Professionals and nonprofessionals on Goodreads: Behavior standards for authors,reviewers,and readers

Abstract

In 2013, Goodreads, a social media Website for book lovers, announced policy changes that included the deletion of reviews that discuss an author’s behavior. These changes occurred after a series of author/reviewer incidents in 2012 and 2013. This article presents a case study of one of those incidents in 2012, when a Goodreads reviewer wrote a negative review of a novel, the author and agent responded on Twitter, and a public discussion ensued around behavior standards for both literary professionals and nonprofessionals. The above incident, and how it does or does not foreshadow the later changes in Goodreads policy, offers a lens through which to examine evolving reading and writing practices and literary censorship, as well as how nonprofessional book reviewers and readers conceive of their and literary professionals’ roles in a complex social media literary landscape.

Keywords

Artist/audience dynamics authors behavior norms Goodreads online communities readers social media spaces

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Absolutewrite (2013) Goodreads and Bad Authors—Changes to Policy. Available at: http://absolutewrite.com/forums/showthread.php?t=277821

Baron

Lindquist

Shevlin

(eds) (2007) Agent of Change: Print Culture Studies after Elizabeth Eisenstein. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

Bassett

(2005) Circulating morals: George Moore’s attack on late-Victorian literary censorship. Pacific Coast Philology 40(2): 73–89.

Baumann

(2007) Hollywood Highbrow: From Entertainment to Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Baym

(1998) The emergence of on-line community. In: Jones

(ed.) Cybersociety 2.0. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 35–68.

Baym

Burnett

(2009) Amateur experts: international fan labour in Swedish independent music. International Journal of Cultural Studies 12(5): 433–449.

Becker-Cantarino

Clausen

(1995) Gender censorship: on literary production in German Romanticism. Women in German Yearbook 11: 81–97.

Bertagna

(2012) YA novel readers clash with publishing establishment. The Guardian. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/jan/16/ya-novel-readers-publishing-establishment

Brantlinger

(1998) The Reading Lesson: The Threat of Mass Literacy in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

10.

Burroughs

(1962) Censorship. The Transatlantic Review 11: 5–10.

11.

Cavallo

Chartier

(eds) (2003) A History of Reading in the West (trans. Cochrane

). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

12.

Chevalier

Mayzlin

(2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research 43(3): 345–354.

13.

Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil

Kossinets

Kleinberg

. (2009) How opinions are received by online communities: a case study on Amazon.com helpfulness votes. In: Proceedings of the 18th international world wide web conference, Madrid, Spain, April 2009, pp. 141–150. New York, NY: ACM.

14.

DiMaggio

(1982) Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth-century Boston: the creation of an organizational base for a high culture in America. Media, Culture & Society 4: 33–50.

15.

Donelson

(1981) Shoddy and pernicious books and youthful purity: literary and moral censorship, then and now. The Library Quarterly 51(1): 4–19.

16.

Eisenstein

(1980) The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Fidelman

(2012) These are the top 25 book reviewers on Goodreads (infographic). Forbes. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/markfidelman/2012/10/16/goodreads-ceo-these-top-25-book-reviewers-represent-the-future-infographic/

18.

Godes

Mayzlin

(2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science 23(4): 545–560.

19.

Finkelstein

McCleery

(2012) An Introduction to Book History. New York: Routledge.

20.

Goldzweig

(1980) Literary censorship in France: historical comparisons with Anglo-Saxon traditions, 1275–1940. Comparative Literature Studies 17(3): 287–304.

21.

Goodreads (2013) Important Note Regarding Reviews. Available at: http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/1499741-important-note-regarding-reviews

22.

Goodreads (2014) Author Guidelines. Available at: http://www.goodreads.com/author/guidelines

23.

Hazard Owen

(2013) Goodreads’ growing pains: attempt to curtail author bullying angers many users. Gigaom. Available at: https://gigaom.com/2013/09/23/goodreads-growing-pains-attempt-to-curtail-author-bullying-angers-many-users/

24.

Hiddenreviews (2013–2014) Available at: http://hiddenreviews.tumblr.com/

25.

