How populists engage with media of various types, and are treated by those media, are questions of international interest. In the United States, Donald Trump stands out for both his populism-inflected campaign style and his success at attracting media attention. This article examines how interactions between candidate communications, social media, partisan media, and news media combined to shape attention to Trump, Clinton, Cruz, and Sanders during the 2015–2016 American presidential primary elections. We identify six major components of the American media system and measure candidates’ efforts to gain attention from them. Our results demonstrate that social media activity, in the form of retweets of candidate posts, provided a significant boost to news media coverage of Trump, but no comparable boost for other candidates. Furthermore, Trump tweeted more at times when he had recently garnered less of a relative advantage in news attention, suggesting he strategically used Twitter to trigger coverage.
AkkermanT (2011) Friend or foe? Right-wing populism and the popular press in Britain and the Netherlands. Journalism12(8): 931–945.
2.
AndersonCW (2013) Rebuilding the News: Metropolitan Journalism in the Digital Age. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.
3.
BennettWLSegerbergAKnüpferCB (2018) The democratic interface: technology, political organization, and diverging patterns of electoral representation. Information, Communication & Society21(11): 1655–1680.
4.
BenoitWLSteinKAHansenGJ (2005) New York Times coverage of presidential campaigns. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly82(2): 356–376.
5.
BerryJMSobierajS (2014) The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BosLvan der BrugWde VreeseC (2011) How the media shape perceptions of right-wing populist leaders. Political Communication28(2): 182–206.
7.
BoydstunAEAelstPV (2018) New rules for an old game? How the 2016 U.S. Election caught the press off guard. Mass Communication and Society21(6): 671–696.
CappellaJNJamiesonKH (1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
CanonDT (1990) Actors, Athletes and Astronauts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
ChadwickA (2017) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. 2nd ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
ConwayBAKenskiKWangD (2015) The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication20(4): 363–380.
13.
De VreeseCHEsserFAalbergT, et al. (2018) Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: a new perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics23: 423–438.
14.
DrewDWilhoitGC (1976) Newshole allocation policies of American Daily Newspapers. Journalism Quarterly53(3): 434–482.
15.
EngesserSErnstNEsserF, et al. (2017a) Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society20(8): 1109–1126.
16.
EngesserSFawziNLarssonAO (2017b) Populist online communication: introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society20(9): 1279–1292.
17.
EsserFStępińskaAHopmannDN (2016) Populism and the Media: Cross-National Findings and Perspectives. In: AalbergTEsserFReinemannC, et al. (eds) Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge, pp. 365–80.
18.
FarisRMRobertsHEtlingB, et al. (2017) Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: online media and the 2016 U.S.Presidential Election. Research paper, Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Cambridge, MA.
19.
FreelonDMcIlwainCClarkM (2016) Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media & Society20: 990–1101.
20.
GandyOH (1982) Beyond Agenda Setting: Information Subsidies and Public Policy. Norwood, NJ: Praeger.
GroshekJEngelbertJ (2013) Double differentiation in a cross-national comparison of populist political movements and online media uses in the United States and the Netherlands. New Media & Society15(2): 183–202.
23.
GroshekJKoc-MichalskaK (2017) Helping populism win? Social media use, filter bubbles, and support for populist presidential candidates in the 2016 US election campaign. Information, Communication & Society20(9): 1389–1407.
24.
GuoLVargoC (2018) “Fake News” and emerging online media ecosystem: an integrated intermedia agenda-setting analysis of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Communication Research47(2): 178–200. DOI: 10.1177/0093650218777177.
25.
HahlOKimMZuckerman SivanEW (2018) The Authentic appeal of the lying demagogue: proclaiming the deeper truth about political illegitimacy. American Sociological Review83(1): 1–33.
26.
HambyP (2013) Did Twitter Kill the Boys On The Bus? Searching for a Better Way to Cover a Campaign. Cambridge, MA: Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics, and Public Policy.
27.
HameleersMBosLde VreeseCH (2017) The appeal of media populism: the media preferences of citizens with populist attitudes. Mass Communication and Society20(4): 481–504.
28.
JagersJWalgraveS (2007) Populism as political communication style: an empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 319–345.
29.
JonesBDBaumgartnerFR (2005) The Politics of Attention. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
KahnKF (1994) The distorted mirror: press coverage of women candidates for statewide office. The Journal of Politics56(1): 154–173.
