The digital world need not solely be conceived in Western, elite terms, but instead can and should be re-envisioned as a space that empowers the values, priorities, and ontologies held by global users from the ‘margins’, within the developing world. This paper asks us to re-consider the ontologies of the digital world in light of the cultural beliefs, languages, and value systems of emerging web users. I argue that as we design new media technologies and develop projects we must think about local ontologies and practices rather than singular Western-created representations of knowledge. I present several examples that think past rigid, hierarchical classifications, opening up the codes of new media to better listen to diverse community and cultural voices.
AdornoTWHorkheimerM (1947) Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
AkerJCMbitiIM (2010) Mobile phones and economic development in Africa. Journal of Economic Perspectives24(3): 207–232.
3.
AppaduraiA (2004) The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. In: RaoVWaltonM (eds) Culture and Public Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 59–85.
4.
BaymNK (2000) Tune in, Log on: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
BijkerWELawJ (1992) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
BoastRBravoMSrinivasanR (2007) Return to Babel: Emergent diversity, digital resources, and local knowledge. The Information Society23(5): 395–403.
7.
BødkerS (1996) Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems development. Human-Computer Interaction11(3): 215–236.
8.
BowkerG (2005) Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
BowkerGStarSL (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
ButtonGDourishP (1996) Technomethodology: Paradoxes and possibilities. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’96. Vancouver, BC, pp. 19–26. New York: ACM.
11.
CaronACaroniaL (2007) Moving Cultures: Mobile Communication in Everyday Life. Montréal, QC, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
12.
CastellsM (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
GinsburgF (2008) Rethinking the digital age. In: WilsonPStewardM (eds) Global Indigenous Media. Atlanta, GA: Duke University Press, pp. 287–306.
23.
GitelmanL (2006) Always Already New: Media, History and the Data of Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
HandMSandywellB (2002) E-topia as cosmopolis or citadel: On the democratizing and de-democratizing logics of the Internet. Theory, Culture & Society19(1): 197–225.
25.
HaylesK (2002) Writing Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
HeeksR (2008) ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development. Computer41(6): 26–33.
27.
HeideggerM (1977) The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Row.
28.
HeuvelC (2008) Building society, constructing knowledge, weaving the web. In: RaywardB (ed.) European Modernism and the Information Society: Informing the Present, Understanding the Past. London: Aldershot, pp. 127–153.
29.
HorstHMillerD (2005) From kinship to link-up: Cell phones and social networking in Jamaica. Current Anthropology46(5): 755–778.
30.
IhdeD (1993) Philosophy of Technology. New York: Paragon.
31.
IntronaLNissenbaumH (2000) The Internet as a democratic medium: Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society16(3): 169–185.
32.
ItoM (2010) Hanging out, Messing around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
JenkinsH (1992) Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture. New York: Routledge.
JosephM (2002) Against the Romance of Community. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
36.
KittlerF (2009) Toward an ontology of media. Theory, Culture, & Society26(3): 23–31.
37.
KwasnikB (1999) The role of classification in knowledge representation and discovery. Library Trends48(1): 22–47.
38.
LakoffG (1987) Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
LawJMolA (2008) The actor-enacted: Cumbrian sheep in 2001. In: MalafourisLKnappettC (eds) Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer, pp. 55–77.
40.
LechnerF (1985) Modernity and its discontents. In: AlexanderJ (ed.) Neofunctionalism. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, pp. 157–176.
41.
LessigL (2006) Lawrence Lessig: Author of Code V 2.0. Available at: http://youtu.be/9xbRE_H5hoU (accessed 3 May 2011).
42.
LievrouwL (2001) New media and the pluralization of life-worlds. New Media & Society3(1): 7–28.
43.
LiuA (2004) The Laws of Cool: Knowledge Work and the Culture of Information. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
LovinkG (2010) Personal interview, June25, Amsterdam, Institute for Network Cultures.
45.
LynchMPeyrotM (1992) Introduction: A reader’s guide to ethnomethodology. Qualitative Sociology15(2): 113–122.
46.
MillerDSlaterD (2000) The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
47.
MorozovE (2011) The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: PublicAffairs.
48.
NissenbaumH (2004) Hackers and the contested ontology of cyberspace. New Media & Society6(2): 195–217.
49.
OlsonH (2007) How we construct subjects: A feminist analysis. Library Trends56(2): 509–541.
PariserE (2011b) The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin.
52.
PinchT (1992) Opening black boxes: Science, technology, and society. Social Studies of Science22(3): 487–510.
53.
PinchTBijkerW (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science14(3): 399–441.
54.
PinchTBijkerW (1986) Science, relativism and the new sociology of technology: Reply to Russell. Social Studies of Science16(2): 347–360.
55.
PlumwoodV (1993) Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
56.
PolyakSTateA (1998) A Common Process Ontology for Process-Centred Organisations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.
PosterM (2008) Global media and culture. New Literary History39(3): 685–703.
59.
PutnamR (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
60.
RobbinsB (1999) Feeling Global: Internationalism in Distress. New York: New York University Press.
61.
SeibtJ (1990) Towards process ontology: A critical study of substance-ontological premises. PhD Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, MI, USA.
62.
SenA (1995) Inequality Reexamined. New York: Harvard University Press.
63.
SenA (2006) Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. New York: Norton.
64.
ShannonCWeaverW (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
65.
SilverstoneRHirschEMorleyD (1992) The moral economy of the household. In: SilverstoneRHirschE (eds) Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London: Routledge, pp. 18–40.
66.
SimonsP (1987) Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
67.
SrinivasanR (2006a) Where information society and community voice intersect. The Information Society22: 355–365.
68.
SrinivasanR (2006b) Indigenous, ethnic, and cultural articulations of new media. International Journal of Cultural Studies9(4): 497–518.
69.
SrinivasanR (2007) Ethnomethodological architectures: Information systems driven by cultural and community visions. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology58(5): 723–733.
70.
SrinivasanRBoastRFurnerJ. (2009) Digital museums and diverse cultural knowledges: Moving past the traditional catalog. The Information Society25(4): 265–278.
71.
SrinivasanRHuangJ (2005) Fluid ontologies for digital museums. International Journal on Digital Libraries, Special Issue on Digital Museums5(3): 193–204.
72.
SrinivasanRBoastRBecvarK. (2010) Diverse knowledges and contact zones within the digital museum. Science Technology and Human Values35(5): 735–768.
StarS (1999) The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist43(3): 377–391.
75.
StarSGriesemerJ (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science19(4): 387–420.
VaidyanathanS (2011) The Googlization of Everything (and Why We Should Worry). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
83.
VerranH (2002) A postcolonial moment in science studies: Alternative firing regimes of environmental scientists and aboriginal landowners. Social Studies of Science32(5–6): 729–762.
84.
WeinbergerD (2008) Everything Is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder. New York: Holt.
85.
WhiteheadA (1929) Process and Reality, an Essay in Cosmology: Gifford Lectures Delivered in the University of Edinburgh during the Session 1927–28. New York: The Macmillan Co.
86.
WiegandW (1998) The Amherst method: The origins of the Dewey decimal classification scheme. Libraries & Culture33(2): 175–194.
87.
WinsbergF (2010) Science in the Age of Computer Simulation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
88.
WoolgarSPawluchD (2004) Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explanations. In: StoutKBuonoRChamblissW (eds) Social Problems, Law, and Society. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, pp. 214–227. http://rameshsrinivasan.org/about/