Hoffelder

(2013) Goodreads announces new content policy—now deletes reviews which mention author behavior. The Digital Reader. Available at: http://the-digital-reader.com/2013/09/20/goodreads-announces-new-content-policy-now-deletes-reviews-mention-author-behavior/#.U6glh_ldWSp

26.

Jenkins

(2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.

27.

Kagawa

(2012) Authors and negative reviews, re-posted. Julie Kagawa. Available at: http://juliekagawa.blogspot.com/2012/01/authors-and-negative-reviews-re-posted.html

28.

Kennedy

(2012a) The first five days on Goodreads. Cuddlebuggery. Available at: http://cuddlebuggery.com/blog/2012/01/05/the-first-five-days-on-goodreads/

29.

Kennedy

(2012b) Wank fest continues. Cuddlebuggery. Available at: http://cuddlebuggery.com/blog/2012/01/07/wank-fest-continues/

30.

Levine

(1990) Highbrow/lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

31.

Martey

Stromer-Galley

(2007) The digital dollhouse context and social norms in The Sims Online. Games and Culture 2(4): 314–334.

32.

Marwick

boyd

(2011) To see and be seen: celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence 17(2): 139–158.

33.

Miller (2013a) Goodreads: where readers and authors battle it out in an online “Lord of the Flies.” Salon. Available at: http://www.salon.com/2013/10/09/goodreads_where_readers_and_authors_battle_it_out_in_an_online_lord_of_the_flies/

34.

Miller (2013b) How Amazon and Goodreads could lose their best readers. Salon. Available at: http://www.salon.com/2013/10/23/how_amazon_and_goodreads_could_lose_their_best_readers

35.

Otterbacher

(2011) Being heard in review communities: communication tactics and review prominence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 16(3): 424–444.

36.

Petersen

(1992) The Harmful Publications (Young Persons) Act of 1926. Literary censorship and the politics of morality in the Weimar Republic. German Studies Review 15(3): 505–523.

37.

Reddit (2013) As Goodreads grows up, it can’t please everyone. Should it try? Available at: http://www.reddit.com/r/books/comments/1n40ax/as_goodreads_grows_up_it_cant_please_everyone

38.

Rose

(1995) Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

39.

Roth

(2012) A really long post about the author/reviewer relationship. Yahighway. Available at: http://www.yahighway.com/2012/01/really-long-post-about-authorreviewer.html

40.

Saunders

41.

Scherer-Bassani

(2011) Interpersonal exchanges in discussion forums: A study of learning communities in distance learning settings. Computers & Education 56(4): 931–938.

42.

Senft

(2013) Microcelebrity and the branded self. In: Hartley

Burgess

Bruns

(eds) A Companion to New Media Dynamics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 346–354.

43.

Springen

(2012) Should authors and agents weigh in on citizen reviews? Publishers Weekly. http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/childrens/childrens-industry-news/article/50268-should-authors-and-agents-weigh-in-on-citizen-reviews.html

44.

The Passive Voice (2013) Goodreads announces new content policy—now deletes reviews which mention author behavior. Available at: http://www.thepassivevoice.com/09/2013/goodreads-announces-new-content-policy-now-deletes-reviews-which-mention-author-behavior

45.

Vannini

(2004) The meaning of a star: interpreting music fans’ reviews. Symbolic Interaction 27(1): 47–68.

46.

Verboord

(2010) The legitimacy of book critics in the age of the Internet and omnivorousness: expert critics, Internet critics and peer critics in Flanders and the Netherlands. European Sociological Review 26(6): 623–637.

47.

Verboord

(2013) The impact of peer-produced criticism on cultural evaluation: a multilevel analysis of discourse employment in online and offline film reviews. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 3 July 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1461444813495164.

48.

Wartella

Jennings

(2000) Children and computers: new technology-old concerns. The Future of Children 10(2): 31–43.

49.

Woodmansee

Jaszi

(1994) The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

50.

Wright

(2009) The battle of the books. The Wilson Quarterly 34(4): 59–64.

51.

Zhang

Varadarajan

(2006) Utility scoring of product reviews. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on information and knowledge management, Arlington, VA, November 2006, pp. 51–57. New York, NY: ACM.