Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-12
How mainstream and alternative media shape public attitudes toward social change: Evidence from two panel studies during Malaysia’s democratic transition
Mainstream and alternative media often frame key political events in divergent ways. The present research examined how mainstream and alternative media consumption was linked to public support for Bersih, a pro-democracy movement in Malaysia. We conducted a two-wave panel study before and after the Bersih 5 protests demanding electoral reform (N = 422), and another two-wave panel study before and after the 14th General Elections which were historic in unseating the ruling government (N = 386). Against mounting corruption, the two events were important to Malaysia’s democratic transition. Across both studies, alternative media consumption was linked to more positive attitudes toward the Bersih movement, especially among people who were strong supporters of the previous ruling government. Mainstream media did not play a consistent role in shaping attitudes toward the movement, nor was there evidence of backlash among government supporters. Thus, alternative media may have legitimized the cause for social change.
AbbottJP (2011) Electoral authoritarianism and the print media in Malaysia: measuring political bias and analyzing its cause. Asian Affairs: An American Review38(1): 1–38.
2.
AbbottJPGivensJW (2015) Strategic censorship in a hybrid authoritarian regime? Differential bias in Malaysia’s online and print media. Journal of East Asian Studies15(3): 455–478.
3.
AnuarMK (2000) Malaysian media and democracy. Media Asia27(4): 183–199.
4.
AzmanS (2018) Utusan shares plunge to five-year low after UMNO’s defeat at election battle. The Edge Markets, 14May. Available at: https://www.theedgemarkets.com (accessed 14 May 2018).
5.
BoomgaardenHGVliegenthartR (2009) How news content influences anti-immigration attitudes: Germany, 1993-2005. European Journal of Political Research48(4): 516–542.
6.
BorahP (2011) Conceptual issues in framing theory: a systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication61(2): 246–263.
7.
BoyleMPSchmierbachM (2009) Media use and protest: the role of mainstream and alternative media use in predicting traditional and protest participation. Communication Quarterly57(1): 1–17.
8.
BoyleMPMcCluskeyMRDevanathanN, et al. (2004) The influence of level of deviance and protest type on coverage of social protest in Wisconsin from 1960 to 1999. Mass Communication and Society7(1): 43–60.
9.
BrownG (2005) The rough and rosy road: sites of contestation in Malaysia’s shackled media industry. Pacific Affairs78(1): 39–56.
10.
CaseW (2009) Electoral authoritarianism in Malaysia: trajectory shift. The Pacific Review22(3): 311–333.
11.
ChanCT (2018) Democratic breakthrough in Malaysia: political opportunities and the role of Bersih. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs37(3): 109–137.
12.
ChanJMLeeCC (1984) Journalistic “paradigms” of civil protests: a case study in Hong Kong. In: ArnoADissanayakeW (eds) The News Media in National and International Conflict. New York: Routledge, pp. 183–202.
13.
ChanM (2017) Media use and the social identity model of collective action: examining the roles of online alternative news and social media news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94(3): 663–681.
14.
ChinnasamySGriffithsM (2013) Looking back at Malaysia’s GE2008: an internet election and its democratic aftermath. The IAFOR Journal of Media, Communication and Film1(1): 59–74.
15.
ChongDDruckmanJN (2007) Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science10: 103–126.
16.
CouldryNCurranJ (2003) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
17.
DowningJDH (2003) Audiences and readers of alternative media: the absent lure of the virtually unknown. Media, Culture & Society25(5): 625–645.
18.
DruckmanJN (2001) The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior23(3): 225–256.
19.
DunlapREMcCrightAM (2008) Social movement identity: validating a measure of identification with the environmental movement. Social Science Quarterly89(5): 1045–1065.
20.
EarlJMartinAMcCarthyJD, et al. (2004) The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology30: 65–80.
21.
EntmanRM (2007) Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication57(1): 163–173.
22.
GeorgeC (2007) Media in Malaysia: zone of contention. Democratization14(5): 893–910.
23.
HeadJ (2020) How Malaysia’s government collapsed in two years. BBC News, 5March. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news (accessed 5 March 2020).
24.
