The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships promoted by professional athletes on Twitter utilizing the theoretical framework of parasocial interaction (PSI). Specifically, this study was a content analysis that examined professional athlete tweets in order to determine whether they predominately promoted social or parasocial relationships. The study also explored with whom athletes were engaging in social interaction as well as the topic of each tweet. The data revealed that professional athletes promoted both parasocial and social relationships equally. When they chose to be social, athletes were communicating with lay people and other professional and college athletes. Most athlete tweets were either general statements or insights into their personal lives. The implications of these and other findings will be discussed further.
AndrewD. P. S.PedersenP. M.McEvoyC. (2011). Research methods and design in sport management. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
2.
BrownW. J.BasilM. D. (1995). Media celebrities and public health: Responses to “Magic” Johnson’s HIV disclosure and its impact on AIDS risk and high-risk behaviors. Health Communication, 7, 345–370.
3.
BrownW. J.BasilM. D.BocarneaM. C. (2003). The influence of famous athletes on health beliefs and practices: Mark McGwire, child abuse prevention, and androstenedione. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 41–57.
4.
BrownW. J.DuaneJ. J.FraserB. P. (1997). Media coverage and public opinion of the O.J. Simpson trial: Implications for the criminal justice system. Communication Law and Policy, 2, 261–287.
5.
BurnettA.BetoR. R. (2000). Reading romance novels: An application of parasocial relationship theory. North Dakota Journal of Speech & Theatre, 13, 28–39.
6.
CilettiD.LanasaJ.RamosD.LuchsR.LouJ. (2010). Sustainability communication in North American professional sport leagues: Insights from web-site self-presentations. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 64–91.
7.
ClavioG.KianT. M. (2010). Uses and gratifications of a retired female athlete’s Twitter Followers. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 485–500.
8.
CohenJ.PerseE. M. (2003, May). Different strokes for different folks: An empirical search for different modes of viewer-character relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
9.
CromwellG. (2009, August 26). Armstrong’s tweet turns out more than 1,000 riders for a jaunt around Dublin. Velo News. Retrieved fromhttp://velonews.competitor.com
EarnheardtA. C.HaridakisP. M. (2009). An examination of fan-athlete interaction: Fandom, parasocial interaction, and identification. Ohio Communication Journal, 47, 27–53.
12.
FischerE.ReuberA. R. (2011). Social interaction via new social media: (How) can interactions on Twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior?Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 1–18.
13.
FleissJ. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions2nd ed. New York , NY: John Wiley.
14.
GilesD. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4, 279–305.
15.
GleichU. (1997). Parasocial interaction with people on the screen. In Winterhoff-SpurkP.Van der VoortT. H. A. (Eds.), New horizons in media psychology: Research co-operation and projects in Europe (pp. 35–55). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
16.
GrantA.GuthrieK.Ball-RokeachS. J. (1991). Television shopping: A media dependency perspective. Communication Research, 18, 773–798.
17.
GregoryS. (2009, June). Twitter craze is rapidly changing the face of sports. Sports Illustrated. Retrieved fromhttp://sportsillustrated.cnn.com//
18.
GudelunasD. (2006). Shopping with friends: Audience perspectives on television shopping. Popular Communication, 4, 229–252.
19.
HambrickM. E.SimmonsJ. M.GreenhalghG. P.GreenwellT. C. (2010). Understanding professional athletes’ use of Twitter: A content analysis of athlete tweets. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 454–471.
20.
HaythornthwaiteC.WellmanB.GartonL. (1998). Work and community via computer-mediated communication. In GackenbachJ. (Ed.), Psychology and the internet (pp. 199–226). San Diego, CA: Academic.
21.
HortonD.WohlR. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229.
22.
KassingJ. W.SandersonJ. (2009). “You’re the kind of guy that we all want for a drinking buddy”: Expressions of parasocial interaction on floydlandis.com. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 182–203.
23.
KassingJ. W.SandersonJ. (2010). Fan-athlete interaction and Twitter tweeting through the Giro: A case study. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 113–128.
KrippendorfK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
27.
MarwickA. E.BoydD. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13, 114–133.
28.
MayberryD. (2011, November 1). Kevin Durant plays intramural flag football with Oklahoma State students. ThunderRumblings.com. Retrieved fromhttp://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/
29.
NabiR. L.StittC. R.HalfordJ.FinnertyK. L. (2006). Emotional and cognitive predictors of enjoyment of reality-based and fictional television programming: An elaboration of the uses and gratifications perspective. Media Psychology, 8, 421–447.
30.
PalmgreenP.WennerL. A.RayburnJ. D.,II. (1980). Relations between gratifications sought and obtained: A study of television news. Communication Research, 7, 161–192.
31.
PegoraroA. (2010). Look who’s talking – athletes on Twitter: A case study. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 501–514.
32.
PerseE. M.RubinR. B. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16, 59–77.
33.
RiffeD.LacyS.FicoF. G. (2008) Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research2nd ed. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group.
34.
RovellD. (2012, February 9). Steelers’ Antonio Brown spends weekend with Twitter fan turned BFF. CNBC.com. Retrieved fromwww.cnbc.com
35.
RubinA. M.HaridakisP. M.EyalK. (2003). Viewer aggression and attraction to television talk shows. Media Psychology, 5, 331–362.
36.
RubinA. M.PerseE. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14, 246–268.
37.
RubinA. M.PerseE. M.PowellR. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180.
38.
RubinA. M.StepM. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction of talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 635–654.
39.
RubinR. B.McHughM. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 31, 279–292.
40.
SandersonJ. (2008a). “You are the type of person that children should look up to as a hero”: Parasocial interaction on 38pitches.com. International Journal of Sport Communication, 1, 337–360.
41.
SandersonJ. (2008b). The blog is serving its purpose: Self-presentation strategies on 38pitches.com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 912–936.
42.
SandersonJ. (2008c). Spreading the word: Empathetic interaction displays on blogmaverick.com. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 156–167.
43.
SandersonJ. (2010). Framing Tiger’s troubles: Comparing traditional and social media. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 438–453.
44.
SchultzB.ShefferM. L. (2010). An exploratory study of how Twitter is affecting sports journalism. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 226–239.
45.
ShefferM. L.SchultzB. (2010). Paradigm shift or passing fad? Twitter and sports journalism. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 472–484.
SoodS.RogersE. (2000). Dimensions of parasocial interaction by letter-writers to a popular entertainment-education soap opera in India. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 386–414.
48.
SpindaJ. S.EarnheardtA. C.HugenbergL. W. (2009). Checkered flags and mediated friendships: Parasocial interaction among NASCAR fans. Journal of Sports Media, 4, 31–55.
49.
SunT. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of parasocial interaction with sport athletes and identification with sport teams. Journal of Sport Behavior, 33, 194–217.
50.
WellmanB. (1996). An electronic group is virtually a social network. In KieslerS. (Ed.), Culture of the internet (pp. 179–205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51.
WennerL. A. (1998). MediaSport. London, England: Routledge.
52.
WertheimJ. (2011, July). Twitter is now a permanent part of the sports firmament. Sports Illustrated. Retrieved fromhttp://sportsillustrated.cnn.com//
53.
WimmerR. D.DominickJ. R. (2006). Mass media research: An introduction8th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.
