Access shrugged: The decline of the copyleft and the rise of utilitarian openness

Abstract

This article maps patterns of interest in key terms associated with copyright and online culture in the US context. Using exploratory factor analysis of data from Google Trends, authors examined patterns in keyword searches between 2004 and 2019. The data show three distinct periods of interest. The first period consists of utopian, cause-driven search terms; the second marks a rise and eventual decline in creatively motivated, maker-fueled searches; and the third is characterized by rising utilitarian and institutional interest in accessible copyrighted material. These data show empirically that the public curiosity about alternatives to strict copyright have changed during the study period. Earlier, more idealistic movements contrast with later, more practical approaches.

Keywords

Copyleft copyright creative commons digital media fair use law and society open license open source remix search trends

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adema

Hall

(2013) The political nature of the book: on artists’ books and radical open access. New Formations 78(1): 138–156.

Anderson

(1991) Imagined Communities. London: Verso.

Aufderheide

Jaszi

(2018) Reclaiming Fair Use: How to Put Balance Back in Copyright. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL; London: The University of Chicago Press.

Aufderheide

Sinnreich

Silvernail

(2019) Norms-shifting for digital and online arts practice: copyright and fair use in the visual arts community. Visual Arts Research 45(2): 91–108.

Bollier

(2001) Public Assets, Private Profits: Reclaiming the American Commons in an Age of Market Enclosure. Washington, DC: New America Foundation.

Bollier

(2002) Why the Public Domain Matters: The Endangered Wellspring of Creativity, Commerce and Democracy. Washington, DC: New America Foundation: Public Knowledge.

Bollier

(2008) Viral Spiral: How the Commoners Built a Digital Republic of Their Own. New York: New Press.

Bollier

Watts

(2002) Saving the Information Commons: A Public Interest Agenda in Digital Media. Washington, DC: New America Foundation: Public Knowledge.

Boyle

(1996) Shamans, Software, and Spleen: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

10.

Boyle

(2008) The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

11.

Bridy

(2012) Copyright policymaking as procedural democratic process: a discourse theoretic perspective on ACTA, SOPA, and PIPA. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 30: 153–164.

12.

Bridy

(2016) Copyright’s digital deputies: DMCA-plus enforcement by internet intermediaries. In: Rothchild

(ed.) Research Handbook on Electronic Commerce Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 185–208.

13.

Coleman

(2012) Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

14.

C-Span (2000) The future of digital music. Available at: https://www.c-span.org/video/?158178-1/future-digital-music (accessed 7 June 2019).

15.

Cunningham

Craig

(2018) Social Media Entertainment: The New Intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley. New York: New York University Press.

16.

Decherney

(2012) Hollywood’s Copyright Wars: From Edison to the Internet. New York: Columbia University Press.

17.

Dewey

(1927) The Public and Its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.

18.

DiBona

Ockman

(1999) Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

19.

Eghbal

(2016) Roads and bridges: the unseen labor behind our digital infrastructure. Available at: https://www.fordfoundation.org/about/library/reports-and-studies/roads-and-bridges-the-unseen-labor-behind-our-digital-infrastructure/ (accessed 7 June 2019).

20.

Ellery

Vaughn

Ellery

, et al. (2008) Understanding internet health search patterns: an early exploration into the usefulness of Google Trends. Journal of Communication in Healthcare 1(4): 441–456.

21.

Ewick

Silbey

(1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Fisher

(2004) Promises to Keep: Technology, Law, and the Future of Entertainment. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law and Politics.

23.

Gillespie

(2007) Wired Shut: Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

24.

Gillespie

(2009) Characterizing copyright in the classroom: the cultural work of antipiracy campaigns. Communication, Culture and Critique 2(3): 274–318.

25.

Gillespie

(2018) Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

26.

Herman

(2013) The Fight Over Digital Rights: The Politics of Copyright and Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

27.

Hyde

(2010) Common as Air: Revolution, Art, and Ownership. 1st ed. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

28.

Internet Society (2019) Global Internet Report: Consolidation in the Internet Economy. Washington, DC: Internet Society. Available at: https://future.internetsociety.org/2019/

29.

