What was Web 2.0? Versions as the dominant mode of internet history

Abstract

This paper explores Web 2.0 as the marker of a discourse about the nature and purpose of the internet in the recent past. It focuses on how Web 2.0 introduced to our thinking about the internet a discourse of versions. Such a discourse enables the telling of a ‘history’ of the internet which involves a complex interweaving of past, present and future, as represented by the additional versions which the introduction of Web 2.0 enabled. The paper concludes that the discourse of versions embodied in Web 2.0 obscures as much as it reveals, and suggests a new project based on investigations of the everyday memories of the internet by which individual users create their own histories of online technology.

Keywords

Discourse history internet version Web 2.0 Web 3.0 World Wide Web

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(2008) Web 2.0: an argument against convergence? First Monday 13(3). Available at: http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2139/1946 (accessed 2 May 2011).

Allen

(2009) Tim O’Reilly and Web 2.0: the economics of memetic liberty and control. Communication, Politics & Culture 42(2): 6–23. Available at: http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au:80/R?func=dbin-jump-full&;local_base=gen01-era02&object_id=130976 (accessed 2 May 2011).

Arnold

(2010) Web 3.0 design for the semantic web: 10 questions to ask your web designer. Available at: http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs004/1011114309989/archive/1103308801318.html

Auletta

(2009) Googled: The End of the World as We Know It. London: Virgin.

Bassett

Hartmann

O’Riordan

(2008) Introduction, ‘After Convergence’ issue. The Fibreculture Journal 13. Available at: http://thirteen.fibreculturejournal.org/ (accessed 2 May 2011).

Berners-Lee

(1998) The World Wide Web: a very short personal history. Available at: http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/ShortHistory.html.

Berners-Lee

(2000) Weaving the Web: The Past, Present and Future of the World Wide Web. London: Texere.

Berners-Lee

Hall

Hendler

. (2006) A framework for web science. Foundations and Trends in Web Science 1(1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1800000001 (accessed 1 May 2011).

Berry

(2007) A contribution to a political economy of open source and free culture. In: McMillan

(ed.) New Directions in Copyright Law. London: Edward Elgar, pp. 193–223.

10.

boyd

(2005) Why Web 2.0 matters, round two. Apophenia, 25 September. Available at: is http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2005/09/25/why_web20_matte-2.html.

11.

boyd

Ellison

(2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html (accessed 30 April 2011).

12.

Bratt

(2008) Fast forward: get ready for Web 3.0. Paper presented at the bDigital Global Congress, 20 May, Barcelona, Spain. Available at: http://www.w3.org/2008/Talks/0520-bratt-BDigital/W3C-Web-3.0p.pdf.

13.

Cammaerts

(2008) Critiques on the participatory potentials of Web 2.0. Communication, Culture & Critique 1: 358–377.

14.

Chapman

(2009) The history of the internet in a nutshell. Six Revisions, 15 November. Available at: http://sixrevisions.com/resources/the-history-of-the-internet-in-a-nutshell/

15.

Cormode

Krishnamurthy

(2008) Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday 13(6). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2125 (accessed 2 May 2011).

16.

Danet

(2001) Cyberpl@y: Communicating Online. Oxford: Berg.

17.

Dean

(2010) The real internet. International Journal of Zizek Studies 4(1): 1–19. Available at: http://zizekstudies.org/index.php/ijzs/article/view/242/322 (accessed 4 May 2011).

18.

DiNucci

(1999) Fragmented future. Print 32: 221–222. Available at: http://darcyd.com/fragmented_future.pdf.

19.

Dvorak

(2006) Web 2.0 baloney. http://PCMag.com , 1 March. Available at: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0, 1895, 1931858,00.asp

20.

Engholm

(2002) Digital style history: the development of graphic design on the internet. Digital Creativity 13(4): 193–211.

21.

Farber

(2006) Web 2.0 = piece of jargon. Between the Lines, 31 August. Available at: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/web-20-a-piece-of-jargon/3552

22.

Fernback

(2004) Community as commodity: empowerment and consumerism on the web. In: Consalvo

Baym

Hunsinger

. (eds) Internet Research Annual: Selected Papers from the Association of Internet Researchers’ Conferences, 2000–2002, vol. 1. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 224–230.

23.

Fuchs

(2008) Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age. New York: Routledge.

24.

Fuchs

(2010a) Labor in informational capitalism and on the internet. The Information Society 26(3): 179–196.

25.

Fuchs

(2010b) Social software and Web 2.0: their sociological foundations and implications. In: Murugesan

(ed.) Handbook of research on Web 2.0, 3.0, and X.0: Technologies, Business, and Social Applications. vol. II. Hershey, PA: IGI-Global, pp. 764–789.

26.

Garrett

(2005) Ajax: a new approach to web applications. Available at: http://www.adaptivepath.com/ideas/e000385.

27.

Gehl

(2010) A cultural and political economy of the web. Doctoral thesis, George Mason University, Arlington, TX, USA. Available at: http://www.robertwgehl.org/text/gehl_diss_full.pdf.

28.

Gehl

(2011) The archive and the processor: the internal logic of Web 2.0. New Media & Society 13(8): 1228–1244.

29.

Graham

(2005) Web 2.0. Available at: http://paulgraham.com/web20.html.

30.

Hagel

(2005) What is Web 2.0? Edge Perspectives, 25 September. Available at: http://edgeperspectives.typepad.com/edge_perspectives/2005/09/what_is_web_20.html.

31.

Heilesen

(2007) A short history of designing for communication on the web. In: Heilesen

Jensen

(eds) Designing for Networked Communications: Strategies and Development. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, pp. 118–136.