KemmersRvan der WaalJAupersS (2016) Becoming politically discontented: anti-establishment careers of Dutch nonvoters and PVV voters. Current Sociology64(5): 757–774.
KrämerB (2014) Media populism: a conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects. Communication Theory24(1): 42–60.
35.
LaddJM (2011) Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters. 1st ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
LechelerSKruikemeierS (2016) Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: a review of research on the use of online sources. New Media & Society18(1): 156–171.
37.
McDonaldIRLawrenceRG (2004) Filling the 24× 7 news hole: television news coverage following September 11. American Behavioral Scientist48(3): 327–340.
38.
McGregorSCMolyneuxL (2018) Twitter’s influence on news judgment: an experiment among journalists. Journalism. Epub ahead of print 5October. DOI: 10.1177/1464884918802975.
MazzoleniG (2008) Populism and the media. In: AlbertazziDMcDonnellD (eds) Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 49–64.
41.
MazzoleniGBraccialeR (2018) Socially mediated populism: the communicative strategies of political leaders on Facebook. Palgrave Communications4(1): 50.
MoffittB (2017) The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
44.
MorstatterFPfefferJLiuH, et al (2013) Is the sample good enough? Streaming API with Twitter’s Firehose. International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.5204
45.
MuddeC (2004) The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39(4): 541–563.
46.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OliverJERahnWM (2016) Rise of the Trumpenvolk: populism in the 2016 election. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science667(1): 189–206.
49.
ParmeleeJH (2014) The agenda-building function of political tweets. New Media & Society16(3): 434–450.
PeckR (2019) Fox Populism: Branding Conservatism as Working Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
PelledALukitoJBoehmF, et al. (2018) “Little Marco,” “Lyin’ Ted,” “Crooked Hillary,” and the “Biased” Media: how Trump used Twitter to attack and organize. In: StroudNJMcGregorSC (eds) New Agendas in Communication: How Big Data Informs Political Communication. New York: Routledge, pp. 176–196.
ReversM (2014) The twitterization of news making: transparency and journalistic professionalism. Journal of Communication64(5): 806–826.
56.
SchlesingerPDoyleG (2015) From organizational crisis to multi-platform salvation? Creative destruction and the recomposition of news media. Journalism16(3): 305–323.
57.
SchmuckDMatthesJBoomgaardenH (2017) Austria: candidate-centered and anti-immigrant right-wing populism. In: AalbergTEsserFReinemannC, et al (eds) Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge, pp. 85–98.
58.
ShahDVWattsMDDomkeD, et al. (1999) News coverage, economic cues, and the public’s presidential preferences, 1984-1996. The Journal of Politics61(4): 914–943.
59.
StierSPoschLBleierA, et al. (2017) When populists become popular: comparing Facebook use by the right-wing movement Pegida and German political parties. Information, Communication & Society20: 1365–1388. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328519
60.
van AelstPStrömbäckJAalbergT, et al. (2017) Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy?Annals of the International Communication Association41(1): 3–27.
61.
WaisbordS (2018) The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics. Communication Research and Practice4(1): 17–34.
62.
WalgraveSBoydstunAEVliegenthartR, et al. (2017) The nonlinear effect of information on political attention: media storms and U.S. congressional hearings. Political Communication34(4): 548–570.
63.
WayneMMurrayC (2009) U.K. television news: monopoly politics and cynical populism. Television & New Media10(5): 416–433.
64.
WebsterJG (2014) The Marketplace of Attention: How Audiences Take Shape in a Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
65.
WellsCShahDVPevehouseJC, et al. (2016) How Trump drove coverage to the nomination: hybrid media campaigning. Political Communication33(4): 669–676.
66.
WettsteinMEsserFSchulzA, et al. (2018) News media as gatekeepers, critics, and initiators of populist communication: how journalists in ten countries deal with the populist challenge. The International Journal of Press/politics23: 476–495.
67.
WilliamsBADelli CarpiniMX (2011) After Broadcast News: Media Regimes, Democracy, and the New Information Environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
WilliamsAHarteDTurnerJ (2015) Filling the news hole? UK community news and the crisis in local journalism. In: NielsenRK (ed.) Local Journalism. The Decline of Newspapers and the Rise of Digital Media. London; New York: I.B. Tauris, pp. 203–223.
69.
ZhangYWellsCWangS, et al. (2017) Attention and amplification in the hybrid media system: the composition and activity of Donald Trump’s Twitter following during the 2016 Presidential Election. New Media & Society20: 3161–3182.
