This article examines how market actors are actively engaged in state control of the Internet in China by studying the emerging industry of Internet-opinion management in that country. It presents an ecology of this industry, identifies three main market actors whose competitiveness is deeply rooted in the Chinese political context and identifies three stages of state-market collaboration. This article sheds light on how the rise of big data has strengthened state capacity for Internet control. It provides original evidence for how the profit motive drives Chinese data companies and media organisations to seek active involvement in the institutional construction of Internet-opinion control. This article also contributes to the literature on repression and contentious politics. It demonstrates that by relying on the market, authoritarian states are able to turn advanced technology into a repressive tool, which makes it more difficult for their citizens to use the Internet to mobilise.
AkgülMKırlıdoğM (2015) Internet censorship in Turkey. Internet Policy Review4(2): 1–22.
2.
AndrejevicM (2011) The work that affective economics does. Cultural Studies25(4–5): 604–620.
3.
BallKSniderL (2013) Introduction. In: BallKSniderL (eds) The Surveillance-Industrial Complex: A Political Economy of Surveillance. London: Routledge, pp. 15–22.
4.
BennettCJ (2015) Trends in voter surveillance in Western societies: privacy intrusions and democratic implications. Surveillance and Society13(3–4): 370–384.
5.
ChenX (2017) Origins of informal coercion in China. Politics and Society45(1): 67–89.
6.
ColyvasJAJonssonS (2011) Ubiquity and legitimacy: disentangling diffusion and institutionalization. Sociological Theory29(1): 27–53.
7.
CramptonJW (2015) Collect it all: national security, big data and governance. GeoJournal80(4): 519–531.
8.
CreemersR (2017) Cyber China: upgrading propaganda, public opinion work and social management for the twenty-First century. Journal of Contemporary China26(103): 85–100.
9.
DeibertRRohozinskiR (2010) Liberation vs. control: the future of cyberspace. Journal of Democracy21(4): 43–57.
10.
DeibertRRohozinskiR (2011) Beyond denial. Introducing next-generation information access controls. Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace62(8): 1647–1649.
11.
DowlingJPfefferJ (1975) Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review18(1): 122–136.
12.
FriedlandRAlfordRR (1991) Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: PowellWWDiMaggioPJ (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago, pp. 232–263.
13.
HanR (2015) Manufacturing consent in cyberspace: China’s ‘fifty-cent army’. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs44(2): 105–134.
14.
HanR (2018) Contesting Cyberspace in China: Online Expression and Authoritarian Resilience. New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
HayesB (2012) The surveillance-industrial complex. In: BallKHaggertyKLyonD (eds) Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 167–175.
16.
HeijdenHV (1997) Political opportunity structure and the institutionalisation of the environmental movement. Environmental Politics6(4): 25–50.
17.
HouR (2017) Neoliberal governance or digitalized autocracy? The rising market for online opinion surveillance in China. Surveillance and Society15(3–4): 418–424.
18.
JiangM (2010) Authoritarian deliberation on Chinese Internet. Electronic Journal of Communication20(3–4) :1–20.
19.
KingGPanJRobertsME (2013) How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review107(2): 326–343.
20.
KingGPanJRobertsME (2014) Reverse-engineering censorship in China: randomized experimentation and participant observation. Science345(6199): 1–10.
21.
KyriakopoulouK (2011) Authoritarian states and Internet social media: instruments of democratisation or instruments of control?Human Affairs21(1): 18–26.
22.
LaiZ (2013) The analysis on the domestic Internet-opinion service’s technical characteristics and market form (in Chinese). Available at: http://shenhaolaoshi.blog.sohu.com/260685906.html (accessed 1 June 2018).
LyonD (1994) The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
25.
LyonDTopakÖE (2013) Promoting global identification. In: BallKSniderL (eds) The Surveillance-Industrial Complex: A Political Economy of Surveillance. London: Routledge, pp. 27–43.
26.
McAdamD (1996) Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. In: McAdamDMcCarthyJDZaldMN (eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–40.
27.
McAdamDTarrowSTillyC (2003) Dynamics of contention. Social Movement Studies2(1): 99–102.
28.
MackinnonR (2011) China’s ‘networked authoritarianism’. Journal of Democracy22(2): 32–46.
29.
MarxG (2016) Windows into the Soul. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
MigdalJS (1994) The state in society: an approach to struggles for domination. In: MigdalJSKohliAShuiV (eds) State Power and Social Forces: Domination and Transformation in the Third World. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–36.
31.
MillerB (2016) Automated detection of Chinese government astroturfers using network and social metadata. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2738325
32.
MorozovE (2011) Whither Internet control?Journal of Democracy22(2): 62–74.
33.
MoscoV (2009) The Political Economy of Communication. SAGE.
34.
MossD (2014) Repression, response, and contained escalation under ‘liberalized’ authoritarianism in Jordan. Mobilization: An International Quarterly19(3): 261–286.
35.
MossD (2018) The ties that bind: Internet communication technologies, networked authoritarianism, and ‘voice’ in the Syrian diaspora. Globalizations15(2): 265–282.
36.
O’BrienK (1998) Military-advisory groups and African security: privatized peacekeeping?Security Studies5(3): 78–105.
37.
OngLH (2018) ‘Thugs-for-Hire’: subcontracting of state coercion and state capacity in China. Perspective on Politics16(3): 1–16.
38.
ØstbøJ (2017) Securitizing ‘spiritual-moral values’ in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs33(3): 200–216.
39.
PallingCV (2017) Internet control through ownership: the case of Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs33(1): 16–33.
40.
People’ Daily Internet-Opinion Centre (2011) How to Address Internet Opinion. Beijing: Xinhua Publisher (in Chinese).
41.
PierreJ (1995) The marketization of the state: citizens, consumers, and the emergence of the public market. In: PetersBGSavoieDJ (eds) Governance in a Changing Environment, Canadian Centre for Management Development. Montreal, QC, Canada; Kingston, ON, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 55–81.
42.
PivenFFClowardR (1971) Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Vintage.
43.
SingerPW (2002) Corporate warriors: the rise of the privatized military industry and its ramifications for international security. International Security26(3): 186–220.
44.
StockmannD (2013) Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
SuchmanMC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review20(3): 571–610.
46.
WoodDMBallK (2013) Brandscapes of control? Surveillance, marketing and the co-construction of subjectivity and space in neo-liberal capitalism. Marketing Theory13(1): 47–67.
47.
YangG (2011) The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online. New York: Columbia University Press.
48.
YangG (2017) Killing emotions softly: the civilizing process of online emotional mobilization. Communication & Society40: 75–104.
49.
ZhangYDuX (2013) The business of Internet opinion: help officials read the Internet (in Chinese). Available at: http://www.infzm.com/content/93779 (accessed 1 June 2018).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