32.

Hempel

(2009) Web 2.0 is so over. Welcome to Web 3.0. http://CNNMoney.com , 8 January. Available at: http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/07/technology/hempel_threepointo.fortune/index.htm.

33.

Hinchcliffe

(2006) All we got was Web 1.0, when Tim Berners-Lee actually gave us Web 2.0. Social Computing Magazine, 4 September.

34.

Iskold

(2006) The road to the semantic web. ReadWriteWeb, 14 November. Available at: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/semantic_web_road.php.

35.

Jarrett

(2008) Interactivity is evil! A critical investigation of Web 2.0? First Monday 13(3). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2140/1947 (accessed 27 April 2011).

36.

Jones

(1997) Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety. London: SAGE.

37.

Koerber

(2001) Postmodernism, resistance, and cyberspace: making rhetorical spaces for feminist mothers on the web. Women’s Studies in Communication 24(2): 218–240.

38.

Lequien

(2011) Le Web 2.0 est-il mort? Tribune, 30 April. Available at: http://www.latribune.fr/technos-medias/internet/20110429trib000618688/le-web-2.0-est-il-mort-.html.

39.

Leuf

Cunningham

(2001) The Wiki Way: Quick Collaboration on the Web. New York: Addison-Wesley Professional.

40.

Light

Rogers

(1999) Conversation as publishing: the role of news forums on the web. Journal of Computer-Mediated communication 4(4). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/light.html (accessed 1 May 2011).

41.

Lin

(2007) Building Web 2.0. Computer 40(5): 101–102.

42.

Lister

Dovey

Giddings

. (2003) New Media: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.

43.

Long

Allen

(2001) Hacking the undernet: libertarian limits; commercial containment. Australian Journal of Communication 28(3): 37–54.

44.

Markoff

(2006) Entrepreneurs see a web guided by common sense. New York Times, 12 November. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/12/business/12web.html.

45.

Mikkonen

Taivalsaari

(2007) Web Applications: Spaghetti Code for the 21st Century. Palo Alto, CA: Sun Microsystems.

46.

Millard

Ross

(2006) Web 2.0: hypertext by any other name? In: Hypertext’06: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Odense, Denmark, 22–25 August 2006. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1149941.1149947 (accessed 30 April 2011).

47.

Miller

Shephard

(2004) Blogging as social action: a genre analysis of the weblog. In: Gurak

Antonijevic

Johnson

. (eds) Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs. Available at: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/women_and_children.html.

48.

Mowery

Simcoe

(2002) Is the internet a US invention? An economic and technological history of computer networking. Research Policy 31(8–9): 1369–1387. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00069-0 (accessed 30 April 2011).

49.

O’Reilly

(2005) What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Available at: http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html.

50.

O’Reilly

(2006) Web 3.0? Maybe when we get there. O’Reilly Radar, 13 November. Available at: http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/11/web_30_maybe_wh.html.

51.

Postigo

(2009) America Online volunteers: lessons from an early co-production community. International Journal of Cultural Studies 12: 451–469.

52.

Raffl

Hofkirchner

Fuchs

. (2009) The Web as techno-social system: the emergence of Web 3.0. In: Trappl

(ed.) Cybernetics and Systems 2008. Vienna: Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies, pp. 604–609.

53.

Reuters (2005) Internet still young, faster access to spur growth. Financial Express, 25 November. Available at: http://www.financialexpress.com/printer/news/159332/.

54.

Ricoeur

(2004) Memory, History, Forgetting. London: University of Chicago Press.

55.

Roscoe

(1999) The construction of the World Wide Web audience. Media Culture & Society 21(5): 673–684.

56.

Schauer

(2005) Experience attributes: crucial DNA of Web 2.0. Available at: http://www.adaptivepath.com/ideas/e000547.

57.

Scholz

(2008) Market ideology and the myths of Web 2.0. First Monday 13(3). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2138/1945 (accessed 29 April 2011).

58.

Siegel

(1997) Creating Killer Websites: The Art of Third Generation Web Design. New York: Hayden.

59.

Song

(2010) Theorising Web 2.0: a cultural perspective. Information, Communication and Society 13(2): 249–275. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691180902914610 (accessed 29 April 2011).

60.

Sterling

(2009) The brief but glorious life of Web 2.0 and what comes after. Wired, 1 March 2009. Available at: http://www.wired.com/beyond_the_beyond/2009/03/what-bruce-ster/.

61.

Strickland

(n.d.) Is there a Web 1.0? Howstuffworks. Available at: http://computer.howstuffworks.com/web-101.htm.

62.

Terranova

(2003) Free labor: producing culture for the digital economy. Electronic Book Review. Available at: http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/technocapitalism/voluntary (accessed 2 May 2011).

63.

Thelen

(1989) Memory and American history. Journal of American History 75(4): 1117–1129. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1908632 (accessed 2 February 2012).

64.

Thomson

(2000) The Voice of the Past: Oral History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

65.

Van Dijck

Nieborg

(2009) Wikinomics and its discontents: a critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos. New Media & Society 11(5): 855–874.

66.

Vossen

Hageman

(2007) Unleashing Web 2.0: From Concepts to Creativity. Boston, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

67.

Walker

(2005) Feral hypertext: when hypertext literature escapes control. In: Hypertext’05: Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, 6–9 September, Salzburg, Austria. Available at: http://jilltxt.net/txt/FeralHypertext.pdf.

68.

Wynn

Katz

(1997) Hyperbole over cyberspace: self-presentation and social boundaries in Internet home pages and discourse. The Information Society 13(4): 297–327. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/019722497129043 (accessed 14 May 2011).