We investigate whether the publicly available information on Facebook about job applicants affects employers’ hiring decisions. To this end, we conduct a field experiment in which fictitious job applications are sent to real job openings in Belgium. The only characteristic in which these candidates differ is the unique Facebook profile that can be found online with their name. Candidates with the most beneficial Facebook picture obtain approximately 38% more job interview invitations compared to candidates with the least beneficial picture. In addition, we find suggestive evidence for a higher effect of Facebook profile picture appearance on hiring chances when candidates are highly educated and when recruiters are female.
AcquistiAFongCM (2015) An Experiment in Hiring Discrimination via Online Social Networks. New York: Mimeo.
2.
ArrowKJ (1973) The theory of discrimination. In: AshenfelterReesA (eds) Discrimination in Labor Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–33.
3.
BackMStopferJVazireS. (2010) Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science20: 1–3.
4.
BaertSCockxBGheyleN. (2015) Is There Less Discrimination in Occupations Where Recruitment Is Difficult?ILR Review68: 467–500.
5.
BaertSDecuypereL (2014) Better sexy than flexy? A lab experiment assessing the impact of perceived attractiveness and personality traits on hiring decisions. Applied Economics Letters21: 597–601.
6.
BaertSOmeyE (2015) Hiring Discrimination against Pro-Union Applicants: The Role of Union Density and Firm Size. De Economist163: 263–280.
7.
BaertSRotsaertOVerhaestD. (2016) Student Employment and Later Labour Market Success: No Evidence for Higher Employment Chances. Kyklos69: 401–425.
8.
BarrickMRMountMK (1991) The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology44: 1–26.
9.
BerkelaarBL (2014) Cybervetting, online information, and personnel selection: new transparency expectations and the emergence of a digital social contract. Management Communication Quarterly28: 479–506.
10.
BerkelaarBLBuzzanellPM (2014) Cybervetting, person–environment fit, and personnel selection: employers’ surveillance and sensemaking of job applicants’ online information. Journal of Applied Communication Research42: 456–476.
11.
BerkelaarBLBuzzanellPM (2015) Online employment screening and digital career capital: exploring employers’ use of online information for personnel selection. Management Communication Quarterly29: 84–113.
12.
BerkelaarBLScaccoJMBirdsellJL (2015) The worker as politician: how online information and electoral heuristics shape personnel selection and careers. New Media & Society17: 1377–1396.
13.
BertrandMMullainathanS (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review94: 991–1013.
14.
BloothooftGOnlandD (2011) Socioeconomic determinants of first names. Names59: 25–41.
15.
BrownVRVaughnE (2011) The writing on the (Facebook)wall: the use of social networking sites in hiring decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology26: 219–225.
16.
CaersRCastelynsV (2011) LinkedIn and Facebook in Belgium: the influences and biases of social network sites in recruitment and selection procedures. Social Science Computer Review29: 437–448.
17.
CaersRDe FreyterTDe CouckM. (2013) Facebook: a literature review. New Media & Society15: 984–1002.
ChangWMaderaJM (2012) Using social network sites for selection purposes: an investigation of hospitality recruiters. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism20: 183–196.
20.
CorreaTHinsleyAWGil de ZúñigaH (2010) Who interacts on the Web?: the intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior26: 247–253.
21.
CorrellSJBenardSPaikI (2007) Getting a job: is there a motherhood penalty?American Journal of Sociology112: 1297–1338.
22.
ElzweigBPeeplesDK (2009) Using social networking web sites in hiring and retention decisions. SAM Advanced Management Journal74: 27–35.
GerardMValsamisD (2015) Arbeidstekorten op de Europese arbeidsmarkt. Over.Werk25: 8–14.
25.
GibbsCMacDonaldFMacKayK (2015) Social media usage in hotel human resources: recruitment, hiring and communication. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management27: 170–184.
26.
GoslingSDGaddisSVazireS (2008) First impressions from the environments that we create and inhabit. In: SkowronskiJAmbadyN (eds) First Impressions. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 334–356.
