNathansonAI (2019) Mixed messages: inconsistent parental mediation indirectly predicts teens’ online relational aggression. Journal of Family Communication19(4): 311–328.
38.
MatthesJThomasMFStevicA, et al. (2021) Fighting over smartphones? Parents’ excessive smartphone use, lack of control over children’s use, and conflict. Computers in Human Behavior116: 106618.
39.
MaySBigelowC (2005) Modeling nonlinear dose-response relationships in epidemiologic studies: statistical approaches and practical challenges. Dose-response3: 474–490.
OjedaMDel ReyRHunterSC (2019) Longitudinal relationships between sexting and involvement in both bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of Adolescence77: 81–89.
42.
PalermitiALServidioRBartoloMG, et al (2017) Cyberbullying and self-esteem: an Italian study. Computers in Human Behavior69: 136–141.
43.
PalladinoBENocentiniAMenesiniE (2015) Psychometric properties of the florence cyberbullying-cybervictimization scales. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking18: 112–119.
44.
PatchinJWHindujaS (2010) Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of School Health80(12): 614–621.
45.
Ravens-SiebererUBullingerM (1998) Assessing health related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: first psychometric and content-analytical results. Quality of Life Research7(5): 399–407.
46.
ReineckeLTrepteS (2014) Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: a two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior30: 95–102.
47.
RobertsREBengtsonVL (1993) Relationships with parents, self-esteem, and psychological well-being in young adulthood. Social Psychology Quarterly56: 263–277.
48.
Rodríguez-de-DiosIvan OostenJMIgartuaJJ (2018) A study of the relationship between parental mediation and adolescents’ digital skills, online risks and online opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior82: 186–198.
RyanRMLynchJH (1989) Emotional autonomy versus detachment: revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood. Child development60(2): 340–356.
51.
SassonHMeschG (2014) Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior33: 32–38.
52.
Schnauber-StockmannAKarnowskiV (2020) Mobile devices as tools for media and communication research: a scoping review on collecting self-report data in repeated measurement designs. Communication Methods and Measures14(3): 145–163.
53.
SchwarzerRSchulzU (2013) Berlin Social Support Scales (BSSS). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Available at: www.midss.ie
54.
SmithPKJMahdaviMCarvalhoS, et al (2008) Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry49: 376–385.
55.
SmokowskiPREvansCBRCotterKL (2014) The differential impacts of episodic, chronic, and cumulative physical bullying and cyberbullying: the effects of victimization on the school experiences, social support, and mental health of rural adolescents. Violence and Victims29(6): 1029–1046.
56.
TantiCStukasAAHalloranMJ, et al (2011) Social identity change: shifts in social identity during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence34(3): 555–567.
57.
ValkenburgPMPeterJSchoutenAP (2006) Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior9(5): 584–590.
58.
YaoMZZhongZ (2014) Loneliness, social contacts and Internet addiction: a cross-lagged panel study. Computers in Human Behavior30: 164–170.
59.
YbarraMLMitchellKJ (2004) Youth engaging in online harassment: associations with caregiver–child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. Journal of Adolescence27(3): 319–336.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
