The purpose of this article is to explore textism in English as adopted by American deaf adolescents, examining its features and social function within the under-represented population of deaf teens in growing research on texting. This case study collected a corpus of 370 text messages exchanged via cell phone between a high-school pair at a US residential school. Also included were survey responses from 35 high-school students and interviews with the texting pair and several teachers, all of which enhanced the understanding of how deaf adolescents at this school used texting for communication. The corpus was analyzed, along with the surveyed general characteristics of texting. The pair’s messages indicated that the deaf adolescents adopted various characteristics of textism used by the English-speaking hearing adolescents studied by other researchers. However, the corpus also showed incidents of characteristics unique to the deaf teens’ texting, such as structural transfer from sign language.
AkamatsuCTMayerCFarrellyS (2005) An investigation of two-way text messaging use with deaf students at the secondary level. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education11(1): 120–131.
BailesCNErtingCJCarolJ. (2009) Language and literacy acquisition through parental mediation in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies9(4): 417–456.
4.
BarakASadovskyY (2008) Internet use and personal empowerment of hearing impaired adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior24: 1802–1815.
5.
BaronN (2008) Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
CareyJ (1980) Paralanguage in computer mediated communication. In: SondheimerNK (ed.) The 18th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Parasession on Topics in Interactive Discourse: Proceedings of the Conference. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, pp. 67–69.
7.
CaronACaroniaL (2007) Moving Cultures: Mobile Communication in Everyday Life. Montreal, QC, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
8.
CastellsMFernandez-ArdevolMQuiLJ. (2007) Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
9.
ChorostM (2005) Rebuilt: My Journey Back to the Hearing World. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
10.
CrystalD (2001) Language and the Internet. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
DörnyeiZ (2003) Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
EckerKD (2008) Mobile phones as a social medium for the deaf: a uses and gratifications study. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, The Rochester Institute of Technology, New York.
13.
GillardPAstbrinkGBaileyJ (2007) Mobile communication in real time for the first time: user evaluation of non-voice terminal equipment for people with hearing and speech disabilities. In: SobhTElleithyKMahmoodAetal. (eds) Innovative Algorithms and Techniques in Automation, Industrial Electronics and Telecommunications. New York: Springer, pp. 347–352.
14.
Henderson-SummetVGrinterRECarrollJ. (2007) Electronic communication: themes from a case study of the deaf community. Lecture Notes in Computer Science4662(Part I): 347–360.
15.
HumphriesTPaddenCO’RourkeTJ (1994) A Basic Course in American Sign Language. Carrollton, TX: T.J. Publishers.
16.
KatzJE (2006) Magic in the Air: Mobile Communication and the Transformation of Social Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
17.
LightbownPMSpadaN (2006) How Languages are Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
LingRBaronNS (2007) Text messaging and IM: linguistic comparison of American college data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology26(3): 291–298.
19.
MarscharkMWautersL (2008) Language comprehension and learning by deaf students. In: MarscharkMHauserPC (eds) Deaf Cognition: Foundations and Outcomes. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 309–350.
20.
MayerC (2009) Issues in second language literacy education with learners who are deaf. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism12(3): 325–334.
21.
MiyakeK (2007) How young Japanese express their emotions visually in mobile phone messages: a sociolinguistic analysis. Japanese Studies27(1): 53–72.
22.
MooresDF (2006) Print literacy: the acquisition of reading and writing skills. In: MooresDFMartinDS (eds) Deaf Learners: Developments in Curriculum and Instruction. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, pp. 41–55.
PaddenCA (2000) Deaf. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology9(1–2): 57–60.
25.
PillingDBarrettP (2007) Text communication preferences of deaf people in the United Kingdom. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education13(1): 92–103.
26.
PlesterBWoodCBellV (2008) Txt msg n school literacy: does texting and knowledge of text abbreviations adversely affect children’s literacy attainment?Literacy42(3): 137–144.
27.
PowerDPowerMRRehlingB (2007) German deaf people using text communication: short message service, TTY, relay services, fax, and e-mail. American Annals of the Deaf152(3): 291–301.
28.
PowerMRPowerDHorstmanshofL (2006) Deaf people communicating via SMS, TTY, relay service, fax, and computers in Australia. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education12(1): 80–91.
29.
RiordanMAKreuzRK (2010) Cues in computer-mediated communication: a corpus analysis. Computers in Human Behavior26(July): 1806–1817.
30.
SegerstadYH (2005) Language use in Swedish mobile text messaging. In: LingRPedersenPE (eds) Mobile Communications: Re-Negotiation of the Social Sphere. New York: Springer, pp. 313–333.
31.
ShortisT (2007) Revoicing txt: spelling, vernacular orthography and “unregimented writing. In: PosteguilloSEsteveMJ (eds) The Texture of Internet: Netlinguistics in Progress. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 2–20.
32.
SnowdenC (2006) Cstng A pwr4l spLL: D evOLshn f SMS (Casting a powerful spell: the evolution of SMS). In: KavooriAArceneauxN (eds) The Cell Phone Reader: Essays in Social Transformation. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 107–124.
33.
SupallaSJCrippsJH (2008) Linguistic accessibility and deaf children. In: SpolskyBHultFM (eds) The Handbook of Educational Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publication, pp. 174–191.
