Parental Internet practices in the family system: Restrictive mediation,problematic Internet use,and adolescents’ age-related variations in perceptions of parent-child relationship quality
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2024
Parental Internet practices in the family system: Restrictive mediation,problematic Internet use,and adolescents’ age-related variations in perceptions of parent-child relationship quality
The current study draws from family systems theory to investigate the relationships between parents’ Internet practices, adolescent age (as a proxy for child development), and adolescents’ perceptions of parent-adolescent relationship quality. Secondary data analysis of 4,592 U.S. parent-adolescent dyads from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey revealed that when parents reported having more problematic Internet use, adolescents (ages 12–17) reported having worse relationships with their parents. Stricter rules regarding Internet usage were associated with lower parent-adolescent relationship quality. This negative relationship was more pronounced for adolescents 14.55 years old and older. Unexpectedly, having stricter rules about Internet content was related to better parent-adolescent relationship quality; this association was weaker for older adolescents. The findings provide insight into the differences between restrictive Internet mediation practices about time and content, the importance of examining parents’ problematic Internet use, and the need for considering children’s development when examining the role of media in the family system.
AloiaL. S. (2020). Parent–child relationship satisfaction: The influence of family communication orientations and relational maintenance behaviors. The Family Journal, 28(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/106648071989656
2.
AloiaL. S.WarrenR. (2019). Quality parent–child relationships: The role of parenting style and online relational maintenance behaviors. Communication Reports, 32(2), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1582682
AndersonE. L.SteenE.StavropoulosV. (2017). Internet use and problematic internet use: A systematic review of longitudinal research trends in adolescence and emergent adulthood. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(4), 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2016.1227716
5.
AndersonS. A.SabatelliR. M. (1992). The differentiation in the family system scale (DIFS). American Journal of Family Therapy, 20(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189208250878
6.
BowenM. (1974). Alcoholism as viewed through family systems theory and family psychotherapy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 233, 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb40288.x
7.
ByrneS.LeeT. (2011). Toward predicting youth resistance to internet risk prevention strategies. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.546255
CollierK. M.CoyneS. M.RasmussenE. E.HawkinsA. J.Padilla-WalkerL. M.EricksonS. E.Memmott-ElisonM. K. (2016). Does parental mediation of media influence child outcomes? A meta-analysis on media time, aggression, substance use, and sexual behavior. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 798–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000108
10.
CoyneS. M.RadeskyJ.CollierK. M.GentileD. A.LinderJ. R.NathansonA. I.RogersJ. (2017). Parenting and digital media. Pediatrics, 140(Supplement_2), S112–S116. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758N
11.
CumsilleP.DarlingN.FlahertyB. P.MartínezM. L. (2006). Chilean adolescents’ beliefs about the legitimacy of parental authority: Individual and age-related differences. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406063554
12.
DavisK.DinhoplA.HinikerA. (2019). “Everything’s the phone” Understanding the phone’s supercharged role in parent-teen relationships. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing systems (pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300457
13.
Dolev-CohenM.RiconT. (2022). The associations between parents’ technoference, their problematic use of digital technology, and the psychological state of their children. Psychologyof Popular Media. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000444
14.
EverriM.MessenaM.NearchouF.FruggeriL. (2022). Parent–child relationships, digital media use and parents’ well-being during COVID-19 home confinement: The role of family resilience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 15687. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315687
15.
FamJ. Y.MännikköN.JuhariR.KääriäinenM. (2023). Is parental mediation negatively associated with problematic media use among children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 55(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000320
16.
FosterS. L.RobinA. L. (1988). Family conflict and communication in adolescence. In MashE. J.TerdalL. G. (Eds), Behavioral assessment of childhood disorders (pp. 717–775). Guilford Press.
17.
GongJ.ZhouY.WangY.LiangZ.HaoJ.SuL.WangT.DuX.ZhouY.WangY. (2022). How parental smartphone addiction affects adolescent smartphone addiction: The effect of the parent-child relationship and parental bonding. Journal of Affective Disorders, 307(2022), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.014
18.
