As one of the first empirical analyses focusing on corporate executive officers’ (CEOs) communication style on social media and its impacts, the study aims to advance the theoretical understanding of CEO sociability and the mechanism underneath its effects on the broader public relations outcome of organization–public relationship and public advocacy. Through a quantitative survey with 332 social media users who have followed corporate CEOs on social media, this study illuminated how CEOs’ responsive and assertive communications induce the CEOs’ followers to perceive the corporate leaders as amicable role models and caring friends, which in turn improve their trust of, satisfaction with, and advocacy for the company. Hence, the findings highlight the pivotal role of CEOs as chief engagement officer in developing meaningful interpersonal interactions and relationships with today’s digital savvy publics.
AndersonCMMartinMMZhongMet al. (1997) Reliability, separation of factors, and sex differences on the assertiveness-responsiveness measure: a Chinese sample. Communication Research Reports14: 58–64.
2.
ArroyoASegrinC (2011) The relationship between self- and other-perceptions of communication competence and friendship quality. Communication Studies62(5): 547–562.
3.
BocarneaMCBrownWJ (2007) Celebrity-persona parasocial interaction scale. In: ReynoldsRAWoodsRBakerJD (eds) Handbook of Research on Electronic Surveys and Measurements. London: Idea Group, pp. 309–312.
BrionesRLKuchBLiuBFet al. (2011) Keeping up with the digital age: how the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review37(1): 37–43.
6.
BrownWJBasilMD (1995) Media celebrities and public health: responses to “Magic” Johnson’s HIV disclosure and its impact on AIDS risk and high-risk behaviors. Health Communication7(4): 345–370.
7.
ClaessensNVan den BulckH (2015) Parasocial relationships with audiences’ favorite celebrities: the role of audience and celebrity characteristics in a representative Flemish sample. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research40(1): 43–65.
8.
CollianderJDahlénM (2011) Following the fashionable friend: the power of social media. Journal of Advertising Research51(1): 313–320.
9.
DiClementeRKDitrincoEAGibbonsKEet al. (2013) The relationship between instructor job satisfaction and communicator style and socio-communicative orientation. Communication Research Reports30(4): 347–351.
10.
EdelmanR (2008) Public Engagement: The Evolution of Public Relations. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
11.
EyalKDaileyRM (2012) Examining relational maintenance in parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society15(5): 758–781.
12.
EyalKTe’eni-HarariT (2013) Explaining the relationship between media exposure and early adolescents’ body image perceptions: the role of favorite characters. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications25(3): 129–141.
13.
GallicanoTDBrettKHoppT (2013) Is ghost blogging like speechwriting? A survey of practitioners about the ethics of ghost blogging. Public Relations Journal7(3): 1–41.
14.
GartenJ (2001) The Mind of the CEO. London: Penguin Books.
15.
GrunigLAGrunigJEDozierD (2002) Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organizations: A Study of Communication Management in Three Countries. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16.
HartmannTStukeDDaschmannG (2008) Positive parasocial relationships with drivers affect suspense in racing sports spectators. Journal of Media Psychology20(1): 24–34.
17.
HenningZ (2010) Teaching with style to manage student perceptions: the effects of socio-communicative style and teacher credibility on student affective learning. Communication Research Reports27(1): 58–67.
18.
HonLCGrunigJE (1999) Guidelines for Measuring Relationships in Public Relations. Gainesville, FL: The Institute for Public Relations, Commission on PR Measurement and Evaluation.
19.
HortonDWohlRR (1956) Mass communication and para-social interaction: observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry19: 215–229.
20.
HoulbergR (1984) Local television news audience and the para-social interaction. Journal of Broadcasting28(4): 423–429.
21.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
22.
HuttonJGGoodmanMBAlexanderJBet al. (2001) Reputation management: the new face of corporate public relations?Public Relations Review27(3): 247–261.
23.
JamesonDA (2014) Crossing public-private and personal-professional boundaries: how changes in technologymayaffect CEOs’ communication business. Communication Quarterly77(1): 7–30.
24.
JiangLCBazarovaNNHancockJT (2010) The disclosure–intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: an attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research37(1): 58–77.
25.
JinCH (2015) The role of Facebook users’ self-systems in generating social relationships and social capital effects. New Media & Society17(4): 501–519.
26.
KangM (2014) Understanding public engagement: conceptualizing and measuring its influence on supportive behavioral intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research26(5): 399–416.
27.
KantolaA (2014) Mediatization of power: corporate CEOs in flexible capitalism. Nordicom Review35(2): 29–41.
28.
KassingJWSandersonJ (2010) Fan–athlete interaction and Twitter tweeting through the Giro: a case study. International Journal of Sport Communication3(1): 113–128.
29.
KlineRB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
30.
KrapfelR (1985) An advocacy behavior model of organizational buyers’ vendor choice. Journal of Marketing49: 51–59.
31.
LeeEJShinSY (2014) When the medium is the message: how transportability moderates the effects of politicians’ Twitter communication. Communication Research41(8): 1088–1110.
32.
McCroskeyJCRichmondVP (1996) Fundamentals of Human Communication: An Interpersonal Perspective. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
33.
MartinMMAndersonCM (1996) Communication traits: a cross-generational investigation. Communication Research Reports13: 58–67.
34.
MenLR (2014) Strategic internal communication: Transformational leadership, communication channels, and employee satisfaction. Management Communication Quarterly28(2): 264–284.
35.
MenLRStacksD (2014) The effects of authentic leadership on strategic internal communication and employee-organization relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research26(4): 301–324.
36.
MenLRTsaiWS (2012) Beyond liking or following: Understanding public engagement with companies on social networking sites in China. Public Relations Review39(1): 13–22.
