Journalism and media studies lack robust theoretical concepts for studying journalistic knowledge generation. More specifically, conceptual challenges attend the emergence of big data and algorithmic sources of journalistic knowledge. A family of frameworks apt to this challenge is provided by “social epistemology”: a young philosophical field which regards society’s participation in knowledge generation as inevitable. Social epistemology offers the best of both worlds for journalists and media scholars: a thorough familiarity with biases and failures of obtaining knowledge, and a strong orientation toward best practices in the realm of knowledge-acquisition and truth-seeking. This article articulates the lessons of social epistemology for two central nodes of knowledge-acquisition in contemporary journalism: human-mediated knowledge and technology-mediated knowledge.
AlbækE (2011) The interaction between experts and journalists in news journalism. Journalism12(3): 335–348.
2.
AndersonCW (2013) Towards a sociology of computational and algorithmic journalism. New Media & Society15(7): 1005–1021.
3.
AndersonCWDe MaeyerJ (2015) Objects of journalism and the news. Journalism16(1): 3–9.
4.
AppelgrenENygrenG (2014) Data journalism in Sweden: introducing new methods and genres of journalism into “old” organizations. Digital Journalism2(3): 394–405.
5.
BeattyJ (2006) Masking disagreement among experts. Episteme3(1): 52–67.
6.
BhaskarR (2013) A Realist Theory of Science. London: Routledge.
7.
BrunsA (2008) The active audience: transforming journalism from gatekeeping to gatewatching. In: PatersonCDomingoD (eds) Making Online News: The Ethnography of New Media Production. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 171–184.
8.
BurgeT (1993) Content preservation. The Philosophical Review102(4): 457–488.
9.
CarlsonM (2018) Automating judgment? Algorithmic judgment, news knowledge, and journalistic professionalism. New Media & Society20(5): 1755–1772.
10.
ChangH (2007) Scientific progress: beyond foundationalism and coherentism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements61: 1–20.
11.
CoadyCAJ (1992) Testimony: A Philosophical Study. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
CoadyD (2011) An epistemic defence of the blogosphere. Journal of Applied Philosophy28(3): 277–294.
13.
CoddingtonM (2015) Clarifying journalism’s quantitative turn: a typology for evaluating data journalism, computational journalism, and computer-assisted reporting. Digital Journalism3(3): 331–348.
14.
CollinsHMEvansR (2008) Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
CollinsHMWeinelM (2011) Transmuted expertise: how technical non-experts can assess experts and expertise. Argumentation25(3): 401.
16.
CookCSirkkunenE (2013) What’s in a niche? Exploring the business model of online journalism. Journal of Media Business Studies10(4): 63–82.
17.
CoxJCGoldmanAI (1994) Accuracy in journalism: an economic approach. In: SchmittFF (ed.) Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 189–215.
18.
DahlES (2017) Appraising black-boxed technology: the positive prospects. Philosophy and Technology31: 571–591.
19.
DomingoD (2008) Interactivity in the daily routines of online newsrooms: dealing with an uncomfortable myth. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(3): 680–704.
20.
EkströmM (2002) Epistemologies of TV journalism: a theoretical framework. Journalism3(3): 259–282.
21.
EricsonRV (1998) How journalists visualize fact. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science560: 83–95.
22.
EttemaJGlasserT (1985) On the epistemology of investigative journalism. Communication8: 183–206.
23.
EttemaJGlasserT (1998) Custodians of Conscience: Investigative Journalism and Public Virtue. New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
FaulknerP (2018) Collective testimony and collective knowledge. Ergo5(4): 103–126.
25.
FinkKAndersonCW (2014) Data journalism in the United States: beyond the “usual suspects.”Journalism Studies16: 467–481.
26.
FishmanM (1980) Manufacturing the News. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
27.
FoleyR (2001) Intellectual Trust in Oneself and Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
FreimanO (2014) Towards the epistemology of the internet of things: techno-epistemology and ethical considerations through the prism of trust. International Review of Information Ethics22: 6–22.
29.
FrickerE (1994) Against gullibility. In: MatilalBKChakrabartiA (eds) Knowing From Words. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 125–161.
30.