Kaplan

Miller

Geik

(2005) An Unhurried View of Copyright, Republished (And with Contributions from Friends). Newark, NJ: LexisNexis/Matthew Bender.

30.

Karaganis

(2011) Media Piracy in Emerging Economies. New York: Social Science Research Council.

31.

Kim

Lahiri

Dey

(2018) The “invisible hand” of piracy: an economic analysis of the information-goods supply chain. MIS Quarterly 42(4): 1117–1141.

32.

Kiousis

(2004) Explicating media salience: a factor analysis of New York Times issue coverage during the 2000 US presidential election. Journal of Communication 54(1): 71–87.

33.

Kline

(1994) An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. London: Routledge.

34.

Kohring

Matthes

(2007) Trust in news media: development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Communication Research 34(2): 231–252.

35.

Krikorian

Kapczynski

(2010) Access to Knowledge in the Age of Intellectual Property. New York: Zone Books.

36.

Lardner

(1987) Fast Forward: Hollywood, the Japanese, and the Onslaught of the VCR. 1st ed. New York: Norton.

37.

Lee

(2018) Purchase, pirate, publicize: private-network music sharing and market album sales. Information Economics and Policy 42: 35–55.

38.

Lessig

(1999) Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.

39.

Lessig

(2004) Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin Press.

40.

Lessig

(2006) Code: Version 2.0. 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.

41.

Leval

(1990) Toward a fair use standard. Harvard Law Review 103(5): 1105–1136.

42.

Litman

(2006) Digital Copyright. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

43.

Loten

(2019) IBM strengthens hybrid cloud with Red Hat acquisition. The Wall Street Journal, 12 July. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/ibm-strengthens-hybrid-cloud-with-red-hat-acquisition-11562967857 (accessed 23 September 2019).

44.

Lucibella

(2015) National Science Foundation issues open access policy. APS News. Available at: https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/updates/access.cfm (accessed 3 June 2019).

45.

McLeod

(2005) Freedom of Expression^®: Overzealous Copyright Bozos and Other Enemies of Creativity. 1st ed. New York: Doubleday.

46.

Malcolm

Rossi

Stoltz

(2017) Which Internet Registries Offer the Best Protection for Domain Owners? San Francisco, CA: Electronic Frontier Foundation. Available at: https://www.eff.org/files/2017/08/02/domain_registry_whitepaper.pdf

47.

Masnick

(2012) The sky is rising! A detailed look at the state of the entertainment industry. Available at: https://www.techdirt.com/skyisrising/

48.

Mitchell

Matsa

Stocking

(2017) Google Flint Methodology. Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.journalism.org/2017/04/27/google-flint-methodology/ (accessed 3 June 2019).

49.

Moon

Ruffini

Segal

(2013) Hacking Politics: How Geeks, Progressives, the Tea Party, Gamers, Anarchists, and Suits Teamed Up to Defeat SOPA and Save the Internet (ed Moon

Ruffini

Segal

). New York: OR Books.

50.

Nghiem

Papworth

Lim

, et al. (2016) Analysis of the capacity of Google Trends to measure interest in conservation topics and the role of online news. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0152802.

51.

Patry

(2009) Moral Panics and the Copyright Wars. New York: Oxford University Press.

52.

Penenberg

(2005) How Apple cashes in on piracy prevention. Slate, 14 November. Available at: https://slate.com/technology/2005/11/how-apple-cashes-in-on-piracy-prevention.html (accessed 3 May 2019).

53.

Peters

(2016) The Idealist: Aaron Swartz and the Rise of Free Culture on the Internet. First Scribner hardcover ed. New York: Scribner.

54.

Quintais

Poort

(2018) The decline of online piracy: how markets-not enforcement-drive down copyright infringement. American University International Law Review 34: 807.

55.

Raiche

Magis

(2019) Package “nFactors.” Cran-R. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nFactors/nFactors.pdf

56.

