This article analyzes the domestication of WhatsApp among Argentine individuals going through young, middle, and late adulthood, drawing on 158 semi-structured interviews and a 700-person survey. Findings show variance in domestication processes related to the different life stages that users belong to. Young adults (18–34 years, in our sample) adopt WhatsApp as a taken-for-granted platform where sociability is mainly produced in groups with friends and enacted through an “always on” availability. Middle adults (35–59 years) appropriate this platform partly shaped by a constellation of work and care responsibilities. Late adults (60 years and older) find in WhatsApp a connection with younger generations in addition to age peers, while enacting less continuous modes of availability than those in other life stages. We propose that considering life stages in domestication processes contributes to unpacking broader dynamics of the social mediation of everyday life.
AhadADLimSMA (2014) Convenience or nuisance? The ‘WhatsApp’dilemma. In: The international conference on communication and media 2014 (i-COME’14), Langkawi, Malaysia, 18–20 October 2014, pp. 189–196. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences.
2.
AuneM (1996) The computer in everyday life: patterns of domestication of a new technology. In: LieMSørensenK (eds) Making Technologies Our Own? Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 91–120.
3.
BakardjievaM (2005) Internet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life. London: SAGE.
4.
BakardjievaM (2011) The Internet in everyday life: exploring the tenets and contributions of diverse approaches. In: ConsalvoMEssC (eds) Handbooks in Communication and Media: The Handbook of Internet Studies. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 59–82.
5.
BayerJBCampbellSWLingR (2015) Connection cues: activating the norms and habits of social connectedness. Communication Theory26(2): 128–149.
6.
BerkerTHartmannMPunieYet al. (eds) (2006) Domestication of Media and Technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
7.
BertelTF (2018) Domesticating smartphones. In: VincentJHaddonL (eds) Smartphone Cultures. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 83–94.
8.
BoczkowskiPLievrouwL (2008) Bridging S&TS and communication studies: research on media and information technologies. In: AmsterdamskaOHackettELynchMetal. (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 949–977.
9.
BoczkowskiPMatassiMMitchelsteinE (2018) How young users deal with multiple platforms: the role of meaning-making in social media repertoires. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication23: 245–259.
10.
CampbellSWLingRBayerJB (2014) The structural transformation of mobile communication implications for self and society. In: OliverMBRaneyAA (eds) Media and Social Life. New York: Routledge, pp. 176–188.
11.
ChanM (2018) Mobile-mediated multimodal communications, relationship quality and subjective well-being: an analysis of smartphone use from a life course perspective. Computers in Human Behavior87: 254–262.
David-BarrettTKerteszJRotkirchAet al. (2016) Communication with family and friends across the life course. PLoS ONE11(11): e0165687.
14.
De ReuverMNikouSBouwmanH (2016) Domestication of smartphones and mobile applications: a quantitative mixed-method study. Mobile Media & Communication4(3): 347–370.
15.
De SchutterBBrownJAVanden AbeeleV (2014) The domestication of digital games in the lives of older adults. New Media & Society17(7): 1170–1186.
16.
ElderGHJr (1994) Time, human agency, and social change: perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly57(1): 4–15.
17.
FarmanJ (2012) Mobile Interface Theory: Embodied Space and Locative Media. New York: Routledge.
18.
Fernández-ArdèvolMRosalesA (2018) Older people, smartphones and WhatsApp. In: VincentJHaddonL (eds) Smartphone Cultures. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 55–68.
19.
FingermanKLBirdittKNussbaumJet al. (2013) Generational juggling: family communication at midlife. In: VangelistiAL (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Family Communication. New York: Routledge, pp. 97–111.
20.
GilleardCWilskaTTaipaleS (2018) Conclusions. In: TaipaleSWilskaTAGilleardC (eds) Digital Technologies and Generational Identity: ICT Usage across the Life Course. Abingdon; Oxon; New York: Routledge, pp. 167–182.
HabibLCornfordT (2002) Computers in the home: domestication and gender. Information Technology & People15(2): 159–174.
23.
HaddonL (1998) Methodological considerations in the UK: research on the domestication of ICTs. EMTEL Working Paper no. 5. Brighton: University of Sussex.
24.
HaddonL (2001) Domestication and mobile telephony. Paper presented at the conference “machines that become us.” Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, 18–19 April.
25.
HaddonL (2001) Time and ICTs. In: Workshop ‘Researching Time’, ESRC Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition (CRIC), Manchester, UK, 19 September 2001, pp. 1–13. Manchester: University of Manchester.
26.
HaddonL (2004) Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life: A Concise Introduction and Research Guide. Oxford: Berg.
27.
HaddonL (2011) Domestication analysis, objects of study, and the centrality of technologies in everyday life. Canadian Journal of Communication36(2): 311–323.
28.
