Political interest is one of the most important individual-level predictors of news media use, public opinion formation, and engagement. When, how, and why some citizens develop a strong interest in politics is, however, less clear. This study analyzes the development of political interest during the formative years of adolescence, using a five-wave panel study among Swedish adolescents, covering a period of 4 years. Based on the citizen communication mediation model, we analyze how interest in political and current affairs news among family and friends influence adolescents’ political interest. Taken together, while the findings lend support for several of the hypotheses, mechanisms, and processes derived from the communication mediation model, parents appear more important than peers when it comes to shaping adolescents’ political interest.
AalbergT.CurranJ. (2012). How media inform democracy: A comparative approach. London, England: Routledge.
2.
AcockA. (2013). Discovering structural equation modeling using tata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
3.
AllisonP. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
4.
BanduraA. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In BryandJ.OliverM.-B. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 94-124). New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BaumC. (2006). An introduction to modern econometrics using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
6.
BoomgaardenH. G. (2014). Interpersonal and mass mediated political communication. In ReinemannC. (Ed.), Political communication. Handbook of communication sciences (pp. 469-488). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
7.
BouchardT. J. (2004). Genetic influence on human psychological traits: A survey. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 148-151. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00295.x
8.
BoulianneS. (2011). Stimulating or reinforcing political interest: Using panel data to examine reciprocal effects between news media and political interest. Political Communication, 28, 147-162. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.540305
9.
BukowskiW. M.BrendgenM.VitaroF. (2007). Peers and socialization: Effects on exernalizing and internalizing problems. In GrusecJ.HastingsP. (Eds.), Handbook of socalization (pp. 355-381). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
CampbellD. E. (2013). Social networks and political participation. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 33-48. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-033011-201728
11.
DaltonR. J.ShinD. C. (2014). Reassessing the civic culture model. In DaltonR.WelzelC. (Eds.), The civic culture transformed (pp. 91-115). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
De VreeseC.MöllerJ. (2014). Communication and political socialization. In ReinemannC. (Ed.), Political communication (pp. 529-546). Berlin: De Gruyter.
13.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
DilliplaneS.GoldmanS. K.MutzD. C. (2013). Televised exposure to politics: New measures for a fragmented media environment. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 236–248. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00600.x
15.
Dostie-GouletE. (2009). Social networks and the development of political interest. Journal of Youth Studies, 12, 405-421. doi:10.1080/13676260902866512
16.
EderD.NengaS. K. (2006). Socialization in adolescence. In DelamaterJ. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 157-182). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
17.
EmlerN. (2015). Explaining political participation: Integrating levels of analysis. In BarrettM.ZaniB. (Eds.), Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 146-161). Hove, UK: Routledge.
18.
EvelandW.HayesA.ShahD.KwakN. (2005). Understanding the relationship between communication and political knowledge: A model-comparison approach using panel data. Political Communication, 22, 423-446. doi:10.1080/10584600500311345
19.
FinkelS. (2008). Linear panel analysis. In MenardS. (Ed.), Handbook of longitudinal research: Design measurement and analysis (pp. 475-504). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
20.
FlanaganC. (2013). Teenage citizens: The political theories of the young. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
FunkC. (2013). Genetic foundations of political behavior. In HuddyL.SearsD.LevyJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 237-261). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
Garcia-AlbaceteG. (2013). Promoting political interest in school: The role of civic education. In AbenschönS. (Ed.), Growing into politics: Contexts and timing of political socialisation (pp. 91-113). Oxon, UK: European Consortium for Political Research Press.
23.
GotliebM.KyoungK.GabayI.RiddleK.ShahD. (2015). Socialization of lifestyle and conventional politics among early and late adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 60-70. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2015.06.004
24.
HarrisJ. R. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102, 458-489. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.458
25.
HidiS.RenningerK. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
26.
HuckfeldtR. (2014). Networks, contexts, and the combinatorial dynamics of democratic politics. Political Psychology, 35, 43-68. doi:10.1111/pops.12161
27.
JenningsM. K.MarkusG. B. (1984). Partisan orientations over the long haul: Results from the three-wave political socialization panel study. American Political Science Review, 78, 1000-1018. doi:10.2307/1955804
28.
JenningsM. K.StokerL.BowersJ. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. The Journal of Politics, 71, 782-799. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090719
29.