37.
MenLRTsaiWS (2015) Infusing social media with humanity: Corporate character, public engagement, and relational outcomes. Public Relations Review41(3): 395–403.
38.
MottetTBeebeS (2006) The relationships between student responsive behaviors, student socio-communicative style, and instructors’ subjective and objective assessments of student work. Communication Education55(3): 295–312.
39.
Moyer-GuseE (2008) Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory18(3): 407–425.
40.
OliverMB (2009) Affect as a predictor of entertainment choice: the utility of looking beyond pleasure. In: HartmannT (ed.) Media Choice: A Theoretical and Empirical Overview. New York: Routledge, pp. 167–184.
41.
PapaMJSinghalALawSet al. (2000) Entertainment-education and social change: an analysis of parasocial interaction, social learning, collective efficacy, and paradoxical communication. Journal of Communication50(4): 31–55.
42.
ParkDBergerBK (2004) The presentation of CEOs in the press, 1990-2000: increasing salience, positive valence, and a focus on competency and personal dimensions of image. Journal of Public Relations Research16(1): 93–125.
43.
PauleyMEmmers-SommerT (2007) The impact of internet technologies on primary and secondary romantic relationship development. Communication Studies58(4): 411–427.
44.
PeterMValkenburgJ (2007) Online communication and adolescent well-being: testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1169–1182.
45.
Pınar ÖzdemirB (2012) Social media as a tool for online advocacy campaigns: Greenpeace Mediterranean’s anti genetically engineered food campaign in Turkey. Global Media Journal: Canadian Edition5: 23–39.
46.
RanftAFerrisGZinkoRet al. (2006) The costs and benefits of CEO reputation. Organizational Dynamics35(3): 279–290.
47.
RichmondVPMcCroskeyJC (1990) Reliability and separation of factors on the assertiveness-responsiveness scale. Psychological Reports67(2): 449–450.
48.
ResickCJWhitmanDSWeingardenSMHillerNJ (2009) The bright-side and the dark-side of CEO personality: Examining core self-evaluations, narcissism, transformational leadership, and strategic influence. Journal of Applied Psychology94(6): 1365–1381.
49.
RosaenSDibbleJ (2008) Investigating the relationships among child’s age, parasocial interactions, and the social realism of favorite television characters. Communication Research Reports25(2): 145–154.
50.
RubinAM (2002) The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In: BryantJZillmannD (eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., pp. 525–548.
51.
RubinAMPerseEMPowellRA (1985) Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research12(2): 155–180.
52.
RubinRBMcHughMP (1987) Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media31(3): 279–292.
53.
SchrammHHartmannT (2008) The PSI-process scales: a new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes. Communications33(4): 385–401.
54.
SnavelyWB (1981) The impact of social style upon person perception in primary relationships. Communication Quarterly29(2): 132–143.
55.
SoodSRogersEM (2000) Dimensions of parasocial interaction by letter-writers to a popular entertainment-education soap opera in India. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media44(3): 386–414.
56.
SteverGS (2013) Mediated vs. parasocial relationships: an attachment perspective. Journal of Media Psychology17(3): 1–13.
57.
SteverGSLawsonK (2013) Twitter as a way for celebrities to communicate with fans: implications for the study of parasocial interaction. North American Journal of Psychology15(2): 339–354.
58.
SungKHKimS (2014) I want to be your friend: the effects of organizations’ interpersonal approaches on social networking sites. Journal of Public Relations Research26(3): 235–255.
59.
SweetserKDMetzgarE (2007) Communicating during crisis: use of blogs as a relationship management tool. Public Relations Review33: 340–342.
60.
ThomasCERichmondVPMcCroskeyC (1994) The association between immediacy and socio-communicative style. Communication Research Reports11(1): 107–114.
61.
ThompsonCAKlopfDW (1991) An analysis of social style among disparate cultures. Communication Research Reports8: 65–72.
62.
ThorsonKSRodgersK (2006) Relationships between blogs as EWOM and interactivity, perceived interactivity, and parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Advertising6(2). Available at: http://jiad.org/article79.html
63.
TothE (2000) From personal influence to interpersonal influence: a model for relationship management. In: LedinghamJABruningSD (eds) Public Relations as Relationship Management: A Relational Approach to Public Relations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., pp. 205–219.
64.
TsayMBodineB (2012) Exploring parasocial interaction in college students as a multidimensional construct. Psychology of Popular Media Culture1(3): 185–200.
65.
Tsay-VogelMSchwartzML (2014) Theorizing parasocial interactions based on authenticity: the development of a media figure classification scheme. Psychology of Popular Media Culture3(2): 66–78.
66.
UrbanG (2005) Customer advocacy: a new era in marketing?Journal of Public Policy & Marketing24(1): 155–159.
67.
VerčičATVerčičD (2007) Reputation as matching identities and images: extending Davies and Chun’s (2002) research on gaps between the internal and external perceptions of the corporate brand. Journal of Marketing Communications13(4): 277–290.
68.
VidgenRSimsJPowellP (2013) Do CEO bloggers build community. Journal of Communication Management17(4): 364–385.
69.
WalzAMCeluchKG (2010) Customer advocacy: the moderating role of trust. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior23: 95–110.
70.
WasikeBS (2013) Framing news in 140 characters: how social media editors frame the news and interact with audiences via Twitter. Global Media Journal: Canadian Edition6(1): 5–23.
WootenAGMcCroskeyJC (1996) Student trust of teacher as a function of socio-communicative style of teacher and socio-communicative orientation of student. Communication Research Reports13: 94–100.
73.
ZakahiWR (1985) The relationship of assertiveness to communication satisfaction: a dyadic assessment. Communication Research Reports2(1): 36–40.