HairE. C.MooreK. A.GarrettS. B.KinukawaA.LippmanL. H.MichelsonE. (2005). The parent-adolescent relationship scale. In MooreK. A.LippmanL. H. (Eds), What do children need to flourish? (pp. 183–202). Springer.
19.
HoS.LwinM. O.ChenL.ChenM. (2020). Development and validation of a parental social media mediation scale across child and parent samples. Internet Research, 30(2), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-02-2018-0061
20.
JohnsonN. F.FrancisZ. (2022). Positive family relationships in a digital age: Hearing the voice of young people. Children & Society, 36(5), 933–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12548
21.
JordanA. B. (2003). A family systems approach to examining the role of the Internet in the home. In TurowJ. (Ed), The wired homestead: An MIT Press sourcebook on the internet and the family (pp. 141–160). MIT Press.
22.
KoernerA. F.FitzpatrickM. A. (2006). Family communication patterns theory: A social cognitive approach. In BraithwaiteD. O.BaxterL. A. (Eds), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 50–65). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452204420
23.
KoningI. M.PeetersM.FinkenauerC.Van Den EijndenR. J. (2018). Bidirectional effects of Internet-specific parenting practices and compulsive social media and Internet game use. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(3), 624–632. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.68
24.
LionettiF.PalladinoB. E.Moses PassiniC.CasonatoM.HamzallariO.RantaM.DellagiuliaA.KeijsersL. (2019). The development of parental monitoring during adolescence: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(5), 552–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2018.1476233
25.
LivingstoneS.HelsperE. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396
McDanielB. T. (2019). Parent distraction with phones, reasons for use, and impacts on parenting and child outcomes: A review of the emerging research. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.139
28.
McDanielB. T.CoyneS. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065
29.
McDanielB. T.PaterJ.CornetV.MughalS.ReiningL.SchallerA.RadeskyJ.DrouinM. (2023). Parents’ desire to change phone use: Associations with objective smartphone use and feelings about problematic use and distraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, 107907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107907
30.
MeeusA.CoenenL.EggermontS.BeullensK. (2020). Family technoference: Exploring parent mobile device distraction from children’s perspectives. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(3), 684. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157921991602
31.
MorenoM.RiddleK.JenkinsM. C.SinghA. P.ZhaoQ.EickhoffJ. (2022). Measuring problematic internet use, internet gaming disorder, and social media addiction in young adults: Cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 8(1), e27719. https://doi.org/10.2196/27719
32.
MorenoM. A.Arseniev-KoehlerA.SelkieE. (2016). Development and testing of a 3-item screening tool for problematic internet use. The Journal of Pediatrics, 176, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.05.067
33.
MorenoM. A.JelenchickL. A.ChristakisD. A. (2013). Problematic internet use among older adolescents: A conceptual framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1879–1887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.053
34.
NathansonA. I. (2001). Mediation of children’s television viewing: Working toward conceptual clarity and common understanding. Annals of the International Communication Association, 25(1), 115–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2001.11679002
35.
NathansonA. I. (2002). The unintended effects of parental mediation of television on adolescents. Media Psychology, 4(3), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_01
36.
NikkenP.JanszJ. (2014). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children's internet use. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(2), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.782038
37.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.CoyneS. M. (2011). “Turn that thing off!” Parent and adolescent predictors of proactive media monitoring. Journal of Adolescence, 34(4), 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.09.002
38.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.CoyneS. M.FraserA. M.DyerW. J.YorgasonJ. B. (2012). Parents and adolescents growing up in the digital age: Latent growth curve analysis of proactive media monitoring. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1153–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.03.005
39.
RobbM. B. (2019). The new normal: Parents, teens, screens, and sleep in the United States. Common Sense Media.
40.
RonyR. J.AhmedN. (2021). ‘My mom took my phone and locked it in the wardrobe’: Parental mediation in teen-parent relationship in technology usage from teens’ perspective in Bangladesh. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4000430
41.
