This article identifies news headlines as media-generated shortcuts for heuristic information about politics. Functionally speaking, headlines are simplifying mechanisms that summarize and attract attention to what lies ahead (or below). Although previous research has demonstrated potentially powerful framing effects of headlines, comparatively little is known about the relationship actual news headlines have with the stories they introduce. This study aims to contribute to this area of research by comparing with their stories the content of newspaper headlines about the 2004 Canadian federal election campaign.The data set has been developed from a content analysis of news, opinion, and editorial articles about the election, drawn from five major Canadian daily newspapers during the campaign. Headlines and full-text stories both have been separately coded for emphasis (campaign oriented vs. issue oriented), party coverage, leader coverage, issues, and tone.The analysis shows a considerable difference between articles and their headlines in terms of emphasis and issue salience. It also demonstrates how the tone of election coverage appeared to change when viewed exclusively through the prism of the headlines versus the lens of full stories. Hence, voters who scanned headlines were supplied with a different set of heuristic cues than those paying closer attention.
Allport, Floyd H., and Milton Lepkin.1943. “Building War Morale with News-Headlines .” Public Opinion Quarterly7(2):211-21.
2.
Althaus, Scott L., Jill A. Edy, and Patricia F. Phalen .2001. “Using Substitutes for Full-text News Stories in Content Analysis: Which Text Is Best?” American Journal of Political Science45(3):707—23.
3.
Althaus, Scott L., Jill A. Edy, and Patricia F. Phalen .2002. “Using the Vanderbilt Television Abstracts to Track Broadcast News Content: Possibilities and Pitfalls .” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media46(3):473—92.
4.
Blais, André, Neil Nevitte, Elisabeth Gidengil , and Richard Nadeau.2000. “Do People Have Feelings toward Leaders about Whom They Say They Know Nothing?” The Public Opinion Quarterly64(4):452—63.
5.
Blais, André, Joanna Everitt, Patrick Fournier, Elisabeth Gidengil, and Neil Nevitte.2005. “The Political Psychology of Voters' Reactions to a Corruption Scandal.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
6.
Blood, Deborah J., and Peter C.B. Phillips .1995. “Recession Headline News, Consumer Sentiment, the State of the Economy and Presidential Popularity: A Time Series Analysis 1989—1993.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research7(2):2—22.
7.
Bowles, Dorothy A., and Diane L. Borden .2000. Creative Editing. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8.
Brady, Henry E., and Richard R. Johnston .1987. “What's the Primary Message: Horse Race or Issue Journalism?” In Media and Momentum: The New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics, ed. Gary R. Orren and Nelson W. Polsby.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
9.
Brady, Henry E., Richard Johnston, and John Sides.2006. “The Study of Political Campaigns .” In Capturing Campaign Effects, ed. Henry E. Brady and Richard Johnston.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes .1960. The American Voter. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
11.
Carmines, Edward G., and James H. Kuklinski .1990. “Incentives, Opportunities, and the Logic of Public Opinion in American Political Representation.” In Information and Democratic Processes, ed. John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
12.
Caulfield, Timothy, and Tania Bubela.2004. “Media Representations of Genetic Discoveries: Hype in the Headlines?” HealthLaw Review12(2):53—61.
13.
Cohen, Bernard.1963. The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Condit, Celeste M., Alex Ferguson, Rachel Kassel, Chitra Thadhani, Holly Catherine Gooding, and Roxanne Parrott .2001. “An Exploratory Study of the Impact of News Headlines on Genetic Determinism.” Science Communication22(4):379—95.
15.
Cutler, Fred.2002. “The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice.” Journal of Politics64(2):466—90.
16.
Dalton, Russell J., Paul A. Beck, and Robert Huckfeldt .1998. “Partisan Cues and the Media: Information Flows in the 1992 Presidential Election.” American Political Science Review92(1):111—26.
17.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter.1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
18.
Dor, Daniel.2003. “On Newspaper Headlines as Relevance Optimizers.” Journal ofPragmatics35(5):695—721.
19.
Fenichel, Michael, and Peter Dan.1980. “Heads from Post and Times on Three-Mile Island .” Journalism Quarterly57(2):338—39.
20.
Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E.Taylor .1984. Social Cognition. New York: Random House.
21.
Flynn, James, Ellen Peters, C.K. Mertz, and Paul Slovic.1998. “Risk, Media, and Stigma at Rocky Flats.” Risk Analysis18(6):715—27.
22.
Fournier, Patrick.2006. “The Impact of Campaigns on Discrepancies, Errors, and Biases in Voting Behavior.” In Capturing Campaign Effects, ed. Henry Brady and Richard Johnston.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23.
