This study explores how women in two devout religious communities cope with the Internet and its apparent incompatibility with their communities’ values and practices. Questionnaires containing both closed and open-ended questions were completed by 82 participants, approximately half from each community. While their discourses included similar framings of danger and threat, the two groups manifested different patterns of Internet use (and nonuse). Rigorous adherence to religious dictates is greatly admired in these communities, and the women take pride in manipulating their status in them. Their agency is reflected in how they negotiate the tension inherent in their roles as both gatekeepers and agents-of-change, which are analyzed as valuable currencies in their cultural and religious markets.
AlmondGAAppelbyRSSivanE (2003) Strong Religion: The Rise of Fundamentalisms Around the World. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
2.
AvishaiO (2008) “Doing religion” in a secular world: women in conservative religions and the question of agency. Gender & Society22: 409–433.
3.
BangstadS (2011) Saba Mahmood and the anthropological feminism after virtue. Theory, Culture & Society28(3): 28–54.
4.
Barzilai-NahonK (2008) Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: a framework for exploring information control. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology59(9): 1493–1512.
5.
Barzilai-NahonKBarzilaiG (2005) Cultured technology: the internet and religious fundamentalism. The Information Society21(1): 25–40.
6.
BenderS (1989) Plain and Simple: A Woman’s Journey to the Amish. New York: HarperCollins Publications.
7.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJE (ed.) Handbook of Theory of Research for the Sociology of Religion. New York: Greenwood, pp. 241–258.
8.
CampbellH (2004) Challenges created by online religious networks. Journal of Media and Religion3(2): 81–99.
9.
CampbellH (2007) Who’s got the power? Religious authority and the internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12: 1043–1062.
10.
CampbellH (2010) When Religion Meets New Media. London: Routledge.
11.
CampbellH (ed.) (2013) Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. London: Routledge.
12.
CampbellH (ed.) (2015) Digital Judaism: Jewish Negotiations with Digital Media and Culture. New York: Routledge.
13.
CaplanK (2007) The Internal Popular Discourse in Israeli Haredi Society. Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar (in Hebrew).
CohenAALemishDSchejterA (2008) The Wonder Phone in the Land of Miracles. New York: Hampton Press.
16.
CohenY (2012) God, Jews and the Media: Religion and Israel’s Media. London: Routledge.
17.
CooperTW (2006) Of script and scriptures: why plain people perpetuate a media fast. The Journal of American Culture29(2): 139–153.
18.
DavidmanL (1991) Tradition in a Rootless World: Women Turn to Orthodox Judaism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
19.
DeutscheN (2009) The forbidden fork, the cell phone holocaust, and other Haredi encounters with technology. Contemporary Jewry29: 3–19.
20.
DouglasM (1966) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
21.
El-OrT (1994) Educated and Ignorant: Ultraorthodox Jewish Women and their World. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
22.
EsserFHanitzschT (2012) Organizing and managing comparative research projects across nations. In: VolkmerI (ed.) The Handbook of Global Media Research. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 521–532.
23.
FederA (2013) Nonliberal Jewish women’s audiocassette lectures in Brooklyn: a crisis of faith and the morality of media. American Anthropologist115(1): 72–84.
24.
FriedmanIShaul-MenaNFogelN. (2011) Measurement and Estimates of the Population of Ultra-Orthodox Jews. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics (in Hebrew).
25.
FriedmanM (1991) Haredi Society: Sources, Trends and Processes. Jerusalem: Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies (in Hebrew).
26.
FriedmanM (1993) The market model and religious radicalism. In: SilbersteinLJ (ed.) Jewish Fundamentalism in Comparative Perspective: Religion, Ideology and the Crisis of Modernity. New York: New York University Press, pp. 192–215.
27.
GourgourisS (2008) Antisecularist failures: a counter-response to Saba Mahmood. Public Culture20(3): 453–459.
28.
HakkarainenP (2012) “No good for shoveling snow and carrying firewood”: social representations of computers and the internet by elderly Finnish non-users. New Media & Society14(7) 1198–1215.
29.
HargittaiE (2004) Internet access and use in context. New Media & Society6(1): 137–143.
30.
HartmanT (2015) “Strong multiplicity”: an interpretive lens in the analysis of qualitative interview narratives. Qualitative Research15(1): 22–38.
31.
HendershotH (2004) Shaking the World for Jesus: Media and Conservative Evangelical Culture. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
32.
HessME (2013) Digital storytelling: empowering feminist and womanist faith formation with young women. In: LövheimM (ed.) Media, Religion and Gender: Key Issues and New Challenges. London: Routledge, pp. 169–182.
33.
HooverSM (2006) Religion in the Media Age. New York: Routledge.
HostetlerJA (1993) Amish Society. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36.
HurstCEMcConnellDL (2010) An Amish Paradox: Diversity and Change in the World’s Largest Amish Community. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.
Johnson-WeinerK (2001) The role of women in Old Order Amish, Beachy Amish and Fellowship Churches. Mennonite Quarterly ReviewLXXV(2): 231–256.