RosenL. D.CheeverN. A.CarrierL. M. (2008). The association of parenting style and child age with parental limit setting and adolescent MySpace behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.005
42.
RoteW. M.SmetanaJ. G. (2015). Acceptability of information management strategies: Adolescents’ and parents’ judgments and links with adjustment and relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(3), 490–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12143
43.
Sampasa-KanyingaH.GoldfieldG. S.KingsburyM.ClayborneZ.ColmanI. (2020). Social media use and parent–child relationship: A cross-sectional study of adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(3), 793–803. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22293
44.
SciaccaB.LaffanD. A.NormanJ. O. H.MilosevicT. (2022). Parental mediation in pandemic: Predictors and relationship with children’s digital skills and time spent online in Ireland. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107081
SmetanaJ. (2005). Adolescent-parent conflict: Resistance and subversion as developmental processes. In NucciL. (Ed), Conflict, contradiction, and contrarian elements in moral development and education (pp. 69–91). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
47.
SteinfeldN. (2021). Parental mediation of adolescent Internet use: Combining strategies to promote awareness, autonomy and self-regulation in preparing youth for life on the web. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1897–1920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10342-w
48.
StockdaleL. A.CoyneS. M.Padilla-WalkerL. M. (2018). Parent and child technoference and socioemotional behavioral outcomes: A nationally representative study of 10-to 20-year-old adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.034
49.
SymonsK.PonnetK.EmmeryK.WalraveM.HeirmanW. (2017). A factorial validation of parental mediation strategies with regard to internet use. Psychologica Belgica, 57(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.372
50.
SymonsK.PonnetK.WalraveM.HeirmanW. (2017). A qualitative study into parental mediation of adolescents’ internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.004
51.
TurielE. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.
52.
ValkenburgP. M.PiotrowskiJ. T.HermannsJ.De LeeuwR. (2013). Developing and validating the perceived parental media mediation scale: A self-determination perspective. Human Communication Research, 39(4), 445–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12010
53.
Van der GraaffJ.BranjeS.De WiedM.HawkS.Van LierP.MeeusW. (2014). Perspective taking and empathic concern in adolescence: Gender differences in developmental changes. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 881–888. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034325
54.
van Den EijndenR. J.SpijkermanR.VermulstA. A.van RooijT. J.EngelsR. C. (2010). Compulsive Internet use among adolescents: Bidirectional parent–child relationships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9347-8
55.
WallaceH. S. (2020). Family systems theory in media research. In Van den BulckJ.EwoldsenD. E.MaresM.-L.ScharrerE. (Eds), The international encyclopedia of media psychology. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0164
56.
White-GosselinC. É.PoulinF. (2022). Associations between young adults’ social media addiction, relationship quality with parents, and internalizing problems: A path analysis model. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement. Advanceonline publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000326
57.
XieX.XieJ. (2020). Parental phubbing accelerates depression in late childhood and adolescence: A two-path model. Journal of Adolescence, 78(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.004
58.
YangY.LiuR. D.LiuJ.DingY.HongW.JiangS. (2021). The relations between parental active mediation, parent-child relationships and children’s problematic mobile phone use: A longitudinal study. Media Psychology, 25(4), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2021.1981945
59.
YoungR.TullyM. (2023). Roadblocks and resistance: Digital mediation as a process of calibration among US parents of adolescents. Journal of Children and Media, 17(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2023.2202869
60.
ZhangY.TangJ.ZhangP. (2021). An exploratory study on Chinese preteens’ Internet use and parental mediation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 875–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.594
61.
ZhouL.WuS.ZhouM.LiF. (2020). ‘School’s out, but class’s on’, the largest online education in the world today: Taking China’s practical exploration during the COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control as an example. Best Evidence in Chinese Education, 4(2), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.15354/bece.20.ar023
62.
Zimmer-GembeckM. J.CollinsW. A. (2008). Autonomy development during adolescence. In AdamsG. R.BerzonskyM. (Eds), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 175–204). John Wiley & Sons.