HaddonL (2018) Generational analysis of people’s experiences of ICTs. In: TaipaleSWilskaTAGilleardC (eds) Digital Technologies and Generational Identity: ICT Usage across the Life Course. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp. 37–51.
29.
HaddonLSilverstoneR (1994) The careers of information and communication technologies in the home. In: BjergKBorrebyK (eds) Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Home Oriented Informatics, Telematics and Automation, Copenhagen, Denmark, 27 June–1 July 1994, pp. 275–284. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
30.
HaddonLSilverstoneR (1995) Lone parents and their information and communication technologies. SPRU/CICT Report Series No.12. Falmer: University of Sussex.
31.
HartmannM (2006) The triple articulation of ICTs. Media as technological objects, symbolic environments and individual texts. In: BerkerTHartmannMPunieYet al. (eds) Domestication of Media and Technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 80–102.
32.
HuntS (2005) The Life Course: A Sociological Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
ItoMEOkabeDEMatsudaME (2005) Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34.
LingR (2004) The Mobile Connection: The Cell Phone’s Impact on Society. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier.
35.
LingR (2012) Taken for Grantedness: The Embedding of Mobile Communication into Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
LivingstoneS (2003) The changing nature of audiences: from the mass audience to the interactive media user. In: ValdiviaA (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Media Research. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 337–359.
37.
LivingstoneS (2007) On the material and the symbolic: Silverstone’s double articulation of research traditions in new media studies. New Media & Society9(1): 16–24.
38.
MackayH (2008) Review: Thomas Berker, Maren Hartmann, PunieYvesWardKate (eds), Domestication of Media and Technology.Maidenhead and New York: Open University Press, 2005. £ 20.99. 255 pp. European Journal of Communication 23(3): 376–379.
39.
MalkaVArielYAvidarR (2015) Fighting, worrying and sharing: operation “protective edge” as the first WhatsApp war. Media, War & Conflict8(3): 329–344.
40.
MorleyD (2006) What’s “home” got to do with it? Contradictory dynamics in the domestication of technology and the dislocation of domesticity. In: BerkerTHartmannMPunieYet al. (eds) Domestication of Media and Technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 21–39.
41.
O’NeillJToyamaKChenJet al. (2016) The increasing sophistication of mobile media sharing in lower-middle-class Bangalore. In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on information and communication technologies and development, Ann Arbor, MI, 3–6 June 2016.
42.
OksmanVTurtiainenJ (2004) Mobile communication as a social stage: meanings of mobile communication in everyday life among teenagers in Finland. New Media & Society6(3): 319–339.
43.
Oliveira SantosMC (2017) Un espacio de interacción socio-afectiva a través del WhatsApp por mujeres mayores brasileña. Caracteres: Estudios Culturales y Críticos de la Esfera Digital6(2): 56–78.
44.
RosalesAFernández-ArdèvolM (2016) Beyond WhatsApp: Older people and smartphones. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations18(1): 27–47.
45.
RosenbergHAsterhanCS (2018) “WhatsApp, teacher?” Student perspectives on teacher-student WhatsApp interactions in secondary schools. Journal of Information Technology Education-research17: 205–226.
46.
SalovaaraALehmuskallioAHedmanLet al. (2010) Information technologies and transitions in the lives of 55–65-year-olds: the case of colliding life interests. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies68(11): 803–821.
47.
SilesIBoczkowskiP (2012) At the intersection of content and materiality: a texto-material perspective on the use of media technologies. Communication Theory22(3): 227–249.
48.
SilverstoneR (1994) Television and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
49.
SilverstoneR (2006) Domesticating domestication: reflections on the life of a concept. In: BerkerTHartmannMPunieYet al. (eds) Domestication of Media and Technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 229–248.
50.
SilverstoneRHaddonL (1996) Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: technical change and everyday life. In: MansellRESilverstoneR (eds) Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 44–74.
51.
SilverstoneRHirschEMorleyD (1992) Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In: SilverstoneRHirschE (eds) Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 15–31.
52.
SmallML (2009) “How many cases do I need?” On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography10(1): 5–38.
SujonZVineyLToker-TurnalarE (2018) Domesticating Facebook: the shift from compulsive connection to personal service platform. Social Media+ Society4(4):2056305118803895. DOI: 10.1177/2056305118803895.
55.
TaipaleSWilskaTGilleardCJ (2018) Digital Technologies and Generational Identity: ICT Usage across the Life Course. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
56.
TenhunenS (2008) Mobile technology in the village: ICTs, culture, and social logistics in India. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute14(3): 515–534.
57.
TurkleS (2008) Always-on/always-on-you: The tethered self. In: KatzJ (ed.) Handbook of Mobile Communication Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 121–137.
58.
WajcmanJ (2008) Life in the fast lane? Towards a sociology of technology and time. The British Journal of Sociology59(1): 59–77.
59.
WaterlooSFBaumgartnerSEPeterJet al. (2018) Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Media & Society20(5): 1813–1831.
