Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Women across a range of industries are creating women-only private Facebook groups for professional support, networking opportunities, and career development. Through interviews with 26 women, this research shows how private Facebook groups provide affordances for creating spaces reminiscent of second-wave consciousness-raising groups. Within these groups, separate from cisgender men, women discuss their work experiences and share advice, leading to changes for women beyond the groups’ borders. Thus, private Facebook groups for professional women support feminist practices despite not being labeled as explicitly feminist. However, these activities are limited in their usefulness for the wider feminist project by the exclusion of some women across lines of difference such as race, class, and age. This study illustrates empirically how social media is used for everyday politics, contributing to understandings of the digital fourth wave of the women’s movement.

Keywords

Affordances digital Facebook groups feminism fourth wave gender professional social media technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahl

Marlow

(2012) Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: advancing debate to escape a dead end? Organization 19(5): 543–562.

Althusser

(1971) Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays. London: New Left Books.

Anderson

Perrin

Jiang

(2018) 11% of Americans don’t use the internet. Who are they? Pew Research Center, 5 March. Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/05/some-americans-dont-use-the-internet-who-are-they/

Anderson

Grace

(2015) “Taking mama steps” toward authority, alternatives, and advocacy: feminist consciousness-raising within a digital motherhood community. Feminist Media Studies 15(6): 942–959.

Banet-Weiser

(2015) Popular misogyny: a zeitgeist. Culture Digitally, 25 January. Available at: http://culturedigitally.org/2015/01/popular-misogyny-a-zeitgeist/

Bennett

(2017) The #Me too moment: the year in gender. The New York Times, 30 December. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/us/the-metoo-moment-the-year-in-gender.html

Blackmon

(2007) (Cyber) conspiracy theories: African-American students in the computerized writing environment. In: Takayoshi

Sullivan

(eds) Labor, Writing Technologies, and the Shaping of Composition in the Academy. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc, pp. 153–166.

Blackwell

(2018) Why people of color need spaces without white people. Arrow Journal, 9 August. Available at: https://arrow-journal.org/why-people-of-color-need-spaces-without-white-people/

Blevins

(2018) Bell Hooks and consciousness raising: argument for a fourth wave of feminism. In: Vickery

Everbach

(eds) Mediating Misogyny. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 91–108.

10.

Brock

(2011) Beyond the pale: the blackbird web browser’s critical reception. New Media and Society 13(7): 1085–1103.

11.

Bucher

Helmond

(2018) The affordances of social media platforms. In: Burgess

Poell

Marwick

(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. London: SAGE, pp. 233–253.

12.

Calfas

(2018) Women have pushed for equal pay for decades: it’s sad how little progress we’ve made. Time, 10 April. Available at: https://www.grameenamerica.org/news/2018/4/10/women-have-pushed-for-equal-pay-for-decades-its-sad-how-little-progress-weve-made

13.

Camp

(1996) We are geeks, and we are not guys: the Systers mailing list. In: Cherny

Weise

(eds) Wired Women: Gender and New Realities in Cyberspace. Seattle, WA: Seal Press, pp. 112–125.

14.

Campbell

(1999) “The rhetoric of women’s liberation: an oxymoron” revisited. Communication Studies 50(2): 138–142.

15.

Charmaz

(2005) Grounded theory in the 21st century: a qualitative method for advancing social justice research. In: Denzin

Lincoln

(eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 359–380.

16.

Cirucci

(2018) A new women’s work: digital interactions, gender, and social network sites. International Journal of Communication 12: 2948–2970.

17.

Cochrane

(2013) The fourth wave of feminism: meet the rebel women. The Guardian, 10 December. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/10/fourth-wave-feminism-rebel-women

18.

Crenshaw

(1991) Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43(6): 1241–1299.

19.

Daniels

(2013) Race and racism in internet studies: a review and critique. New Media & Society 15(5): 695–719.

