What sustains prosocial attitudes and political engagement in the era of online connectivity? Scholars disagree on whether frequent consumers of virtual entertainment disconnect from sociopolitical life. Using the Swedish Political Socialization Panel dataset and partial-pool time series methodology, I investigate the relationship between playing videogames and adolescents’ political and social attitudes over time. I find that those gamers who spend more time engaging in their favorite pastime become less interested in sociopolitical issues and less prosocial than non-gamers from year to year. My findings tell a cautionary tale about the adverse effects of extensive gaming on the development of democratic attitudes among adolescents.
AchenCH (2002) Parental socialization and rational party identification. Political Behavior24(2): 151–170.
2.
AguiarMBilsMCharlesKK, et al. (2017) Leisure Luxuries and the Labor Supply of Young Men. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
AhmadMAKeeganBWilliamsD, et al. (2010) Trust among rogues? A hypergraph approach for comparing clandestine trust networks in MMOGs. In: Proceedings of the fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, 2010, pp. 10–17. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Available at: file:///C:/Users/UKID3915/Downloads/2845-14212-1-PB.pdf
4.
AllenJJAndersonCA (2018) Satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs in the real world and in video games predict internet gaming disorder scores and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior84: 220–229.
5.
AmnåEEkströmMKerrM, et al. (2009) Political socialization and human agency: the development of civic engagement from adolescence to adulthood. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift111(1): 27–40.
AndersonCADillKE (2000) Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78(4): 772–790.
8.
AndersonCABerkowitzLDonnersteinE, et al. (2003) The influence of media violence on youth. Psychological Science in the Public Interest4(3): 81–110.
9.
AndersonCAShibuyaAIhoriN, et al. (2010) Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin136(2): 151–173.
10.
BakkerTPde VreeseCH (2011) Good news for the future? Young people, Internet use, and political participation. Communication Research38(4): 451–470.
11.
BarghJAMcKennaKYA (2004) The internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology55: 573–590.
12.
BatsonCDPowellAA (2003) Altruism and prosocial behavior. In: MillonTLernerMJWeinerIB (eds) Handbook of Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 463–484.
13.
BellAJonesK (2015) Explaining fixed effects: random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods3(1): 133–153.
14.
BimberB (1998) The Internet and political transformation: populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity31(1): 133–160.
15.
BoulianneS (2009) Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication26(2): 193–211.
16.
BoulianneS (2015) Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society18(5): 524–538.
17.
CastronovaEWilliamsDShenC, et al. (2009) As real as real? Macroeconomic behavior in a large-scale virtual world. New Media & Society11(5): 685–707.
18.
ChristakisNAFowlerJH (2009) Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives—How Your Friends’ Friends’ Friends Affect Everything You Feel, Think, and Do. New York: Back Bay Books.
19.
ChristensenHS (2011) Political activities on the Internet: slacktivism or political participation by other means?First Monday16(2). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v16i2.3336.
20.
ClarkTSLinzerDA (2015) Should I use fixed or random effects?Political Science Research and Methods3(2): 399–408.
21.
DaltonRJ (1980) Reassessing parental socialization: indicator unreliability versus generational transfer. American Political Science Review74(2): 421–431.
22.
DaltonRJ (1982) The pathways of parental socialization. American Politics Quarterly10: 139–157.
23.
DiMaggioPHargittaiENeumanWR, et al. (2001) Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology27: 307–336.
24.
EaglyAH (2009) The his and hers of prosocial behavior: an examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist64(8): 644–658.
25.
EkströmMOlssonTShehataA (2014) Spaces for public orientation? Longitudinal effects of Internet use in adolescence. Information, Communication & Society17(2): 168–183.
26.
Entertainment Software Association (2019) Essential Facts about the Computer and Video Game Industry. Washington, DC: Entertainment Software Association.
27.
FitzgeraldJ (2011) Family dynamics and Swiss parties on the rise: exploring party support in a changing electoral context. Journal of Politics73(3): 783–796.
28.
FoxRLLawlessJL (2014) Uncovering the origins of the gender gap in political ambition. American Political Science Review108(3): 499–519.
29.
FurlongA (2008) The Japanese hikikomori phenomenon: acute social withdrawal among young people. The Sociological Review56(2): 309–325.
30.
GeeJP (2003) What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
GeeJP (2006) Are video games good for learning?Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy3: 172–183.
32.
GeeJP (2008) Video games and embodiment. Games and Culture3(3–4): 253–267.
33.
GentileDAAndersonCAYukawaS, et al. (2009) The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: international evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin35(6): 752–763.
