This article attends to the idea of disconnection as a way of theorising people’s lived experience of social networking sites. Enrolling and extending a disconnective practice lens, we suggest that the disconnective strategies of suspension and prevention are operational necessities for those we might see as the users and owners of sites such as Facebook. Indeed, our work demonstrates that disconnection in these contexts need not be associated only with modes of resistance and departure, but can also act as socioeconomic lubricant.
AkrichM (1992) The de-scription of technical objects. In: BijkerWELawJ (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. London: The MIT Press, pp. 205–224.
BaymNK (2010) Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
BijkerWELawJ (1994) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5.
boydd (2008) Why youth ♥ social network sites: the role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: BuckinghamD (ed.) Youth Identity and Digital Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 119–142.
6.
boydd (2011) Social network sites as networked publics. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp. 39–58.
7.
boyddmEllisonNB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(1): 210–230.
8.
CassidyE (2013) Gay men, social media and self-presentation: managing identities in Gaydar, Facebook and beyond. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
9.
CastellsM (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.
10.
CrawfordK (2009) Following you: disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies23(4): 525–535.
11.
DenaC (2008) Emerging participatory culture practices. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies14(1): 41–57.
12.
EllisonNBboydd (2013) Sociality through social networks. In: DuttonWH (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–172.
13.
FerneleyELightB (2008) Unpacking user relations in an emerging ubiquitous computing environment: introducing the bystander. Journal of Information Technology23(3): 163–175.
14.
FriedmanALCornfordDS (1989) Computer Systems Development: History, Organization and Implementation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
GerlitzCHelmondA (2013) The like economy: social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society15(8): 1348–1365.
16.
GriffithsMLightB (2008) Social networking and digital gaming media convergence: classification and its consequences for appropriation. Information Systems Frontiers10(4): 447–459.
17.
HargittaiE (2007) Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(1): 276–297.
18.
HargittaiE (2012) Open doors, closed spaces? Differentiated adoption of social network sites by user background. In: NakamuraLChow-WhitePA (eds) Race after the Internet. New York: Routledge, pp. 223–245.
19.
HargittaiEHsiehYP (2011) From dabblers to omnivores: a typology of social network site usage. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp. 146–168.
20.
ItoM (2007) Introduction. In: VarnelisK (ed.) Networked Publics. London: The MIT Press, pp. 1–14.
21.
JonesSG (1995) Understanding community in the information age. In: JonesSG (ed.) CyberSociety: Computer Mediated Communication and Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 10–35.
LightB (2014) Disconnecting with Social Networking Sites. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
LightBMcGrathK (2010) Ethics and social networking sites: a disclosive analysis of Facebook. Information Technology and People23(4): 290–311.
30.
LovnikG (2011) Networks without a Cause: A Critique of Social Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
31.
LudlowP (1996) High Noon on the Electronic Frontier: Conceptual Issues in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
32.
LukesS (1974) Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.
33.
LukesS (2005) Power: A Radical View. 2nd edn.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
MarwickAEllisonNB (2012) ‘There Isn’t Wifi in Heaven!’ Negotiating visibility on Facebook memorial pages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media56(3): 378–400.
35.
Mayer-SchönbergerV (2011) Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
MilesIThomasG (1995) User resistance to new interactive media: participants, processes and paradigms. In: BauerM (ed.) Resistance to New Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 255–276.
37.
MillerV (2008) New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies14(4): 387–400.
38.
OudshoornNPinchT (2005a) How users and non-users matter. In: OudshoornNPinchT (eds) How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology (Paperback Edition). London: The MIT Press, pp. 1–25.
39.
OudshoornNPinchT (2005b) How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology (Paperback Edition). London: The MIT Press.
40.
PapacharissiZ (2009) The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, Linkedin and Asmallworld. New Media & Society11(1/2): 199–220.
41.
PapacharissiZ (2010) A Private Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.
42.
PapacharissiZ (2011) A networked self. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp. 304–318.
43.
Portwood-StacerL (2013) Media refusal and conspicuous non-consumption: the performative and political dimensions of Facebook abstention. New Media & Society15(7): 1041–1057.
44.
Quan-HaaseACollinsJL (2008) ‘I’m There, but I Might Not Want to Talk to You’. Information, Communication & Society11(4): 526–543.
45.
RheingoldH (1994) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. New York: Harper Perennial.
46.
RoharcherH (2005a) The diverse role of users in innovation processes. In: RoharcherH (ed.) User Involvement in Innovation Processes: Strategies and Limitations from a Socio-Technical Perspective. Wien: Profil, pp. 9–35.
47.
RoharcherH (2005b) User Involvement in Innovation Processes: Strategies and Limitations from a Socio-Technical Perspective. Wien: Profil.
48.
SchwarzO (2010) On friendship, boobs and the logic of the catalogue. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies16(2): 163–183.
49.
SørensenKH (2002) Social shaping on the move? On the policy relevance of the social shaping of technology perspective. In: SørensenKHWilliamsR (eds) Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces and Tools. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 19–35.
50.
TufekckiZ (2008) Grooming, gossip, Facebook and Myspace: what can we learn about these sites from those who won’t assimilate?Information, Communication & Society11(4): 544–564.
51.
Van DijckJ (2013a) Facebook and the engineering of connectivity a multi-layered approach to social media platforms. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies19(2): 141–155.
52.
Van DijckJ (2013b) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
Van DijckJPoellT (2013) Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication1(1): 2–14.
54.
WellmanB (2001) Physical place and cyberplace: the rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25(2): 227–252.
55.
WellmanBGuliaM (1999) Virtual communities as communities: net surfers don’t ride alone. In: KollockPSmithM (eds) Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge, pp. 167–194.
WyattS (2005) Non-users also matter: the construction of users and non-users of the Internet. In: OudshoornNPinchT (eds) How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. London: The MIT Press, pp. 67–79.
58.
WyattSThomasGTerranovaT (2002) They came, they surfed, they went back to the beach: conceptualising use and non-use of the Internet. In: WoolgarS (ed.) Virtual Society?Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–40.