Egypt’s feminist counterpublic: The re-invigoration of the post-revolution public sphere

Abstract

This study examines the current feminist counterculture movements which appears to be reinvigorating the Egyptian public sphere. The study argues women in particular have been able to find themselves alternative ways to develop a discourse focused on a desire for social changes around which they can unite. In focusing on lifestyle issues that normally are discussed only in small private spheres, they are able to challenge norms while not provoking the state or security apparatus and avoiding becoming part of the polarised political environment. This article explores the dynamics and motivations of these groups through a case study of three of the networked feminist movements. Our data from semi-structured interviews with the founders show that they grew from networks to movements which then evolved in order to be sustainable. This article argues that through the process of their evolution, these movements are helping strengthen the public sphere and enhance Egyptian democracy.

Keywords

Counterpublics Egypt feminist movements public sphere social movements

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aboughazala

(2018) Beauty standards: Egypt’s curly hair comeback. BBC News, 30 April. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-43879170 (accessed 13 April 2019).

Ackerly

Okin

(1999) Feminist social criticism and the international movement for women’s rights as human rights. In: Shapiro

Hacker-Cordón

(eds) Democracy’s Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 134–162.

Adi

Lilleker

Pekalski

(2018) #Rezist 2017: communicating dissent in a hypermedia environment. Media Research: Croatian Journal for Journalism and the Media 24(1): 69–86.

Alaimo

(2015) How the Facebook Arabic page ‘we are all Khaled Said’ helped promote the Egyptian revolution. Social Media + Society 1(2): 87–96.

BBC Arabic (2018) The revolution of curly hair in Egypt, 28 April. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/arabic/middleeast-43815049 (accessed 13 April 2019).

Benhabib

(1992) Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bennett

Segerberg

(2012) The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 739–768.

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

Castells

(2015) Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

10.

Collins

(2001) Social movements and the focus of emotional attention. In: Goodwin

Jasper

Polletta

(eds) Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 27–44.

11.

Dahlberg

(2001) Extending the public sphere through cyberspace: the case of Minnesota E-Democracy. Available at: https://firstmonday.org/article/view/838/747 (accessed 6 April 2019).

12.

Dahlgren

(2005) The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication 22(2): 147–162.

13.

Eickelman

Salvadore

(2002) The public sphere and Muslim Identities. European Journal of Sociology 43(1): 92–115.

14.

El-Bendary

(2013) The Egyptian Revolution and Its Aftermath: Mubarak to Morsi. New York: Algora Publishing. Available at: https://www.questia.com/library/120082583/the-egyptian-revolution-between-hope-and-despair (accessed 12 April 2019).

15.

Eley

(1992) Nations, Publics, and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth Century. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

16.

Elsheikh

(2018) Campaign Professionalism during Egypt’s 2012 Presidential Election. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

17.

Eltantawy

Wiest

(2011) The Arab spring: social media in the Egyptian revolution: reconsidering resource mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication 5: 18.

18.

Fiig

(2011) A powerful, opinion-forming public? Rethinking the Habermasian public sphere in a perspective of feminist theory and citizenship. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 12(3): 291–308.

19.

Foss

(1991) Women Speak: The Eloquence of Women’s Lives. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

20.

Fraser

(1990) Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 26(25): 109–142.

21.

Griffin

(1996) The essentialist roots of the public sphere: a feminist critique. Western Journal of Communication 60(1): 21–39.

22.

Haas

(2018) ‘Escape the corset’: South Korean women rebel against strict beauty standards. The Guardian, 26 October. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/26/escape-the-corset-south-korean-women-rebel-against-strict-beauty-standards (accessed 3 July 2019).

23.

Habermas

(1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

24.

Habermas

(2006) Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory 16: 411–426.

25.

Harvey

(2011) Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research 11(4): 431–441.

26.

Hauser

(1999) Vernacular Voices: The Rhetoric of Publics and Public Spheres. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

27.

Hirschman

(1977) The Passions and the Interests: Political. Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

28.

Iskander

(2011) Connecting the national and the virtual: can Facebook activism remain relevant after Egypt’s January 25 uprising. International Journal of Communication 5: 1225–1237.

29.

Kasprzak

(2017) Black natural hair: why women are returning to their roots. BBC News, 6 May. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-39195836

30.

Khamis

Sisler

(2010) The new Arab cyberscape redefining boundaries and reconstructing public spheres. Annals of the International Communication Association 34(1): 227–315.

31.

Knoppers

(2014) Gender and the public sphere in Habermas and Milton: new critical directions. Literature Compass 11(9): 615–624.

32.

Kruse

Norris

Flinchum

(2018) Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social media. The Sociological Quarterly 59(1): 62–84.

33.

McAdam

McCarthy

Zald

(2012) Introduction: opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes – toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements. In: McAdam

McCarthy

Zald

(eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–20.

34.

Papacharissi

(2002) The virtual sphere: the Internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society 4(1): 9–27.

35.

Poor

(2005) Mechanisms of an online public sphere: the website Slashdot. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(2). Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com

36.

Radsch

Khamis

(2013) In their own voice: technologically mediated empowerment and transformation among young Arab women. Feminist Media Studies 13(5): 881–890.

37.

Rhodan

(2014) U.S. military rolls back restrictions on Black hairstyles. Time, 3 August. Available at: https://time.com/3107647/military-black-hairstyles/ (accessed 3 July 2019).

38.

Roth

(2007) Sisterhood and exclusionary solidarity in a labor women’s organization. In: Flam

King

(eds) Emotions and Social Movements. London: Routledge, pp. 189–206.

39.

Salime

(2016) Embedded counterpublics: Women and islamic revival in Morocco. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 37(3): 47–73.

40.

Salvatore

(2007) The Public Sphere: Liberal Modernity, Catholicism, Islam. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

41.

Salvatore

(2013) New media, the ‘Arab spring’, and the metamorphosis of the public sphere: beyond Western assumptions. Constellations 20(2): 217–228.

42.

Sasha

(2013) The Differential Impact of Women’s Participation in the Arab Spring. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.

43.

Shehata

(2018) Cairo runners, hair addicts and more. Al-Ahram Weekly, 15 November. Available at: https://www.masress.com/en/ahramweekly/125848 (accessed 6 April 2019).

44.

Squires

(2002) Rethinking the Black public sphere: an alternative vocabulary for multiple public spheres. Communication Theory 12(4): 446–468.

45.

Tarrow

(2011) Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

46.

Taylor

(1995) Watching for vibes: bringing emotions into the study of feminist organizations. In: Ferree

Martin

(eds) Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women’s Movement. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, pp. 223–233.

47.

Thorsen

Sreedharan

(2019) #EndMaleGuardianship: women’s rights, social media and the Arab public sphere. New Media & Society 21: 1121–1140.

48.

Toepfl

Piwoni

(2017) Targeting dominant publics: how counterpublic commenters align their efforts with mainstream news. New Media & Society 20: 2011–2027.

49.

Witschge

(2004) Online deliberation: possibilities of the internet for deliberative democracy. In: Shane

(ed.) Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet. London: Routledge, pp. 109–122.