While emerging research illuminates how youth engage with digital media, relatively little attention has been given to moral and ethical issues. Drawing on interviews with 61 teens and young adults, we explored the extent to which youth’s approaches to online life include moral or ethical considerations. We report the prevalence of three ways of thinking about use of social networks, massive multiplayer games, Wikipedia, and downloading. We found that individualistic thinking (focusing on consequences for oneself) dominated participants’ thinking; moral thinking (considering known others) was somewhat prevalent; and ethical thinking (acknowledging unknown others and communities) was least prevalent. We explore the targets and triggers of these approaches to online life, discuss ethical lapses observed, and consider theoretical and practical implications.
AlexanderCNLangerEJ (eds) (1990) Higher Stages of Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
ArnettJJ (2004) Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from the Late Teens through the Twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
BebeauMJRestJRNarvaezD (1999) Beyond the promise: A perspective on research in moral education. Educational Researcher28(4): 18–26.
4.
boydd (2008) Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: BuckinghamD (ed.) Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp.119–142.
5.
boydd (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self. New York: Routledge, pp.39–58.
6.
BradleyK (2005) Internet lives: Social context and moral domain in adolescent development. New Directions for Youth Development108: 57–76.
7.
BurnamBKafaiYB (2001) Ethics and the computer: Children’s development of moral reasoning about computer and Internet use. Journal of Educational Computing Research25(2): 111–127.
DamonW (1988) The Moral Child. New York: Free Press.
14.
FischerKWBidellTR (1998) Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought. In: LearnerRM (ed.) Handbook of Child Psychology, vol. 1. New York: Wiley, pp. 467–561.
15.
FischmanWSolomonBGreenspanD. (2004) Making Good: How Young People Make Moral Decisions at Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
GardnerH (2006) Five Minds for the Future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
17.
GardnerH (2011) Truth, Beauty and Goodness Reframed. New York: Basic Books.
18.
GilbertS (2009) Ethics at play: Patterns of ethical thinking among young online gamers. In: SchrierKGibsonD (eds) Ethics and Game Design: Teaching Values through Play. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp.151–166.
19.
GilliganC (1982) In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
21.
ItoMBaumerSBittantiM. (2009) Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
22.
JamesCDavisKFloresA. (2009) Young People, Ethics, and the New Digital Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
23.
JenkinsHPurushotmaRWeigelM. (2009) Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
MaHLuRYTurnerS. (2007) An empirical investigation of digital cheating and plagiarism among middle school students. American Secondary Education35(2): 69–82.
30.
MilesMBHubermanM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
NoddingsN (1984) Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
32.
NucciL (1996) Morality and the personal sphere of action. In: ReedETurielEBrownT (eds) Knowledge and Values. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 41–60.
33.
NucciLLeeJ (1993) Morality and personal autonomy. In: NoamGWrenT (eds) The Moral Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.123–148.
34.
PalfreyJGasserU (2008) Born Digital. New York: Basic Books.
35.
PiagetJ (1965) The Moral Judgment of the Child. New York: The Free Press.
36.
PooleD (2007) A study of beliefs and behaviors regarding digital technology. New Media & Society9(5): 771–793.
37.
PowersTM (2003) Real wrongs in virtual communities. Ethics and Information Technology5: 191–198.
38.
RestJRNarvaezDThomaSJ. (2000) A neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal of Moral Education29(4): 381–395.
39.
SelmanRL (1975) Level of social perspective-taking and the development of empathy in children: Speculations from a social-cognitive viewpoint. Journal of Moral Education5(1): 35–43.
40.
ShirkyC (2008) Here Comes Everybody. New York: Penguin Press.
41.
SilverstoneR (2006) Media and Morality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
42.
SmithCChristoffersenKDavidsonH (2011) Lost in Transition: The Dark Side of Emerging Adulthood. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
SulerJ (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior7(3): 321–326.
44.
TurielE (1983) The Development of Social Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
TurkleS (2011) Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Ourselves. New York: Basic Books.
WolakJFinkelhorDMitchellK. (2008) Online ‘predators’ and their victims: Myths, realities and implications for prevention and treatment. American Psychologist63(2): 111–128.