KrosnickJ. A.AlwinD. F. (1989). Aging and susceptibility to attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 416-425.
30.
KruikemeierS.ShehataA. (2017). News media use and political engagement among adolescents: An analysis of virtuous circles using panel data. Political Communication, 34, 221-242. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1174760
31.
LazarsfeldP.BerelsonB.GaudetH. (1948). The people’s choice: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign (2nd ed.) New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
32.
LeeN.-J.ShahD.McLeodJ. M. (2013). Processes of political socialization: A communication mediation approach to youth civic engagement. Communication Research, 40, 669-697. doi:10.1177/0093650212436712
33.
LuskinR. C. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12, 331-361. doi:10.1007/BF00992793
34.
MacedoS.Alex-AssensohY.BerryJ.BrintnallM.CampbellD.E.FragaL.R.. . . Cramer WalshK. (2005). Democracy at risk: How political choices undermine citizen participation and what we can do about it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
35.
McDewittM.KiousisS. (2006). Deliberative learning: An evaluative approach to interactive civic education. Communication Education, 55, 247-264. doi:10.1080/03634520600748557
36.
McLeodJ.ShahD. (2009). Communication and political socialization: Challenges and opportunities for research. Political Communication, 26, 1-10. doi:10.1080/10584600802686105
37.
McLeodJ. (2000). Media and civic socialization of youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 45-51. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(00)00131-2
38.
MöllerJ.De VreeseC. (2015). Spiral of political learning the reciprocal relationship of news media use and political knowledge among adolescents. Communication Research, doi:10.1177/0093650215605148
39.
NeundorfA.SmetsK.García-AlbaceteG. M. (2013). Homemade citizens: The development of political interest during adolescence and young adulthood. Acta Politica, 48, 92-116. doi:10.1057/ap.2012.23
40.
NiemiR. G.HepburnM. A. (1995). The rebirth of political socialization. Perspectives on Political Science, 24, 7-16. doi:10.1080/10457097.1995.9941860
41.
PriorM. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42.
PriorM. (2010). You’ve either got it or you don’t: The stability of political interest over the life cycle. The Journal of Politics, 72, 747-766. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000149
43.
RobisonJ. (2017). The social rewards of engagement: Appealing to social motivations to stimulate political interest at high and low levels of external efficacy. Political Studies, 65, 24-41. doi:10.1177/0032321715619431
44.
RussoS.StattinH. (2017). Stability and change in youths’ political interest. Social Indicators Research, 132, 643-658. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1302-9
45.
RyanR.DeciE. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
46.
SearsD. O. (1981). Life stage effects upon attitude change, especially among the elderly. In KieslerS. B.MorganbJ. N.OppenheimerV. K. (Eds.), Aging social change (pp. 183-204). New York, NY: Academic Press.
47.
SearsD. O. (1983). The persistence of early political predispositions: The roles of attitude object and life stage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 79-116.
48.
ShaniD. (2009). On the origins of political interest (Doctoral dissertation). Princeton University, NJ.
49.
SilviaP. J. (2008). Interest—The curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 57-60. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00548.x
50.
SmetanaJ.RobinsonJ.RoteW. M. (2016). Socialization in adolescence. In GrusecJ.HastingsP. (Eds.), Handbook of socialization research (pp. 60-84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
51.
StrömbäckJ.Djerf-PierreM.ShehataA. (2013). The dynamics of political interest and new media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25, 414-435. doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds018
52.
StrömbäckJ.ShehataA. (2010). Media malaise or a virtuous circle? Exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest. European Journal of Political Research, 49, 575-597. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01913.x
53.
TeorellJ.TorcalM.MonteroJ. R. (2007). Political Participation: Mapping the Terrain. In van DethJ. W.MonteroJ. R.WestholmA. (Eds.), Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis, pp. 334-357. London & New York: Routledge.
54.
van DethJ. W. (1990). Interest in politics. In Kent JenningsM. (Ed.), Continuities in political action: A longitudinal study of political orientations in three Western democracies (pp. 275-312). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
55.
van DethJ. W.AbendschönS.VollmarM. (2011). Children and politics: An empirical reassessment of early political socialization. Political Psychology, 32, 147-174. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00798.x
56.
van DethJ. W.MonteroJ. R.WestholmA. (Eds.). (2007). Citizenship and involvement in European democracies: A comparative analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
