This research investigates various factors of social capital, media use and demographics that may have an influence on online community use. Although some have argued that internet use may erode an individual’s social capital, this study found that people who access the internet for online community use tend to have more sociability and higher levels of generalized norm than do online community non-users.When important socio-psychological factors of social capital, such as trust and life contentment, were considered, however, social capital was not fully related to online community use. In this regard, it is suggested that online communities may enhance the communication ability of individuals due to technological advantages, but face-to-face communication in the form of the traditional community is still essential to ensure the quality of community as a whole.
Althaus, S.L. and D. Tewksbury ( 2000) ‘Patterns of Internet and Traditional News Media Use in a Networked Community’, Political Communication17(1): 21-45.
2.
Bourdieu, P. and L.J.D. Wacquant ( 1992) An Innovation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Brehm, J. and W.M. Rahn ( 1997) ‘Individual Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital’, American Journal of Political Science41: 999-1023.
4.
Cai, X. ( 2005) ‘An Experimental Examination of the Computer’s Time Displacement Effects’, New Media & Society7(1): 8-21.
5.
Castells, M. ( 2002) ‘Preface: The Internet and the Network Society’ , in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. xxix-xxxi. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
6.
Coffey, S. and H. Stipp ( 1997) ‘The Interactions between Computer and Television Usage’, Journal of Advertising Research37(2): 61- 7.
7.
Cole, J. ( 2000) ‘Surveying the Digital Future’, University of California at Los Angeles, Center for Communication Policy, URL (consulted October 2007): http://ccp.ucla.edu/pages/internetreport.asp
8.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1988) ‘Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital’ , American Journal of Sociology94: S95-S120.
9.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1994) Foundation of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
de Haan, J. and S. Rijken ( 2002) ‘The Digital Divide in the Netherlands: The Influence of Material, Cognitive, and Social Resources on the Possession and Use of ICTs’, Electronic Journal of Communication12(1&2), URL (consulted October 2009): http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/012/1/01215.html
11.
DeSanctis, G. and M.S. Poole ( 1994) ‘Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory’, Organization Science5(2): 121-47.
12.
Dimmick, J., Y. Chen and Z. Li ( 2004) ‘Competition between the Internet and Traditional News Media: The Gratification-opportunities Niche Dimension’, Journal of Media Economics17(1): 19-33.
13.
Hampton, K.N. and B. Wellmam ( 1999) ‘Netville Online and Offline: Observing and Surveying a Wired Suburb’, American Behavioral Scientist43(3): 475-92.
14.
Haythornthwaite, C. ( 2000) ‘Online Personal Networks: Size, Composition and Media Use among Distance Learners’, New Media & Society2(2): 195-226.
15.
Heikkinen, K. and S. Reese ( 1986) ‘Newspaper Readers and a New Information Medium: Information Need and Channel Orientation as Predictors of Videotext Adoption’ , Communication Research13(1): 19-36.
16.
Helliwell, J. ( 2001) ‘Social Capital, the Economy and Well-being’ , Review of Economic Performance and Social Progress, URL (consulted September 2008): http://ideas.repec.org/s/sls/repsls.html
17.
Hughes, J. and K. Hill ( 1998) ‘The Political Culture of New Media Users: A Snapshot of Talk Radio and Internet Users’, paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, 25 April.
18.
Hunter, B. ( 2002) ‘Learning in the Virtual Community Depends upon Changes in Local Communities’, in K.A. Renninger and W. Shumar (eds) Building Virtual Communities: Learning and Change in Cyberspace, pp. 96-126. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
19.
Jonassen, D.H., K.C. Peck and B.G. Wilson ( 1998) ‘Creating Technology-supported Learning Communities’ , URL (consulted December 2007): http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~bwilson/learncomm.html
20.
Kavanaugh, A., J.M. Carroll, M.B. Rosson, T.T. Zin and D.D. Reese ( 2005) ‘Community Networks: Where Offline Communities Meet Online’, Journal of Computer-mediated Communication10(4), URL (consulted March 2009): http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/kavanaugh.html
21.
