You should have been there,man: Live music,DIY content and online communities

Abstract

In terms of technological change and participatory media, the phenomenon of taking and sharing videos of live music events offers an insightful case study for discussing the individual production of online content and interpersonal interactions on social media sites. We use interviews with YouTube users who post videos of live music events to investigate motivations for the capture of personal video recordings, the protocols for sharing of videos, and the roles videos play in online fan activities. Analysis of interviews identifies key motivations for capture and sharing, and exposes tensions between short- and long-term goals of these activities. Further, the results expose differences in attitudes, motivations and practices between mainstream and ‘indie’ concert goers. These findings have implications for understanding participation on social media sites, as well as broader issues of online communities, fan cultures and individual production of media.

Keywords

fan culture live music online communities social media YouTube

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auslander

(1998) Seeing is believing: Live performance and the discourse of authenticity in rock culture. Literature and Psychology 44(4): 1–26.

Biel

Gatica-Perez

(2009) Wearing a YouTube hat: Directors, comedians, gurus, and user aggregated behavior. Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2009.

boyd

Ellison

(2007) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 13(1). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html (accessed 21 December 2010).

Cha

Kwak

Rodriguez

Ahn

Moon

(2007) I tube, YouTube, everybody tubes: Analyzing the world’s largest user generated content video system. Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, San Diego, CA, 24–26 October 2007.

Corbin

Strauss

(1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13(1): 3–21.

Cover

(2006) Audience inter/active: Interactive media, narrative control and reconceiving audience history. New Media & Society 8(1): 139–158.

Currah

(2007) Managing creativity: The tensions between commodities and gifts in a digital networked environment. Economy and Society 36(3): 467–494.

Donath

(2008) Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 13(1). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/donath.html (accessed 21 December 2010).

Hall

(1980) The television discourse: Encoding and decoding. Education and Culture 25: 8–15.

10.

Haridakis

Hanson

(2009) Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 53(2): 317–335.

11.

Huberman

Romero

(2009) Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. Journal of Information Science 35(6): 758–765.

12.

Jenkins

(2006) Convergence Culture. New York: New York University Press.

13.

Lange

(2007) Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 13(1). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/lange.html (accessed 21 December 2010).

14.

Lessig

(2008) Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York, NY: Penguin.

15.

Naaman

(2009) Social media definition (redefinition, that is). Avalilable at: http://www.ayman-naaman.net/2009/09/26/social-media-definition/ (accessed 21 December 2010).

16.

Paasonen

(2010) Labors of love: Netporn, web 2.0 and the meanings of amateurism. New Media & Society 12(8):1297–1312.

17.

Rivett

(1999) Misfit lit: ‘Punk writing’, and representations of punk through writing and publishing. In Sabin

(ed.) Punk Rock So What? The Cultural Legacy of Punk. London: Routledge, 31–48.

18.

Rotman

Golbeck

Preece

(2009) The community is where the rapport is – on sense and structure in the YouTube community. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies, ACM, University Park, PA.

19.

Sinnreich

(2010) Mashed Up: Music, Technology, and the Rise of Configurable Culture. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

20.

Spradley

(1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

21.

Terranova

(2000) Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text 18(2): 33–58.

22.

van Dijck

(2009) Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society 31(1): 41–58.

23.

Williams

(1961) Culture and Society. New York: Penguin.