KeeCPIsmailNSHashimN, et al. (2013) Framing Bersih 3.0: online versus traditional mass communication. Procedia Technology11: 161–168.
25.
KhazaeliSStockemerD (2013) The Internet: a new route to good governance. International Political Science Review34(5): 463–482.
26.
KhooGC (2014) The rise of constitutional patriotism in Malaysian civil society. Asian Studies Review38(3): 325–344.
27.
KhooYHSelvanathanHPLickelB (in press) Rights consciousness in Malaysia: an analysis of the electoral reform movement and political efficacy. Asian Studies Review.
28.
LeungDKLeeFL (2014) Cultivating an active online counterpublic: examining usage and political impact of Internet alternative media. The International Journal of Press/Politics19(3): 340–359.
29.
LouisWR (2009) Collective action—and then what?Journal of Social Issues65(4): 727–748.
30.
LumsdenLJ (2013) How independent? An analysis of GE13 coverage by Malaysia’s online news portal coverage. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication29(2): 1–30.
31.
McGartyCThomasEFLalaG, et al. (2014) New technologies, new identities, and the growth of mass opposition in the Arab Spring. Political Psychology35(6): 725–740.
32.
McLeodDM (1995) Communicating deviance: the effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media39(1): 4–19.
33.
McLeodDMDetenberBH (1999) Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Communication49(3): 3–23.
34.
McLeodDMHertogJK (1992) The manufacture of “public opinion” by reporters: informal cues for public. Discourse Society3(3): 259–275.
ManafAMASeduN (2015) Framing Islam-related issues during GE13: an analysis of Malaysian mainstream newspapers. Intellectual Discourse23(1): 29–52.
37.
MeansGP (1996) Soft authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Democracy7(4): 103–117.
38.
NadzriMM (2019) The 14th General Election, the fall of Barisan Nasional, and political development in Malaysia, 1957-2018. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs37(3): 139–171.
NisbetECStoycheffEPearceKE (2012) Internet use and democratic demands: a multinational, multilevel model of Internet use and citizen attitudes about democracy. Journal of Communication62(2): 249–265.
RajaratnamUD (2009) Role of traditional and online media in the 12th General Election, Malaysia. The Journal of the South East Asia Research Centre for Communications and Humanities1(1): 33–58.
44.
SaguyTSzekeresH (2018) Changing minds via collective action: exposure to the 2017 Women’s March predicts decrease in (some) men’s gender system justification over time. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations21(5): 678–689.
45.
SalmanAYusoffMASallehMAM, et al. (2018) Political engagement on social media as antecedent for political support among voters in Malaysia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication34(2): 152–165.
46.
SanawiJB (2014) Ideologies underlying the use of photographs in newspaper coverage of Bersih 3.0 rally: a social semiotic analysis. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication30(2): 41–60.
47.
SaniMAM (2014) Malaysia’s 13th General Election: political partisanship in the mainstream print media. Asia Pacific Media Educator24(1): 61–75.
48.
ScheufeleDA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication49(1): 103–122.
49.
ScottJ (1987) Weapons of the weak: everyday struggle, meaning and deeds. In: ShaninT (ed.) Peasants and Peasant Societies: Selected Readings. 2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 343–345.
50.
SelvanathanHPLickelB (2019) Empowerment and threat in response to mass protest shape public support for a social movement and social change: a panel study in the context of the Bersih movement in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Psychology49(2): 230–243.
51.
SelvanathanHPLickelBJettenJ (in press) Collective psychological ownership and the rise of reactionary counter-movements defending the status quo. British Journal of Social Psychology.
52.
SmeltzerS (2008) Blogging in Malaysia: hope for a new democratic technology?Journal of International Communication14(1): 28–45.
53.
SmeltzerSLepawskyJ (2010) Foregrounding technology over politics? Media framings of federal elections in Malaysia. Area42(1): 86–95.
54.
StroudNJ (2008) Media use and political predispositions: revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior30(3): 341–366.
WillnatLWongWJTamamE, et al. (2013) Online media and political participation: the case of Malaysia. Mass Communication and Society16(4): 557–585.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
