A positive bias of opinions has frequently been identified across online review websites, suggesting that the public is making decisions based on a limited range of opinions. While scholars often attribute this bias to social loafing or self-selection, this study investigates the positive bias from the perspective of opinion expression. Drawing from the spiral of silence theory, a qualitative analysis of discussion forums reveals that fear of isolation reduces the willingness of members to voice neutral and negative reviews. Additionally, communicative affordances of the interface were found to further suppress neutral and negative opinions. These results extend the spiral of silence theory into the context of non-anonymous multichannel communication platforms and indicate the need to consider the role of communicative affordances in online opinion expression.
AschSE (1956) Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied70(9): 1–70.
2.
BowenG (2008) Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods5(3): 12–23.
3.
ChevalierJAMayzlinD (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research43(3): 345–354.
4.
CialdiniRBTrostMR (1998) Social influence: social norms, conformity and compliance. In: GilbertDTFiskeSTLindzeyG (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology. 4th ed.New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 151–192.
5.
ClairRP (1993) The use of framing devices to sequester organizational narratives: hegemony and harassment. Communication Monographs60(2): 113–136.
6.
CorbinJMStraussA (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology13(1): 3–21.
7.
DellarocasCWoodCA (2008) The sound of silence in online feedback: estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Management Science54(3): 460–476.
8.
DittesJEKelleyHH (1956) Effects of different conditions of acceptance upon conformity to group norms. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology53(1): 100–107.
9.
EdwardsMGreenbergJ (2009) Sounding off on voice and silence. In: EdwardsMGreenbergJ (eds) Voice and Silence in Organizations. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 275–291.
10.
EllisonNSteinfieldCLampeC (2007) The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1143–1168.
11.
FriedmanB (1997) Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
HarveyOConsalviC (1960) Status and conformity to pressures in informal groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology60(2): 182–187.
15.
HoSMcLeodD (2008) Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Communication Research35(2): 190–207.
16.
HuNPavlouPAZhangJ (2007) Why do online product reviews have a J-shaped distribution? Overcoming biases in online word-of-mouth communication. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2380298
17.
InskoCASmithRHAlickeMD. (1985) Conformity and group size: the concern with being right and the concern with being liked. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin11(1): 41–50.
JiangMXuH (2009) Exploring online structures on Chinese Government Portals. Social Science Computer Review27: 174-195.
20.
JøsangAIsmailRBoydC (2007) A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems43(2): 618–644.
21.
KennamerJD (1990) Self-serving biases in perceiving the opinions of others: implications for the spiral of silence. Communication Research17: 393–404.
22.
KucukSU (2008) Consumer exit, voice, and “power” on the internet. Journal of Research for Consumers15(1): 1–13.
23.
LeonardiPBarleyS (2008) Materiality and change: challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization18(3): 159–176.
24.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
25.
LottAJLottBE (1965) Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin64(4): 259–309.
26.
McDevittMKiousisSWahl-JorgensenK (2003) Spiral of moderation: opinion expression in computer-mediated discussion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research15(4): 454–470.
27.
McLure-WaskoMFarajS (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly29(1): 35–57.
28.
MaloneTWLaubacherRDellarocasC (2010) The collective intelligence genome. MIT Management Review Spring51(3): 20–31.
29.
Noelle-NeumannE (1974) The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication24(2): 43–51.
30.
Noelle-NeumannE (1991) The theory of public opinion: the concept of the spiral of silence. In: AndersonJA (ed.) Communication Yearbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 256–308.
31.
Noelle-NeumannE (1993) The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion: Our Social Skin. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
32.
OtterbacherJ (2011) Being heard in review communities: communication tactics and review prominence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication16(3): 424–444.
33.
PattonMQ (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
34.
PeetersGCzapinskiJ (1990) Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: the distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology1(1): 33–60.
35.
PettigrewAM (1979) On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly24: 570–581.
36.
PinchTKeslerF (2011) How aunt ammy gets her free lunch: a study of the top thousand customer reviewers at Amazon.com. Available at: http://www.freelunch.me/filecabinet
37.
ResnickPZeckhauserR (2002) Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. Advances in Applied Microeconomics: A Research Annual11: 127–157.
38.
ResnickPKuwabaraKZeckhauserR. (2000) Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM43(12): 45–48.
39.
SalwenMLinCMateraF (1994) Willingness to discuss “official English”: a test of three communities. Journalism Quarterly71: 282–290.
40.
ScheufeleDMoyP (2000) Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: a conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research12(1): 3–28.
41.
SlaterMD (2007) Reinforcing spirals: the mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory17(3): 281–303.
42.
SpenderD (1984) Defining reality: a powerful tool. In: KramaraeCSchulzMO’ BarrWM (eds) Language and Power. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, pp. 194–205.
43.
WillemsenLMNeijensPCBronnerF. (2011) “Highly recommended!” the content characteristics and perceived usefulness of online consumer reviews. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(1): 19–38.
