“One part politics,one part technology,one part history”: Racial representation in the Unicode 7.0 emoji set

Abstract

Emoji are miniature pictographs that have taken over text messages, emails, and Tweets worldwide. Although contemporary emoji represent a variety of races, genders, and sexual orientations, the original emoji set came under fire for its racial homogeneity: minus two “ethnic” characters, the people emoji featured in Unicode 7.0 were represented as White. This article investigates the set of circumstances that gave rise to this state of affairs, and explores the implications for users of color whose full participation in the emoji phenomenon is constrained by their exclusion. This project reveals that the lack of racial representation within the emoji set is the result of colorblind racism as evidenced through two related factors: aversion to, and avoidance of, the politics of technical systems and a refusal to recognize that the racial homogeneity of the original emoji set was problematic in the first place.

Keywords

Colorblind racism emoji race and technology technological neutrality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbate

(2012) Recoding Gender: Women’s Changing Participation in Computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Allen

(2017) Power puff!: the natural hair emoji is coming in 2018. BET, 13 December. Available at: https://www.bet.com/style/beauty/2017/12/13/natural-hair-emoji-coming-in-2018.html

Allen

(2013) A whale of an acquisition. Library of Congress Blog, 22 February. Available at: http://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2013/02/a-whale-of-an-acquisition/

Associated Press (2019) New interracial couple emoji mark victory for partners of color. The Guardian, 9 March. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/mar/08/new-interracial-couple-emoji-tinder

Benjamin

(2019) Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Berard

(2018) I second that emoji: the standards, structures, and social production of emoji. First Monday 23. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v23i9.9381.

Bonilla-Silva

(2006) Racism without Racists: Color-blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Bowker

Star

(1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Brock

(2012) From the blackhand side: Twitter as a cultural conversation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56(4): 529–549.

10.

Browne

(2015) Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

11.

Chaey

(2013) Are emoji racist? Fast Company, 22 August. Available at: http://www.fastcompany.com/3016256/fast-feed/are-emojis-racist

12.

Chan

(2013) Networking Peripheries: Technological Futures and the Myth of Digital Universalism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

13.

Cheney-Rice

(2014) Out of the 250 new emojis you can use on your phone, there’s one glaring omission. Mic, 17 June. Available at: https://www.mic.com/articles/91405/out-of-the-250-new-emojis-you-can-use-on-your-phone-there-s-one-glaring-omission

14.

Chun

WHK

(2009) Introduction: race and/as technology; or, how to do things to race. Camera Obscura 70(1): 7–35.

15.

Chun

WHK

(2018) Queerying homophily. In: Apprich

Chun

WHK

Cramer

, et al. (eds) Pattern Discrimination, Vol. 1. Minneapolis, MN: Meson Press.

16.

Danesi

(2016) The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.

17.

De la Peña

(2010) The history of technology, the resistance of archives, and the whiteness of race. Technology and Culture 51(4): 919–937.

18.

Dinerstein

(2006) Technology and its discontents: on the verge of the posthuman. American Quarterly 58(3): 569–595.

19.

Dyer

(1997) White: Essays on Race and Culture. Abingdon: Psychology Press.

20.

Edberg

Davis

(2014) Proposed enhancements for emoji characters: background (Document no. L2/14-172), The Unicode Consortium. Available at: http://goo.gl/g3IBiQ

21.

Eglash

(2007) Broken metaphor: the master-slave analogy in technical literature. Technology and Culture 48(2): 360–369.

22.

Etherington

(2015) Apple’s latest betas bring more diversity to emoji. TechCrunch, 24 February. Available at: http://social.techcrunch.com/2015/02/23/apple-emoji-diversity/

23.

Fitzpatrick

(1988) The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Archives of Dermatology 124(6): 869–871.

24.

Flanagan

Howe

Nissenbaum

(2008) Embodying values in technology: theory and practice. In: van den Hoven

Weckert

(eds) Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 322–353.

25.

Fouché

(2013) From Black inventors to one laptop per child: exporting a racial politics of technology. In: Nakamura

Chow-White

(eds) Race After the Internet. New York: Routledge, pp. 67–90.

26.