Kraut, R., M. Patterson, V. Lundmark, S. Kiesler, T. Mukhopadhyay and W. Scherlis ( 1998) ‘Internet Paradox: A Social Technology that Reduced Social Involvement and Psychological Well-being?’, American Psychologist53(9): 1017-31.
22.
Lin, C. ( 1994) ‘Audience Fragmentation in a Competitive Video Marketplace’ , Journal of Advertising Research34(6): 30-8.
23.
Lin, C. ( 1999) ‘Predicting Online Service Adoption Likelihood among Potential Subscribers: A Motivational Approach’, Journal of Advertising Research39(2): 1-11.
24.
Lin, C. ( 2001) ‘Audience Attributes, Media Supplementation, and Likely Online Service Adoption’, Mass Communication and Society4(1): 19-38.
25.
Nadel, S.F. ( 1957) The Theory of Social Structure. London : Cohen and West.
26.
Narayan, D. ( 1997) Voice of the Poor: Poverty and Social Capital in Tanzania . Washington, DC: World Bank.
27.
Narayan, D. ( 1999) Bonds and Bridges: Social Capital and Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank.
28.
Narayan, D. and M.F. Cassidy ( 2001) ‘A Dimensional Approach to Measuring Social Capital: Development and Validation of a Social Capital Inventory’, Current Sociology49(2): 59-102.
29.
Nie, N.H. ( 2001) ‘Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet: Reconciling Conflicting Findings’, American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 420-35.
30.
Nie, N.H. and L. Erbring ( 2000) ‘Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report’ , Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society, URL (consulted December 2006): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/Press_Release/press_release.html
31.
Nielsen (2008) Nielsen and NetRatings , URL (consulted July 2008): http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/
32.
Norris, P. ( 2003) ‘Social Capital and ICTs: Widening or Reinforcing Social Network?’, paper presented at the International Forum on Social Capital for Economic and Social Research Institute , Cabinet Office, Tokyo, 24-25 March.
33.
Owston, R. ( 1998) Making the Link: Teacher Professional Development on the Internet. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann .
34.
Papacharissi, Z. ( 2002) ‘The Presentation of Self in Virtual Life: Characteristics of Personal Home Pages’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly79(3): 643-60.
35.
Patulny, R. ( 2005) ‘Social Capital and Welfare: Dependency or Division? Examining Bridging Trends by Welfare Regime, 1981 to 2000’, Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW: Sydney, URL (consulted March 2009): http://arrow.unsw.edu.au/vital/access/services/Download/unsworks:1960/SOURCE01?view=true
36.
Perse, E.M. and D.G. Dunn ( 1998) ‘The Utility of Home Computers and Media Use: Implications of Multimedia and Connectivity’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media42(4): 435-56.
37.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press ( 1999) ‘Online Newcomers More Middle-brow, Less Work-oriented; The Internet News Audience Goes Ordinary’, URL (consulted October 2009): http://people-press.org/dataarchive/#1999
38.
Portes, A. ( 1998) ‘Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology24: 1-24.
39.
Preece, J. ( 2002) ‘Supporting Community and Building Social Capital’ , Communications of the ACM45(4): 36-9.
40.
Putnam, R.D. ( 2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
41.
Quan-Hasse, A. and B. Wellman ( 2004) ‘How Does the Internet Affect Social Capital?’ , in M. Huysman and V. Wulf (eds) Social Capital and Information Technology, pp. 113-32. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Robinson, J.P., K. Barth and A. Kohut ( 1997) ‘Social Impact Research: Personal Computers, Mass Media, and Use of Time’, Social Science Computer Review15(1): 65-82.
43.
Robinson, J.P. and G. Godbey ( 1999) Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time, 2nd edn. University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press.
44.
Robinson, J.P. and M. Kestenbaum ( 1999) ‘The Personal Computer, Culture and Other Uses of Free Time’, Social Science Computer Review17(2): 209-16.
45.
Robinson, J.P., M. Kestenbaum, A. Neustadtl and A. Alvarez ( 2002) ‘The Internet and Other Uses of Time’, in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 244-62. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
46.
