This study assesses whether Facebook users have different ‘connection strategies,’ a term which describes a suite of Facebook-related relational communication activities, and explores the relationship between these connection strategies and social capital. Survey data (N = 450) from a random sample of undergraduate students reveal that only social information-seeking behaviors contribute to perceptions of social capital; connection strategies that focus on strangers or close friends do not. We also find that reporting more ‘actual’ friends on the site is predictive of social capital, but only to a point. We believe the explanation for these findings may be that the identity information in Facebook serves as a social lubricant, encouraging individuals to convert latent to weak ties and enabling them to broadcast requests for support or information.
Acquisti A. and Gross R. ( 2006) Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Lecture Notes in Computer Science4258: 36-58.
2.
Bessiere K., Kiesler S., Kraut R. and Boneva B. ( 2008) Effects of Internet use and social resources on changes in depression. Information, Communication and Society11: 47-70.
3.
Boase J., Horrigan JB, Wellman B. and Rainie L. ( 2006) The Strength of Internet Ties. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project .
4.
Bourdieu P. ( 1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson JG (ed.) Handbook of Theory And Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, 241-258.
5.
boyd d ( 2006) Friends, Friendsters, and MySpace Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday11(12).
6.
boyd d and Ellison N. ( 2007) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship . Journal of Computer-mediated Communication13: 210-230.
7.
Burke M., Marlow C. and Lento T. ( 2010) Social network activity and social well-being. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 1909-1912.
8.
Burt RS ( 1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Burt RS ( 2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
10.
Coleman JS ( 1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital . The American Journal of Sociology94(Supplement): S95-S120.
11.
Donath J. ( 2007) Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication13: 231-251.
12.
Donath JS and boyd d ( 2004) Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal22(4): 71-82.
13.
Dunbar RIM ( 1996) Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Dwyer C., Hiltz SR and Passerini K. ( 2007) Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Available at: http://csis.pace.edu/~dwyer/research/DwyerAMCIS2007.pdf
15.
Ellison NB, Steinfield C. and Lampe C. ( 2007) The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication12: 1143-1168.
16.
Facebook Data Team (2009) Maintained relationships on Facebook. Available at: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=55257228858&id=8394258414&ref=nf
17.
Golder S., Wilkinson D. and Huberman B. ( 2007) Rhythms of social interaction: Messaging within a massive online network. In: Steinfield C , Pentland BT, Ackerman M and Contractor N (eds), Communities and Technologies 2007: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Communities and Technologies. London: Springer, 41-66.
18.
Granovetter M. ( 1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78: 1360-1380.
19.
Hargittai E. ( 2007) Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication13: 276-297.
20.
Hargittai E. ( 2008) The digital reproduction of inequality. In: Grusky D (ed.) Social Stratification . Boulder, CO: Westview, 936-944.
21.
Haythornthwaite C. ( 2005) Social networks and Internet connectivity effects . Information, Communication & Society8: 125-147.
22.
Joinson AN ( 2008) Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: Motives and use of Facebook. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York : ACM, 1027-1036.
23.
Kraut R., Fussell S., Brennan S. and Siegel J. ( 2002) Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In: Hinds P and Kiesler S (eds) Distributed Work. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 137-162.
24.
Lampe C., Ellison N. and Steinfield C. ( 2006) A Face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. In: Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM, 167-170.
25.
Lampe C., Ellison N. and Steinfield C. ( 2007) A familiar Face(book): Profile elements as signals in an online social network. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 435-444.
26.
Lampe C., Ellison N. and Steinfield C. ( 2008) Changes in use and perception of Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM , 721-730.
27.
Lin N. ( 2001) Building a network theory of social capital. In: Lin N, Cook KS and Burt RS (eds) Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter , 3-29.
28.
Mayer A. and Puller SL ( 2008) The old boy (and girl) network: Social network formation on university campuses. Journal of Public Economics92: 329-347.
29.
Papacharissi Z. and Mendelson A. ( 2008) Toward a new(er) sociability: Uses, gratifications, and social capital on Facebook. Paper presented at the Internet Research conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, October 2008.
30.
Putnam R. ( 1995) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital . Journal of Democracy6: 65-78.
31.
Putnam RD ( 2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community . New York: Simon and Schuster.
32.
Quan-Haase A. and Wellman B. ( 2004) How does the Internet affect social capital? In: Huysman M and Wulf V (eds) Social Capital and Information Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 113-135.
33.
Rheingold H. ( 1993) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
34.
Rosenberg M. ( 1989) Society and the Adolescent Self-image (revised ed). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
35.
Stecher K. and Counts S. ( 2008) Thin slices of online profile attributes. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Weblogs and Social MediaSeattle, WA: AAAI Press.
36.
Steinfield C., Ellison NB and Lampe C. ( 2008) Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology29: 434-445.
37.
Subrahmanyam K., Reich SM, Waechter N. and Espinoza G. ( 2008) Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology29: 420-433.
38.
Tomai M., Rosa V., Mebane ME, D’Acunti A., Benedetti M. and Francescato D. ( 2010) Virtual communities in schools as tools to promote social capital with high schools students. Computers & Education54: 265-274.
39.
Tong ST, Van Der Heide B., Langwell L. and Walther J. ( 2008) Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication13: 531-549.
40.
Valenzuela S., Park N. and Kee KF ( 2009) Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation . Journal of Computer-mediated Communication14: 875-901.
41.
Walther JB and Parks MR ( 2002) Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In: Knapp ML and Daly JA (eds) Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 529-563.
42.
Williams D. ( 2006) On and off the ‘net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication11: 593-628.