Freedman

(2018) Cultural literacy in the empire of emoji signs: who is crying with joy? First Monday 23. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v23i9.9395.

27.

Galloway

(2016) The original NTT DOCOMO emoji set has been added to the museum of modern art’s collection. Moma.org, 2 April 2. Available at: https://stories.moma.org/the-original-emoji-set-has-been-added-to-the-museum-of-modern-arts-collection-c6060e141f61

28.

Gillespie

(2010) The politics of “platforms.” New Media & Society 12(3): 347–364.

29.

Gregg

Wilson

(2015) The myth of neutral technology. The Atlantic, 13 January. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/01/the-myth-of-neutral-technology/384330/

30.

Grint

Woolgar

(1997) The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

31.

Harrell

(2010) Toward a theory of critical computing: the case of social identity representation in digital media applications. Code Drift: Essays in Critical Digital Studies, 13 May www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=641

32.

Jenkins

(2002) Cyberspace and race: The color-blind Web—a techno-utopia, or a fantasy to assuage liberal guilt? MIT Technology Review, 1 April. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/401404/cyberspace-and-race/

33.

Kelly

(2015) Apple’s new diverse emoji characters. CNNmoney, 23 February. Available at: https://money.cnn.com/2015/02/23/technology/apple-diverse-emoji/index.html

34.

Lee

(2019) Emoji are showing up in court cases exponentially, and courts aren’t prepared. The Verge, 18 February. Available at: https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/18/18225231/emoji-emoticon-court-case-reference

35.

Lee

(2018) Emoji at MoMA: considering the “original emoji” as art. First Monday 23(9). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v23i9.9401.

36.

Leondis

(director) (2017) The emoji movie. Culver City, CA: Columbia Pictures.

37.

McHoul

Grace

(1993) A Foucault Primer: Discourse, Power, and the Subject. New York: New York University Press.

38.

McPherson

(2013) US operating systems at mid-century: the intertwining of race and UNIX. In: Nakamura

Chow-White

(eds) Race After the Internet. New York: Routledge, pp. 27–43.

39.

Matamoros-Fernández

(2017) Platformed racism: the mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. Information, Communication & Society 20(6): 930–946.

40.

Michaels

(n.d.) What the difference between master & slave hard drives? Techwalla. https://www.techwalla.com/articles/what-is-the-difference-between-master-slave-hard-drives

41.

Nakamura

(2008) Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet, Vol. 23. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

42.

Ngai

(2005) The cuteness of the avant-garde. Critical Inquiry 31(4): 811–847.

43.

Noble

(2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.

44.

Ong

(2017) Facebook rolls out new family emoji, but there’s something missing. The Verge, 25 August. Available at: https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/25/16201400/facebook-new-family-emoji-same-skin-tone

45.

Pilgrim

(2012) The Golliwog caricature. Jim Crow Museum of Racist Memorabilia, November. Available at: https://www.ferris.edu/JIMCROW/golliwog/

46.

Ruhlmann

(n.d.) Al Jolson: biography history. AllMusic. Available at: https://www.allmusic.com/artist/al-jolson-mn0000609215/biography

47.

Sinclair

(2004) Technology and the African-American Experience: Needs and Opportunities for Study. Cambridege, MA: The MIT Press.

48.

Slaton

(2010) Race, Rigor, and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color Line. Cambridege, MA: Harvard University Press.

49.

Streeter

(2011) The Net Effect: Romanticism, Capitalism, and the Internet. New York: New York University Press.

50.

Sweeney

Whaley

(2019) Technically white: emoji skin-tone modifiers as American technoculture. First Monday 24(7). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v24i7.10060.

51.

The Stream (2017) How are emoji chosen? And are they diverse enough? The Stream—Al Jazeera, 28 August. Available at: https://ajmn.tv/xvj44

52.

Vonberg

Shubert

Schmidt

(2017) Teen behind new hijab emoji: “I wanted an emoji of me.” CNN. 18 July. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/18/europe/hijab-emoji-teenager/index.html

53.

Whittaker

Crawford

Dobbe

, et al. (2018) AI now report 2018. AI Now. https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2018_Report.pdf

54.

Winner

(1980) Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109: 121–136.