The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of the Sensibility Development Program against Cyberbullying in raising awareness around cyberbullying and reducing cyberbullying behaviors. The program specifically targeted adolescents who were at risk of exposure to cyberbullying behaviors. For this study, an experimental design with a control group was used (N = 18). The Cyberbullying Sensibility Scale (CBSS) was administered to the experimental and the control groups before and after the program. The experimental group also filled out the Cyberbullying Scale, which measured engagement with cyberbullying behaviors. Statistical analysis indicated that there was a significant difference between CBSS pre-and-post-test scores in the experimental group. No significant difference was found for the control group, suggesting that the program was effective in helping students develop a level of sensibility against cyberbullying. No significant difference was found between pre-and-post-tests with respect to students’ engagement with cyberbullying behaviors. The implications for prevention and intervention programs were discussed.
AngRPGohDH (2010) Cyberbullying among adolescents: the role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry & Human Development41(4): 387–397.
2.
ArıcakOT (2009) Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research34(Winter): 167–184.
3.
ArıcakOT (2011) Cyberbullying: the new danger waiting for adolescents. Career Window (Kariyer Penceresi)November–December(6): 10–11.
4.
ArıcakOTKınayHTanrıkuluT (2012) Initial psychometric findings of cyber bullying scale. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi9(1): 101–114.
5.
ArıcakTSiyahhanSUzunhasanogluA. (2008) Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior11(3): 253–261.
6.
BakerÖEKavşutF (2007) Cyberbullying: a new face of peer bullying. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research27: 31–42.
7.
ChanKChanS (2008) Emotional autonomy versus susceptibility to peer pressure. Research in Education79: 38–52.
8.
CoreyG (2008) Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. 7th ed.Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
9.
CowieHCollietyP (2010) Cyberbullying: sanctions or sensitivity?Pastoral Care in Education28(4): 261–268.
10.
DiamandurosTDownsEJenkinsSJ (2008) The role of school psychologists in the assessment, prevention, and intervention of cyberbullying. Psychology in the Schools45: 693–704.
11.
DonaldJWPattenTG (1979) Repression-sensitization and nonverbal expressiveness. Journal of Personality Assessment43(2): 171–176.
12.
GlasserW (1999) Choice Theory a New Psychology of Personal Freedom. New York: Harper Perennial.
13.
GlassGVHopkinsKD (2008) StatisticalMethods in Education and Psychology. 3rd ed.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
HowattWA (2001) The evolution of reality therapy to choice theory. International Journal of Reality Therapy21(1): 7–12.
15.
JosePEKljakovicMScheibE. (2011) The joint development of traditional bullying and victimization with cyber bullying and victimization in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence22(2): 301–309.
16.
KrahéBMöllerIBergerA. (2011) Repression versus sensitization in response to media violence as predictors of cognitive avoidance and vigilance. Journal of Personality79(1): 165–190.
17.
LevineLEConwayJM (2010) Self-other awareness and peer relationships in toddlers: gender comparisons. Infant and Child Development19(5): 455–464.
18.
LiauAKKhooAAngPH (2008) Parental awareness and monitoring of adolescent Internet use. Current Psychology27(4): 217–233.
19.
ManAF (1990) Repression-sensitization and measures of adjustment. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal18(1): 13–16.
20.
MasonKL (2008) Cyberbullying: a preliminary assessment for school personnel. Psychology in the Schools45(4): 323–348.
21.
MemduhoğluHBTaştanM (2007) School and student security: a conceptual solution. Journal of Çukurova University Educational Sciences34(3): 69–83.
22.
MoralesM (2011) Cyberbullying. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet15(4): 406–419.
23.
MorganettRS (2005) Ergenler için Grupla Psikolojik Danışma Uygulamaları [Skills for Living: Group Counseling Activities for Young Adolescents]. Translated by Alim Kaya et al. Ankara: Pegem A Press.
24.
OcejaLAmbronaTLópez-PérezB. (2010) When the victim is one among others: empathy, awareness of others and motivational ambivalence. Motivation and Emotion34(2): 110–119.
25.
OlsonJMZannaMP (1982) Repression-sensitization differences responses to a decision. Journal of Personality50: 46–57.
26.
PearceNCrossDMonksH. (2011) Current evidence of best practice in whole-school bullying intervention and its potential to inform cyberbullying interventions. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling21: 1–21.
27.
QingL (2005) Cyberbullying in schools: nature and extent of Canadian adolescents’ experience. In: The Montreal: annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, 2005.Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490641.pdf.
28.
RaffoneATaginiASrinivasanN (2010) Mindfulness and the cognitive neuroscience of attention and awareness. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science45(3): 627–646.
29.
RogerDSchapalsT (1996) Repression-sensitization and emotion control. Current Psychology15(1): 30–37.
30.
RohrmannSNetterPHennigJ. (2003) Repression-sensitization, gender, and discrepancies in psychobiological reactions to examination stress. Anxiety, Stress and Coping16(3): 321–329.
31.
SchneiderSKO’DonnellLStueveA. (2012) Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: a regional census of high school students. American Journal of Public Health102(1): 171–177.
32.
ShariffS (2005) Cyber-dilemmas in the new millennium: school obligations to provide student safety in a virtual school environment. McGill Journal of Education 40(3): 457–477.
33.
ShaughnessyJJ (1997) Research Methods in Psychology. 4th ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.
SolimanAMMathnaEK (2009) Metacognitive strategy training improves driving situation awareness. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal37(9): 1161–1170.
35.
StevensJP (2009) Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. New York: Taylor & Francis.
36.
StromPStromR (2005) When teens turn cyberbullies. The Education Digest71(4): 35–41.
37.
SulistyawatiKWickensCChuiYP (2011) Prediction in situation awareness: confidence bias and underlying cognitive abilities. International Journal of Aviation Psychology21(2): 153–174.
38.
ŞahinaslanEKandemirRŞahinaslanÖ (2009) Bilgi güvenliği farkındalık eğitim örneği [Information Security Awareness Sample]. Academic Informatics’09 XI. Academic Informatics Conference Paper, Şanlıurfa: Harran University. Retrieved from http://ab.org.tr/ab09/bildiri/117.pdf
39.
TanrıkuluTKınayHArıcakOT (2013) Cyberbullying sensibility scale: validity and reliability study. Trakya University Journal of Education3(1): 38–47.
40.
TopçuÇErdur-BakerÖÇapa-AydinY (2008) Examination of cyberbullying experiences among Turkish students from different school types. Cyberpsychology & Behavior11(6): 643–648.
41.
TotanT (2007) Okulda zorbalığı önlemede eğitimcilere ve ebeveynlere öneriler [Suggestions for Educators and Parents to Prevent Bullying in School]. AIBU Journal of Education Faculty7(2):190-202.
42.
VandeboschHVan CleemputK (2009) Cyberbullying among youngsters: profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society11(8): 1349–1371.
43.
WarnerQT (2005) Awareness and cognition: the role of awareness training in child development. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality17: 47–64.
44.
WillifordALElledgeCBoultonAJ. (2013) Effects of the Kiva antibullying program on cyberbullying and cybervictimization frequency among Finnish youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. Epub ahead of print 9May. DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2013.787623.
45.
WrightVHJoyJBChristopherTI. (2009) Cyberbullying: using virtual scenarios to educate and raise awareness. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education26(1): 35–42.
