This research investigates how digital news headlines influence contemporary news information seeking. In two studies (a lab experiment and a field test), we examine how the presentation of news information—traditional, summary news headlines or clickbait, curiosity news headlines—influences the attitudinal and behavioral components of news seeking. Study 1 models the news-seeking process, finding that summary headlines heighten perceptions of headline information adequacy, which increase expectations that an article will provide clear information, which in turn increase anticipated audience engagement with news compared to some curiosity headlines. Study 2 determines that individuals’ selection behavior on nine local newspaper websites also favors summary headlines. The findings encourage researchers to employ information-seeking mechanisms in understanding news selection decisions.
AfifiWAWeinerJL (2004) Toward a theory of motivated information management. Communication Theory14: 167–190.
2.
AfifiWAWeinerJL (2006) Seeking information about sexual health: applying the theory of motivated information management. Human Communication Research32(1): 35–57.
3.
AllisonPD (2005) Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
4.
AndrewBC (2007) Media-generated shortcuts: do newspaper headlines present another roadblock for low-information rationality?The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12: 24–43.
5.
BatsellJ (2015) Engaged Journalism: Connecting with Digitally Empowered News Audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
BlomJNHansenKR (2015) Click bait: forward-reference as lure in online news headlines. Journal of Pragmatics76: 87–100.
7.
BolsenTLeeperTJ (2013) Self-interest and attention to news among issue publics. Political Communication30(3): 329–348.
ChakrabortyAParanjapeBKakarlaS, et al. (2016) Stop clickbait: detecting and preventing clickbaits in online news media. In:2016 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM), San Francisco, CA, 18–21 August, pp. 9–16. New York: IEEE.
10.
ChernovGValenzuelaSMcCombsM (2011) An experimental comparison of two perspectives on the concept of need for orientation in agenda-setting theory. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly88(1): 142–155.
11.
ClatterbuckGW (1979) Attributional confidence and uncertainty in initial interaction. Human Communication Research5: 147–157.
12.
DayMVFiskeSTDowningEL, et al. (2014) Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin40: 1559–1573.
13.
DiddiALaRoseR (2006) Getting hooked on news: uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an Internet environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media50: 193–210.
14.
DorD (2003) On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics35: 695–721.
15.
EckerUKHLewandowskyS (2014) The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied20: 323–335.
16.
GantzWFitzmauriceMFinkE (1991) Assessing the active component of information-seeking. Journalism Quarterly68: 630–637.
17.
GraberDA (1984) Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. New York: Longman.
18.
HayesAF (2018) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. 2nd edn.New York: Guildford Press.
19.
HindmanM (2015). Stickier news: what newspapers don’t know about web traffic has hurt them badly—but there is a better way. Discussion Paper Series #D-93, 3 April. Available at: http://shorensteincenter.org/stickier-news-matthew-hindman/
20.
HurleyRJKosenkoKABrashersD (2011) Uncertain terms: message features of online cancer news. Communication Monographs78(3): 370–390.
21.
KayeBKJohnsonTJ (2002) Online and in the know: uses and gratifications of the web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media46: 54–71.
22.
KilgoDKSintaV (2016) Six things you didn’t know about headline writing: sensational form in viral news of traditional and digitally native news organizations. The Official Journal of the International Symposium of Online Journalism6: 111–130.
23.
Knobloch-WesterwickSSharmaNHansenDL, et al. (2005) Impact of popularity indications on readers’ selective exposure to online news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media49(3): 296–313.
24.
KrippendorffK (2013) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
KuhlthauCC (1991) Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science42: 361–371.
26.
KuikenJSchuthASpittersM, et al. (2017) Effective headlines of newspaper articles in a digital environment. Digital Journalism5: 1300–1314.
27.
LaiLFarbrotA (2014) What makes you click? The effect of question headlines on readership in computer-mediated communication. Social Influence9(4): 289–299.
28.
LeeCSMaL (2012) News sharing in social media: the effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior28(2): 331–339.
29.
LaroseREastinMS (2004) A social cognitive theory of internet uses and gratifications: toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media48(3): 358–377.
30.
MokrosHBAakhusM (2002) From information-seeking behavior to meaning engagement practice. Human Communication Research28: 298–312.
31.
Molek-KozakowskaK (2013) Towards a pragma-linguistic framework for the study of sensationalism in news headlines. Discourse & Communication7: 173–197.
PalmgreenPRayburnJD (1982) Gratifications sought and media exposure: an expectancy value model. Communication Research9: 561–580.
34.
PriorM (2007) Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
RamirezAWaltherJBBurgoonJK, et al. (2002) Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research28: 213–228.
36.
RubinVL (2010) Epistemic modality: from uncertainty to certainty in the context of information seeking as interactions with texts. Information Processing and Management46: 533–540.
37.
SoleyLCReidLN (1983) Industrial AD readership as a function of headline type. Journal of Advertising12(1): 34–38.
38.
StroudNJ (2011) Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
StroudNJ (2017) Attention as a valuable resource. Political Communication34(3): 479–489.
40.
StroudNJMuddimanA (2018) Social media engagement with strategy and issue framed political news. In: Manuscript presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Salt Lake City, UT, 8–11 November.
41.
StroudNJMuddimanAScaccoJM (2015) Engaging audiences via online news sites. In: Gil De ZúñigaH (ed.) New Technologies and Civic Engagement. New York: Routledge, pp. 178–194.
42.
SundarSSLimperosAM (2013) Uses and grats 2.0: new gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media57: 504–525.
43.
SundarSSKnobloch WesterwickSHastallMR (2007) News cues: information scent and cognitive heuristics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology58: 366–378.
44.
TrillingDTolochkoPBurscherB (2017) From newsworthiness to shareworthiness: how to predict news sharing based on article characteristics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94(1): 38–60.
45.
UsherN (2014) Making News at the New York Times. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
46.
WinterSMetzgerMJFlanaginAJ (2016) Selective use of news cues: a multiple motive perspective on information selection in social media environments. Journal of Communication66: 669–693.
47.
ZallerJ (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