FrickerE (1995) Telling and trusting: reductionism and anti-reductionism in the epistemology of testimony. Mind101(414): 393–411.
31.
FrickerE (2006) Testimony and epistemic autonomy. In: LackeyJSosaE (eds) The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 225–253.
32.
FrickerM (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
FullerS (1987) On regulating what is known: a way to social epistemology. Synthese73(1): 145–183.
34.
FullerS (2002) Social Epistemology. 2nd ed.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
35.
GandyOH (1982) Beyond Agenda Setting: Information Subsidies and Public Policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
36.
GansH (2004) Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News Newsweek and Time. 25th Anniversary ed. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
37.
GelfertA (2011) Expertise, argumentation, and the end of inquiry. Argumentation25(3): 297–312.
38.
GettierEL (1963) Is justified true belief knowledge?Analysis23(6): 121–123.
39.
GodlerY (2018) Why anti-realist views persist in communication research: a political economic reflection on relativism’s prominence. Critical Sociology44(1): 107–125.
40.
GodlerYReichZ (2017) Journalistic evidence: cross-verification as a constituent of mediated knowledge. Journalism18(5): 558–574.
41.
GoldbergSC (2007) Anti-Individualism: Mind and Language, Knowledge and Justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
GoldbergSC (2010) Relying on Others: An Essay in Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
GoldbergSC (2012) Epistemic extendedness, testimony, and the epistemology of instrument-based belief. Philosophical Explorations15(2): 181–197.
44.
GoldbergSC (2017) Epistemically engineered environments. Synthese. Epub ahead of print 29 April 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-017-1413-0.
45.
GoldmanAI (1987) Foundations of social epistemics. Synthese73(1): 109–144.
46.
GoldmanAI (1999) Knowledge in a Social World. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
GoldmanAI (2001) Experts: which ones should you trust?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research63(1): 85–110.
48.
GoldmanAI (2002) What is social epistemology? A smorgasbord of projects. In: GoldmanA (ed.) Pathways to Knowledge: Private and Public. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 182–204.
49.
GoldmanAI (2008) The social epistemology of blogging. In: van den HovenJWeckertJ (eds) Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–122.
50.
GoldmanAI (2011) A guide to social epistemology. In: GoldmanAIWhitcombD (eds) Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 11–37.
51.
GravesL (2016) Deciding What’s True: The Rise of Political Fact-checking in American Journalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
IlyenkovEV (2007) The biological and the social in man. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology45(4): 64–68.
58.
KarlsenJStavelinE (2014) Computational journalism in Norwegian newsrooms. Journalism Practice8(1): 34–48.
59.
KitcherP (1993) Knowledge, society, and history. Canadian Journal of Philosophy23(2): 155–176.
60.
KitcherP (1994) Contrasting conceptions of social epistemology. In: SchmittFF (ed.) Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 111–134.
61.
KletzlS (in press) Knowledge by instruments.
62.
Knorr-CetinaK (2009) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
KuschM (2002) Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.
64.
LatourB (2002) Morality and technology: the end of the means. Theory, Culture & Society19(56): 247–260.
65.
LatourBWoolgarS (2013) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
LewisSC (2012) The tension between professional control and open participation: journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society15(6): 836–866.
68.
LiptonP (1998) The epistemology of testimony. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science29(1): 1–32.
69.
LonginoHE (2002) The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70.
LynchMP (2016) The Internet of Us: Knowing More and Understanding Less in the Age of Big Data. New York: Liveright.
71.
MathesonD (2005) Conflicting experts and dialectical performance: adjudication heuristics for the layperson. Argumentation19(2): 145–158.
72.
MillerB (2013) When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement. Synthese190(7): 1293–1316.
73.
MillerB (2015) Why (some) knowledge is the property of a community and possibly none of its members. The Philosophical Quarterly65(260): 417–441.
74.
MillerB (2016) Scientific consensus and expert testimony in courts: lessons from the Bendectin litigation. Foundations of Science21(1): 15–33.
75.
MillerBRecordI (2013) Justified belief in a digital age: on the epistemic implications of secret Internet technologies. Episteme10(2): 117–134.
76.