20.

Daniels

(2016) The trouble with white feminism: whiteness, digital feminism, and the intersectional internet. In: Noble

Tynes

(eds) The Intersectional Internet: Race, Sex, Class and Culture Online. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 41–61.

21.

Duggan

(2017) Experiencing online harassment. Pew Research Center, 11 July. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/07/11/online-harassment-2017/

22.

Fixmer

Wood

(2005) The personal is still political: embodied politics in third wave feminism. Women’s Studies in Communication 28(2): 235–257.

23.

Gibson

(1979) The Ecological Approach to Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

24.

Gill

(2007) Post-feminist media culture: elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies 10(2): 147–166.

25.

Hooks

(1984) Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston, MA: South End Press.

26.

Hooks

(2000) Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. Boston, MA: South End Press.

27.

Hanisch

(2010) Women’s liberation consciousness-raising: then and now. On the Issues Magazine. Available at: https://www.ontheissuesmagazine.com/2010spring/2010spring_Hanisch.php

28.

Haraway

(1988) Situated knowledge: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.

29.

Highfield

(2016) Social Media and Everyday Politics. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

30.

Hollander

Einwohner

(2004) Conceptualizing resistance. Sociological Forum 19(4): 533–554.

31.

Lepore

(2018) Women’s Facebook groups are honing their power more than ever right now and it is incredible. Levo, 20 February. Available at: https://twitter.com/geschehaas/status/966120405416124416

32.

McDonald

(2011) What’s in the “old boys” network? Accessing social capital in gendered and racialized networks. Social Networks 33(4): 317–330.

33.

MacKinnon

(1989) Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

34.

Munro

(2013) Feminism: a fourth wave? Political Insight 4(2): 22–25.

35.

Nagy

Neff

(2015) Imagined affordance: reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society 1(2). DOI: 10.1177/2056305115603385.

36.

Nakamura

(2002) Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.

37.

Nelson

(2017) Women and the good ole boys club. Psychology Today, 28 March. Available at: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/he-speaks-she-speaks/201703/women-and-the-good-ole-boys-club

38.

Noble

Tynes

(2016) Introduction. In: Noble

Tynes

(eds) The Intersectional Internet: Race, Sex, Class and Culture Online. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 1–21.

39.

NYU Law (2018) After #Me Too. NYU Law News, 15 February. Available at: http://www.law.nyu.edu/news/ideas/melissa-murray-amy-adler-forum-metoo-sexual-harassment-amy-adler-melissa-murray

40.

Parker

Funk

(2017) Gender discrimination comes in many forms for today’s working women. Pew Research Center, 14 December. Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/14/gender-discrimination-comes-in-many-forms-for-todays-working-women/

41.

Pew Research Center (2018) Social media fact sheet. Pew Research Center, 5 February. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/

42.

Sandberg

(2013) Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. New York: Random House.

43.

Shaw

(2014) The internet is full of jerks, because the world is full of jerks: what feminist theory teaches us about the internet. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 11(3): 273–277.

44.

Simi

Futrell

(2009) Negotiating white power activist stigma. Social Problems 56(1): 89–110.

45.

Steel

(2016) Signifyin,’ bitching, and blogging: black women and resistance discourse online. In: Noble

Tynes

(eds) The Intersectional Internet: Race, Sex, Class and Culture Online. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 73–95.

46.

Tynes

Schuschke

Noble

(2016) Digital intersectionality theory and the #BlackLivesMatter movement. In: Noble

Tynes

(eds) The Intersectional Internet: Race, Sex, Class and Culture Online. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 21–40.

47.

Vivienne

(2016) Digital Identity and Everyday Activism: Sharing Private Stories with Networked Publics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

48.

Wajcman

(2010) Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34: 143–152.

49.

Walby

(2011) The Future of Feminism. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

“A group that’s just women for women”: Feminist affordances of private Facebook groups for professionals

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References