Any social phenomenon with more than a billion participants daily is ripe for investigation into the implications of social capital. This research conducts a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature and conference material published between 1 January 1997 and 31 March 2018 regarding the question, can the use of online social networking sites cultivate and nurture an individual’s bonding social capital? The systematic review using EBSCOhost, EndNote, and final manual review process has aggregated 54 articles containing 116 distinct studies resulting in 85 answering in the affirmative to the research question. These studies are coded into a 13-category framework to provide a roadmap to future researchers. The results are wide and varied providing data from large and small groups. Generalization of the results supports the research question in that individual bonding social capital can be cultivated and nurtured via use of online social networking sites.
AhmadSMustafaMUllahA (2016) Association of demographics, motives and intensity of using social networking sites with the formation of bonding and bridging social capital in Pakistan. Computers in Human Behavior57: 107–114.
2.
*AhnJ (2012) Teenagers’ experiences with social network sites: relationships to bridging and bonding social capital. The Information Society28: 99–109.
3.
*AntheunisMLSchoutenAPKrahmerE (2014) The role of social networking sites in early adolescents’ social lives. The Journal of Early Adolescence36: 348–371.
4.
BaumeisterRFLearyMR (1997) Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology1: 311–320.
5.
Ben-DavidAMatamoros-FernándezA (2016) Hate speech and covert discrimination on social media: monitoring the Facebook pages of extreme-right political parties in Spain. International Journal of Communication10: 1167–1193.
6.
BenhamAEdwardsEFractenbergB, et al. (2012) Web of Deceit: Misinformation and Manipulation in the Age of Social Media. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
7.
BensonR (1999) Field theory in comparative context: a new paradigm for media studies. Theory and Society28: 463–498.
8.
BohnABuchtaCHornikK, et al. (2014) Making friends and communicating on Facebook: implications for the access to social capital. Social Networks37: 29–41.
9.
BouchillonBC (2013) Social ties and generalized trust, online and in person. Social Science Computer Review32: 506–523.
10.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of Taste (trans. NiceR). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BourdieuP (1985) The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society14: 723–744.
12.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital (English version). In: RichardsonJG (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, pp. 241–258.
13.
BourdieuP (1998) On Television (trans. FergusonPP). London: New Press.
14.
BourdieuPNiceR (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge university press Cambridge.
15.
BourdieuPWacquantLJ (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. University of Chicago press.
16.
boydDMEllisonNB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication13: 210–230.
17.
BozkuşŞB (2016) Pop polyvocality and internet memes: as a reflection of socio-political discourse of Turkish youth in social media. Global Media Journal: Turkish Edition6: 44–74.
BrandtzaegPBHeimJKaareBH (2010) Bridging and bonding in social network sites—investigating family-based capital. International Journal of Web Based Communities6: 231–253.
20.
*BrooksBHoganBEllisonN, et al. (2014) Assessing structural correlates to social capital in Facebook ego networks. Social Networks38: 1–15.
21.
BrownGMichinovN (2017) Cultural differences in garnering social capital on Facebook: French people prefer close ties and Americans prefer distant ties. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research46: 579–593.
22.
*BundonAHurd ClarkeL (2014) Unless you go online you are on your own: blogging as a bridge in para-sport. Disability & Society30: 185–198.
23.
BurtRS (1997) The Contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly42: 339–365.
24.
*ChenH-TLiX (2017) The contribution of mobile social media to social capital and psychological well-being: examining the role of communicative use, friending and self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior75: 958–965.
25.
ChenXSinS-CJThengY-L, et al. (2015) Why students share misinformation on social media: motivation, gender, and study-level differences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship41: 583–592.
26.
*ChoJ (2015) Roles of smartphone app use in improving social capital and reducing social isolation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking18: 350–355.
27.
ChoiSMKimYSungY, et al. (2011) Bridging or bonding?Information, Communication & Society14: 107–129.
28.
ChuS-CChoiSM (2010a) A cross-cultural study of social relationships and use of social networking sites in the US and China. In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Suntec Singapore International Convention & Exhibition Centre, Suntec City, Singapore, 21June.
29.
ChuS-CChoiSM (2010b) Social capital and self-presentation on social networking sites: a comparative study of Chinese and American young generations. Chinese Journal of Communication3: 402–420.
30.
ColemanJS (1986) Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology91: 1309–1335.
31.
ColemanJS (2000) Social capital in the creation of human capital. In: LesserE (ed.) Knowledge and Social Capital. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 17–41.
32.