Rogers

(2016) What is Google Trends data—and what does it mean? Medium, 1 June 2016. Available at: https://medium.com/google-news-lab/what-is-google-trends-data-and-what-does-it-mean-b48f07342ee8 (accessed 3 June 2019).

57.

Rummel

(1988) Applied Factor Analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

58.

Samuelson

(1996) The copyright grab. Wired. Available at: https://www.wired.com/1996/01/white-paper/

59.

Samuelson

(1997) The U.S. digital agenda at WIPO (Symposium: Intellectual Property Law in the International Marketplace). Virginia Journal of International Law 37(2): 369–439.

60.

Samuelson

(1998) The digital rights war. The Wilson Quarterly (1976-) 22(4): 48–53. Available at: http://www.jstor.org.proxyau.wrlc.org/stable/40260383

61.

Sinnreich

(2007) Right move, wrong reasons: inside the EMI Apple deal. Truthdig. Available at: https://www.truthdig.com/articles/right-move-wrong-reasons-inside-the-emiapple-deal/ (accessed 3 May 2019).

62.

Sinnreich

(2013) The Piracy Crusade: How the Music Industry’s War on Sharing Destroys Markets and Erodes Civil Liberties. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

63.

Sinnreich

(2018) Four crises in algorithmic governance. Annual Review of Law and Ethics 26: 181–190.

64.

Sinnreich

(2019a) Music, copyright, and technology: a dialectic in five moments. International Journal of Communication 13: 422–439.

65.

Sinnreich

(2019b) The Essential Guide to Intellectual Property. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

66.

Sinnreich

Aufderheide

Newman

(2020) Creative action under two copyright regimes: filmmaking and visual arts in Australia and the United States. Communication, Culture and Critique. Epub ahead of print 10 June 2020. DOI: 10.1093/ccc/tcaa003.

67.

Sprigman

(2017) Copyright and creative incentives: what we know (and don’t). Houston Law Review 55(2): 451–478.

68.

Stocking

Matsa

(2017) Using Google Trends data for research? Here are 6 questions to ask. Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/@pewresearch/using-google-trends-data-for-research-here-are-6-questions-to-ask-a7097f5fb526 (accessed 3 June 2019).

69.

Suber

(2012) Open Access. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

70.

Tanaka

(2019) The Effects of Internet Book Piracy: Case of Comics (No. 2019-016). Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/keo/dpaper/2019-016.html

71.

The Daily Show (2000) Lars attacks. Available at: http://www.cc.com/video-clips/y16u54/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-headlines—-lars-attacks (accessed 4 May 2019).

72.

Troumbis

(2017) Declining Google Trends of public interest in biodiversity: semantics, statistics or traceability of changing priorities? Biodiversity and Conservation 26(6): 1495–1505.

73.

Vaidhyanathan

(2001) Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. New York: New York University Press.

74.

Varela

(2007) The center for the public domain: a short-lived venture philanthropy. Center for Strategic Philanthropy and Civil Society Teaching Case, Duke Sanford School of Public Policy, Durham, NC.

75.

Vosen

Schmidt

(2011) Forecasting private consumption: survey-based indicators vs. Google Trends. Journal of Forecasting 30(6): 565–578.

76.

Watson

Zizzo

Fleming

(2017) Risk, benefit, and moderators of the affect heuristic in a widespread unlawful activity: evidence from a survey of unlawful file-sharing behavior. Risk Analysis 37(6): 1146–1156.

77.

William and Flora Hewlett Foundation (2015) Open Educational Resources: Advancing Widespread Adoption to Improve Instruction and Learning. Available at: https://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Open_Educational_Resources_December_2015.pdf (accessed 7 June 2010).

78.

Yano

(2017) Connect OER Annual Report, 2016-2017. Washington, DC: SPARC. Available at: https://sparcopen.org/our-work/connect-oer/reports

79.

Yuan

MacNeill

Kraan

(2008) Open educational resources—opportunities and challenges for higher education. Educational Cybernetics: Reports, Paper 1. Available at: https://www.oerknowledgecloud.org/archive/OER_Briefing_Paper.pdf