Despite popular interest in reality television, social media, and self-branding, much scholarship focuses on a single platform and places the burden of self-branding on the individual alone. Drawing on 6 years of research into the Real Housewives (RH) franchise and interviews with “Housewives,” I focus on the women’s performances of identity and self-branding across platforms. This article demonstrates that the women of RH become experts at working the system that exploits them via a form of labor I conceptualize as “emotional camping.” Successfully branded “Housewives” tend to be (1) dedicated to Bravo, (2) inclined to present as walking GIFs on Instagram, and (3) seemingly authentic. I argue this self-branding strategy affords these women a semblance of privacy in their highly public careers. These findings are a critique of and feminist mediation into the legitimate labor reality stars do for networks and themselves across platforms.
AbidinC (2016) “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?” Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media+ Society2(2): 2056305116641342.
2.
AndrejevicM (2004) RTV: The Work of Being Watched. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
3.
AngI (1985) Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. London: Routledge.
4.
ArcyJ (2018) The digital money shot: Twitter wars, the Real Housewives, and transmedia storytelling. Celebrity Studies9(4): 487–502.
5.
Banet-WeiserS (2018) Postfeminism and popular feminism. Feminist Media Histories4(2): 152–156.
6.
Banet-WeiserSPortwood-StacerL (2006) “I just want to be me again!” Beauty pageants, reality television and post-feminism. Feminist Theory7(2): 255–272.
7.
BielbyDDHarringtonCL (2008) Global TV: Exporting Television and Culture in the World Market. New York: New York University Press.
8.
BoorstinD (1962) The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-events in America. New York: Vintage.
9.
BoylornRM (2008) As seen on TV: an autoethnographic reflection on race and reality television. Critical Studies in Media Communication25(4): 413–433.
10.
BunaiD (2014) If this is a “real” housewife, who are all these women around me? An examination of the Real Housewives of Atlanta and the persistence of historically stereotypical images of black women in popular reality television, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
11.
ChunWHK (2017) Updating to Remain the Same: Habitual New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
CollinsS (2008) Making the most out of 15 minutes: Reality TV’s dispensable celebrity. Television & New Mediab9(2): 87–110.
13.
CottinghamMDEricksonRJDiefendorffJM (2015) Examining men’s status shield and status bonus: how gender frames the emotional labor and job satisfaction of nurses. Sex Roles72(7–8): 377–389.
14.
CoxNB (2014) Bravo’s “the Real Housewives”: living the (capitalist) American dream. In: SladeAFNarroNJBuchananBP (eds) Reality Television: Oddities of Culture. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 77–100.
15.
CurnuttH (2011) Durable participants: a generational approach to RTV’s “ordinary” labor pool. Media, Culture & Society33(7): 1061–1076.
16.
DominguezP (2015) “I’m very rich, bitch!”: the melodramatic money shot and the excess of racialized gendered affect in the Real Housewives docusoaps. Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies30(1): 155–183.
17.
DubrofskyR (2011) The Surveillance of Women on Reality Television: Watching the Bachelor and the Bachelorette. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
18.
DuffyBE (2016) The romance of work: gender and aspirational labour in the digital culture industries. International Journal of Cultural Studies19(4): 441–457.
19.
EricksonRJRitterC (2001) Emotional labor, burnout, and inauthenticity: does gender matter?Social Psychology Quarterly64(2): 146–163.
20.
GillR (2007) Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity.
21.
GillR (2016) Post-postfeminism? New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times. Feminist Media Studies16(4): 610–630.
22.
GrindstaffLMurrayS (2015) Reality celebrity: branded affect and the emotion economy. Public Culture27(1(75)): 109–135.
23.
HardtMNegriA (2004) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin.
24.
HawleyAC (2014) An image rarely seen: the Real Housewives of Atlanta and the televisual image of the African American woman. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Iowa’s Institutional Repository, Iowa City, IA.
25.
HearnA (2016) Witches and bitches: reality television, housewifization and the new hidden abode of production. European Journal of Cultural Studies20(1): 10–24.
26.
HenshellRL (2011) An analysis of season two of the Real Housewives of New Jersey. Master of Science Thesis. Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
27.
HochschildA (2012 [1983]) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28.
JarrettK (2015) Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. New York: Routledge.
29.
JenkinsH (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
30.
JohnsonRTreleaseR (2018) Glocalization, hard-won status, and performative femininity: a case study of the Real Housewives format. Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture3(2): 324–341.
31.
KellnerD (2011) Cultural studies, multiculturalism, and media culture. In: DinesGHumezJM (eds) Gender, Race, and Class in Media: A Critical Reader. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 7–18.
32.
KhamisSAngLWellingR (2016) Self-branding, “micro-celebrity” and the rise of Social Media Influencers. Celebrity Studies8: 191–208.
33.
LeeMJMoscowitzL (2013) The “rich bitch” class and gender on the Real Housewives of New York City. Feminist Media Studies13(1): 64–82.
34.
LevyY (2018) Serial housewives: the feminist resistance of the Real Housewives’ matrixial structure. Continuum32(3): 370–380.
35.
LittlerJ (2004) Making fame ordinary: intimacy, reflexivity and “keeping it real.”Mediactive2: 8–25.
36.
MarwickA (2013) Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McRobbieA (2009) The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: SAGE.
39.
MiltnerKMHighfieldT (2017) Never gonna GIF you up: analyzing the cultural significance of the animated GIF. Social Media+ Society3(3): 2056305117725223.
40.
NayarKI (2015) You did (n’t) build that: audience reception of a reality television star’s transformation from a Real Housewife to a real brand. The Journal of Popular Culture48(1): 3–16.
41.
PsarrasE (2014) We all want to be big stars: the desire for fame and the draw to the Real Housewives. Clothing Cultures2(1): 51–72.
42.
SenftT (2013) Microcelebrity and the branded self. In: HartleyJBurgessJBrunsA (eds) A Companion to New Media Dynamics. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 346–354.
43.
SkeggsB (2009) The moral economy of person production: the class relations of self-performance on “reality” television. The Sociological Review57(4): 626–644.
44.
SontagS (1964) Notes on camp. In: Cleto F (ed) Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject: A Reader. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 53–56.
45.
SquiresL (2014) Class and productive avoidance in the Real Housewives reunions. Discourse, Context & Media6: 33–44.
46.
TurnerG (2006) The mass production of celebrity “celetoids,” RTV and the “demotic turn.”International Journal of Cultural Studies9(2): 153–165.
47.
WoodcockJJohnsonMR (2019) The affective labor and performance of live streaming on Twitch. tv. Television & New Media20(8): 813–823.
48.
WoodsF (2014) Classed femininity, performativity, and camp in British structured reality programming. Television & New Media15(3): 197–214.