27.
GoslingSDRentfrowPJSwannWB (2003) A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality37: 504–528.
28.
HaferkampNKrämerNC (2011) Social comparison 2.0: examining the effects of online profiles on social-networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking14: 309–314.
29.
HamermeshDBiddleJ (1994) Beauty and the labor market. American Economic Review84: 1174–1194.
30.
KluemperDHRosenPA (2009) Future employment selection methods: evaluating social networking web sites. Journal of Managerial Psychology24: 567–580.
31.
LebelKDanylchukK (2014) Facing off on Twitter: a generation y interpretation of professional athlete profile pictures. International Journal of Sport Communication7: 317–326.
32.
LutgenVVan der LindenB (2015) Regional equilibrium unemployment theory at the age of the internet. Regional Science and Urban Economics53: 50–67.
33.
MaderaJM (2012) Using social networking websites as a selection tool: the role of selection process fairness and job pursuit intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management31: 1276–1282.
34.
Mauzer-FazioMLeiL (2015) ‘As rare as a panda’: how facial attractiveness, gender, and occupation affect interview callbacks at Chinese firms. International Journal of Manpower36: 68–85.
35.
MobiusMMRosenblatTS (2006) Why beauty matters. American Economic Review96: 222–235.
36.
MuellerGPlugE (2006) Estimating the effect of personality on male and female earnings. ILR Review60: 3–22.
37.
NikolaouI (2014) Social networking web sites in job search and employee recruitment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment22: 179–189.
38.
PagerDQuillianL (2005) Walking the talk? What employers say versus what they do. American Sociological Review70: 355–380.
39.
RainsSABrunnerSR (2015) What can we learn about social network sites by studying Facebook? A call and recommendations for research on social network sites. New Media & Society17: 114–131.
40.
RamirezAJr.WaltherJBBurgoonJK. (2002) Information seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: towards a conceptual model. Human Communication Research28: 213–228.
41.
RiachPARichJ (2004) Deceptive field experiments of discrimination: are they ethical?Kyklos57: 457–470.
42.
RothPBobkoPVan IddekingeC. (2013) Social media in employee-selection-related decisions: a research agenda for uncharted territory. Journal of Management20: 1–30.
43.
RoulinNBangerterA (2013) Social networking websites in personnel selection: a signaling perspective on recruiters’ and applicants’ perceptions. Journal of Personnel Psychology12: 143–151.
44.
TongSTVan Der HeideBLangwellL. (2008) Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13: 531–549.
45.
TuftsSHJacobsonWSStevensMS (2015) Status update: social media and local government human resource practices. Review of Public Personnel Administration35: 193–207.
46.
UysalSDPohlmeierW (2011) Unemployment duration and personality. Journal of Economic Psychology32: 980–992.
47.
Van DijckJ (2008) Digital photography: communication, identity, memory. Visual Communication7: 57–76.
48.
Van HouseNA (2011) Personal photography, digital technologies, and the uses of the visual. Visual Studies25: 125–134.
49.
VasalouAJoinsonANCourvoisierD (2010) Cultural differences, experience with social networks and the nature of ‘true commitment’ in Facebook. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies68: 719–728.
50.
VerbeekM (2004) A Guide to Modern Econometrics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
51.
WaltherJBVan Der HeideBKimSY. (2008) The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: are we known by the company we keep?Human Communication Research34: 28–49.
52.
WangSSMoonSIKwonKH. (2010) Face off: implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior26: 225–234.
53.
WestermanDVan Der HeideBKleinKA. (2008) How do people really seek information about others? Information seeking across internet and traditional communication channels. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13: 751–767.
54.
WilsonREGoslingSDGrahamLT (2012) A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science7: 203–220.
55.
ZhangYLeungL (2015) A review of social networking service (SNS) research in communication journals from 2006 to 2011. New Media & Society17: 1007–1024.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