Freimuth, Vicki S., Rachel H. Greenberg, Jean DeWitt, and Rose Mary Romano .1984. “Covering Cancer: Newspapers and the Public Interest.” Journal of Communication34(1): 62—73.
24.
Geer, John G., and Kim F. Kahn.1993. “Grabbing Attention: An Experimental Investigation of Headlines during Campaigns.” Political Communication10(2): 175—91.
25.
Gidengil, Elisabeth, André Blais, Neil Nevitte, and Richard Nadeau.2004. Citizens. Vancouver: UBC Press.
26.
Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth, Stuart Soroka, and Antonia Maioni.2004. “The Role of the Media: A Campaign Saved by a Horserace.” Policy Options25(8):89—91.
27.
Graber, Doris A.2001. Processing Politics: Learning from Television in the Internet Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Johnston, Richard, Andre Blais, Elisabeth Gidengil, and Neil Nevitte.1996. The Challenge of Direct Democracy: The 1992 Canadian Referendum . Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
29.
Kahn, Kim F., and Patrick J. Kenney .2002. “The Slant of News: How Editorial Endorsements Influence Campaign Coverage and Citizens' Views of Candidates.” American Political Science Review96(2):381—94.
30.
Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic , and Amos Tversky, eds. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Kenney, Keith, and Chris Simpson.1993. “Was Coverage of the 1998 Presidential Race by Washington's Two Major Dailies Biased? ” Journalism Quarterly70(2):345—55.
32.
Knobloch, Silvia, Grit Patzig, Anna-Maria Mende, and Matthias Hastall .2004. “Affective News: Effects of Discourse Structure in Narratives on Suspense, Curiosity, and Enjoyment while Reading News and Novels.” Communication Research31 (3):259-87.
33.
Kuklinski, James H., and Paul J. Quirk.2000. “Reconsidering the Rational Public: Cognition, Heuristics, and Mass Opinion.” In Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, ed. Arthur Lupia, Matthew D. McCubbins, and Samuel Popkin.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Lau, Richard, and David P. Redlawsk .2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science45(4):951—71.
35.
Lazarsfeld, Paul Felix, Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet.1948. The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a PresidentialCampaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
36.
León, José.1997. “The Effects of Headlines and Summaries on News Comprehension and Recall.” Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal9(2):85—106.
37.
Lupia, Arthur.1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” The American Political Science Review88(1):63—76.
38.
Marquez, F.T.1980. “How Accurate Are the Headlines. ” Journal of Communication3:30—36.
39.
McCombs, Maxwell E., and Donald L. Shaw.1972. “The Agenda-setting Function of Mass Media.” The Public Opinion Quarterly36(2): 176-87.
Mondak, Jeff.1994. “Cognitive Heuristics, Heuristic Processing, and Efficiency in Political Decision Making.” In New Directions in Political Psychology, ed. Michael X.Delli Carpini, Leonie Huddy , and Robert Y. Shapiro.Greenwich, CT: JAI.
42.
Pfau, Michael R.1995. “Covering Urban Unrest: The Headline Says It All . ” Journal of Urban Affairs17(2):131—41.
43.
Popkin, Samuel L.1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Protess, David L., and Maxwell McCombs, eds. 1991. Agenda Setting: Readings on Media, Public Opinion and Policy Making. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45.
Riggle, Ellen D., Victor C. Ottati, Robert S. Wyer, James Kuklinski, and Norbert Schwarz .1992. “Bases of Political Judgments: The Role of Stereotypic and Nonstereotypic Information.” Political Behavior14(1):67—87.
46.
Seidman, Steven A.1995. “Effects of Headings and Headlines in a Corporate Annual Report on Text Recall and Attitudes about the Organization.” International Journal of Instructional Media22(4):277—82.
47.
Smith, Edward J., and Gilbert L. Fowler Jr. 1982. “How Comprehensible Are Newspaper Headlines? ” Journalism Quarterly59(2): 305-8.
48.
Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A. Brody, and Philip Tetlock.1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Tannenbaum, Percy H.1953. “The Effect of Headlines on the Interpretation of News Stories.” Journalism Quarterly30:189—97.
50.
Trimble, Linda.2005. “Who Framed Belinda Stronach? National Newspaper Coverage of the Conservative Party of Canada's 2004 Leadership Race.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, London, Ontario.
51.
van Dijk, Teun A.1988. News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
van Dijk, Teun A., and Walter Kintsch.1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
53.
Wegner, Daniel M., Richard Wenzlaff, R. Michael Kerker , and Ann E. Beattie.1981. “Incriminating through Innuendo: Can Media Questions Become Public Answers? ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology40(5):822.
54.
Zwann, Rolf A.1994. “Effects of Genre Expectations on Text Comprehension .” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition20(4):920—33.
