The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of parental restrictive mediation and to examine the effects of restrictive mediation on children’s internet use. Data were obtained through a survey of Korean children from fourth to ninth grade, and their parents. According to the findings, the age of a child, parental perception of the negative influence of the internet, parental perception of their child’s low self-control, and parental internet skills were significant predictors of restrictive mediation. Restrictive mediation was significantly associated with reduced online risks and reduced time spent online, and was not associated with addictive use. In particular, the effects of restrictive mediation on online time and online risks were greater for a child with low self-control. This study advances the understanding of the effects, predictors and moderators of restrictive mediation.
AhnJ (2008) Types of Internet mediation and its relationship with precedent variables. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies22: 230–264.
2.
BeaulieuDABugentalDB (2007) An evolutionary approach to socialization. In: GrusecJEHastingsPD (eds) Handbook of Socialization. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 71–95.
3.
BuijzenMValkenburgPM (2005) Identifying determinants of young children’s brand awareness: television, parents, and peers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology26(4): 456–468.
4.
CaplanSE (2005) A social skill account of problematic internet use. Journal of Communication55(4): 721–736.
5.
ChoCHCheonHJ (2005) Children’s exposure to negative Internet content: effects of family context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media49(4): 488–509.
6.
ChoYBaeJ (2010) Study on parental mediation of children’s digital media use within the home environment. Media, Gender & Culture13: 37–74.
7.
ClarkLS (2009) Digital media and the generation gap. Information, Communication, & Society12(3): 388–407.
8.
DarlingNSteinbergL (1993) Parenting style as context: an integrative model. Psychological Bulletin113(3): 487–496.
9.
EastinMSGreenbergBSHofschireL (2006) Parenting the internet. Journal of Communication56(3): 486–504.
10.
FujiokaYAustinEW (2003) The implications of vantage point in parental mediation of television and child’s attitudes toward drinking alcohol. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media47(3): 418–434.
11.
GrasmickHGTittleCRBursikRJ. (1993) Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30(1): 5–29.
12.
GrusecJEDavidovM (2007) Socialization in the family: the roles of parents. In: GrusecJEHastingsPD (eds) Handbook of Socialization. New York: The Guilford Press, 259–284.
13.
GrusecJEDavidovM (2010) Integrating different perspectives on socialization theory and research: a domain-specific approach. Child Development81(3): 687–709.
14.
GuanSASubrahmanyamK (2009) Youth Internet use: risks and opportunities. Current Opinion in Psychiatry22: 351–356.
15.
HasebrinkULivingstoneSHaddonL (2009) Comparing Children’s Online Opportunities and Risks across Europe: Cross-National Comparisons for EU Kids Online. EU Kids Online Deliverable D3.2 for the EC Safer Internet Plus Programme, 2nd edn.London: EU Kids Online.
16.
HoffnerCBuchananM (2002) Parents’ responses to television violence: the third-person perception, parental mediation, and support for censorship. Media Psychology4: 231–252.
17.
HustonAWrightJC (1994) Educating children with television: the form of the medium. In: ZilmannDBryantJHustonAC (eds) Media, Children, and the Family: Social Scientific, Psychodynamic, and Clinical Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 73–84.
18.
JordanA. (1992) Social class, temporal orientation, and mass media use within the family system. Critical Studies in Media Communication9(4): 374–386.
19.
LaroseRLinCAEastinMS (2003) Unregulated Internet usage: addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation?Media Psychology5(3): 225–253.
20.
LarsonRWVermaS (1999) How children and adolescents spend time across the world: work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin125(6): 701–736.
21.
LeeSChaeY (2007) Children’s internet use in a family context: influence on family relationships and parental mediation. CyberPsychology & Behavior10(5): 640–644.
22.
LeeSJeonS (2011) Adolescent internet use and parental mediation practice: using parent-child interviews. Media, Gender & Culture17: 5–42.
LivingstoneS (2003) Children’s use of the internet: reflections on the emerging research agenda. New Media & Society5(2): 147–166.
