Deletion is part of the Internet’s history and predates Twitter. Today, research on the laws underlying and facilitating government social media use and deletion practices has remained limited. The question of how government agencies create their own Twitter archives and subsequently institutionalize cultural memory has also been largely unexplored. Drawing on a US case study, I argue that the lack of a standardized federal policy has led to the creation of myriad digital “memory holes” of varying porosities. I show that, when systematically drafted and deployed, research based on the US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) can serve as a generative method of unearthing deleted tweets and memory narratives that might otherwise be inaccessible. Finally, I build on the US case study by offering pathways for other new media scholars to examine and trace tweeting and deleting by government employees in other jurisdictions.
AdlerEPouliotV (2011) International practices. International Theory3(1): 1–36.
2.
BertotJCJaegerPTGrimesJM (2010) Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly27(3): 264–271.
3.
BesserH (2013) Archiving aggregates of individually created digital content: lessons from archiving the occupy movement. Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture42(1): 31–37.
4.
BigoDTsoukalaA (2008) Understanding insecurity. In: BigoDTsoukalaA (eds) Terror, Insecurity, and Liberty: Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes after 9/11. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 1–9.
5.
BonsónETorresLRoyoS, et al. (2012) Local e-government 2.0: social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly29(2): 123–132.
BrüggerN (2018) The Archived Web: Doing History in the Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
8.
BrüggerNAnkersonMSMilliganI (eds) (2019) SAGE Handbook of Web History. London: SAGE.
9.
BurgessJBaymN (2020) Twitter: A Biography. New York: New York University Press.
10.
CateFHFieldsDAMcBainJK (1994) The right to privacy and the public’s right to know: the “central purpose” of the Freedom of Information Act. Administrative Law Review46: 41–74.
11.
ChunWHK (2016) Updating to Remain the Same: Habitual New Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12.
CoxRJ (2000) Closing an Era: Historical Perspectives on Modern Archives and Records Management (No. 35). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
13.
CriadoJISandoval-AlmazanRGil-GarciaJR (2013) Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly30(4): 319–326.
DeibertRPalfreyJRohozinskiR, et al. (2011) Access Contested: Security, Identity, and Resistance in Asian Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
17.
ElorreagaG (2019) Don’t delete that tweet: federal and presidential records in the age of social media. St. Mary’s Law Journal50(1): 483–519.
18.
FondrenEMcCuneMM (2018) Archiving and preserving social media at the Library of Congress: institutional and cultural challenges to build a Twitter archive. Preserving Digital Technology and Culture47(2): 33–44.
19.
FranksPC (2016) Applying records management principles to managing public government social media records. In: ZavattaroSMBryerTA (eds) Social Media for Government: Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 45–59.
20.
Garde-HansenJHoskinsAReadingA (2009) Introduction. In: Garde-HansenJHoskinsAReadingA (eds) Saving As . . . Digital Memories. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–26.
GeigerRSFordH (2011) Participation in Wikipedia’s article deletion processes. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on Wikis and open collaboration, Mountain View, CA, 3–5 October, pp. 201–202. New York: ACM.
GlassmanMStrausJRShoganCJ (2009) Social Networking and Constituent Communication: Member Use of Twitter During a Two-Week Period in the 111th Congress (Library of Congress). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
25.
HazellRWorthyBGloverM (2010) Does FOI Work? The Impact of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on British Central Government. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
HeverinTZachL (2010) Twitter for city police department information sharing. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology47(1): 1–7.
LandsbergenD (2004) Screen level bureaucracy: databases as public records. Government Information Quarterly21(1): 24–50.
31.
LewisDESelinJL (2012) Sourcebook of United States Executive Agencies: Technical Report. Washington, DC: Administrative Conference of the United States.
32.
Library of Congress (2013) About the Library. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
33.
Library of Congress (2017) Update on the Twitter Archive at the Library of Congress. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
34.
LindgrenMPhillipsG (2016) Asbestos memories: journalistic “mediation” in mediated prospective memory. In: HajekALohmeierCPentzoldC (eds) Memory in a Mediated World. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 158–178.
35.
LingelJ (2020) An Internet for the People: The Politics and Promise of Craigslist. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
National Archives and Record Administration (NARA) (2013) White paper on best practices for the capture of social media records. College Park, MD: NARA.
38.
OrwellG (1949) Nineteen Eighty-Four. London: Secker and Warburg.
39.
PattersonGSpreheJT (2002) Principle challenges facing electronic records management in federal agencies today. Government Information Quarterly19: 307–315.
40.
SchatzkiTR (2001) Introduction. In: CetinaKKSchatzkiTRSavignyEV (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 10–23.
StewartDRCDavisCN (2016) Bringing back full disclosure: a call for dismantling FOIA. Communication Law and Policy21(4): 515–537.
43.
Tenenboim-WeinblattK (2013) Bridging collective memories and public agendas: toward a theory of mediated prospective memory. Communication Theory23(2): 91–111.
US Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 489 US 749 (1989).
46.
WalbyKLuscombeA (2017) Criteria for quality in qualitative research and use of freedom of information requests the social sciences. Qualitative Research17(5): 537–553.
47.
YangGWuS (2018) Remembering disappeared websites in China: passion, community, and youth. New Media & Society20(6): 2107–2124.
48.
ZimmerM (2015) The Twitter archive at the Library of Congress: challenges for information practice and information policy. First Monday20(7).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