MillerBRecordI (2017) Responsible epistemic technologies: a social-epistemological analysis of autocompleted web search. New Media and Society19(12): 1945–1963.
77.
MolotchHLesterM (1974) News as purposive behavior: on the strategic use of routine events, accidents, and scandals. American sociological review39(1): 101–112.
78.
MorNReichZ (2017) From “trust me” to “show me” journalism: can documentCloud help to restore the deteriorating credibility of news?Journalism Practice12: 1091–1108.
79.
MunnNJ (2012) The new political blogosphere. Social Epistemology26(1): 55–70.
80.
NielsenRK (2017) Digital news as forms of knowledge a new chapter in the sociology of knowledge. In: BoczkowskiPJAndersonCW (eds) Remaking the News: Essays on the Future of Journalism Scholarship in the Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 91–110.
81.
ParasieS (2015) Data-driven revelation? Epistemological tensions in investigative journalism in the age of “big data.”Digital Journalism3(3): 364–380.
82.
ParasieSDagiralE (2013) Data-driven journalism and the public good: “computer-assisted-reporters” and “programmer-journalists” in Chicago. New Media & Society15(6): 853–871.
83.
RecordI (2013) Technology and epistemic possibility. Journal for General Philosophy of Science44: 319–336.
84.
ReichZ (2009) Sourcing the News. An Innovative Study of the Israeli. New York: Hampton Press.
85.
ReichZ (2012) Journalism as bipolar interactional expertise. Communication Theory22(4): 339–358.
86.
ReichZ (2018) The decline in orally negotiated news: revisiting (again) the role of technology in reporting. New Media & Society20: 4116–4134.
87.
ReichZGodlerY (2016) The disruption of journalistic expertise. In: PerersCBroersmaM (eds) Rethinking Journalism Again: Societal Role and Public Relevance in a Digital Age. New York: Routledge, pp. 64–81.
88.
ReichZGodlerY (2017) Being there? The role of journalistic legwork across new and traditional media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94(4): 1115–1129.
89.
ReidT (2002) Inquiry into the human mind. In: HuemerM (ed.) Epistemology: Contemporary Readings. London: Routledge, pp. 234–238.
90.
RomSReichZ (2017) Between the technological hare and the journalistic tortoise: minimization of knowledge claims in online news flashes. Journalism. Epub ahead of print 22 November. DOI: 10.1177/1464884917740050.
91.
SchifferesSNewmanNThurmanN, et al. (2014) Identifying and verifying news through social media: developing a user-centred tool for professional journalists. Digital Journalism2(3): 406–418.
92.
SchudsonM (1989) The sociology of news production. Media, culture & society11(3): 263–282.
93.
SchudsonM (2015) What sorts of things are thingy? And what sorts of thinginess are there? Notes on stuff and social construction. Journalism16(1): 61–64.
94.
SigalLV (1986) Who? Sources make the news. In: ManoffRKSchudsonM (eds) Reading the News. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 9–37.
95.
SimonJ (2010a) A socio-epistemological framework for scientific publishing. Social Epistemology24(3): 201–218.
96.
SimonJ (2010b) The entanglement of trust and knowledge on the Web. Ethics and Information Technology12(4): 343–355.
97.
SperberDClémentFHeintzC, et al. (2010) Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language25(4): 359–393.
98.
TalE (2014) Making time: a study in the epistemology of measurement . British Journal for the Philosophy of Science67(1): 297–335.
99.
TiffenRJonesPKRoweD, et al. (2014) Sources in the news: a comparative study. Journalism Studies15(4): 374–339.
100.
TollefsenDP (2009) Wikipedia and the epistemology of testimony. Episteme6(1): 8–24.
101.
TuchmanG (1972) Objectivity as strategic ritual: an examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology77(4): 660–679.
102.
UsherN (2014) Making News at the New York Times. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
103.
VygotskyLS (1980) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
104.
WardSJL (2004) The Invention of Journalism Ethics: The Path to Objectivity and beyond. Montreal, QC, Canada: McGill–Queen’s University Press.
105.
WardSJL (2009) Truth and objectivity. In: WilkinsLChristiansCG (eds) The Handbook of Mass Media Ethics. New York: Routledge, pp. 71–84.