34.
GentileDAChooHLiauA, et al. (2011) Pathological video game use among youths: a two-year longitudinal study. Pediatrics127(2): e319–e329.
35.
GentileDASwingELLimCG, et al. (2012) Video game playing, attention problems, and impulsiveness: evidence of bidirectional causality. Psychology of Popular Media Culture1(1): 62–70.
36.
Gil de ZúñigaHPuig-I-AbrilERojasH (2009) Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: an assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment. New Media & Society11(4): 553–574.
37.
GlassJBengtsonVLDunhamCC (1986) Attitude similarity in three-generation families: socialization, status inheritance, or reciprocal influence?American Sociological Review51(5): 685–698.
38.
GoetzmannA (2017) Elementary school children’s political knowledge. American Behavioral Scientist61(2): 238–253.
39.
GreensteinFIHermanVStradlingRN, et al. (1974) The child’s conception of the queen and the prime minister. British Journal of Political Science4(3): 257–287.
40.
GriffithsMDDaviesMNOChappellD (2004) Online computer gaming: a comparison of adolescent and adult gamers. Journal of Adolescence27(1): 87–96.
41.
HindmanM (2008) The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
HoffmanLHAppiahO (2008) Assessing cultural and contextual components of social capital: is civic engagement in peril?The Howard Journal of Communications19: 334–354.
43.
HoogheMBoonenJ (2015) The intergenerational transmission of voting intentions in a multiparty setting: an analysis of voting intentions and political discussion among 15-year old adolescents and their parents in Belgium. Youth & Society47(1): 125–147.
44.
HuesmannLRMoise-TitusJPodolskiCL, et al. (2003) Longitudinal relations between children’s exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood: 1977-1992. Developmental Psychology39(2): 201–221.
45.
InglehartRNorrisP (2000) The developmental theory of the gender gap: women’s and men’s voting behavior in global perspective. International Political Science Review21(4): 441–463.
46.
JenningsMKNiemiRG (1974) The Political Character of Adolescence: The Influence of Families and Schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
JenningsMKZeitnerV (2003) Internet use and civic engagement. Public Opinion Quarterly67: 311–334.
48.
JenningsMKStokerLBowersJ (2009) Politics across generations: family transmission reexamined. The Journal of Politics71(3): 782–799.
49.
JohnsonNFXuCZhaoZ, et al. (2009) Human group formation in online guilds and offline gangs driven by a common team dynamic. Physical Review E79(6): 066117.
50.
KatoTTatenoMShinfukuN, et al. (2012) Does the “hikikomori” syndrome of social withdrawal exist outside Japan? A preliminary international investigation. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology47(7): 1061–1075.
51.
KawataJ (1987) Political socialization in contemporary Japan. International Political Science Review/Revue Internationale de Science Politique8(3): 245–259.
52.
KeeganBAhmadMAWilliamsD, et al. (2010) Dark gold: statistical properties of clandestine networks in massively multiplayer online games. In: Second international conference on social computing, Minneapolis, MN, 20–22 August 2010, pp. 201–208. New York: IEEE.
53.
KeeganBAhmadMAWilliamsD, et al. (2011) What can gold farmers teach us about criminal networks?XRDS: Crossroads17(3): 11–15.
54.
KingDLDelfabbroPH (2014) The cognitive psychology of Internet gaming disorder. Clinical Psychology Review34(4): 298–308.
55.
KrahéBBuschingRMöllerI (2012) Media violence use and aggression among German adolescents: associations and trajectories of change in a three-wave longitudinal study. Psychology of Popular Media Culture1(3): 152–166.
56.
KrautRPattersonMLundmarkV, et al. (1998) Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?American Psychologist53(9): 1017–1031.
57.
La Due LakeRHuckfeldtR (1998) Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology19(3): 567–584.
58.
LiTMWongPW (2015) Youth social withdrawal behavior (hikikomori): a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry49(7): 595–609.
59.
LignierWPagisJ (2017) “Left” vs. “right”: how French children reconstruct the political field. American Behavioral Scientist61(2): 167–185.
60.
MadiganJ (2019) Getting Gamers: The Psychology of Video Games and Their Impact on the People Who Play Them. Reprint ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
61.
MilnerH (2010) The Internet Generation: Engaged Citizens or Political Dropouts. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
62.
MlimperosADownsEDivoryJ, et al. (2013) Leveling up: a review of emerging trends and suggestions for the next generation of communication research investigating video games’ effects. Annals of the International Communication Association1: 349–377.
63.