38.
JollyN (2007) Public culture, private birth: social pattern of Amish domestic space. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Pennsylvania State University, Philadelphia, PA.
39.
KraybillDB (2001) The Riddle of Amish Culture. Baltimore, MD; London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40.
KraybillDB (2008) Amish informants: mediating humility and publicity. In: Zimmerman-UmbleDWeaver-ZercherD (eds) The Amish and the Media. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 161–180.
41.
KraybillDBJohnson-WeinerKMNoltSM (2013) The Amish. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
42.
LeeRM (1993) Doing Research in Sensitive Topics. London: SAGE.
43.
Lev-OnANeriya-Ben ShaharR (2012) To browse, or not to browse? Third person effect among ultra-Orthodox Jewish women, in regards to the perceived danger of the internet. In: CheongPHMartinJNMacfadyenL (eds) New Media and Intercultural Communication. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 223–236.
44.
LivingstoneSHelsperE (2007) Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society9(4): 671–696.
45.
LivioOTenenboim-WeinblattK (2007) Discursive legitimation of a controversial technology: ultra-Orthodox Jewish women in Israel and the internet. The Communication Review10(1): 29–56.
46.
LövheimM (2011) Mediatisation of religion: a critical appraisal. Culture and Religion12(2): 153–166.
47.
LövheimM (ed.) (2013) Media, Religion and Gender: Key Issues and New Challenges. London: Routledge.
48.
MahmoodS (2005) The Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
MarvinC (1988) When Old Technologies Were New. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
MehraBMerkelCBishopAP (2004) The internet for empowerment of minority and marginalized users. New Media & Society6(6): 781–802.
51.
Neriya-Ben ShaharR (2008) Haredi (Ultra-Orthodox) women and mass media in Israel: exposure patterns & reading strategies. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem (in Hebrew).
52.
Neriya-Ben ShaharRLev-OnA (2011) Gender, religion and new media: attitudes and behaviours related to the internet among ultra-Orthodox women employed in computerized environments. International Journal of Communication5: 875–895.
53.
NeubergerB (2011) The Amish, the rule of law and freedom of religion—The culture of compromise in American democracy. Democratic Culture12: 115–140.
54.
NeubergerBTamamKM (2014) The image of the Amish in the New York Times versus the image of the Haredim in Haaretz (1980–2010). Conflict and Communication Online13(1): 1–17.
Portwood-StacerL (2012) Media refusal and conspicuous non-consumption: the performative and political dimensions of Facebook abstention. New Media & Society15(7): 1041–1057.
57.
PressALLivingstoneS (2006) Taking audience research into the age of new media: old problem and new challenges. In: WhiteMSchwochJ (eds) The Question of Method in Cultural Studies. London: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 175–200.
58.
ReinharzS (1992) Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
RierDASchwartzbaumAHellerC (2008) Methodological issues in studying an insular, traditional population: a women’s health survey among Israeli Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) Jews. Women & Health48(4): 363–381.
60.
SchmidtKDReschlySD (2000) A women’s history for Anabaptist tradition: a framework of possibilities, possibly changing the framework. Journal of Mennonites Study18: 29–46.
61.
SchmidtKDZimmerman-UmbleDReschlySD (2002) Strangers at Home: Amish and Mennonites Women in History. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
62.
SelwynN (2003) Apart from technology: understanding people’s non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life. Technology in Society25(1): 99–116.
63.
SelwynN (2004) Reconsidering political and popular understanding of the digital divide. New Media & Society6(3): 341–362.
64.
SpinnerJ (1994) The Boundaries of Citizenship: Race, Ethnicity and Nationality in the Liberal State. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
65.
StausbergM (2011) Comparison. In: StausbergMEnglerS (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. London: Routledge, pp. 21–39.
66.
SteinmetzSHaj-YahiyeM (2006) Definitions of and beliefs about wife abuse among ultra-Orthodox Jewish men from Israel. Journal of Interpersonal Violence21(4): 525–554.
67.
StoltzfusL (1994) Amish Women: Lives and Stories. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.
68.
StraussACorbinJM (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
69.
TanTK (1998) Silence, sacrifice and shoo-fly pies: an inquiry into the social capital organizational strategies of the Amish community in Lancaster country, Pennsylvania. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
70.
Tydor Baumel-SchwartzJ (2009) Frum surfing: orthodox Jewish women’s internet forums as a historical and cultural phenomenon. Journal of Jewish Identities2(1): 1–30.
71.
Van NessS (1995) Ohio Amish women in the vanguard of a language change: Pennsylvania German in Ohio. American Speech70(1): 69–80.
72.
WyattSHenwoodFHartA. (2005) Digital divide, health information and everyday life. New Media & Society7(2): 199–218.
73.
Zimmerman-UmbleD (1992) The Amish and the telephone: resistance and reconstruction. In: SilverstoneRHirshE (eds) Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London: Routledge, pp. 183–194.