25.
LivingstoneS (2009) Children and the Internet: Great Expectations, Challenging Realities. Cambridge: Polity.
26.
LivingstoneSHelsperE (2008) Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media52(4): 581–599.
27.
LivingstoneSHelsperE (2010) Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society12(2): 309–329.
28.
MeirickPCSimsJDGilchristES. (2009) All the children are above average: parents’ perceptions of education and materialism on media effects on their own and other children. Mass Media and Society12(2): 217–237.
29.
MendozaK (2009) Surveying parental mediation: connections, challenges and questions for media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education1: 28–41.
MitchellKJFinkelhorDWolakJ (2003) The exposure of youth to unwanted sexual material on the Internet: a national survey of risk, impact, and prevention. Youth & Society34(3): 330–358.
32.
MitchellKJWolakJFinkelhorD (2008) Are blogs putting youth at risk for online sexual solicitation or harassment?Child Abuse & Neglect32: 277–294.
33.
NathansonAI (2001) Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media45(2): 201–220.
34.
NathansonAI (2002) The unintended effects of parental mediation of television on adolescents. Media Psychology4(3): 207–230.
NathansonAIWilsonBJMcGeeJ. (2002) Counteracting the effects of female stereotypes on television via active mediation. Journal of Communication52(4): 922–937.
37.
NikkenPJanszJ (2006) Parental mediation of children’s video game playing: a comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, Media & Technology31(2): 181–202.
38.
RobertsDFoehrURideoutV (2005) Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8−18 Year-Olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
39.
ShinWHuhJ (2011) Parental mediation of teenagers’ video game playing: antecedents and consequences. New Media & Society13(6): 945–962.
40.
SubrahmanyamKGreenfieldPM (2008) Online communication and adolescent relationships. The Future of Children18: 119–146.
41.
TrippLM (2011) ‘The computer is not for you to be looking around, it is for schoolwork’: challenges for digital inclusion as Latino immigrant families negotiate children’s access to the internet. New Media & Society13(4): 552–567.
42.
ValckeMDe WeverBVan KeerH. (2011) Long-term study of safe internet use of young children. Computers & Education57(1): 1292–1305.
43.
ValkenburgPMSoetersKE (2001) Children’s positive and negative experiences with the internet. Communication Research28(5): 652–675.
44.
ValkenburgPMKrcmarMPeetersAL. (1999) Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: ‘instructive mediation’, ‘restrictive mediation’, and ‘social coviewing’. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media43(1): 52–66.
45.
Van den EijndenRJJMSpijkermanRVermulstAA. (2010) Compulsive internet use among adolescents: bidirectional parent-child relationships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology38(1): 77–89.
46.
VandewaterEAParkSEHuangX. (2005) ‘No, you can’t watch that’: parental rules and young children’s media use. American Behavioral Scientist48(5): 608–623.
47.
WarrenR (2005) Parental mediation of children’s television viewing in low-income families. Journal of Communication55(4): 847–863.
48.
WarrenRGerkePKelleyMA (2002) Is there enough time on the clock? Parental involvement and mediation of children’s television viewing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media46(1): 87–111.
49.
WindleMSpearLPFuligniAJ. (2008) Transitions into underage and problem drinking: developmental processes and mechanisms between 10 and 15 years of age. Pediatrics121: S273–S289.
50.
WolakJFinkelhorDMitchellKJ (2008) Is talking online to unknown people always risky? Distinguishing online interaction styles in a national sample of youth internet users. CyberPsychology & Behavior11(3): 340–343.
51.
WolakJMitchellKFinkelhorD (2007) Unwanted and wanted exposure to online pornography in a national sample of youth internet users. Pediatrics119: 247–257.
52.
YoungKS (1999) Internet addiction: symptoms, evaluation, and treatment. In: Van de CreekLJacksonX (eds) Innovations in Clinical Practice: A Source Book. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press, pp. 19–31.