MöllerIKrahéB (2009) Exposure to violent video games and aggression in German adolescents: a longitudinal analysis. Aggressive Behavior35(1): 75–89.
64.
MolyneuxLVasudevanKGil de ZúñigaH (2015) Gaming social capital: exploring civic value in multiplayer video games. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication20: 381–399.
65.
MüllerKWJanikianMDreierM, et al. (2014) Regular gaming behavior and internet gaming disorder in European adolescents: results from a cross-national representative survey of prevalence, predictors, and psychopathological correlates. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry24: 565–574.
66.
MutzDC (2011) Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67.
NgBDWiemer-HastingsP (2005) Addiction to the Internet and online gaming. CyberPsychology & Behavior8(2): 110–113.
68.
OldenburgR (1999) The Great Good Place: Cafe’s, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You Through the Day. New York: Marlowe & Company.
69.
PetersonSA (1983) Biology and political socialization: a cognitive developmental link?Political Psychology4(2): 265–288.
70.
PiffPKKrausMWCôtéS, et al. (2010) Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology99(5): 771–784.
71.
ProtSAndersonCAGentileDA, et al. (2015) Media as agents of socialization. In: GrusecJEHastingsPD (eds) Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 276–300.
72.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
73.
PutnamRD (2002) Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74.
QuintelierEVissersS (2008) The effect of Internet use on political participation: an analysis of survey results for 16-year-olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review26(4): 411–427.
75.
QuintelierEVerhaegenSHoogheM (2014) The intergenerational transmission of European identity: the role of gender and discussion within families. Journal of Common Market Studies52(5): 1103–1119.
76.
RitterfeldUCodyMVordererP (eds) (2009) Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects. New York: Routledge.
77.
SaleemMAndersonCA (2013) Arabs as terrorists: effects of stereotypes within violent contexts on attitudes, perceptions, and affect. Psychology of Violence4(1): 84–99.
78.
SaleemMProtSAndersonCA, et al. (2017) Exposure to Muslims in media and support for public policies harming Muslims. Communication Research44(6): 841–869.
79.
ShulmanSW (2009) The case against mass E-mails: perverse incentives and low quality public participation in U.S. federal rulemaking. Policy & Internet1(1): 23–53.
SteinkuehlerCAWilliamsD (2006) Where everybody knows your (screen) name: online games as “third places.”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication11: 885–909.
82.
StipEThibaultABeauchamp-ChatelA, et al. (2016) Internet addiction, hikikomori syndrome, and the prodromal phase of psychosis. Frontiers in Psychiatry7: 6–8.
83.
TedescoJC (2007) Examining Internet interactivity effects on young adult political information efficacy. American Behavioral Scientist9: 1183–1194.
84.
TedinKL (1974) The influence of parents on the political attitudes of adolescents. American Political Science Review68(4): 1579–1592.
85.
ThackerSGriffithsMD (2012) An exploratory study of trolling in online video gaming. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning2(4): 17–33.
86.
TolbertCJMcNealRS (2003) Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation?Political Research Quarterly56(2): 175–185.
87.
WangSI (2007) Political use of the Internet, political attitudes and political participation. Asian Journal of Communication17(4): 381–395.
88.
WestholmA (1999) The perceptual pathway: tracing the mechanisms of political value transfer across generations. Political Psychology20(3): 525–551.
89.
WilliamsD (2006a) Groups and goblins: the social and civic impact of an online game. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media50(4): 651–670.
90.
WilliamsD (2006b) On and off the ’net: scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication11: 593–628.
91.
WilliamsDDucheneautNXiongL, et al. (2006) From tree house to barracks: the social life of guilds in World of Warcraft. Games and Culture: A Journal of Interactive Media1(4): 338–361.
XenosMMoyP (2007) Direct and differential effects of the Internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication57: 704–718.
94.
YeeN (2001) The Norrathian scrolls: a study of EverQuest. Available at: http://www.nickyee.com/report.pdf (accessed 12 November 2019).
95.
YeeN (2006) The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments15(3): 309–329.
96.
YeeN (2009) Befriending ogres and wood-elves: relationship formation and the social architecture of Norrath. Game Studies9(1). Available at: http://gamestudies.org/0901/articles/yee (accessed 12 November 2019).
97.
YoungKSRogersRC (1998) The relationship between depression and Internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior1(1): 25–28.
98.
Zimmer-GembeckMJGeigerTCCrickNR (2005) Relational and physical aggression, prosocial behavior, and peer relations: gender moderation and bidirectional associations. The Journal of Early Adolescence25(4): 421–452.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