De Souza BriggsX (1998) Doing democracy up-close: culture, power, and communication in community building. Journal of Planning Education and Research18: 1–13.
33.
DekkerREngbersenG (2014) How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. Global Networks14: 401–418.
34.
Del VicarioMBessiAZolloF, et al. (2016) The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America113: 554–559.
35.
EllisonNBboydDM (2013) Sociality through social network sites. In: DuttonWH (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–172.
36.
EllisonNBSteinfieldCLampeC (2011) Connection strategies: social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society13: 873–892.
37.
*ErjavecK (2013) Informal Learning through Facebook among Slovenian Pupils. Comunicar21: 117–126.
GittellRVidalA (1998) Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy. New York: SAGE.
42.
GonenSAharonyN (2017) Relations between privacy behaviors and social capital on Facebook. Libri67: 103–118.
43.
GranovetterM (1983) The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociological Theory1: 201–233.
44.
GranovetterMS (1977) The strength of weak ties. American journal of Sociology347–367.
45.
GreenhowCBurtonL (2011) Help from my "friends": social capital in the social network sites of low-income students. Journal of Educational Computing Research45: 223–245.
46.
HoferMAubertV (2013) Perceived bridging and bonding social capital on Twitter: differentiating between followers and followees. Computers in Human Behavior29: 2134–2142.
47.
HossainMDVeenstraAS (2016) Social capital and relationship maintenance: uses of social media among the South Asian Diaspora in the U.S. Asian Journal of Communication27: 1–17.
48.
*JiYGHwangboHYiJS, et al. (2010) The influence of cultural differences on the use of social network services and the formation of social capital. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction26: 1100–1121.
49.
JinC-H (2013) The role of Facebook users’ self-systems in generating social relationships and social capital effects. New Media & Society17: 501–519.
50.
JulienC (2015) Bourdieu, social capital and online interaction. Sociology49: 356–373.
51.
KentML (2010) Directions in social media for professionals and scholars. The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations2: 643–656.
52.
KorzennyF (1978) A theory of electronic propinquity: mediated communication in organizations. Communication Research5: 3–24.
53.
*KwonMWMcLeodDM (2012) Social network activity on Facebook and social capital. In International Communication Association (ICA) Annual Conference of Held in Phoenix from May pp. 24–28.
54.
*KwonM-WD’AngeloJMcLeodDM (2013) Facebook use and social capital. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society33: 35–43.
55.
LášticováB (2014) New media, social capital and transnational migration: Slovaks in the UK. Human Affairs24: 406–422.
56.
LatanéBLiuJHNowakA, et al. (1995) Distance matters: physical space and social impact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin21: 795–805.
57.
LeeEKimYJAhnJ (2014) How do people use Facebook features to manage social capital?Computers in Human Behavior36: 440–445.
58.
LeeJYParkSNaE-Y, et al. (2016) A comparative study on the relationship between social networking site use and social capital among Australian and Korean youth. Journal of Youth Studies19: 1164–1183.
59.
LeonardM (2004) Bonding and bridging social capital: reflections from Belfast. Sociology38: 927–944.
60.
*LiXChenW (2014) Facebook or Renren? A comparative study of social networking site use and social capital among Chinese international students in the United States. Computers in Human Behavior35: 116–123.
61.
LiuDAinsworthSEBaumeisterRF (2016) A meta-analysis of social networking online and social capital. Review of General Psychology20: 369–391.
62.
*LiuHShiJLiuY, et al. (2013) The moderating role of attachment anxiety on social network site use intensity and social capital. Psychological Reports112: 252–265.
*MeschGS (2018) Race, ethnicity and the strength of Facebook ties. Journal of Youth Studies21(5): 575–589.
65.
MondalMSilvaLABenevenutoF (2017) A measurement study of hate speech in social media. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM conference on hypertext and social media, Prague, Czech Republic, 4–7 July, pp. 85–94. New York: ACM.
OksanenAHawdonJHolkeriE, et al. (2014) Exposure to online hate among young social media users. Sociological Studies of Children and Youth18: 253–273.
68.
PerryMWMittelmarkMB (2006) The use of emerging technology to build health promotion capacity in regions with diversity in language and culture. Promotion & Education13: 197–202.
69.
PerryMWRiccaAV (2006) Instant messaging: virtual propinquity for health promotion networking. Promotion & Education13: 211–212.
70.
PetticrewM (2001) Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions322: 98–101.
71.
PetticrewMRobertsH (2006) Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. New York: Blackwell.
PhuaJJinS-AA (2011) ‘Finding a home away from home’: the use of social networking sites by Asia-Pacific students in the United States for bridging and bonding social capital. Asian Journal of Communication21: 504–519.
