This article develops a critical alternative to the common equation between participatory culture and democratic communication and argues that power on online participatory platforms should be understood as the governance of semiotic open-endedness. This article argues that the concept of cultural expression cannot be understood solely by looking at users’ cultural practices, but should be revisited to pay attention to the networked conditions that enable it. This involves tracing the governance of disparate processes such as protocols, software, linguistic processes, and cultural practices that make the production and circulation of meaning possible. Thus, communication on participatory platforms should be understood as the management of flows of meaning, that is, as the processes of codification of the informational, technical, cultural, and semiotic dynamics through which meanings are expressed. This makes it possible to understand the logics through which software platforms transform information into cultural signs and shape users’ perceptions and agencies.
Berners-LeeT.1999. Weaving the web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the world wide web by its inventor. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.
3.
BenklerY.2007. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale: Yale University Press.
4.
BolterJ.GrusinR.1999. Remediation: Understanding new media. London: MIT Press.
ChunW.2005. On software, or the persistence of visual knowledge. Grey Room18:26-51.
11.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF.1987. Thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia, translated by B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
ElmerG.2009. Robots.txt: The politics of search engine exclusion. In The spam book: On anomalous objects of digital culture, edited by ParikkaJ.SampsonT.London: Hampton Press, 2009.
13.
ElmerG.2006. The vertical (layered) net. In Critical cyberculture studies: New directions, edited by SilverD., 159-67. New York: NYU Press.
14.
FoucaultM.2003. The essential Foucault, edited by RabinowP.RoseN.New York: New Press.
15.
FullerM.2003. Behind the blip: Essays on the culture of software. Brooklyn, NY, USA: Autonomedia.
16.
GallowayA.2004. Protocol: How control exists after decentralization. Cambridge: MIT Press.
17.
GitelmanL.2008. Always already new: Media, history, and the data of culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
18.
GuattariF.1977. La révolution moléculaire. Paris: Recherches.
19.
GuattariF.1989. Les trois écologies. Paris: Galilee.
20.
GuattariF.1995. Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm, translated by P. Bains and J. Pefanis. Sydney: Power Publications.
21.
GuattariFelix. 1996. Microphysics of power/Micropolitics of desire. In The Guattari reader, edited by GenoskoG., 172-83. London: Blackwell.
22.
GumbrechtH.2003. The production of presence: What meaning cannot convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
23.
HallS.1980. Encoding/decoding. In Culture, media, language, edited by HallS., 128-38. New York: Routledge.
24.
HermanE.ChomskyN.2002. Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon.
25.
InnisH.1951. The bias of communication. In The bias of communication, 117-30. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
26.
JenkinsH.2006. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
27.
KeltyC.2008. Two bits: The cultural significance of free software and the internet. Durham: Duke University Press.
28.
KittlerF.1990. Discourse networks. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