Saguaro Seminar (2000) ‘Better Together: Civic Engagement in America’, URL (consulted April 2006): http://www.bettertogether.org/bt_report.pdf
47.
Shah, D.V. ( 1998) ‘Civic Engagement, Interpersonal Trust, and Television Use: An Individual Level Assessment of Social Capital’, Political Psychology19(3): 469-96.
48.
Shah, D.V., N. Kwak and R.L. Holbert ( 2001) ‘ "Connecting" and "Disconnecting" with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital’, Political Communication18(2): 141-62.
49.
Shapiro, E. ( 1998) ‘Web Lovers Love TV, Often It’s Not Coming Out of the Same Box’, Wall Street Journal (12 June): p. B9.
50.
Sonnemans, J., F. van Dijk and F. van Winden ( 2006) ‘On the Dynamics of Social Ties Structures in Groups’ , Journal of Economic Psychology27(2): 187-204.
51.
Stempel, G.H. III, T. Hargrove and J.P. Bernt ( 2000) ‘Relation of Growth of Use of the Internet to Changes in Media Use from 1995 to 1999’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly77(1): 71-9.
52.
Stone, W. ( 2001) ‘Measuring Social Capital’, Research Paper No. 24Australian Institute of Family Studies, URL (consulted April 2008): http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/pubs/RP24.html
53.
Sullivan, J.L. and J.E. Transue ( 1999) ‘The Psychological Underpinnings of Democracy: A Selective Review of Research on Political Tolerance, Interpersonal Trust, and Social Capital’, Annual Review of Psychology50(1): 625-50.
54.
Sung, E.J., H.J. Lee and H.S. Kim ( 2005) ‘Factors Influencing Choice of Bandwidth and the Impact on Media Use Behavior’, paper presented at National Communication Association conference, Boston, MA, November.
55.
Uslaner, E.M. ( 1998) ‘Social Capital, Television and the "Mean World": Trust, Optimism, and Civic Participation’, Political Psychology19(3): 441-67.
56.
Uslaner, E.M. ( 1999a) ‘Democracy and Social Capital’, in M.E. Warren (ed.) Democracy Band Trust , pp.121-50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Uslaner, E.M. ( 1999b) ‘Trust but Verify: Social Capital and Moral Behavior’ , Social Science Information38(1): 29-55.
58.
Uslaner, E.M. ( 2000) ‘Social Capital and the Net’, Communications of the ACM43(12): 60-4.
59.
Uslaner, E.M. ( 2002) The Moral Foundation of Trust. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
60.
van Dijk, J. ( 2004) ‘Divides in Succession: Possession, Skills, and Use of New Media for Social Participation’, in E.P. Bucy and J.E. Newhagen (eds) Media Access: Social and Psychological Dimensions of New Technology Use, pp. 233-54. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
Wellman, B. ( 2001) ‘Physical Place and Cyber Place: The Rise of Personal Networking’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25(2): 227-52.
62.
Wellman, B. and K. Frank ( 2001) ‘Network Capital in a Multi-level World: Getting Support fromPersonal Communities’, URL (consulted May 2008): http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/networkcapital/hlmnan10.pdf
63.
Wellman, B. and C. Haythornthwaite ( 2002) ‘The Internet in Everyday Life: An Introduction’ , in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 3-44. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
64.
Wellman, B., A.Q. Haase, J. Witte and K. Hampton ( 2001) ‘Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment’ , The American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 436-55.
65.
Wellman, B., J. Salaff, D. Dimitrova, L. Garton, M. Gulia and C. Haythornthwaite ( 1996) ‘Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Tele-work, and Virtual Community’, Annual Review of Sociology22: 213-38.
66.
Wilson, B. and M. Ryder ( 1996) ‘Dynamic Learning Communities: An Alternative to Designed Instruction’, Proceedings of Selected Research and Development National Convention of Association for Educational Research and Technology, Indianapolis, IN, URL (consulted May 2007): http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/dlc.html