74.
PierreB (1989) Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory7: 14–25.
75.
PiwekLJoinsonA (2016) “What do they snapchat about?” Patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service. Computers in Human Behavior54: 358–367.
76.
PutnamRD (2001) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
77.
PutnamRD (2002) Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
78.
PutnamRDLeonardiRNanettiRY (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Institutions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79.
*RazaSAQaziWUmerA (2016) Facebook is a source of social capital building among university students. Journal of Educational Computing Research55: 295–322.
80.
ResnickP (2001) Beyond bowling together: sociotechnical capital. HCI in the New Millennium77: 247–272.
81.
RichMD (2018) Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
82.
RuiJRCovertJMStefanoneMA, et al. (2014) A communication multiplexity approach to social capital. Social Science Computer Review33: 498–518.
83.
*SajuriaJvan Heerde-HudsonJHudsonD, et al. (2014) Tweeting alone? An analysis of bridging and bonding social capital in online networks. American Politics Research43: 708–738.
84.
*SharmaMKMenonISMarimuthuP (2017) An exploration of use of social networking sites amongst users with psychological problems. ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry18: 22–31.
85.
*ShpigelmanCN (2017) Leveraging social capital of persons with intellectual disabilities through Facebook participation: the perspectives of family members and direct support staff. Intellectual and developmental disabilities55: 407–418.
86.
ShuKSlivaAWangS, et al. (2017) Fake news detection on social media: a data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter19: 22–36.
87.
SilvaLMondalMCorreaD, et al. (2016) Analyzing the targets of hate in online social media. In: Proceedings of the 10th international AAAI conference on web and social media. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.07709
88.
SkoricMMKwanGCE (2011) Platforms for mediated sociability and online social capital: the role of Facebook and massively multiplayer online games. Asian Journal of Communication21: 467–484.
89.
SkoricMMJiPFuWW-J, et al. (2015) Does the use of social network sites and mobile phones promote the acquisition of job-related information, job mobility and entrepreneurship in Asia?Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia14: 5–22.
StanfieldDBeddoeLBallantyneN, et al. (2017) Critical conversations: social workers’ perceptions of the use of a closed Facebook group as a participatory professional space. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Journal29: 42–54.
92.
StefanoneMAKyoungheeKLackaffD (2011) The value of online friends: networked resources via social network sites. First Monday16: 1–1.
93.
Stevens AubreyJChattopadhyaySRillL (2008) Are Facebook friends like face-to-face friends: Investigating relations between the use of social networking websites and social capital. Conference Papers – International Communication Association, pp. 1–33. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true…db=ufh…AN=36956641…site=ehost-live (accessed 19 June 2019).
94.
*SuCCChanNK (2017) Predicting social capital on Facebook: the implications of use intensity, perceived content desirability, and Facebook-enabled communication practices. Computers in Human Behavior72: 259–268.
95.
*TianX (2015) Network domains in social networking sites: expectations, meanings, and social capital. Information, Communication & Society19: 188–202.
96.
TongSWaltherJB (2011) Relational maintenance and CMC. Computer-mediated Communication in personal relationships53: 98–118.
*UusiauttiSMaattaK (2014) I am no longer alone—how do university students perceive the possibilities of social media?International Journal of Adolescence and Youth19: 293–305.
99.
*VitakJEllisonNB (2012) ‘There’s a network out there you might as well tap’: exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook. New Media & Society15: 243–259.
100.
WaltherJB (2011) Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. The Handbook of Interpersonal Communication4: 443–479.
101.
WaltherJBBazarovaNN (2008) Validation and application of electronic propinquity theory to computer-mediated communication in groups. Communication Research35: 622–645.
102.
WidmalmS (2005) The utility of bonding social capital. Journal of Civil Society1: 75–95.
103.
*WongCLChingTYCWhitfieldJ, et al. (2016) Online social participation, social capital and literacy of adolescents with hearing loss: a pilot study. Deafness & Education International18: 103–116.
104.
WuLMorstatterFHuX, et al. (2016) Mining misinformation in social media. In: ThaiMTWuWXiongH (eds) Big Data in Complex and Social Networks. London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 123–152.
105.
*YuanCWFussellSR (2017) A tale of two sites: dual social network site use and social network development. Computers in Human Behavior74: 83–91.
106.
*ZhongZ-J (2014) Civic engagement among educated Chinese youth: the role of SNS (Social Networking Services), bonding and bridging social capital. Computers & Education75: 263–273.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
