Previous research on verbal representations shows how the news media consistently depicts young people’s uses of digital media in a narrow, negative light. In this article, we present an innovative methodology for demonstrating how young people and their digital practices are visually depicted. We focus on stock photography produced by the commercial image banks which source the news media with much of its imagery. Following an indicative analysis of news media images, we present a social semiotic analysis (grounded also in a descriptive content analysis) of a dataset of 600 stock photos top-sliced from three major image banks. By pinpointing dominant representational, compositional and interpersonal meanings, we show how image banks and, in turn, the news media produce a rather pessimistic metadiscursive framing of ‘teens and technology’. These influential visualizations are often reductionistic – consistently centering technologies over relationships; they are also problematic in, for example, their inexplicably gendered and classist assumptions.
AielloGParryK (2019) Visual Communication: Understanding Images in Media Culture. London: SAGE.
3.
AielloGWoodhouseA (2016) When corporations come to define the visual politics of gender: the case of Getty Images. Journal of Language and Politics15(3): 352–368.
4.
AndroutsopoulosJTereickJ (2015) YouTube: language and discourse practices in participatory culture. In: SpiliotiTGeorgakopoulouA (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication. New York: Routledge, pp. 354–371.
5.
BellP (2001) Content analysis of visual images. In: Van LeeuwenTJewittC (eds) The Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 10–34.
6.
BounegruLGrayJVenturiniT, et al (2017) A field guide to ‘fake news’ and other information disorders. Public Data Lab. Available at: https://fakenews.publicdatalab.org/
7.
CameronD (2000) Styling the worker: gender and the commodification of language in the globalized service economy. Journal of Sociolinguistics4(3): 323–347.
8.
DürscheidCSieverCM (2017) Jenseits des Alphabets – Kommunikation mit Emojis [Beyond the alphabet – communication with emojis]. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik45: 256–285.
9.
FaircloughN (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
10.
FoucaultM (1975/1995) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Vintage Books.
11.
FroshP (2003) The Image Factory: Consumer Culture, Photography and the Visual Content Industry. Oxford: Berg.
12.
FroshP (2013) Beyond the image bank: digital commercial photography. In: ListerM (ed.) The Photographic Image in Digital Culture. London: Routledge, pp. 131–148.
13.
GeorgakopoulouASpiliotiT (eds) (2015) The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication. New York: Routledge.
14.
GershonI (2010) Media ideologies: an introduction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology20: 283–293.
15.
GlücklerJPanitzR (2013) Survey of the Global Stock Image Market 2012. Heidelberg: GSIM Research Group. Available at: http://www.stockimagemarket.uni-hd.de/
16.
GürselZ (2016) Image Brokers: Visualizing World News in the Age of Digital Circulation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17.
HasinoffAA (2012) Sexting as media production: rethinking social media and sexuality. New Media & Society15(4): 449–465.
18.
HerringSC (2001) Computer-mediated discourse. In: SchiffrinDTannenDHamiltonHE (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 612–634.
19.
HunzikerM (2015) Normalizing the Middle Class: A Visual Discourse Analysis of New Media Representations in Mediatized Stock Photography. MA Thesis, University of Bern, Switzerland.
20.
IrvineJTGalS (2000) Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In: KroskrityP (ed.) Regimes of Language. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, pp. 35–83.
21.
JewittCOyamaR (2001) Visual meaning: a social semiotic approach. In: Van LeeuwenTJewittC (eds) The Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 134–156.
22.
KellyJP (2009) Not so revolutionary after all: the role of reinforcing frames in US magazine discourse about microcomputers. New Media & Society11(1–2): 31–52.
23.
KressGVan LeeuwenT (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Hodder Arnold.
24.
MachinD (2004) Building the world’s visual language: the increasing global importance of image banks in corporate media. Visual Communication3(3): 316–336.
25.
MachinDMayrA (2012) How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: SAGE.
McKaySThurlowCToomey ZimmermanH (2005) Wired whizzes or techno-slaves? Young people and their emergent communication technologies. In: WilliamsAThurlowC (eds) Talking Adolescence: Perspectives on Communication in the Teenage Years. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 185–203.
28.
PariserE (2011) The Filter Bubble. London: Penguin.
29.
PorteousMAColstonNJ (1980) How adolescents are reported in the British press. Journal of Adolescence3: 197–207.
30.
RoseG (2010) Doing Family Photography: The Domestic, the Public and the Politics of Sentiment. Farnham: Ashgate.
31.
SeargeantPTaggC (eds) (2014) The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
StöcklH (2020) Multimodality and mediality in an image-centric semiosphere – a rationale. In: ThurlowCDürscheidCDiemozF (eds) Visualizing Digital Discourse: Interactional, Institutional and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter.
33.
TanSO’HalloranKLWignellP, et al. (2018) A multimodal mixed methods approach for examining recontextualisation patterns of violent extremist images in online media. Discourse, Context & Media21: 18–35.
ThurlowC (2007) Fabricating youth: New-media discourse and the technologization of young people. In: JohnsonSEnsslinA (eds) Language in the Media: Representations, Identities, Ideologies. London: Continuum, pp. 213–233.
36.
ThurlowC (2014) Disciplining youth: language ideologies and new technologies. In: JaworskiACouplandN (eds) The Discourse Reader. 3rd ed.London: Routledge, pp. 481–496.
37.
ThurlowC (2017) ‘Forget about the words’? Tracking the language, media and semiotic ideologies of digital discourse: the case of sexting. Discourse, Context and Media20: 10–19.
38.
ThurlowC (2018) Digital discourse: locating language in new/social media. In: BurgessJPoellTMarwickA (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. NewYork: SAGE, pp. 135–145.
39.
ThurlowCAielloG (2007) National pride, global capital: a social semiotic analysis of transnational visual branding in the airline industry. Visual Communication6(3): 305–344.
40.
ThurlowCDürscheidCDiemozF (eds) (2020) Visualizing Digital Discourse: Interactional, Institutional and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter.
41.
TurkleS (2011) Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
42.
VaismanC (2014) Beautiful script, cute spelling and glamorous words: doing girlhood through language playfulness on Israeli blogs. Language and Communication34: 69–80.
43.
Van LeeuwenT (2005) Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
WeinsteinE (2018) The social media see-saw: positive and negative influences on adolescents’ affective well-being. New Media & Society20(10): 3597–3623.
46.
WoolardKASchieffelinBB (1994) Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology23: 55–82.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
