While there is emerging research on the motivations of workers who engage with specific digital platforms, scant attention has been afforded to the contours of the digital economy as they affect workers in occupational or professional contexts. Drawing on interviews with 51 Australian photographers, the authors examined the extent to which, and why, photographers engage with or resist digital platform work. The photographic profession is an ideal context in which to examine such questions due to the fragmentation of the workforce and the recent proliferation of platforms. The findings revealed that the level of worker engagement is explained by platform control over price, service and product quality, and relationship management. The experiences of self-employed, freelance workers complicate our understanding of work afforded by digital platforms. Engaging with the political economy surrounding freelance creative labour, the study enables a richer theorisation of the experiences of platform-generated work in this context.
BeerepootNLambregtsB (2015) Competition in online job marketplaces: towards a global labour market for outsourcing services?Global Networks15(2): 236–255.
4.
BridgesL (2018) Flexible as freedom? The dynamics of creative industry work and the case study of the editor in publishing. New Media & Society20(4): 1303–1319.
5.
BucherEFieselerC (2017) The flow of digital labor. New Media & Society19(11): 1868–1886.
6.
CaldwellJT (2010) Breaking ranks: backdoor workforces, messy workflows, and craft disaggregation. Popular Communication8(3): 221–226.
7.
ChenJY (2018) Thrown under the bus and outrunning it! The logic of Didi and taxi drivers’ labour and activism in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society20(8): 2691–2711.
8.
CohenN (2016) Writers’ Rights: Freelance Journalism in a Digital Age. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
9.
CohenN (2019) At work in the digital newsroom. Digital Journalism7(5): 571–591.
10.
CoyleD (2017) Precarious and productive work in the digital economy. National Institute Economic Review240(1): R5–R14.
11.
CurtinMSansonK (2016) Precarious Creativity: Global Media, Local Labor. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
12.
DartR (2004) Being ‘business-like’ in a nonprofit organization: a grounded and inductive typology. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly33(2): 290–310.
DrahokoupilJJepsenM (2017) The digital economy and its implications for labour. 1. The platform economy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research23(2): 103–107.
15.
DuffyBPruchniewskaU (2017) Gender and self-enterprise in the social media age: a digital double bind. Information, Communication & Society20(6): 843–859.
16.
Eriksson-ZetterquistULindbergKStyhreA (2009) When the good times are over: professionals encountering new technology. Human Relations62(8): 1145–1170.
FlemingP (2019) Robots and organization studies: why robots might not want to steal your job. Organization Studies40: 23–38.
19.
GillRPrattA (2008) In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society25(7–8): 1–30.
20.
GrahamMHjorthILehdonvirtaV (2017) Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research23(2): 135–162.
21.
HallJKruegerA (2018) An analysis of the labor market for Uber’s driver-partners in the United States. ILR Review71(3): 705–732.
22.
HealyJNicholsonDPekarekA (2017) Should we take the gig economy seriously?Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work27(3): 232–248.
23.
HesmondhalghDBakerS (2008) Creative work and emotional labour in the television industry. Theory, Culture & Society25(7–8): 97–118.
24.
HesmondhalghDBakerS (2011) Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries. London: Routledge.
25.
HoedemaekersC (2018) Creative work and affect: social, political and fantasmatic dynamics in the labour of musicians. Human Relations71: 1348–1370.
26.
IBISWorld (2017) Professional photographic services in Australia. Industry risk rating report, IBISWorld, Los Angeles, CA.
27.
IraniL (2015) Difference and Dependence among Digital Workers: The Case of Amazon Mechanical Turk. South Atlantic Quarterly114(1): 225–234.
28.
JonesCSvejenovaSPedersenJS, et al. (2016) Misfits, mavericks and mainstreams: drivers of innovation in the creative industries. Organization Studies37: 751–768.
29.
KenneyMZysmanJ (2016) The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology32(3): 61–69.
30.
KuhnKM (2016) The rise of the ‘Gig Economy’ and implications for understanding work and workers. Industrial and Organizational Psychology9(1): 157–162.
31.
KuhnKMMalekiA (2017) Micro-entrepreneurs, dependent contractors, and instaserfs: understanding online labor platform workforces. Academy of Management Perspectives31(3): 183–200.
LewchukW (2017) Precarious jobs: where are they, and how do they affect well-being?The Economic and Labour Relations Review28(3): 402–419.
34.
McDonaldPWilliamsPStewartA, et al. (2019) Digital platform work in Australia. Preliminary findings from a national survey. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Department of Premier and Cabinet. Available at https://apo.org.au/node/242706
35.
McRobbieA (2002) Clubs to companies: notes on the decline of political culture in speeded up creative worlds. Cultural Studies16(4): 516–531.
36.
McRobbieA (2015) Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
37.
MinifieJWiltshireT (2016) Peer-to-peer pressure – policy for the sharing economy. Grattan Institute Report No. 2016-7. Available at: https://grattan.edu.au/report/peer-to-peer/
38.
MunirKAPhillipsN (2005) The birth of the ‘Kodak Moment’: institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies. Organization Studies26(11): 1665–1687.
39.
PesoleAUrzí BrancatiMCFernández-MacíasE, et al. (2018) Platform workers in Europe. EUR 29275 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
40.
RothYKimaniR (2014) Crowdsourcing in the production of video advertising: the emerging roles of crowdsourcing platforms. In: DeFillippiRWikstromP (eds) International Perspectives on Business Innovation and Disruption in the Creative Industries: Film, Video and Photography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 177–199.
41.
SalamonE (2016) E-lancer resistance: precarious freelance journalists use digital communications to refuse rights-grabbing contracts. Digital Journalism4(8): 980–1000.
42.
SalamonE (2018) Freelance journalists’ rights, contracts, labor organizing and digital resistance. In: EldridgeSIIFranklinB (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Developments in Digital Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 186–197.
43.
SalamonE (2020) Digitizing freelance media labor: a class of workers negotiates entrepreneurialism and activism. New Media & Society22(1): 105–122.
44.
ScholzT (2013) Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge.
45.
SchorJB (2017) Does the sharing economy increase inequality within the eighty percent? Finding from a qualitative study of platform providers. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society10(2): 263–279.
46.
SchorJBFitzmauriceCJ (2014) Collaborating and connecting: the emergence of the sharing economy. In: ReischLAThøgersenJ (eds) Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 410–425.
47.
SchörpfPFleckerJSchönauerA, et al. (2017) Triangular love–hate: management and control in creative crowdworking. New Technology, Work and Employment32(1): 43–58.
48.
ScolereL (2019) Brand yourself, design your future: portfolio-building in the social media age. New Media & Society21(9): 1891–1909.
49.
ShapiroA (2018) Between autonomy and control: strategies of arbitrage in the ‘on-demand’ economy. New Media & Society20(8): 2954–2971.
50.
SmithCElgerT (2014) Critical realism and interviewing subjects. In: VincentSO’MahoneyJEdwardsPK (eds) Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–131.
51.
SpencerD (2018) Fear and hope in an age of mass automation: debating the future of work. New Technology, Work and Employment33(1): 1–12.
52.
StewartAStanfordJ (2017) Regulating work in the gig economy: what are the options?The Economic and Labour Relations Review28(3): 420–437.
ThompsonPJonesMWarhurstC (2007) From conception to consumption: creativity and the missing managerial link. Journal of Organizational Behavior28(5): 625–640.
55.
ThuanNHAntunesPJohnstoneD (2016) Factors influencing the decision to crowdsource: a systematic literature review. Information Systems Frontiers18(1): 47–68.
